PDA

View Full Version : EXCLUSIVE: ACLU says Reid’s gun legislation could threaten privacy rights, civil liberties




sailingaway
04-04-2013, 02:41 PM
http://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/harryreidshootsrifle-e1365039839647.jpg


As Senate Democrats struggle to build support for new gun control legislation, the American Civil Liberties Union now says it’s among those who have “serious concerns” about the bill.

Those concerns have the capacity to prove a major setback to Sen. Harry Reid’s current gun bill, which includes language from earlier bills introduced by Sens. Chuck Schumer and Barbara Boxer.

In an exclusive interview with The Daily Caller, a top lobbyist for the ACLU announced that the group thinks Reid’s current gun bill could threaten both privacy rights and civil liberties.

The inclusion of universal background checks — the poll-tested lynchpin of most Democratic proposals — “raises two significant concerns,” the ACLU’s Chris Calabrese told TheDC Wednesday.

Calabrese — a privacy lobbyist — was first careful to note that the ACLU doesn’t strictly oppose universal background checks for gun purchases. “If you’re going to require a background check, we think it should be effective,” Calabrese explained.

“However, we also believe those checks have to be conducted in a way that protects privacy and civil liberties. So, in that regard, we think the current legislation, the current proposal on universal background checks raises two significant concerns,” he went on.

“The first is that it treats the records for private purchases very differently than purchases made through licensed sellers. Under existing law, most information regarding an approved purchase is destroyed within 24 hours when a licensed seller does a [National Instant Criminal Background Check System] check now,” Calabrese said, “and almost all of it is destroyed within 90 days.”

Calabrese wouldn’t characterize the current legislation’s record-keeping provision as a “national gun registry” — which the White House has denied pursuing — but he did say that such a registry could be “a second step.”

“[U]nfortunately, we have seen in the past that the creation of these types of records leads sometimes to the creation of government databases and collections of personal information on all of us,” Calabrese warned. “That’s not an inevitable result, but we have seen that happen in the past, certainly.”

“As we’ve seen with many large government databases, if you build it, they will come.”



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/04/exclusive-aclu-says-reids-gun-legislation-could-threaten-privacy-rights-civil-liberties/#ixzz2PTfXMbbK


//

WhistlinDave
04-04-2013, 03:03 PM
I am SO plastering this article on FB for all my lefty lib friends and family that I've been debating for the last several days.

BOOOYAH!!!!

sailingaway
04-04-2013, 03:06 PM
But ACLU has no problem with the Obamacare databases? Or has no one asked them that question?

DamianTV
04-04-2013, 03:48 PM
There you go. The Coupe De Taut in a nutshell. Make sure you know who ALL the gun owners are so they know exactly who to go after when the shit hits the fan. Take em out in the middle of the night and use anything but guns as an excuse to disarm them, like drugs or even merely supporting pot legalization. The thing is, it isnt the unregistered guns that you have to worry about. It is the exact opposite. The ones that should be worried are the ones that are known to not have guns, which will soon become public. When that happens, the non gun owners will become victims of criminals, both the criminals who seek to deprive you of your shit, and the criminals in office. The real goal is to make sure everyone is a non-gun owner so everyone can be victims. Many of those victims will cry out for their beloved Govt to "do something", and dont care who the Govt hurts for them to feel protected (not actually protected) by their beloved Govt.

Acala
04-04-2013, 05:04 PM
This is good. The ACLU RARELY has anything to say about gun control. In fact I don't recall them EVER uttering a peep about it. For them to come out now and express concerns is a big gut-punch for the bill sponsors because it gives waffling democrats a lefty reason for not supporting it. Hahahahahaha!