PDA

View Full Version : NYT: Rand Paul's Loopy Ascent




supermario21
03-26-2013, 08:07 AM
The New York liberals are coming after Rand now....must be enough of a threat!

http://w ww.ny tim es.com/2013/03/26/opinion/bruni-rand-pauls-loopy-ascent.html?ref=todayspaper&_r=0



When you’ve got loons the likes of Ted Cruz and Sarah Palin fluttering about, I suppose it’s easy not to seem like such a wacko bird yourself.

Is that why Rand Paul is flying high right now? Or is it because he followed his 13-hour filibuster — that knee-defeating, bladder-defying moment in the Senate sun — by showing a few of his less florid feathers? Either way, he has managed, with remarkable speed, to migrate to the foreground of Republican politics. You could almost lose sight of what an albatross he really is.

Today he’s singing the moderate song of immigration reform, and that dirge about drones, which had a valid bass note despite its alarmist melody, struck chords across the political spectrum.

But Paul’s greatest hits include a denunciation of Medicare as socialism, a recommendation of stopping foreign aid to a few key allies, and the insistent introduction of Patriot Act amendments so loopy that one of them netted all of 10 votes from the 95 senators present while another garnered a whopping total of 4.

As Jennifer Steinhauer noted in The Times right after he peddled those clunkers, he had seemingly relocated to Washington “less to make laws than points.”

Now he’s making headlines and waves, and not as a Tea Party curiosity but as a Republican Party lodestar, someone discussed seriously as a possible force in the 2016 presidential primaries. He was tapped just last week to be the featured speaker at the approaching Lincoln Day Dinner in Iowa. There’s an important caucus in that state, you’ll recall.

Paul personifies the G.O.P.’s curse right now. Although it needs to re-establish its bearings in the mainstream, many of the Republicans making the biggest splashes are rowing in from strange tributaries, and the establishment can’t seem to stop the tide.

Seasoned hands with cooler heads tend not to generate nearly as much excitement. All Jeb Bush generated with the publicity tour for his immigration book was outright befuddlement.

The tail wags the dog. Rather than Cruz, the junior senator from Texas, humbly taking cues from John Cornyn, the senior senator, Cornyn labors to match the supercilious upstart scowl for scowl, and even followed Cruz’s intemperate lead to cast one of only three Senate votes against John Kerry’s confirmation as secretary of state.

And Mitch McConnell, who is not only Kentucky’s senior senator but also the Senate minority leader, seems to worry more about Paul, the state’s junior senator, than vice versa.

Back when Paul began his 2010 Senate campaign as an insurgent ophthalmologist (how many times does a journalist get to write that phrase?), McConnell supported the other, more established candidate in the Republican primary. Then Paul triumphed, the Tea Party proved its muscle and McConnell, eyeing his own 2014 re-election bid, had to worry about being undone by the very romance with naysaying outsiders that lofted Paul to victory.

McConnell’s campaign manager this time around? The same one Paul used. His new public posture toward Paul? Indulgent, sometimes even adulatory. He joined Paul for a portion of that marathon filibuster, egging him on.

McConnell doesn’t fear a potential Democratic run by Ashley Judd. He fears being “primaried” — the menacing verb that was popularized by the 2010 and 2012 elections, signifying the threat that a state’s restive Republican voters will pick a Richard Mourdock over a Richard Lugar. That’s Cornyn’s dread, too. He’s also up in 2014.

And so someone like Paul (who, by the way, voted for Kerry’s confirmation) sets the tone. I also wonder if he’s modulating his own, as some long-term strategy moseys into his thinking.

Yes, his recent questioning of jail time for marijuana arrests isn’t a certain winner, but it’s not a surefire loser, either. And his immigration speech last week, which called for a path to citizenship without quite calling it that, suggested a fresh calibration and sensitivity.

But his past brims with statements and stands that make him an unhelpful mascot for his party. He’d be a skunk in a presidential primary and a quixotic, doomed nominee.

He has railed erroneously about the Clean Water Act’s effect on his toilets, indelicately quibbled with aspects of the Civil Rights and Americans With Disabilities Acts, and carped about the “nanny state” in relation to seat-belt laws. Yes, seat-belt laws.

His distaste for government is so deep you wonder how he can bear to work there. He’s like a vegan who has chosen to sup at a steakhouse, though I guess that’s the point. Now that he has access to the kitchen, he can filibuster the filet, stall the sirloin with nuisance amendments, and leave diners with only a side of spinach, and maybe an iceberg wedge.

It’s a crazy salad he’s serving, no matter how it’s currently dressed.




---


[mod edit] great response from Conor Friedersdorf in The Atlantic:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/03/fact-check-please-a-confused-critique-of-rand-paul/274395/

RonPaulFanInGA
03-26-2013, 08:09 AM
Hey conservatives: Rand Paul is not endorsed by the New York Times, McCain, Graham and/or Rove.

fr33
03-26-2013, 08:53 AM
Oh now he did it, he brought up low flow toilets! I don't know of any American that supports low flow toilets. Never heard a positive thing about them ever.

abacabb
03-26-2013, 09:13 AM
The New York liberals are coming after Rand now....must be enough of a threat!

http://w ww.ny tim es.com/2013/03/26/opinion/bruni-rand-pauls-loopy-ascent.html?ref=todayspaper&_r=0
Article pumps Jeb Bush and its from a liberal. I, like many Americans, will read no more.

KingNothing
03-26-2013, 09:17 AM
HOW DARE SOMEONE SUGGEST THAT THE GOVERNMENT NOT REGULATE THE FLOW OF MY TOILETS!

Sola_Fide
03-26-2013, 09:19 AM
There's that "crazy" meme....

RonPaulFanInGA
03-26-2013, 09:59 AM
There's that "crazy" meme....

Maybe Santorum will purchase RandPaulStrangeIdeas.com from Grayson in 2015?

http://www.pageonekentucky.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/strangerand.jpg

MRK
03-26-2013, 09:59 AM
There's that "crazy" meme....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6UI79pLEM

mczerone
03-26-2013, 10:18 AM
Memo to the NYT:

To be taken seriously as a "news" source in the 21st century, you have to back your claims and make substantive arguments. Hyperlinks should be used in all web-content, especially when making a specific unsourced claim.

Calling people crazy because they don't agree with you doesn't make them crazy, nor does it make you right. The only substantive facts in this article were demonstrating that Paul's submitted amendments had poor voting support in the Senate - this does not say that the amendments were "crazy" anymore than saying that since 95% of the papal astronomers disagreed, Galileo's ideas were crazy.

Your slander-laden approach to political engineering worked in the 20th century when you were a huge, govt supported propaganda arm. But now that the internet has made opinions spreadable by anyone who can type, real facts and analysis quickly rise to the top of people's consciousness. Your approach may still be able to sink Rand's aspirations, but it won't be long before most people see this type of article as just the hyperbolic hysteria of a paid shill.

mczerone
03-26-2013, 10:29 AM
His distaste for government is so deep you wonder how he can bear to work there. He’s like a vegan who has chosen to sup at a steakhouse, though I guess that’s the point. Now that he has access to the kitchen, he can filibuster the filet, stall the sirloin with nuisance amendments, and leave diners with only a side of spinach, and maybe an iceberg wedge.

It’s a crazy salad he’s serving, no matter how it’s currently dressed.

And since we're all FORCED to eat ONLY at this steakhouse, a substantial portion of vegans and vegan-friendly people would LAUD him for bringing up that crazy idea that we don't all need a well-done dry-rub 23oz porterhouse for every meal.

He's not outlawing your low-flow toilet, your ability to start a race-blind business, your ability to wear your seat-belt, your ability to give money to your favorite war-criminals foreign allies, your ability to pool resources to provide your group with retirement "insurance", or your ability to protect your property with rational, peaceful, constitutional methods. You're just butt-hurt that people don't want to eat at your horrible, dirty, wasteful steakhouse and are starting to revolt at being dragged in there three times a day and being prevented from acquiring their own food.

/I love my steak, but an iceberg wedge and some spinach, properly prepared with vegan ingredients sounds pretty damn good sometimes.

fr33
03-26-2013, 11:31 AM
Maybe Santorum will purchase RandPaulStrangeIdeas.com from Grayson in 2015?

http://www.pageonekentucky.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/strangerand.jpg

That domain is available along with the other suffixes in case someone here wants to buy them up.

AuH20
03-26-2013, 06:44 PM
Fire meets Ice.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/26/opinion/bruni-rand-pauls-loopy-ascent.html?ref=todayspaper&_r=1&


His distaste for government is so deep you wonder how he can bear to work there. He’s like a vegan who has chosen to sup at a steakhouse, though I guess that’s the point. Now that he has access to the kitchen, he can filibuster the filet, stall the sirloin with nuisance amendments, and leave diners with only a side of spinach, and maybe an iceberg wedge.

It’s a crazy salad he’s serving, no matter how it’s currently dressed.

satchelmcqueen
03-26-2013, 08:59 PM
these people really dont understand what freedom is. thats all it really comes down to.

mz10
03-26-2013, 09:55 PM
these people really dont understand what freedom is. thats all it really comes down to.

It's not that they don't understand it. It's that they don't value it.

Cleaner44
03-26-2013, 10:22 PM
That means its working! When statists in NY are getting bent out of shape then you know things are on the right track.

I always find it interesting that the original 13 colonies have drifted furthest from liberty.

Brian4Liberty
03-26-2013, 11:12 PM
Obviously a Bush supporting, big government, totalitarian.

ClydeCoulter
03-26-2013, 11:32 PM
It's not that they don't understand it. It's that they don't value it.

Yep, they don't like it and want to make anyone that does look like an idiot/nut. That's their j.o.b.

anaconda
03-26-2013, 11:45 PM
The article is so bad I barely no where to begin. For example, it is a well-known fact that seat belt laws do not save lives overall, because people drive more recklessly with them. The author makes one stupid statement after another.

S.Shorland
03-27-2013, 04:24 AM
I think they lie.They know the opposing case,can't beat it via argument,so they LIE.
The article is so bad I barely no where to begin. For example, it is a well-known fact that seat belt laws do not save lives overall, because people drive more recklessly with them. The author makes one stupid statement after another.

abacabb
03-27-2013, 04:31 AM
t’s a crazy salad he’s serving, no matter how it’s currently dressed.
An argument reduced to name calling is a bullcrap argument.

jct74
03-27-2013, 05:50 AM
Great response to this column from Conor Friedersdorf in The Atlantic, I really love this guy lately.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/03/fact-check-please-a-confused-critique-of-rand-paul/274395/

limequat
03-27-2013, 07:26 AM
"quixotic" here we go again.

Brian4Liberty
03-27-2013, 10:56 AM
Great response to this column from Conor Friedersdorf in The Atlantic, I really love this guy lately.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/03/fact-check-please-a-confused-critique-of-rand-paul/274395/

Yeah, good response.

Kind of humorous how he takes that scumbag propagandist Bruni at face value. Of course Bruni is inconsistent and illogical. He's nothing more than an errand boy, sent by grocery clerks.

jtstellar
03-28-2013, 09:21 AM
were the founders using such language back in their days? 'loopy'? since when did english become so cartoonish? ya i'm aware it's a slang, but when did it get started? cus people who use terms like these sound like they were bullied in elementary school and never were able to graduate

Brian4Liberty
03-28-2013, 09:49 AM
were the founders using such language back in their days? 'loopy'? since when did english become so cartoonish? ya i'm aware it's a slang, but when did it get started? cus people who use terms like these sound like they were bullied in elementary school and never were able to graduate

"Slam!" "Blast!" "Crush!" "Loopy!"

This is the new level of writing in the media.