PDA

View Full Version : Bloomberg's Phony Fudd Ads Run in 13 States




RonPaulFanInGA
03-24-2013, 01:36 PM
http://www.backwoodsengineer.com/2013/03/bloombergs-phony-fudd-ads-run-in-12.html


Colorado has fallen, and NYC Mayor Bloomberg's "Mayors Against Illegal Guns" is rejoicing. And, they are pressing on to destroy gun rights in other states they see as vulnerable.

Below is an image from Bloomberg's $12 million ad campaign (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/nyc-mayor-announces-12m-gun-control-ad-buy-targeting-senators-before-legislation-debate/2013/03/23/01207654-9419-11e2-8e33-9cc6c739d012_story.html?hpid=z2) that will be running in North Carolina, and 12 other states: Arkansas, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, New Hampshire, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

I am sad to see this targeted at my state, because many people will go along with it, right up until the whole state is disarmed.

https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/s480x480/28159_10152159870688912_1818190372_n.jpg

In the ads, we have an actor dressed up in Cabella's best, sittin' on the tailgate of his putative huntin' truck, portraying an "Elmer Fudd" hunter type who wants to ban those eeeevil black rifles, as long as his huntin' gun is untouched.

The whole thing is as phony as a Mississippi travelin' snake oil salesman. We know Bloomberg wants to ban everything: rifles, handguns, and shotguns. He wants these United States to be just like England, completely disarmed, except for the crooks, the bodyguards of the elite, and the government.

This is what the Fudd actor holding a shotgun says in the ad:

"I believe in the Second Amendment and I'll fight to protect it. But with rights come responsibilities. That's why I support comprehensive background checks so criminals and the dangerously mentally ill can't buy guns."

A second spot shows the same guy saying,

"Background checks have nothing to do with taking guns away from anyone."

talkingpointes
03-24-2013, 01:59 PM
Who cares. Fuck bloomberg, fuck his ads, and fuck giving them attention.

Lucille
03-24-2013, 02:37 PM
So not only is the press quoting concern trolls (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?407576-NYT-CNN-interviews-concern-troll-on-guns), politicians are making ads featuring them. Pathetic.

Cool to see them wasting their money on AZ though!


When was the last time a criminal submitted himself to a background check to buy a gun? In fact, the 5th Amendment releases them from having to go through them! Don't believe me? Read Supreme Court case ruled in Haynes vs. U.S. (1968), where the Court ruled that convicted felons have a Constitutional right to not register a gun, because to register a gun would be self-incrimination. Only people that aren't criminals can be punished for not registering.

Huh! I did not know that.

Lucille
03-24-2013, 03:41 PM
http://www.theburningplatform.com/?p=51547


King Bloomberg is using some of his pocket change to have Madison Avenue maggots create a propaganda campaign to take away your guns. It will be easier for his drone airforce to win if you are unarmed. Below the article, I’ve bankrolled my own ad campaign. You can make up your own mind which is more convincing.
[...]
After funding a splashy anti-gun ad starring Hollywood heavyweights, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has shifted tactics and is trying to appeal to the heartland in a new $12 million ad spend in gun-friendly states.

The new commercial, simply titled Family, features a bearded, flannel-clad man wearing a camo hat and holding rifle, while his sits in the back of a pickup truck in a rural setting.

He speaks squarely to viewers about his constitutional right to bear arms and offers assurances that supporting universal background checks on gun sales won’t jeopardize that right.

The 30 second spot, funded by Bloomberg’s super PAC Independence USA, will begin airing on Monday in 13 states including Arizona, Arkansas and Georgia – states which have some of the loosest gun laws in the nation.

MY FREE AD CAMPAIGN BASED UPON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES

http://www.rightwingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/gun9.jpg

http://www.rightwingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/gun8.jpg

http://www.rightwingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/gun7.jpg

http://www.rightwingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/gun6.jpg

http://www.rightwingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/gun3.jpg

http://www.rightwingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/gun2.jpg

I left a few off if you want to click and check out the rest.

Anti Federalist
03-24-2013, 03:47 PM
"Background checks have nothing to do with taking guns away from anyone."

So what good are they?

I mean, I know, "Brawndo has Electrolytes", but FFS, c'mon...this is critical thought 101.

If "background checks" are not in place to prevent/restrict/confiscate guns from prohibited persons, then what are they there for?

RonPaulFanInGA
03-24-2013, 03:53 PM
https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc6/5579_470647033006552_1847917094_n.jpg