PDA

View Full Version : The Drone Makers and their friends in Washington




Carlybee
03-08-2013, 12:36 AM
This article is from last July but thought it was worth another read.

http://www.kpbs.org/news/2012/jul/05/drone-makers-friends-washington/



General Atomics is the company that supplies and maintains the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol’s ten Predator drones.


In the last two election cycles, General Atomics’ PAC has given more than $140,000 to drone caucus members in border states, according to our analysis.

A PAC affiliated with Los Angeles-based Northrop Grumman, the defense firm that makes the Global Hawk drone, gave close to $150,000 to 16 drone caucus members representing districts in California, Texas, Arizona and Nevada. (A Global Hawk drone owned by the U.S. Navy crashed in June in southern Maryland.)


Southern California-based AeroVironment, which supplies the U.S. military with most of its small drones, has spent more on lobbying each year from 2007 to 2011 than during the previous five years combined, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics.

New Mexico State University has lobbied on several drone-related issues, including “nuclear detection utilizing unmanned aerial vehicles,” according to lobbying disclosure forms. It’s also lobbied on the establishment of new unmanned aerial test sites to be established in the U.S., according to Bronstein-Moffly.

The FAA will select six sites around the country to test how to safely fly drones alongside manned airplanes in U.S. airspace. The university already tests drones for the government at its Las Cruces site.

Carlybee
03-08-2013, 12:42 AM
Donations from drone companies to drone caucus members from border states, 2009-2012

Representative Amount

Buck McKeon (R-CA) $124,500
Jerry Lewis (R-CA) $108,000
Ken Calvert (R-CA) $106,500
Silvestre Reyes (D-TX) $97,000
Duncan Hunter (R-CA) $96,225
Brian Bilbray (R-CA) $54,500
Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) $52,500
Darrell Issa (R-CA) $45,000
Loretta Sanchez (D-CA $43,500
Trent Franks (R-AZ) $34,500
Mike Conaway (R-TX) $33,000
Pete Olson (R-TX) $32,500
Henry Cuellar (D-TX) $32,400
Michael McCaul (R-TX) $30,500
David Dreier (R-CA) $16,000
Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA)$16,000
Gene Green (D-TX) $8,000
Blake Farenthold (R-TX) $4,000
Elton Gallegly (R-CA) $2,000
Paul Gosar (R-AZ) $1,000
Steve Pearce (R-NM) $1,000

Total $938,625

Fivezeroes
03-08-2013, 12:47 AM
This right here is why there will never be world peace.... If there was peace, arms manufacturers wouldn't make any money.

Carlybee
03-08-2013, 12:56 AM
Well that and the elephant in the room (no pun intended) is the fact that our tax dollars are paying for a drone caucus and some of those caucus members are receiving contributions from drone manufacturers. It would be interesting to find out if any members of Congress stand to profit from any sort of investment in these companies.

Natural Citizen
03-08-2013, 01:52 AM
Well that and the elephant in the room (no pun intended) is the fact that our tax dollars are paying for a drone caucus and some of those caucus members are receiving contributions from drone manufacturers. It would be interesting to find out if any members of Congress stand to profit from any sort of investment in these companies.

Think bigger. http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/news/FactSheets/FS-073-DFRC.html

Rep for being the only one on the board to start hiking in the right direction though.

Fivezeroes
03-08-2013, 02:04 AM
Well that and the elephant in the room (no pun intended) is the fact that our tax dollars are paying for a drone caucus and some of those caucus members are receiving contributions from drone manufacturers. It would be interesting to find out if any members of Congress stand to profit from any sort of investment in these companies.

Oh yea, you can bet these guys are making money, hand over fist. Most congressmen have stock in a lot of these companies, it's sad that no one can seem to catch them, or seems to care enough to catch them for that matter.

Carlybee
03-08-2013, 11:02 AM
I think it should go beyond just being against the use of drones and do something about it becoming an industry dependent on their being able to use them over US skies. Bad enough they are being used overseas on a regular basis. I can see where they would be useful on the border but elsewhere...NO. And I am referring to non-military use as well. I don't know if that require educating people about the pitfalls, possible collateral damage, etc. but the public needs to be against our skies being crowded with these things. Here in Houston we rejected the redlight cameras and the mayor finally had to rescind the order for them and cancel the contract. That is what needs to happen with these drones...but given that there is a caucus actively being courted by the industry and given that the president is the dronebomber in chief who knows if that would work.