PDA

View Full Version : Why Are The Domestic Extremists All White?




Anti Federalist
03-03-2013, 05:50 PM
Why Are The Domestic Extremists All White?

February 22, 2013

By eric

http://ericpetersautos.com/2013/02/22/why-are-the-domestic-extremists-all-white/

Perhaps you have seen the loathsome “no more hesitation” target practice sheets (see here, if you haven’t) provided to the Department of Heimat Sicherheitsdeinst by an entity called Law Enforcement Targets, Inc.

They depict old men, young mothers, pregnant women – even a little boy. Anyone who has seen these cretinous confections has been dismayed – and outraged. What sort of sick mind would even think to create such things – let alone actually create them? And can you imagine the reaction if someone made shooting targets depicting cops? No doubt there would be two-in-the-morning SWAT raids and probably a Waco-style barbeque of the offenders.

But I’d like to bring up another aspect of this despicable affair that’s just as telling – and perhaps even more dismaying. The same government that hectors the country relentlessly about diversity is apparently very happy with a certain homogeneity when it comes to portraying “domestic extremists” on shooting targets: White older man; white young mother; white grandmother; white little boy.

No diversity at all.

This is of a piece with the none-too-subtle efforts to depict Ron Paul supporters, constitutionalists, Tea Party people – in brief, any who disagree with the current administration – no, any who disagree with authoritarian, collectivist government – as racial enemies.

They’ve made this rather explicit.

I’m reminded of something cruel and awful from the past – something many of you who are over 40 may also remember: The Official Running nigg3r target.

http://i.imgur.com/KbM9PEC.jpg

In the ’70s, these were commonly seen at gun stores and elsewhere. Their purpose was to turn black people into things – less than human things – in the minds of people who weren’t black. So as to make it easier to treat black people as less than human.

And now, history is repeating itself – only this time, it is white people – in particular, anti-government, liberty-minded white people – who are the “nigg3rs.”

But, there’s a difference. This time, there’s no outrage. Or rather, there’s no outrage from officialdom. This is startling – and, alarming.

Even in the darkest days of segregation, it would have been inconceivable for the government to order a few million “running nigg3r” targets. If someone within the government had done such a thing, he’d have been cashiered right quick – even in 1950s America. There would have been abundant – and very public – mea culpas.

And now, here we are in 2013 – and the government has ordered a bunch of “shoot whitey” targets – and no one seems to have noticed, much less care.

Oh, they care that harmless-looking old men, pregnant women, grannies and little boys are depicted as shooting targets for government thugs, in order to desensitize them to shooting old men, pregnant women, grannies and little boys in actuality – when the time comes. But no one seems outraged that all the targets are white folks.

Apparently, people of color cannot be “domestic extremists” – and for them, “hesitation” is still protocol.

One can draw several conclusions from all this:

First, it’s indicative of the racial hatred or at least contempt that bubbles beneath the seemingly placid, even-toned lectures of Barack Obama and Eric Holder. They may not have actually ordered the targets (though who knows? maybe they did) but now that the existence of these targets is public knowledge – and not a single apologetic word has been forthcoming from the executive – we can reasonably assume there is no outrage within the executive. Which is another way of saying, they approve of these things.

Because we can fairly assume that had the “no more hesitation” targets depicted pregnant black women and small black kids and black men there would have been an eruption of not merely apologies from the executive but a witch hunt of McCarthyite proportions.

Any official of the government remotely involved would not only have been summarily fired, he’d be publicly vilified and perhaps even brought up on “hate crimes” charges.

But here, silence.

And as Sir Thomas More once pointed out, silence is taken to mean approval.

We have a new Imperial Wizard, it seems. He may not wear a white sheet – but he’s the same sort of person. A racialist – or a racialist fear-monger. It means the same thing, ultimately.

The government – the Obama government – may simply be using these odious targets for the age-old purpose of divide and conquer. Enrage whites – and egg on their fear/race hatred of blacks. Anything to prevent blacks and whites from thinking of themselves – and one another – as individuals.

Individuals in the same crosshairs, ultimately.

otherone
03-03-2013, 06:26 PM
Their purpose was to turn black people into things – less than human things – in the minds of people who weren’t black.


Close, but incorrect. Their purpose was to take advantage of those individuals who already believed that blacks were less than human...the same way that the current "targets" exploit the prevailing belief among the police that mundanes are less than human.

sailingaway
03-03-2013, 06:28 PM
That isn't actually true, the 'Fusion Centers' named black colleges as 'hotbeds for radicalism' which should be focused on as well. Basiclally, if you politically dissent from the status quo, you're a potential domestic terrorist.

Anti Federalist
03-03-2013, 06:34 PM
That isn't actually true, the 'Fusion Centers' named black colleges as 'hotbeds for radicalism' which should be focused on as well. Basiclally, if you politically dissent from the status quo, you're a potential domestic terrorist.

True enough.

Step outside the box in any real way, display any "non compliance" and you will be cracked down on.

phill4paul
03-03-2013, 06:39 PM
Close, but incorrect. Their purpose was to take advantage of those individuals who already believed that blacks were less than human...the same way that the current "targets" exploit the prevailing belief among the police that mundanes are less than human.

Not incorrect. Every one, yes, becomes less than human now. That is how you start it. We are at each others throats. What better way to rule?

phill4paul
03-03-2013, 06:41 PM
That isn't actually true, the 'Fusion Centers' named black colleges as 'hotbeds for radicalism' which should be focused on as well. Basiclally, if you politically dissent from the status quo, you're a potential domestic terrorist.

MIAC cast a wide net that it includes everyone. Including your mother.

BAllen
03-03-2013, 06:42 PM
Why Are The Domestic Extremists All White?

February 22, 2013

By eric

http://ericpetersautos.com/2013/02/22/why-are-the-domestic-extremists-all-white/

Perhaps you have seen the loathsome “no more hesitation” target practice sheets (see here, if you haven’t) provided to the Department of Heimat Sicherheitsdeinst by an entity called Law Enforcement Targets, Inc.

They depict old men, young mothers, pregnant women – even a little boy. Anyone who has seen these cretinous confections has been dismayed – and outraged. What sort of sick mind would even think to create such things – let alone actually create them? And can you imagine the reaction if someone made shooting targets depicting cops? No doubt there would be two-in-the-morning SWAT raids and probably a Waco-style barbeque of the offenders.

But I’d like to bring up another aspect of this despicable affair that’s just as telling – and perhaps even more dismaying. The same government that hectors the country relentlessly about diversity is apparently very happy with a certain homogeneity when it comes to portraying “domestic extremists” on shooting targets: White older man; white young mother; white grandmother; white little boy.

No diversity at all.

This is of a piece with the none-too-subtle efforts to depict Ron Paul supporters, constitutionalists, Tea Party people – in brief, any who disagree with the current administration – no, any who disagree with authoritarian, collectivist government – as racial enemies.

They’ve made this rather explicit.

I’m reminded of something cruel and awful from the past – something many of you who are over 40 may also remember: The Official Running nigg3r target.

http://i.imgur.com/KbM9PEC.jpg

In the ’70s, these were commonly seen at gun stores and elsewhere. Their purpose was to turn black people into things – less than human things – in the minds of people who weren’t black. So as to make it easier to treat black people as less than human.

And now, history is repeating itself – only this time, it is white people – in particular, anti-government, liberty-minded white people – who are the “nigg3rs.”

But, there’s a difference. This time, there’s no outrage. Or rather, there’s no outrage from officialdom. This is startling – and, alarming.

Even in the darkest days of segregation, it would have been inconceivable for the government to order a few million “running nigg3r” targets. If someone within the government had done such a thing, he’d have been cashiered right quick – even in 1950s America. There would have been abundant – and very public – mea culpas.

And now, here we are in 2013 – and the government has ordered a bunch of “shoot whitey” targets – and no one seems to have noticed, much less care.

Oh, they care that harmless-looking old men, pregnant women, grannies and little boys are depicted as shooting targets for government thugs, in order to desensitize them to shooting old men, pregnant women, grannies and little boys in actuality – when the time comes. But no one seems outraged that all the targets are white folks.

Apparently, people of color cannot be “domestic extremists” – and for them, “hesitation” is still protocol.

One can draw several conclusions from all this:

First, it’s indicative of the racial hatred or at least contempt that bubbles beneath the seemingly placid, even-toned lectures of Barack Obama and Eric Holder. They may not have actually ordered the targets (though who knows? maybe they did) but now that the existence of these targets is public knowledge – and not a single apologetic word has been forthcoming from the executive – we can reasonably assume there is no outrage within the executive. Which is another way of saying, they approve of these things.

Because we can fairly assume that had the “no more hesitation” targets depicted pregnant black women and small black kids and black men there would have been an eruption of not merely apologies from the executive but a witch hunt of McCarthyite proportions.

Any official of the government remotely involved would not only have been summarily fired, he’d be publicly vilified and perhaps even brought up on “hate crimes” charges.

But here, silence.

And as Sir Thomas More once pointed out, silence is taken to mean approval.

We have a new Imperial Wizard, it seems. He may not wear a white sheet – but he’s the same sort of person. A racialist – or a racialist fear-monger. It means the same thing, ultimately.

The government – the Obama government – may simply be using these odious targets for the age-old purpose of divide and conquer. Enrage whites – and egg on their fear/race hatred of blacks. Anything to prevent blacks and whites from thinking of themselves – and one another – as individuals.

Individuals in the same crosshairs, ultimately.

You're absolutely right. Just as government money is used to support the racist organization of la razza.

sailingaway
03-03-2013, 06:44 PM
MIAC cast a wide net that it includes everyone. Including your mother.

MAIC loves my mother. Her only regret about Obama being president is that she couldn't have Hillary this time. Except NDAA is an issue, but not enough to make her think the president is a problem.

WM_in_MO
03-03-2013, 07:23 PM
MAIC loves my mother. Her only regret about Obama being president is that she couldn't have Hillary this time. Except NDAA is an issue, but not enough to make her think the president is a problem.
I severely hate that report as it came from my state.

Yet one more reason to not call the "authorities" ever.

Smart3
03-03-2013, 07:37 PM
Time for a quote out of context.


“They call them terrorists, I call them freedom fighters.”

Louis Farrakhan

Keith and stuff
03-03-2013, 07:53 PM
Can someone please move this to HOT TOPICs. The N word is used here.

fisharmor
03-03-2013, 08:09 PM
Can someone please move this to HOT TOPICs. The N word is used here.

No, it's not... the only text example is nigg3r.
Are you one of those people who denounced Pope Benedict when he quoted a Byzantine emperor talking about Islam?

BlackTerrel
03-03-2013, 08:11 PM
Because there is no danger of stereotyping the majority and white people aren't racially harassed for being terrorists more than anyone else.

Adam Carolla (who I usually like) was recently bitching that all the criminals in the Brinks Home Security commercials are white - that this is somehow racist.

But white people don't suffer from that stereotype. No one cluthes their purse or runs when they see a white man down the street, no one denies a job or thinks "all white people are thugs" - Brinks commercial or not.

That's the difference.

talkingpointes
03-03-2013, 08:42 PM
Because there is no danger of stereotyping the majority and white people aren't racially harassed for being terrorists more than anyone else.

Adam Carolla (who I usually like) was recently bitching that all the criminals in the Brinks Home Security commercials are white - that this is somehow racist.

But white people don't suffer from that stereotype. No one cluthes their purse or runs when they see a white man down the street, no one denies a job or thinks "all white people are thugs" - Brinks commercial or not.

That's the difference.

Actually as a white construction worker that is complete bs.

dillo
03-03-2013, 08:45 PM
There are no black terrorists because of political correctness

Giuliani was there on 911
03-03-2013, 08:48 PM
Because there is no danger of stereotyping the majority and white people aren't racially harassed for being terrorists more than anyone else.

Adam Carolla (who I usually like) was recently bitching that all the criminals in the Brinks Home Security commercials are white - that this is somehow racist.

But white people don't suffer from that stereotype. No one cluthes their purse or runs when they see a white man down the street, no one denies a job or thinks "all white people are thugs" - Brinks commercial or not.

That's the difference.

The problem is those commercials and pretty much all tv commercials don't depict reality. Stereotypes about black criminality don't fall out the sky, they're based on hard evidence.

tod evans
03-03-2013, 08:50 PM
Breaking news.........

TV doesn't "depict reality".....

Giuliani was there on 911
03-03-2013, 08:53 PM
Breaking news.........

TV doesn't "depict reality".....
It used to and it still does to an extent, just when it comes to race and gender it starts depicting the bizzaro world.

tod evans
03-03-2013, 08:55 PM
It used to and it still does to an extent, just when it comes to race and gender it starts depicting the bizzaro world.

Oh really?

I quit watching late 70's and it was fake then, pushing agendas etc...

Are you saying it's better now or that I was delusional in my impression then?

BlackTerrel
03-03-2013, 09:13 PM
Actually as a white construction worker that is complete bs.

Which part? People think you are a terrorist because you are white? Give an example.

BAllen
03-03-2013, 09:20 PM
The problem is those commercials and pretty much all tv commercials don't depict reality. Stereotypes about black criminality don't fall out the sky, they're based on hard evidence.

That's right, Terrell. Even Jesse Jackson admitted when he was alone on a dark city street and heard footsteps behind him, he was relieved to see a white man.
As long as blacks blame the white man for their failures, and take the socialists' bribe money, they will remain in squalor. How convenient to have the white man to blame for all your failures. That way you never need to improve, and will always be dependant on the government. Government has replaced the plantation owners as your slave master.
Why don't you listen to some blacks like J.C. Watts, Herman Cain, Walter Williams, or Thomas Sowell. Here is his latest article on choices and learning from mistakes:

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell022613.php3

phill4paul
03-03-2013, 09:26 PM
Can someone please move this to HOT TOPICs. The N word is used here.

Honkeys! HONKEYS! HONKEYS!

Cracker! CRACKERS! CRACKERS!

OK we surely need to go to HT now!

Antischism
03-03-2013, 09:56 PM
It'll always be more politically correct to depict the majority race in such a manner than singling out minorities. White people are the "default" so to speak. If this country were majority black and (minority) white people had the same history of enslavement, you would see the same thing except in reverse. It would be white leaders clamoring about how racist it is to depict white people as criminals and terrorists. The "default" in such a world would be black. That would be the more politically correct option.

Working Poor
03-03-2013, 10:01 PM
Keith is the hot topics police.

acptulsa
03-03-2013, 10:10 PM
Well, ain't this an adult conversation?

I don't recall seeing any blacks in The Godfather or Goodfellas.

Yes, the feds are actively trying to desensitize their sturmtruppen to shoot all of us, not just the ones they're used to shooting, first and ask questions later. Good. Now that we're all in the same boat, maybe all of us will get as outraged as we all should have been all along.

There are peace-loving folk of every race, creed and description. And all of us should be mad as hell. All of us.

So, there is now a crack in their divide and conquer tactics. Hallelujah. Maybe now we can all see that we're all targets, and we can be divided from the real enemy and united in our desire to defeat them.

Working Poor
03-03-2013, 10:40 PM
I see that blacks have had a target on their backs for a very long time and now so does everyone else. We are all finally equal. How about that.

phill4paul
03-03-2013, 10:52 PM
I see that blacks have had a target on their backs for a very long time and now so does everyone else. We are all finally equal. How about that.

Some blacks I know, knew, were L.E. Some animals are more equal............

BlackTerrel
03-03-2013, 11:11 PM
That's right, Terrell. Even Jesse Jackson admitted when he was alone on a dark city street and heard footsteps behind him, he was relieved to see a white man.

Well that's just idiotic.


As long as blacks blame the white man for their failures, and take the socialists' bribe money, they will remain in squalor. How convenient to have the white man to blame for all your failures. That way you never need to improve, and will always be dependant on the government. Government has replaced the plantation owners as your slave master.

Blaming "the white man" for all your failures is just as dumb as blaming "the government" for all your failures. I don't blame either for mine. I succeed and fail on my own.


Why don't you listen to some blacks like J.C. Watts, Herman Cain, Walter Williams, or Thomas Sowell. Here is his latest article on choices and learning from mistakes:

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell022613.php3

Herman Cain is a good source of info? Since when?

J_White
03-04-2013, 12:09 AM
http://i.imgur.com/e1mLuoV.jpg

No more hesitation.

Philhelm
03-04-2013, 12:18 AM
Blaming "the white man" for all your failures is just as dumb as blaming "the government" for all your failures. I don't blame either for mine. I succeed and fail on my own.

No, not all, just most.

phill4paul
03-04-2013, 12:38 AM
Blaming "the white man" for all your failures is just as dumb as blaming "the government" for all your failures. I don't blame either for mine. I succeed and fail on my own.

True. Except that the "white man" the "government" and even , to some "the black man" is a cause for ills. Yes, we all should overcome it. Yes, we all should fight it. Sme do. Most don't.

Bunch of ******s and Crackers out there. Bunch of Jews and Wops too. These days those damn Nips and other Slope Heads are in the mix. And those damn sand ******s. I wonder if in the sake of national security every bloodline that ain't genetically North American pre 1400s shouldn't be put in a concentration camp? And shipped put?

coastie
03-04-2013, 01:19 AM
http://www.picvalley.net/u/2655/48268955619849088091362381239wh6Bb1PKAuJEnwUnqKJW. JPG (http://www.picvalley.net/v.php?p=u/2655/48268955619849088091362381239wh6Bb1PKAuJEnwUnqKJW. JPG)

phill4paul
03-04-2013, 01:23 AM
http://www.picvalley.net/u/2655/48268955619849088091362381239wh6Bb1PKAuJEnwUnqKJW. JPG (http://www.picvalley.net/v.php?p=u/2655/48268955619849088091362381239wh6Bb1PKAuJEnwUnqKJW. JPG)

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to coastie again.

tangent4ronpaul
03-04-2013, 02:01 AM
Whoa! - did someone get lost on their way to Stormfront?

Here's a little help for your racial slur collection...
http://www.tshirthell.com/funny-shirts/i-fucking-hate

As to why they are only printing up white bread as targets? I have two theories:

1) There is a shortage of blacks in that part of the country to use as models.
2) The cops get so much practice shooting black people already, it probably wasn't thought necessary.

-t

Pericles
03-04-2013, 10:59 AM
Which part? People think you are a terrorist because you are white? Give an example.

Got your point, and not disagreeing, except to answer your question: who does the TSA profile?

KCIndy
03-04-2013, 11:41 AM
As to why they are only printing up white bread as targets? I have two theories:

1) There is a shortage of blacks in that part of the country to use as models.
2) The cops get so much practice shooting black people already, it probably wasn't thought necessary.

-t


I'm guessing you hit it right with #2.

As soon as government forces are conditioned to shoot ALL civilians unhesitatingly and without regard to color, we'll have..... true equality??

BAllen
03-04-2013, 11:51 AM
Well that's just idiotic.



Blaming "the white man" for all your failures is just as dumb as blaming "the government" for all your failures. I don't blame either for mine. I succeed and fail on my own.



Herman Cain is a good source of info? Since when?


You were the one complaining about blacks being victims, weren't you? Woman clutching purces, etc. You've been conditioned to think that way. Here's an example:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRfjLfyXYlA

Notice how he blames white people for his anger. He tries to make us responsible for his feelings.

re: Hermain Cain made the point that the media is racist because they say that blacks can't make it in the free market.

talkingpointes
03-05-2013, 04:36 PM
Which part? People think you are a terrorist because you are white? Give an example.

People treat you like trash because in their eyes paint stains and dirty clothes tend to turn people off. Imagine then working with a van and getting out in the suburbs in the middle of the day while some vain mom is also running by... It doesn't have to with with color of skin but merely people not using their brains to often.

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
03-05-2013, 05:09 PM
You are hurting by helping push unnecessarily against the false dichotomy of black versus white. In contrast, the true American dichotomy deals with a disadvantaged majority and their eternal desire to control tyranny. As is the case with these false conflicts, the pendulum will always swing over to the extreme which is why I'm always encouraging people in here to avoid addressing such unnecessary issues. Remember, rather than solving problems, the best government dissolves issues. This leaves the problem solving to the people to work out.

Get back to the dogs. Dogs should be considered "arms" as in "the right to bear arms . . .." The best way to insure the welfare of your children is to draw a line by protecting your guard dogs.

libertygrl
03-05-2013, 05:56 PM
MIAC cast a wide net that it includes everyone. Including your mother.

It's AMERICANS. PERIOD.

BlackTerrel
03-07-2013, 09:13 PM
You were the one complaining about blacks being victims, weren't you? Woman clutching purces, etc. You've been conditioned to think that way. Here's an example:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRfjLfyXYlA

Notice how he blames white people for his anger. He tries to make us responsible for his feelings.

Dude are you serious? That was clearly a joke video.

BlackTerrel
03-07-2013, 09:15 PM
People treat you like trash because in their eyes paint stains and dirty clothes tend to turn people off. Imagine then working with a van and getting out in the suburbs in the middle of the day while some vain mom is also running by... It doesn't have to with with color of skin but merely people not using their brains to often.

I was responding to people who think that videos showing white domestic extremists would hurt them in the real world and make people think they are terrorists due to the color of their skin.

I find that very hard to believe. In fact I don't believe it at all and am sure it is made up.

When is the last time you heard "oh white people... damn terrorists" by anyone?

BAllen
03-08-2013, 07:19 AM
Dude are you serious? That was clearly a joke video.

No, it wasn't. Blacks really believe that. You don't really believe the 'blame whitey' propaganda doesn't affect them, do you? You said yourself most of them think the media is against obama, which is really laughable in the light of reality.

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
03-08-2013, 07:58 AM
Ya-awn! . . . "clunk!"

BlackTerrel
03-08-2013, 09:13 PM
No, it wasn't. Blacks really believe that. You don't really believe the 'blame whitey' propaganda doesn't affect them, do you? You said yourself most of them think the media is against obama, which is really laughable in the light of reality.

Most Obama supporters think the media is against Obama. Most Paul supporters think the media is against Paul. Even Rand.

Most Laker supporters think the media is against the Lakers. Seriously check an article on ESPN.

That's human, not racial.

BAllen
03-08-2013, 09:14 PM
Most Obama supporters think the media is against Obama. Most Paul supporters think the media is against Paul. Even Rand.

Most Laker supporters think the media is against the Lakers. Seriously check an article on ESPN.

That's human, not racial.

You, and they, are delusional.