RT: BREAKING: Supreme Court explains ruling barring Americans challenging FISA

[sailingaway]

"This theory of future injury is too speculative," Justice Samuel Alito said in announcing the 5-4 decision, calling it "hypothetical future harm."

“In sum, respondents’ speculative chain of possibilities does not establish that injury based on potential future surveillance,” the court ruled. “[R]espondents’ self-inflicted injuries are not fairly traceable to the Government’s purported activities under [the FAA] and their subjective fear of surveillance does not give rise to standing.”

so invasion of 4th amendment is not enough without 'proven future harm?'

http://rt.com/usa/scotus-FISA-FAA-surveillance-483/

[sailingaway]

Here is USA today on it http://t.co/WsugR7X8vx

[Lucille]

Remind me again why we must elect a Republican to the WH so s/he can nominate SCOTUS justices?

Conservatives say they'll defend economic liberty, and progs say they'll defend civil liberties, but it's funny how we've ended up with neither.

Nothing but a complete collapse will rid us of these contemptible bastards who destroy our liberties in favor of state power.

Also here (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?405714-U-S-Supreme-Court-5-4-Won-t-Allow-Challenge-To-Surveillance-Law).