PDA

View Full Version : Who would make a better president?




nayjevin
02-19-2013, 04:22 PM
1. Marco Rubio
2. Naom Chomsky, Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel, AND Cynthia McKinney

libertyjam
02-19-2013, 04:43 PM
http://i.imgur.com/z2gxeWg.gif

mz10
02-19-2013, 04:47 PM
Rubio. I don't care if a Fabian Socialist is anti-war, they're still a Fabian Socialist.

phill4paul
02-19-2013, 04:55 PM
Not a valid poll. There is no vote for "kludge is a douchebag."

Occam's Banana
02-19-2013, 05:04 PM
A better president than ... ?

Reminds me of the old diet Dr. Pepper commercials: "Diet Dr. Pepper tastes more like the original Dr. Pepper."

I always wondered, "More like the original Dr. Pepper than what? Horse piss?"

shane77m
02-19-2013, 05:13 PM
http://i.imgur.com/z2gxeWg.gif

Jack is everywhere.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

RickyJ
02-19-2013, 05:28 PM
I don't like these choices so I will abstain from voting. I would rather not vote then vote for one of them. But hey, if Cynthia McKinney ran and talked about 9/11 truth I would support her in that, the others, no way.

Obama4Dictator
02-19-2013, 05:55 PM
What a troll thread.

Philhelm
02-19-2013, 06:37 PM
Ron Paul.

dannno
02-19-2013, 07:11 PM
It's head to head with the anti-establishment picks in the lead, as I would think they should be here.

We know Ron Paul supported those folks over McCain, so why not?

FrankRep
02-19-2013, 07:11 PM
2. Naom Chomsky, Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel, AND Cynthia McKinney

Hell No.

dannno
02-19-2013, 07:14 PM
Hell No.

Would your decision change if you found out that Rubio was actually a Trotsky-ite pro-establishment Communist who only espouses conservative rhetoric to get elected?

I mean, fuck, you HAVE to pick an anti-establishment Communist over a pro-establishment Communist if you're forced into choosing a Communist for a leader, right? Doesn't that make sense at all?

Tod
02-19-2013, 07:15 PM
I decline to vote in this poll. Two worses don't make a better.

Tod
02-19-2013, 07:16 PM
What is up with the home page having Jack's gif? lol

kcchiefs6465
02-19-2013, 07:24 PM
What is up with the home page having Jack's gif? lol
"I didn't do it"

Zippyjuan
02-19-2013, 07:47 PM
Me. I would never do anything as President I don't agree with. Vote for Zippy and as we like to say in Chicago- vote early and vote often!

Dianne
02-19-2013, 08:37 PM
Sorry, my dog would make a better President.. You seem to assert there is power in the Presidency ... Obama.. Bush, Bush, clinton ... Kennedy all were Presidents .. Presidents sound good, but they are controlled by the Bilderberg's .. Anyone lucky enough to have had the votes rigged enough to become President of the United States is some mind controlled robot.

Kennedy tried to buck it.... You know what happened to him... Kennedy's Attorney General Brother, tried to investigate it... you know what happened to him.


The answer to your question is, there is NO PRESIDENT .. there is a CARTEL leader.. but no President. There is no republic anymore... The Mafia now owns every dime you pay into "TAXES?" ... your home... your kids, their futures, your pension, your salary, your SS benefits...

"Welcome, Welcome to the Jungle... I'm gonna make you Bleed... Bleed ... I want to watch you Bleed" ... There is no longer a United States of America.

I realize this country is no longer viable ... I'm searching for another place to move... No loyalty to this piece of chit Mafia controlled Nation... Fuck what they call liberty in the US .. Liberty is only for the wealthy... the poor need not apply.

FrankRep
02-19-2013, 08:58 PM
Would your decision change if you found out that Rubio was actually a Trotsky-ite pro-establishment Communist who only espouses conservative rhetoric to get elected?

I mean, fuck, you HAVE to pick an anti-establishment Communist over a pro-establishment Communist if you're forced into choosing a Communist for a leader, right? Doesn't that make sense at all?

Or we can agree that this is a silly Poll.

Antischism
02-19-2013, 10:27 PM
I have some respect for Chomsky and Kucinich, so those two.

sailingaway
02-19-2013, 11:05 PM
Ron Paul. :p

kahless
02-19-2013, 11:35 PM
http://i.imgur.com/z2gxeWg.gif

Best usage of Jack so far.

oyarde
02-20-2013, 12:27 AM
Well , in reality if you cannot have Jesus ,Ron Paul , Goldwater , then you would need to select Satan. Satan would only sign bills that enabled free markets, eliminated regulation and allowed for maximum prosperity , because he would want all of you to have plenty of money left to sin with.These Socialist /Democrat /Commies are all evil , but probably just athiest , this is why they do not understand how to play this game.

nayjevin
02-20-2013, 01:05 AM
What a troll thread.

1753

Anti Federalist
02-20-2013, 01:25 AM
Or we can agree that this is a silly Poll.

http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/744297_o.gif

Anti Federalist
02-20-2013, 01:29 AM
Jack is everywhere.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy...and so on

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m19iozNSwH1r0kx5qo1_500.png

http://i.imgur.com/gKlcU2W.jpg

http://chrisbaker.typepad.com/.a/6a01156f1b6b31970c01348859a884970c-320wi

http://i.imgur.com/EiM4K1q.jpg

BuddyRey
02-20-2013, 05:22 AM
Even if Marco Rubio was eligible to be President, he's still a foaming-from-the-mouth Zionist and "American exceptionalist" who isn't even that fiscally conservative. Michele Bachmann is the same brand of crazy, but at least she reads Mises.

NCGOPer_for_Paul
02-20-2013, 07:35 AM
How about....NONE OF THOSE!

compromise
02-20-2013, 10:20 AM
If it's a Chomsky-Nader ticket, with Kucinich, Gravel and McKinney in the cabinet, RUBIO 2016. Rubio is mildly retarded, but Chomsky in charge would do unimaginable damage to this country.

BSU kid
02-20-2013, 10:24 AM
Rubio has a few marginally good traits, I dislike him immensely but it is better then straight up enviro-communisim that the offers offer.

nayjevin
03-02-2013, 09:24 AM
A better president than ... ?

Reminds me of the old diet Dr. Pepper commercials: "Diet Dr. Pepper tastes more like the original Dr. Pepper."

I always wondered, "More like the original Dr. Pepper than what? Horse piss?"

Oh, nice, a contextual confusion Nazi. Next you'll be telling me that the correct answer to the poll question is

'None, as prima facie existence of wagering inclination cannot be asserted'

Origanalist
03-02-2013, 09:29 AM
A better president than ... ?

Reminds me of the old diet Dr. Pepper commercials: "Diet Dr. Pepper tastes more like the original Dr. Pepper."

I always wondered, "More like the original Dr. Pepper than what? Horse piss?"

I'm not sure, but I think it would be hard to tell them apart. Dr. pepper might have a couple more mystery flavors.

Occam's Banana
03-02-2013, 09:11 PM
Oh, nice, a contextual confusion Nazi. Next you'll be telling me that the correct answer to the poll question is

'None, as prima facie existence of wagering inclination cannot be asserted'

No ... next I'll be telling you that "Naom Chomsky, Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel, AND Cynthia McKinney" cannot in any sensible way be referred to as "a" president ("better" or otherwise).

Now you can call me a grammar Nazi, as well (and the poll will *still* be just as ridiculous and unilluminating as it was before).

Feeding the Abscess
03-02-2013, 09:29 PM
The president has the most power over troop deployments, foreign policy in general, and whatnot. Domestic policy has more to do with the makeup of Congress. So with that in mind, I'd take anyone from the second group over Rubio. And it's not close.

erowe1
03-02-2013, 09:43 PM
I voted Rubio.

Do I actually think he'd be better? I don't really know. But those others all get far too much love around here, and I'll be no part of that.

Anti Federalist
03-02-2013, 10:43 PM
///

oyarde
03-02-2013, 11:47 PM
So far, I am sticking with my decision on pg 3.

NorfolkPCSolutions
03-03-2013, 04:00 AM
I vote Anti-Federalist. He seems to know what's up

bolil
03-03-2013, 04:11 AM
Anti fed, fer shur.l

nayjevin
03-03-2013, 10:23 AM
No ... next I'll be telling you that "Naom Chomsky, Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel, AND Cynthia McKinney" cannot in any sensible way be referred to as "a" president ("better" or otherwise).

Switzerland:


The Swiss Federal Council (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_Federal_Council) is a seven-member executive council that heads the federal administration (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_administration_of_Switzerland), operating as a combination cabinet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabinet_(government)) and collective presidency (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_presidency).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Switzerland#Executive_branch


Now you can call me a grammar Nazi, as well (and the poll will *still* be just as ridiculous and unilluminating as it was before).

I recommend a new seasoning for your post toasties.

Occam's Banana
03-03-2013, 10:38 AM
Switzerland:

So you're saying the poll concerns the presidency of Switzerland (not the presidency of the United States) ... OK.

In that case, I guess it's even sillier than I thought it was to begin with.