Greg Brannon for US Senate **website**

[GunnyFreedom]

Check out the new digs!

http://gregbrannon.com/

[Spoa]

Check out the new digs!

http://gregbrannon.com/

Awesome. I look forward to looking through the website. Please post this on the 2014 Candidates page so more people will find out!

[Confederate]

Awesome! I checked it on Saturday and it wasn't up yet, very glad it's up now!

[Confederate]

As an OB/GYN for more than twenty-five years, I have been fortunate to deliver more than 9,000 babies and in 2010 I was asked to review and give a declaratory statement of North Carolina’s Women’s Right to Know Act by the North Carolina House Majority Leader.

lol, he beats Ron at least on that.

[SpreadOfLiberty]

Check out the new digs!

http://gregbrannon.com/I was wondering why it was taking so long but now I see why...its great!

[Bastiat's The Law]

Bring on the Brannon!!

[Chester Copperpot]

yay

[Confederate]

Just read through the entire issues pages and I can't say I disagree with a single point.

This guy looks great!

[Bastiat's The Law]

That's a polished website too, nicely done!

[Spoa]

bump for importance!

[SpreadOfLiberty]

Now we just need a wiki page....

[Spoa]

That's a polished website too, nicely done!

Amen. And it was made quite fast and is really neat. A good website isn't everything, but it could be the difference between a successful and an unsuccessful candidate. Candidates with messy, disorganized websites don't encourage me to support them.

[itshappening]

Can we get him a wiki page? There's enough information including public polls, news reports, his website and the fact that he's running to consider him a public figure worthy of one.

Jmdrake can maybe write him one although I'm sure he may need more information about his background than we have in the public domain at this moment in time.

[Confederate]

Can someone link to some sources for Greg Brannon so I can start the wiki page?

[SpreadOfLiberty]

Can someone link to some sources for Greg Brannon so I can start the wiki page?

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/283681-tea-party-challenger-to-mcconnell-emerging

http://carolinalibertypac.com/2013/01/dr-greg-brannon-announces-u-s-senate-run-to-replace-kay-hagan/

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/279797-libertarians-tea-party-unite-around-hagan-challenger

[sluggo]

Awesome! I'll start spreading the word.

[Confederate]

Alright, the page is up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Brannon

Please help with editing and adding information.

[SpreadOfLiberty]

Alright, the page is up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Brannon

Please help with editing and adding information.

Do you know how to put a picture up?

[phill4paul]

http://gregbrannon.com/the-issues/marriage/


As a Christian, I believe marriage is between one man and one woman.

For years, activists have been attempting to use the federal government to force individual states and citizens to accept their view of same-sex marriage.

Unfortunately, the Obama Administration stopped enforcing the Defense of Marriage Act.

The Defense of Marriage Act was enacted in 1996 to stop Big Government in Washington from re-defining marriage and forcing its definition on the States. The Defense of Marriage Act prevents places like San Francisco and New York City from imposing their definition of marriage on North Carolina.

The Obama Administration’s actions are not only an assault on traditional marriage, but show a profound lack of respect for the Constitution and the Rule of Law.

If elected to the U.S. Senate, I pledge to do everything I can to stop bureaucrats and unelected judges from imposing their definition of marriage on the people of North Carolina.

That's the biggest pile of shit I have ever heard. No thank you. Unless his position is government OUT of the definition of marriage then, no. I'm tired of this shit. He is FOR government definition of something that is not governments role.

He doesn't pass the test. Better than Hagan? Yeah. But not enough that I care.

[Confederate]

http://gregbrannon.com/the-issues/marriage/



No thank you. Unless his position is government OUT of the definition of marriage then, no. I'm tired of this shit. He is FOR government definition of something that is not governments role.

He doesn't pass the test. Better than Hagan? Yeah. But not enough that I care.

He says nothing about government defining marriage, he actually says the opposite. He says he will fight against federal bureaucrats and judges imposing their definition of marriage on the people of North Carolina.

[SpreadOfLiberty]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKbSgSzcJg8&feature=youtu.be

[supermario21]

That's Ron Paul's position on marriage. I'm assuming phil4paul supported him. Marriage should either be a state issue or out of government entirely. Seeing that the latter isn't likely, I support the former.

[SpreadOfLiberty]

If you are interesting in support Dr. Brannon join this facebook group:

http://www.facebook.com/groups/510386058979124/?ref=ts&fref=ts

HIS facebook page can be found here: http://www.facebook.com/groups/510386058979124/?ref=ts&fref=ts

And my grassroots page can be accessed in my signature.

[supermario21]

I also love his website. He is going to be a great candidate.

[phill4paul]

He says nothing about government defining marriage, he actually says the opposite. He says he will fight against federal bureaucrats and judges imposing their definition of marriage on the people of North Carolina.


Stop the shit already. He is functioning ON a DEFINITION of marriage as one man/one woman. Defined by government. Benefits. He is fine with the current definitions and the benefits granted by government to men AND women by marriage. His post shows he is FINE with the current definition and that he will endeavor to block any change to this.
Christ, even Gunny, the OP, gave a great speech saying the government needs to be out of issue.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaJ2iF9oLi0

[phill4paul]

That's Ron Paul's position on marriage. I'm assuming phil4paul supported him. Marriage should either be a state issue or out of government entirely. Seeing that the latter isn't likely, I support the former.

It's only unlikely because you support the former.

[SpreadOfLiberty]

Brannon is to the right of Rand Paul on marriage so calm down.

[Confederate]

Stop the shit already. He is functioning ON a DEFINITION of marriage as one man/one woman. Defined by government. Benefits. He is fine with the current definitions and the benefits granted by government to men AND women by marriage. His post shows he is FINE with the current definition and that he will endeavor to block any change to this.
Christ, even Gunny, the OP, gave a great speech saying the government needs to be out of issue.


If you won't support a great candidate because of one tiny issue then you're severely short-sighted.

[supermario21]

Brannon is to the right of Rand Paul on marriage so calm down.

Same with immigration. Will that fly in NC? Certainly in the primary it would.

[phill4paul]

If you won't support a great candidate because of one tiny issue then you're severely short-sighted.

No. I'm just a no shitter. It's kinda funny. The gay marriage issue is not of terrible import to me. I'm straight. But I knew that, even before I had clicked on the marriag link, where he would stand. I don't care for him. Either he is not for government being out of citizens lives (or consequently in others lives as long as it is in alignment w/ his) or he is a panderer.
Either/or is not enough to get my support.

[Spoa]

No. I'm just a no shitter. It's kinda funny. The gay marriage issue is not of terrible import to me. I'm straight. But I knew that, even before I had clicked on the marriag link, where he would stand. I don't care for him. Either he is not for government being out of citizens lives (or consequently in others lives as long as it is in alignment w/ his) or he is a panderer.
Either/or is not enough to get my support.

So you want him to say that he supports same-sex marriage in a state that just passed a marriage amendment defining marriage between one man/one woman? I agree with him personally, but even if you disagree with him, this is such a small issue that will almost never be debated in the near future. We need him in the senate to fight on issues like the debt, against the NDAA and the Patriot Act, and for lower taxes.

[phill4paul]

So you want him to say that he supports same-sex marriage in a state that just passed a marriage amendment defining marriage between one man/one woman? I agree with him personally, but even if you disagree with him, this is such a small issue that will almost never be debated in the near future. We need him in the senate to fight on issues like the debt, against the NDAA and the Patriot Act, and for lower taxes.

dafuq? I don't want him to say anything of the such.

I expect more......


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=XaJ2iF9oLi0#!

EVERY little issue matters. Believe it or not.

^^^ This guy, Gunny, is the best fucking thing that ever happened to N.C. If Brannon is willing to take some advise from him then I'm willing to change my mind.

[Bastiat's The Law]

Can someone link to some sources for Greg Brannon so I can start the wiki page?
During his 2nd amendment speech he spoke about his background in detail.

[sluggo]

This is why we get nowhere.

[Bastiat's The Law]

We're lucky if we can even find a candidate willing to move the ball a few inches towards liberty. A Brannon win would gain YARDS in that endeavor. It would also show the considerable force the liberty movement wields. We could be on the verge of shaping national politics if we play our cards right.

[Brett85]

http://gregbrannon.com/the-issues/marriage/



That's the biggest pile of shit I have ever heard. No thank you. Unless his position is government OUT of the definition of marriage then, no. I'm tired of this shit. He is FOR government definition of something that is not governments role.

He doesn't pass the test. Better than Hagan? Yeah. But not enough that I care.

I'm definitely going to have to donate money to this guy.

[phill4paul]

I'm definitely going to have to donate money to this guy.

I would expect no less.

[phill4paul]

We're lucky if we can even find a candidate willing to move the ball a few inches towards liberty. A Brannon win would gain YARDS in that endeavor. It would also show the considerable force the liberty movement wields. We could be on the verge of shaping national politics if we play our cards right.

Put your left foot in, take your right foot out, do the hookie pookie and shake it all about....

[Brett85]

We're lucky if we can even find a candidate willing to move the ball a few inches towards liberty. A Brannon win would gain YARDS in that endeavor. It would also show the considerable force the liberty movement wields. We could be on the verge of shaping national politics if we play our cards right.

Don't you know that you can't support liberty if you don't support gay marriage? That's the one defining issue that determines whether one supports liberty or not.

[Brett85]

Some of the wording that he uses for his issues positions is basically identical to the wording that Rand used on his website when he was running for the Senate.

[phill4paul]

Don't you know that you can't support liberty if you don't support gay marriage? That's the one defining issue that determines whether one supports liberty or not.

Stop the shit already. I've made my point clear about where a liberty candidate should stand. I even posted a video. It's not about supporting gay marriage. Though to you that is EXACTLY what it is.

[matt0611]

Sounds like a great candidate to me. I'm really glad he's running.

[Brett85]

Stop the shit already. I've made my point clear about where a liberty candidate should stand. I even posted a video. It's not about supporting gay marriage. Though to you that is EXACTLY what it is.

I would still support him if he took your position, or even if he took Jack Hunter's position of supporting actual gay marriage. For most of us there are more important issues.

[matt0611]

http://gregbrannon.com/the-issues/marriage/



That's the biggest pile of shit I have ever heard. No thank you. Unless his position is government OUT of the definition of marriage then, no. I'm tired of this shit. He is FOR government definition of something that is not governments role.

He doesn't pass the test. Better than Hagan? Yeah. But not enough that I care.

He's running to be a US Senator to represent the state of North Carolina in the US Senate.

You think he should be for the Feds telling the people of North Carolina how to handle marriage?

That. Makes. No. Sense.

[Confederate]

He's running to be a US Senator to represent the state of North Carolina in the US Senate.

You think he should be for the Feds telling the people of North Carolina how to handle marriage?

That. Makes. No. Sense.

Exactly. What he said is he will fight against federal interference in North Carolina's affairs. The Constitution does not give the federal government any role in marriage whatsoever and he said he would make sure it remains like that.

[matt0611]

Exactly. What he said is he will fight against federal interference in North Carolina's affairs. The Constitution does not give the federal government any role in marriage whatsoever and he said he would make sure it remains like that.

Yeah, it would be like him saying "I know you guys just voted to change the NC Constitution to define marriage, but I'm actually in favor of the Feds to come in and overrule you to shove gay marriage down your throat weather you want it or not. I'm Greg Brannon and I approve this message!"

Oh yeah, that's a winning platform right there...

[phill4paul]

I would still support him if he took your position, or even if he took Jack Hunter's position of supporting actual gay marriage. For most of us there are more important issues.

Jack Hunter supports gay marriage? Lol. I'll have to google that. That's a new one on me. Really? Or you just jerking my chain?

Back to question at hand. Brannon.

I support ideologically pure candidates. That is all.

I'd just as soon Dems win all the seats. Or neo-cons. Whatever it takes to get to the breaking point.

Incrementalism is the death of a Republic. We are at that gate. I'm fine with that. In fact I've half a mind to start contributing to Dems and anti-gun PACS.

A boil is best brought to a head.

[Brett85]

Jack Hunter supports gay marriage? Lol. I'll have to google that. That's a new one on me. Really? Or you just jerking my chain?

http://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/charleston/the-same-sex-marriage-debate-is-a-distraction/Content?oid=4075897

"In fact, I happen to agree with the president, not only that gay marriage should be legal but also that it should be handled by the states."

[phill4paul]

http://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/charleston/the-same-sex-marriage-debate-is-a-distraction/Content?oid=4075897

"In fact, I happen to agree with the president, not only that gay marriage should be legal but also that it should be handled by the states."

Ah, gotcha. Thanks. That would make sense from Jack's point.

Unfortunately, marriage is an issue wrapped up in federal AND state government.

Brannon it would seem then is fine with taking it to a state level, But on the state level he wants to define it as a man and woman and keep the distraction well within the bonds of government.

My point stands.

[phill4paul]

And don't get me wrong. I'm not saying for anyone else not to support him. I'm just saying I'm out WRT funds and word of mouth grassroot advertising. Over Hagan he would get my vote. That's about it.

[Anti-Neocon]

But on the state level he wants to define it as a man and woman and keep the distraction well within the bonds of government.

My point stands.
He's running for federal office, so what he wants individual states to do is irrelevant.

[GunnyFreedom]

Amen. And it was made quite fast and is really neat. A good website isn't everything, but it could be the difference between a successful and an unsuccessful candidate. Candidates with messy, disorganized websites don't encourage me to support them.

http://www.georgehutchins.com/ :p

[GunnyFreedom]

//

[GunnyFreedom]

Stop the shit already. He is functioning ON a DEFINITION of marriage as one man/one woman. Defined by government. Benefits. He is fine with the current definitions and the benefits granted by government to men AND women by marriage. His post shows he is FINE with the current definition and that he will endeavor to block any change to this.
Christ, even Gunny, the OP, gave a great speech saying the government needs to be out of issue.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaJ2iF9oLi0

Yes, and knowing Greg Brannon personally I know we hold the same position on marriage. There is a reason that Ron Paul, brave as he is to stand in opposition to all the powers, also thought this way but articulated the position identically to Brannon. And NC is worse than Texas in this regard.

[GunnyFreedom]

//

[GunnyFreedom]

//

[GunnyFreedom]

dafuq? I don't want him to say anything of the such.

I expect more......


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=XaJ2iF9oLi0#!

EVERY little issue matters. Believe it or not.

^^^ This guy, Gunny, is the best fucking thing that ever happened to N.C. If Brannon is willing to take some advise from him then I'm willing to change my mind.


Look I appreciate it, but I can tell you as the guy who got Brannon to run in the first place AND as the guy who directly recommended that he take up Ron Paul's rhetoric on the matter to side-step the irrationals in the Primary, that Brannon and I are on the same page of music here.

[GunnyFreedom]

He's running to be a US Senator to represent the state of North Carolina in the US Senate.

You think he should be for the Feds telling the people of North Carolina how to handle marriage?

That. Makes. No. Sense.

Exactly. Peel away the rhetoric and what that position says is simply "No federal definition of marriage" full stop. With a little decoration tossed in to assure the irrationals that he's not about to run around NC performing seam sex marriage ceremonies. The only way, logically, to oppose that position would be to support a federal definition of marriage.

I know for a 100% fact that does not describe Phill.

[GunnyFreedom]

He's running for federal office, so what he wants individual states to do is irrelevant.

Which is why *I* am the one who recommended he take up Ron Paul's rhetoric on the matter even though he agreed with me. Because the State level position is 1000% irrelevant to what Brannon is running for. It's not smart to hemorrhage electoral support based on a completely irrelevant issue to your potential office that straight up 60% of the voters will NOT comprehend anyway no matter how well you articulate it.

[itshappening]

Gunny, are you an unofficial adviser to his campaign? Have you got a plan to move swiftly up in the polls and unite Tea party groups in N.C?

Try and learn the lessons from Rand's campaign in Kentucky. Hopefully we can help Greg with cash and try help the campaign along. Outside endorsements would be nice since it's an open seat they shouldn't be too hard to get.

I really think Brannon has a great chance and it's very similar to Rand in Kentucky, you just need to reach out and convince the primary electorate across the state with his bio, his positions and his activist background. I can't see it being too much of a difficult sell. Remember Rand railed against "career politicians"

[GunnyFreedom]

Gunny, are you an unofficial adviser to his campaign? Have you got a plan to move swiftly up the polls and unite Tea party groups in N.C?

We don't really have to worry about Tea or Liberty, we already have them locked up. We have to break into the mainstream Republican demographics more than anything else. Of course, then we have to worry about liberty people freaking out because he is 0.000001% off of ideal perfection lmao

[itshappening]

We don't really have to worry about Tea or Liberty, we already have them locked up. We have to break into the mainstream Republican demographics more than anything else. Of course, then we have to worry about liberty people freaking out because he is 0.000001% off of ideal perfection lmao

You don't need to worry about them that much, just look at how Rand did. The key period for him was between July-December, he took the lead in December and never looked back. I dont even think he was using paid media by then either... he was just attending lots of meetings and reaching out to the groups and and had a lot of free media coverage.

That's also a key, getting the local TV stations and newspapers to cover him. The recent poll will help, for example the TV networks in the state should now be running pieces like "So who is Dr. Greg Brannon and how is he polling better than the House speaker?" and if they're not you need to be calling them and insisting they get a crew to his office and do it.

[GunnyFreedom]

You don't need to worry about them that much, just look at how Rand did. The key period for him was between July-December, he took the lead in December and never looked back. I dont even think he was using paid media by then either... he was just attending lots of meetings and reaching out to the groups and and had a lot of free media coverage.

That's also a key, getting the local TV stations and newspapers to cover him. The recent poll will help, for example the TV networks in the state should now be running pieces like "So who is Dr. Greg Brannon and how is he polling better than the House speaker?" and if they're not you need to be calling them and insisting they get a crew to his office and do it.

Obviously he's not going to ignore the base, and he has been attending all kinds of meetings. We just know which demog we have to break into.

I'm not his campaign manager, so my input is a bit limited. I'm running for State Vice Chair instead. He has picked Reilly O'Niel as his campaign manager.

[itshappening]

Obviously he's not going to ignore the base, and he has been attending all kinds of meetings. We just know which demog we have to break into.

I'm not his campaign manager, so my input is a bit limited. I'm running for State Vice Chair instead. He has picked Reilly O'Niel as his campaign manager.

We just need the TV network news to cover him in the State and to give him the free media he needs to build his name and the momentum will grow from that like it did in Kentucky with Rand, although because of who Rand's dad is he also got national attention

[itshappening]

For example notice PPP's tweet and their surprise... "we have no idea who he is but Republicans like him".

Well, PPP are based in NC and they're a political polling organization. If they don't know who he is then how do we expect everyone else to?

He needs to reach out to political insiders. Journalists from the network news and state newspapers need to start profiling him and that poll is a good excuse to get the ball rolling. He can then run with it all the way to the nomination .

[GunnyFreedom]

For example notice PPP's tweet and their surprise... "we have no idea who he is but Republicans like him".

Well, PPP are based in NC and they're a political polling organization. If they don't know who he is then how do we expect everyone else to?

He needs to reach out to political insiders. Journalists from the network news and state newspapers need to start profiling him and that poll is a good excuse to get the ball rolling. He can then run with it all the way to the nomination .

If you knew the people at PPP that would not be so much of a mystery. I actually know them personally. Been to the owner's Christmas parties more than once. Anything to the right of Chairman Mao is outside of their comprehension. After that tweet I sent them an email detailing who he was and why he's popular.

[FSP-Rebel]

Of course, then we have to worry about liberty people freaking out because he is 0.000001% off of ideal perfection lmao
small tent mentality complex

[supermario21]

http://us6.campaign-archive1.com/?u=dfe59cfa8720316f956cf5b22&id=b1c30f2fd1

Brannon announces a 2 day kickoff. Good to see he's hitting all parts of the state, big and small.



Brannon Makes it Official: Announces U.S. Senate Campaign Kickoff Tour

RALEIGH, North Carolina - Dr. Greg Brannon, a Cary pro-life Obstetrician and conservative leader in North Carolina, will officially announce his bid to challenge Democrat Senator Kay Hagan with a two-day “Restore the American Dream” kickoff tour on Wednesday, February 27.

The eight-city tour will highlight Greg Brannon's background, his motivation for running and his passion for restoring constitutional government in America. The “Restore the American Dream” tour begins Tuesday morning in Wilmington.





February 27

Wilmington
Greenville
Raleigh
Greensboro

February 28

Monroe
Charlotte
Asheville
Burlington

[compromise]

Nice site. Just donated $25, I'll try to donate more later on. Brannon seems like a great candidate. Keep up the good work with the Brannon campaign, Gunny!

[lx43]

How is Brannon doing so far with fundraising?

[Anti-Neocon]

If only all those Daily Paulers would support real liberty candidates like they willingly threw away millions on "super" brochures... we'd be able to have quite a few victories here.

[Brett85]

If only all those Daily Paulers would support real liberty candidates like they willingly threw away millions on "super" brochures... we'd be able to have quite a few victories here.

The Daily Paulers would rather support more Dennis Kucinich's for political office than support the kind of right-leaning libertarians that we support.

[GunnyFreedom]

How is Brannon doing so far with fundraising?


Just getting kicked off, but the group he has handling that are impressive to say the least.

[Bastiat's The Law]

Gunny, are you an unofficial adviser to his campaign? Have you got a plan to move swiftly up in the polls and unite Tea party groups in N.C?

Try and learn the lessons from Rand's campaign in Kentucky. Hopefully we can help Greg with cash and try help the campaign along. Outside endorsements would be nice since it's an open seat they shouldn't be too hard to get.

I really think Brannon has a great chance and it's very similar to Rand in Kentucky, you just need to reach out and convince the primary electorate across the state with his bio, his positions and his activist background. I can't see it being too much of a difficult sell. Remember Rand railed against "career politicians"
And putting 20k miles on his vehicle crisscrossing the state. Speak true and speak often; Brannon can win this.

[Bastiat's The Law]

small tent mentality complex
Tom Woods would call them the "no gazebo" crowd.

"We love the free house and the 6000 sq. feet, but no gazebo?!?"

[Bastiat's The Law]

Which is why *I* am the one who recommended he take up Ron Paul's rhetoric on the matter even though he agreed with me. Because the State level position is 1000% irrelevant to what Brannon is running for. It's not smart to hemorrhage electoral support based on a completely irrelevant issue to your potential office that straight up 60% of the voters will NOT comprehend anyway no matter how well you articulate it.
Gunny understands the way this game is played.

[brandon]

No time to research right now. WHo is this guy? Is he a serious candidate? Any prior political experience? Any bad associations like neocons/conpsiracytards?

Edit: His website looks really good.

[GunnyFreedom]

No time to research right now. WHo is this guy? Is he a serious candidate? Any prior political experience? Any bad associations like neocons/conpsiracytards?

Edit: His website looks really good.


Take Ron's principles, Rand's rhetoric, and my stubbornness and blend until homogenized.

Apparently he was partly inspired to activism by what I was doing in the House, and I'm the one who encouraged him to run.

[FSP-Rebel]

Take Ron's principles, Rand's rhetoric, and my stubbornness and blend until homogenized.

Apparently he was partly inspired to activism by what I was doing in the House, and I'm the one who encouraged him to run.

solid piece of work, standout i sware. Tru champ

[fr33]

The Daily Paulers would rather support more Dennis Kucinich's for political office than support the kind of right-leaning libertarians that we support.

Daily Paulers seem to have a lot of lunatics among them. That site has gone crazy. Maybe the saner folks leave after elections.

[FSP-Rebel]

Daily Paulers seem to have a lot of lunatics among them. That site has gone crazy. Maybe the saner folks leave after elections.
Very few of the active members actually post anything and I suppose that's similar to here. But, they get somewhere north of 115k guests a day and that could really help in terms of fundraising for activist ventures if they had a mind to use it more effectively. However, between all the banner ads, expensive and cheap, added up with the biannual DP fundraiser it's obvious that Nystrom is in it for the $$$$$ and not to use his audience for effective action to institute change.

[Bastiat's The Law]

Looks like Brannon will kick off a speaking tour tomorrow.

[Anti-Neocon]

If only we cared as much about people like Greg Brannon getting elected as we did about whether or not Glenn Beck is good for liberty... Brannon would probably be our best Senator if we just got him in there, and he also can appeal to teocons and socons, so this is a fight we can win.

[AuH20]

I just sent him a C Note.

[Bastiat's The Law]

Rand needs help in the Senate and Brannon would be huge in that regard.

[AuH20]

If only we cared as much about people like Greg Brannon getting elected as we did about whether or not Glenn Beck is good for liberty... Brannon would probably be our best Senator if we just got him in there, and he also can appeal to teocons and socons, so this is a fight we can win.

Actually, I will contact Beck so he can give this man some airtime. Beck helped Cruz emerge from obscurity and he could help Brannon by merely getting his name out.