PDA

View Full Version : Sheriff: There was no intent to burn cabin to get Dorner




Anti Federalist
02-13-2013, 09:12 PM
FBI at Waco - "This is not an assault! This is not an assault!"


Sheriff: There was no intent to burn cabin to get Dorner

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/02/13/dorner-lapd-officer-fugitive-gunbattle/1915961/

Deputies did not intentionally burn down the Southern California mountain cabin where fugitive Christopher Dorner apparently made his deadly last stand Tuesday, the San Bernardino County sheriff said Wednesday.

"We did not intentionally burn down that cabin to get Mr. Dorner out," Sheriff John McMahon said at an afternoon news conference.

He said deputies initially fired conventional "cold" tear gas into the cabin in Seven Oaks, near Big Bear Lake, then switched to "pyrotechnic-type" rounds" known as "burners."

jj-
02-13-2013, 09:14 PM
ha!

Anti Federalist
02-13-2013, 09:17 PM
Neiman said it was not clear who, if anyone, might claim the reward if the body is confirmed to be that of Dorner.

How about to the person who owns that mountainside home you just burned to the ground?

MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2
02-13-2013, 09:19 PM
They call them "burners" because... meh


It was clear they planned to execute this guy from the outset, if that's even what happened.

I have to say... every level of government lies so much, it's getting pretty impossible to tell truth from fiction, and that's very much to their advantage.

VoluntaryAmerican
02-13-2013, 09:19 PM
Your epic signature is applicable here, AF.

POS tyrant cop just like Dorner.

squarepusher
02-13-2013, 09:23 PM
Don't think anyone buys this story.

phill4paul
02-13-2013, 09:32 PM
"We did not intentionally burn down that cabin to get Mr. Dorner out," Sheriff John McMahon said at an afternoon news conference.

Of course not. They intentionally burnt it down to kill him. That's why U.S. Marshalls "pushed" him back in.

fr33
02-13-2013, 09:33 PM
This is the response to the lie: http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/how-law-enforcement-and-media-covered-plan-burn-christopher-dorner-alive?paging=off

h/t this topic: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?404473-How-Law-Enforcement-and-Media-Covered-Up-the-Plan-to-Burn-Christopher-Dorner-Alive

presence
02-13-2013, 09:59 PM
“We’re gonna go ahead with the plan with the burner,”
one sheriff’s deputy told another.
“Like we talked about.”
Minutes later, another deputy’s voice crackled across the radio:
“The burner’s deployed and we have a fire.”

AGRP
02-13-2013, 10:03 PM
“We’re gonna go ahead with the plan with the burner,”
one sheriff’s deputy told another.
“Like we talked about.”
Minutes later, another deputy’s voice crackled across the radio:
“The burner’s deployed and we have a fire.”

They must have been talking about a bon fire on the other side of the mountain!

lx43
02-13-2013, 10:15 PM
What happened to trial by jury?

Danke
02-13-2013, 10:21 PM
What happened to trial by jury?

http://i.imgur.com/pJMFFZd.gif

FindLiberty
02-13-2013, 10:33 PM
LOL, "pyrotechnic-type rounds" known as "burners".

IMO, intentional...

jj-
02-13-2013, 10:35 PM
What they're saying is "we lighted up a match and put it in, but we didn't mean to burn it".

tod evans
02-14-2013, 03:33 AM
And the solution is to take members of the "Just-Us" department to task in front of other "Just-Us" department minions?

Somehow I can't see justice being accomplished in this manner..:mad:

S.Shorland
02-14-2013, 05:26 AM
"We did not intentionally burn down that cabin to get Mr. Dorner out," If that is his quote,it is not a lie.What he could have said was 'We did intentionally burn down that cabin to get Mr Dorner.' Getting Mr Dorner out was not their intention.

S.Shorland
02-14-2013, 05:31 AM
Can an American citizen contact the ACLU and ask them to present a FOIA request asking about policy vis a vis these pyrotechnic rounds?

tod evans
02-14-2013, 05:35 AM
Can an American citizen contact the ACLU and ask them to present a FOIA request asking about policy vis a vis these pyrotechnic rounds?

The ACLU is no different than another government agency with an agenda....

TywinLannister
02-14-2013, 06:32 AM
http://i.qkme.me/3sz500.jpg

Danke
02-14-2013, 05:13 PM
FBI at Waco - "This is not an assault! This is not an assault!"


Sheriff: There was no intent to burn cabin to get Dorner

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/02/13/dorner-lapd-officer-fugitive-gunbattle/1915961/

Deputies did not intentionally burn down the Southern California mountain cabin where fugitive Christopher Dorner apparently made his deadly last stand Tuesday, the San Bernardino County sheriff said Wednesday.

"We did not intentionally burn down that cabin to get Mr. Dorner out," Sheriff John McMahon said at an afternoon news conference.

He said deputies initially fired conventional "cold" tear gas into the cabin in Seven Oaks, near Big Bear Lake, then switched to "pyrotechnic-type" rounds" known as "burners."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud93F5J2F8shttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud93F5J2F8s

anaconda
02-14-2013, 05:28 PM
I have to say... every level of government lies so much, it's getting pretty impossible to tell truth from fiction, and that's very much to their advantage.


The noose is tightening around our necks. The sheep won't question authority nor demand transparency.

kcchiefs6465
02-14-2013, 05:43 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIpfGFMtaJw
There's a video out that shows the cops throwing some type of grenade or cannister at the cabin. Afterwards smoke can be seen. I'll try and find it if it's not in this one.

kcchiefs6465
02-14-2013, 06:21 PM
What, is no one going to comment on the video? I thought I was bringing breaking video to you guys and all I 'see is crickets.' :o Hell there was only like 94 hits on the video when I first watched it.. I can't imagine too many have seen it. Anyone have some insight on what they were throwing? I'd imagine tear gas canisters would be shot.. I don't know why they would get that close as to throw anything other than a "burner" (presumably) to purposely burn him out.

The whole video is amazing though. Wait until the reporters are out of the way and the automatic fire really opens up. It's plain as day they had no intentions of taking him alive.

The one video I posted in the 32 page long thread has another person who knows nothing about guns speaking. (covering up for the police barrage) Something along the lines of the suspect had a suppressor or gun silencer (where's a laughing smiley when you need one) and you can't hear him shooting. GTFOH. Suppressors do just that, they suppress. What's the standard for cans now days? A 32dB reduction wet? Another thing she was saying was how much it looked like a military operation. There was quite a few things she said that made me shake my head.

shane77m
02-14-2013, 06:32 PM
Backed it up just in case. I would like to know how many rounds they fired at him. Has to be well over a thousand.

CPUd
02-14-2013, 08:09 PM
I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out he shot himself long before they ran up there shooting like that. If he's as familiar with their tactics as was claimed, he would have known if they had him in checkmate.

Anti Federalist
02-14-2013, 09:11 PM
Waco FLIR footage.

People trying to escape, being fired at by FedCoats with full auto weapons.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdgnha3lkc8