Is this tin-foil hat stuff or real concerns? --> foreign soldiers in the hundreds.

[Lord Xar]

Probably already talked about, but is there any meat to the idea that Hundreds of British and Russian soldiers are being trained on U.S. soil for an eventual confrontation with american citizens.

A bit more than a hundred soldiers were laid off near edwards air force base, and subsequently replaced with British soldiers - in the housing.

Also heard that near 80% of American Soldiers would NOT fire on american civilians.....

Is this normal, to train outside forces - I figured it was..... but with the gun grabbing talk, drones able to kill americans without any process, and all those make-believe fema camps.... starting to get curious.

[jcannon98188]

Pretty normal yeah. Back in WW2 We had some Americans training over in Britain for the Air Force. I believe the reasoning is that since we will be fighting together in NATO, it would make sense for us to cross train. That being said, I don't want any of them over here. American Troops only (and let's start getting rid of those). Leave the UN, Leave NATO.

[fr33]

Normal but you should be suspicious. Here's why you should be suspicious: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?403732-Obama-executive-order-exempts-Interpol-from-FOIA-requests-etc

[RonPaulMall]

It is pretty standard stuff. Their governments do the bidding of our government, and as such will be fighting alongside our troops in all our imperialistic adventures. So tight coordination and cooperation is a practical necessity. They certainly aren't going to use foreigners to fight Americans. When that day comes you can assured it will be American troops pulling the trigger and the massacre will be framed as our loyal, patriotic soldiers defending the country against "extremists".

[devil21]

It happens but is always worth watching. It's neither tinfoil nor a real concern (for now). The Russian angle is interesting though (assuming your info is correct) because of all of the anti-Russia propaganda from the gov't and media. They can't be too unfriendly if we're training their soldiers here.

[juleswin]

It happens but is always worth watching. It's neither tinfoil nor a real concern (for now). The Russian angle is interesting though (assuming your info is correct) because of all of the anti-Russia propaganda from the gov't and media. They can't be too unfriendly if we're training their soldiers here.

The Russian angle is exactly what tells you it is dis info or tin foil conspiracy. How in the world would Russia who has done everything in its power to foil the US take over of Syria could be at the same time running military drills with the US? I just cant believe that sort of stories that makes very little sense. There is still a possibility that it is true, but I will just need to see video/pictures and confirmation from both govts to believe it

[acptulsa]

Back in WW2 We had some Americans training over in Britain for the Air Force. I believe the reasoning is that since we will be fighting together in NATO, it would make sense for us to cross train.

NATO didn't exist yet during WWII. Our pilots trained over there because we hadn't been in a war in twenty years, while they were in the middle of one and knew what was going on. And because those pilots were going to be working in Britain with the Brits to defend Britain. Today, we've not been able to go a decade without at least a police action in the last seventy years, and we don't need their help to defend ourselves. So, that excuse doesn't hold water any more.

This would be a non-issue if we were sticking to our principles and keeping the standing army from policing us here at home. But that principle is increasingly being ignored. So, yes, this looks like a cause for concern to me. Murphy's Law says, whatever can go wrong will go wrong. And much can go wrong with this.

[libertygrl]

It happens but is always worth watching. It's neither tinfoil nor a real concern (for now). The Russian angle is interesting though (assuming your info is correct) because of all of the anti-Russia propaganda from the gov't and media. They can't be too unfriendly if we're training their soldiers here.

Exactly. This morning I began reading the first few pages from the 2000 book, "Barbarians Inside the Gates: The Black Book of Bolshevism" by Donn de Grand Pre". I haven't gone beyond the first few pages but your post connected with me from what little I read. It's a must have book and I'm learning things I never knew before:

LEAGUE TO ENFORCE PEACE:

The United Nations Charter was purposely designed as an instrument of force. Patterned after the Soviet constitution it even allowed for a Soviet Commander-in-chief of the UN forces. Those who fought in Korea served under that commander. They thought Gen. Collins, the chief of staff of the US Army was "the boss". He was not. A Soviet Bolshevik was.

The UN Undersecretary for Political and Security Affairs from 1949 -1953, Kostantin E. Zinchenko of the USSR occupied that position. He was in fact "the boss" and orchestrated the defaet of the UN forces in N. Korea.None of the men fighting in Korea realized that. Not even Gen. Collins or Gen MacArthur was aware until after the "peace" negotiations that our politicians -including Presidents Truman and Eisenhower - had sold us out to a twin-headed monstor, the Zionist-Bolshevist and the Fabian Socialist, whose heads occasionally snarl and spit at each other, but in fact are joined to the same body.

Bear in mind that it is not "Jewish," although many of its individual components are in fact Zionist-Bolshevist Jews. Neither is it Christian, although an equivalent number purport to be Christians. The two headed monster is comprised of Jews who are not Jews and Christians who arre not Christian, for this Bicephalous Monster is in fact satanic.

The late Representative Usher L. Burdick of North Dakota knew who was in charge. He delivered a scathing speech on 17 Jan 1957 on the floor of the House in which he said: The Russians are and will continue to be on the inside of any Military Action taken by the Security Council of the United Nations.

This is still not general knowledge, for the mainstream press has surpressed it over the years; yet, today, the UN Security Council is the prime instrument for global conquest and establishment of the New World Order. And this, of course, is exactly the way the UN founders intended it to be.

Let's look back briefly to a statement by the first Secretary General for the UN, Trygve Lie, who said in his book, Cause for Peace:
"Vyshinski was the first to inform me of an understanding which the Big Five had reached in London on the appointment of a Soviet national as Assistant Secretary-General for Political and Security Affairs."

Who sold us out to the Soviets? We can cite the litany of our country's traitors starting with FDR and those that surrounded him, such as Alger Hiss, Harry Hopkins, Henry Morganthau Jr., Bernard Baruch, Samuel Rosenmann, Harry Dexter White (Weiss), et al, but it was Edward Stettinius who had agreed in London that the USSR would get that post.

The "Ultimate Dictator" gets his marching orders in Chapter VII of the Charter that says in part under Article 47: The Military Staff Committee shall be responsible under the Security for the strategic direction of any armed forces placed at the disposal of the Security Council.

*************************

You can download a free pdf of the book here: h ttp://iamthewitness.com/books/index.php?dir=Donn.de.Grand.Pre%2F

[Todd]

Yes. We train Foreign troops in US military schools. But they are exempt from certain classes for security purposes. Not once in my travels have I seen a foreign soldier on US soil acting in an authority capacity.

[Anti Federalist]

It is pretty standard stuff. Their governments do the bidding of our government, and as such will be fighting alongside our troops in all our imperialistic adventures. So tight coordination and cooperation is a practical necessity. They certainly aren't going to use foreigners to fight Americans. When that day comes you can assured it will be American troops pulling the trigger and the massacre will be framed as our loyal, patriotic soldiers defending the country against "extremists".

Yup, that it will be...stamping out the nests of viscious, reactionary holdouts.

[sailingaway]

It's absolutely conditioning towards globalism. and those idiots thinking we will hold the strings are delusional, imho.

[Anti Federalist]

NATO didn't exist yet during WWII. Our pilots trained over there because we hadn't been in a war in twenty years, while they were in the middle of one and knew what was going on. And because those pilots were going to be working in Britain with the Brits to defend Britain. Today, we've not been able to go a decade without at least a police action in the last seventy years, and we don't need their help to defend ourselves. So, that excuse doesn't hold water any more.

This would be a non-issue if we were sticking to our principles and keeping the standing army from policing us here at home. But that principle is increasingly being ignored. So, yes, this looks like a cause for concern to me. Murphy's Law says, whatever can go wrong will go wrong. And much can go wrong with this.

Exactly.