pulp8721
02-06-2013, 09:07 PM
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2013/02/06/john-brennan-as-cia-chief-would-serve-his-own-interests-not-americas/
For those who don't have time to read the article, he lists 4 reasons why he shouldn't be CIA chief:
1) In '96, he stopped sending Michael's requests to Saudi Intelligence for their info on Bin Laden because they were "getting annoyed by them".
2) In '98, he convinced high level security personnel to cancel a capture raid on Bin Laden, only to support it after the embassy bombings.
3) In '10, he said "Jihad" is not correctly attributed with Al-Queda (Basically P.C BS)
4) He's basically a incompetent kiss-ass, who's bad at his job.
For those who don't have time to read the article, he lists 4 reasons why he shouldn't be CIA chief:
1) In '96, he stopped sending Michael's requests to Saudi Intelligence for their info on Bin Laden because they were "getting annoyed by them".
2) In '98, he convinced high level security personnel to cancel a capture raid on Bin Laden, only to support it after the embassy bombings.
3) In '10, he said "Jihad" is not correctly attributed with Al-Queda (Basically P.C BS)
4) He's basically a incompetent kiss-ass, who's bad at his job.