SeanEdwards
06-22-2007, 12:16 PM
Watching CNN right now, and there's a story about a poor girl whose feet were severed by a malfunctioning thrill ride.
The CNN story featured some woman, whose entire commentary consisted of:
"Theme Parks are exempted from Federal oversight. That means there will be no federal investigation of the incident. If this incident had involved a worker in a factory, then Federal investigators would be able to come in and make sure nothing like this ever happens again anywhere in the U.S." :rolleyes:
Why does the MSM endorse this nonsense, and why does the public lap this tripe up? Why can't a fat lawsuit judgement against the theme park, or the public deciding to not visit a theme park that has rides that chop off patrons legs, take care of the issue? I just don't get it. :confused:
The CNN story featured some woman, whose entire commentary consisted of:
"Theme Parks are exempted from Federal oversight. That means there will be no federal investigation of the incident. If this incident had involved a worker in a factory, then Federal investigators would be able to come in and make sure nothing like this ever happens again anywhere in the U.S." :rolleyes:
Why does the MSM endorse this nonsense, and why does the public lap this tripe up? Why can't a fat lawsuit judgement against the theme park, or the public deciding to not visit a theme park that has rides that chop off patrons legs, take care of the issue? I just don't get it. :confused: