PDA

View Full Version : NJ Paper Compares Liberty Lovers to Terrorist




VoluntaryAmerican
01-28-2013, 08:34 AM
For those who strain to understand why anyone needs an arsenal of Uzis in his garage, here’s the standard argument: What restrains the American government from imposing all-out tyranny isn’t the rule of law, but a small contingent of gun hoarders.
You know who: the tin-can-shooting survivalists, armed with a stockpile of weaponry, a backpack full of food, a rabid fear of the United Nations and the utmost conviction that President Obama is secretly a communist. The Antichrist. Or both.

When these people hear “balance of power,” they’re not thinking the three co-equal branches of our federal government. No, what they’re thinking is the “jackbooted government thugs” vs. “my stash of rifles.” Because that’s what makes the United States government pause and reconsider its evil plans — right?

Never mind the independent judiciary, due process of law, democratic elections or founding principles such as the separation of church and state. As far as these guys are concerned, all that stands between civil society and total apocalypse is the Second Amendment. And by necessity, that includes everybody and their neighbor’s right to own rapid-fire, military-style rifles with body-armor piercing bullets. Assault weapons ban be damned.

But wait: If you’re truly locked in an arms race with the federal government, why stop there? Think about it: If you actually believe that the U.S. military would go along with a totalitarian scheme to gut American freedoms, hatched by some Grand Poobah in the White House, what good will your Bushmaster do against a professional fleet of shoulder-fired grenade launchers?

You’re going to need a bazooka, too. And if those “government thugs” that National Rifle Association CEO Wayne LaPierre warned us about, who “harass, intimidate, even murder law-abiding citizens,” decide to drive their armored battle tanks past the perimeter of your driveway, mortar rounds won’t do much. You’ve got to get yourself a military fighter jet. Or maybe a few missile-launching drones.

When civilization crumbles, you’ll be fighting your neighbors, too. So if the guy next door tramples your daffodils with his own personal armored tank and all you’ve got is a couple of Uzis, what does that make you?

Just another angry gunslinger planning an armed revolt against his own government, with a garage full of assault weapons and mags that nobody had better confiscate.

Does that sound like a “patriot” or a terrorist to you?

http://blog.nj.com/njv_editorial_page/2013/01/youre_not_protecting_us_agains.html#incart_river_d efault

jkr
01-28-2013, 08:36 AM
put this asshole on the first train

TheTexan
01-28-2013, 08:40 AM
You’re going to need a bazooka, too.

Yep. Will definitely need bazookas, too.

VoluntaryAmerican
01-28-2013, 08:42 AM
put this asshole on the first train

Multiple assholes, this was written by the NJ Star Ledger's Editorial Board. Star Ledger is the biggest paper in NJ.

Athan
01-28-2013, 08:46 AM
I think we need bazookas, RPG's, grenades, and explosive ordinaces! That way if the media wants to come attack on the second ammendment they are going to have to FIRST try to reban those first, THEN try again with firearms! lol! Time to gain some ground people!

TheTexan
01-28-2013, 08:46 AM
I'd say this latest gun-grab attempt is proof that our weapons do inhibit the growth of tyranny. If the threat of revolution did not exist, the gun-grabbers would be more honest and instead try to repeal the 2nd amendment. Instead, they deceptively try to subvert it using the manipulation of language and distortion of its purpose.

As for "democratic elections"... that's what got us here in the first place. That's also what got Hitler elected.

Arms are a minority's only defense against the tyranny of the majority.

phill4paul
01-28-2013, 08:47 AM
Ah, the old "Their ORDINANCE is greater than the sum of your small arms" fallacy.

kathy88
01-28-2013, 08:51 AM
Reported for posting propoganda.

VoluntaryAmerican
01-28-2013, 08:51 AM
Comment section is looking pretty good.

TheTexan
01-28-2013, 08:52 AM
The bottom line is, they will never understand this argument, because they love where this country is at and where its headed.

Because they can never understand this argument, they will never respect it.

VoluntaryAmerican
01-28-2013, 09:00 AM
The bottom line is, they will never understand this argument, because they love where this country is at and where its headed.

Because they can never understand this argument, they will never respect it.

Yup.

There has been multiple articles on the same paper about gun buyback programs "success" in Trenton and Camden.

Origanalist
01-28-2013, 09:14 AM
Comment section is looking pretty good.

Yep, they are ripping that garbage up. :)

BAllen
01-28-2013, 12:34 PM
Is this liberal rag going broke like the others? I sure hope so. They deserve it.

sailingaway
01-28-2013, 12:35 PM
And I think they're terrorists. Nya nya nya.

What actual NEWS is occurring? Because calling us names is only expected by this point.

Anti Federalist
01-28-2013, 12:52 PM
Lines are forming...

Just started watching "John Adams" again with the kids.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Had the word been coined yet, Adams (both) and Revere and Knox and Warren and Otis and all the rest would have been branded "terrorists".

The only thing that has changed is the amount of tyranny people will put up with.

King George was guilty of benign neglect and a hot temper, that's about it.

We suffer under manifestly greater tyranny than King George could have ever imagined or implemented.

Anti Federalist
01-28-2013, 12:57 PM
Terrorist

http://www.biography.com/imported/images/Biography/Images/Profiles/A/Samuel-Adams-9176129-1-402.jpg

Origanalist
01-28-2013, 01:02 PM
Lines are forming...

Just started watching "John Adams" again with the kids.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Had the word been coined yet, Adams (both) and Revere and Knox and Warren and Otis and all the rest would have been branded "terrorists".

The only thing that has changed is the amount of tyranny people will put up with.

King George was guilty of benign neglect and a hot temper, that's about it.

We suffer under manifestly greater tyranny than King George could have ever imagined or implemented.

They didn't have the art of indoctrination mastered as well back then.

phill4paul
01-28-2013, 01:06 PM
We suffer under manifestly greater tyranny than King George could have ever imagined or implemented.

Truer words............

pcosmar
01-28-2013, 01:11 PM
Jeeze,, I have been called that so often over the last few years I am beginning to embrace it.

Kinda makes me wonder about all those other "terrorists" out there.

Lucille
01-28-2013, 01:14 PM
But wait: If you’re truly locked in an arms race with the federal government, why stop there? Think about it: If you actually believe that the U.S. military would go along with a totalitarian scheme to gut American freedoms, hatched by some Grand Poobah in the White House, what good will your Bushmaster do against a professional fleet of shoulder-fired grenade launchers?

The Pentagon can't even beat a couple ten thousand Afghan peasants armed with AKs, and it's been 11 years.

CaptUSA
01-28-2013, 01:18 PM
Never mind the independent judiciary (that we have bought and who will rubber stamp whatever BS we can dream up) , due process of law (tee hee, we can't even say any more this without laughing) , democratic elections (where we pick both sides to make you feel like you have a choice) or founding principles such as the separation of church and state (where we have turned the state into the church where you will obey and pray at our convenience).

Ok, I think I fixed that for him...

Occam's Banana
01-28-2013, 01:24 PM
Does that sound like a “patriot” or a terrorist to you?

Actually, it doesn't sound like either of those things to me. What it sounds like is journalistic jackassery. THAT'S what it sounds like.

Occam's Banana
01-28-2013, 01:33 PM
Would love to see Paul Mulshine pick this garbage to pieces: http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/index.html

XTreat
01-28-2013, 02:47 PM
Tell the Afghani's that few AK-47s won't stop a well trained army.

tod evans
01-28-2013, 02:53 PM
put this asshole on the first train

Nah, a couple of well timed no-knock drug raids on their homes might convince them otherwise..

Danke
01-28-2013, 05:16 PM
You’re going to need a bazooka, too. And if those “government thugs” that National Rifle Association CEO Wayne LaPierre warned us about, who “harass, intimidate, even murder law-abiding citizens,” decide to drive their armored battle tanks past the perimeter of your driveway, mortar rounds won’t do much. You’ve got to get yourself a military fighter jet. Or maybe a few missile-launching drones.

Correct.