PDA

View Full Version : NRA needs to have Kids at conference too just like Obama is going to do tomorrow




BnXmkpfrME
01-15-2013, 01:03 PM
Yep This is why I have a gun....as a father for their protection.
Gentlemen it is time to fight as the feel good pregressives do. If they want to have a "for the children" photo op then we need to do one too and hammer home the protection of the kids IS WHY WE CARRY. Govt cant protect us BECAUSE THEY CANT CONTROL CRIME.



(is the New York Mob going along with the gun ban????)

Original_Intent
01-15-2013, 01:19 PM
I know it would be in poor taste, but someone needs to make a poster of Jewish kids in concentration camps that reads "Arm yourselves: Do it for the children!"

OK, pardon my poor taste:

http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb17/Denryu/Keeparms_zpsfa77d1c9.jpg

phill4paul
01-15-2013, 01:38 PM
The left would scream and say that children shouldn't be forced to stand up for gun rights and that the parents should be investigated by DSS.

adisongrace
01-15-2013, 01:41 PM
http://www.secretsofthefed.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/bs.jpg

But no one is guiding the narrative.... lol.

Even the BSOA are being brainwashed into the idea of elite superiority
and their right to control our guns.

CaptUSA
01-15-2013, 01:44 PM
Anyone else feel like Rand's gonna come back from Israel, look at his fellow party members, and be like, "What the hell did you guys do while I was gone?!"


A President parading around little kids whose parents will be losing the ability to protect them... What a sick, sick world in which we live...

Lucille
01-15-2013, 01:47 PM
I disagree. I don't think shameless demagoguery should be countered with more shameless demagoguery. And screw the NRA (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/09/james-buchanan-rip_n_2443693.html?utm_hp_ref=the-agitator).


The NRA claims to stand for the rights of gun owners. But the most important gun rights case to come before the Supreme Court in 80 years was the Heller case in 2008. The NRA fought like hell to try to prevent it from happening--at least until the very end. The organization will claim that it fought Heller because it wasn't the right test case, or because the makeup of the Court wasn't right. But some close to the case have suggested--plausibly I think--that the organization fought the case in the early stages because it wasn't brought by the NRA, and the group would look foolish if such an important case for gun rights had been initiated by someone other than the NRA. Which is to say that the NRA was more interested in protecting the NRA than in protecting the rights of gun owners.

erowe1
01-15-2013, 01:48 PM
I don't think the NRA should pretend to care about the second amendment.

But if some other group wants to speak out on behalf of our right to bear arms, I still don't think they should go the adorable kid route. I think they should muster up a few thousand armed-to-the-teeth rednecks with a giant banner saying, "Don't even think about it!"

Philhelm
01-15-2013, 01:57 PM
I don't think the NRA should pretend to care about the second amendment.

But if some other group wants to speak out on behalf of our right to bear arms, I still don't think they should go the adorable kid route. I think they should muster up a few thousand armed-to-the-teeth rednecks with a giant banner saying, "Don't even think about it!"

Don't you mean "armed-to-the-tooth?" ;)

erowe1
01-15-2013, 01:58 PM
Don't you mean "armed-to-the-tooth?" ;)

Very good point.

puppetmaster
01-15-2013, 02:25 PM
I know it would be in poor taste, but someone needs to make a poster of Jewish kids in concentration camps that reads "Arm yourselves: Do it for the children!"

OK, pardon my poor taste:

http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb17/Denryu/Keeparms_zpsfa77d1c9.jpg

History is never in poor taste