PDA

View Full Version : Piers Morgan and Guests Discuss Shooting Alex Jones




cajuncocoa
01-09-2013, 07:29 AM
Some sports columnist on Piers Morgan just made a joke about shooting Alex Jones in a boxing ring with an AR-15. The whole panel chuckled.:confused:

Daily Beast writer Buzz Bissinger says Piers Morgan should “pop” Alex Jones with a semi-automatic weapon.
Aaron Dykes
Infowars.com
January 8, 2013

CNN and the gun grabbing media are now calling for Alex Jones to be shot the day after his heated appearance with Piers Morgan.

In a segment on Piers Morgan’s CNN program, sports columnist for the Daily Beast, Buzz Bissinger, shockingly states:

“I don’t care what the justification is that you’re allowed in this country to own a semi-automatic weapon – much less a handgun. But what do you need a semi-automatic weapon for? The only reason I think you’d need it is, Piers, challenge Alex Jones to a boxing match, show up with a semi-automatic that you got legally and pop him.”

Abby Huntsman (Huffington Post) : “I’d love to see that… [laughter] in uniform.”

Piers Morgan: “I’ll borrow my brothers uniform.”

More: http://www.infowars.com/veiled-threat-piers-morgan-guest-says-shoot-alex-jones/

truelies
01-09-2013, 07:39 AM
of course these people want to kill those who dare resist them.

jkr
01-09-2013, 07:53 AM
isnt this inciting violence?

jmdrake
01-09-2013, 08:15 AM
More proof that Alex Jones got under Piers Morgan's skin and was doing something right. Haters gonna hate.

squarepusher
01-09-2013, 08:17 AM
More proof that Alex Jones got under Piers Morgan's skin and was doing something right. Haters gonna hate.

I think its the other way around, Alex Jones challeneges him to a boxing match.

jclay2
01-09-2013, 08:24 AM
This definitely makes me feel better about the interview. I was ok with the interview, but thought people would have a real negative response. To my surprise, there was a lot of support for the tirade against piers.

FindLiberty
01-09-2013, 08:36 AM
Before the crazy wagon is sent out to pick up and sedate AJ, I wish they'd consider who is originating actual "semi-auto gun violence" threats (murder).

CNN's Buzz Bissinger and Abby Huntsman (Huffington Post) with Piers Morgan aiding and abetting (providing uniform).

luctor-et-emergo
01-09-2013, 08:44 AM
Before the crazy wagon is sent out to pick up and sedate AJ, I wish they'd consider who is originating actual "semi-auto gun violence" threats (murder).

CNN's Buzz Bissinger and Abby Huntsman (Huffington Post) with Piers Morgan aiding and abetting (providing uniform).

Isn't that the daughter of Jon Huntsman ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abby_Huntsman

liberty2897
01-09-2013, 08:48 AM
The only people that seem to be suggesting murdering (shooting) various people over their issue with guns are the gun-grabbers. Maybe they don't want guns because of their own issues with controlling their murderous desires.

PaulConventionWV
01-09-2013, 08:48 AM
Daily Beast writer Buzz Bissinger says Piers Morgan should “pop” Alex Jones with a semi-automatic weapon.
Aaron Dykes
Infowars.com
January 8, 2013

CNN and the gun grabbing media are now calling for Alex Jones to be shot the day after his heated appearance with Piers Morgan.

In a segment on Piers Morgan’s CNN program, sports columnist for the Daily Beast, Buzz Bissinger, shockingly states:

“I don’t care what the justification is that you’re allowed in this country to own a semi-automatic weapon – much less a handgun. But what do you need a semi-automatic weapon for? The only reason I think you’d need it is, Piers, challenge Alex Jones to a boxing match, show up with a semi-automatic that you got legally and pop him.”

Abby Huntsman (Huffington Post) : “I’d love to see that… [laughter] in uniform.”

Piers Morgan: “I’ll borrow my brothers uniform.”

More: http://www.infowars.com/veiled-threat-piers-morgan-guest-says-shoot-alex-jones/

It disturbs me to no end how people can joke about this. Shooting someone who disagrees with them on gun rights. It's kind of a Freudian joke if you ask me. They act like they're joking, but their intentions are not much better. They would probably do it if it wasn't frowned upon to do so. I occasionally hear atheists joking the same way about converting someone at the point of a gun. They're joking, but in both cases, it seems to me like they're just daydreaming.

PaulConventionWV
01-09-2013, 08:50 AM
isnt this inciting violence?

No, it's a joke but that doesn't mean it doesn't have hidden malice.

PaulConventionWV
01-09-2013, 08:53 AM
The only people that seem to be suggesting murdering (shooting) various people over their issue with guns are the gun-grabbers. Maybe they don't want guns because of their own issues with controlling their murderous desires.

I think that's part of it. It would be comical how badly they can't seem to hide it if it wasn't so serious.

airborne373
01-09-2013, 09:25 AM
CNN & Crew also made a veiled threat against Alex Jones' children. On an earlier program a quest expressed hope that Alex Jones children would not be killed. Could you imagine being at home with your family and having your lives directly threatened by the national media?

This will be allowed to "pass" just like all the other crimes committed against us. All the while little narcissistic nobodies bitch about Alex Jones style.

pcosmar
01-09-2013, 09:30 AM
Two notes,,

They are calling AJ Crazy,, and casually talking about murdering him. (who's crazy?)

And wearing a uniform (even borrowed) makes Murder OK. (who's crazy?)

cajuncocoa
01-09-2013, 09:41 AM
Remember this from just two years ago? My, how hypocritical the Left can be.

Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' blood is on Sarah Palin's hands after putting cross hair over district



MCNAMEE/GETTY
Sarah Palin should've known what she was doing when she put a target on Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (below). Palin might as well have said, 'Fire!'

Here is what Sarah Palin (http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/Sarah+Palin) said on the Facebook (http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/Facebook+Inc.) page where she depicted Gabrielle Giffords (http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/Gabrielle+Giffords) in the cross hairs of a rifle scope: "Don't retreat! Instead - RELOAD!"


Well, the guy who shot Giffords yesterday managed to keep firing until he killed six, including a child, and wounded 13 .


Palin would no doubt say that she was only speaking in metaphor, that she only meant her followers should work to unseat Giffords and 19 other Democrats (http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/U.S.+Democratic+Party) who had roused her ire by voting for health care.


But anyone with any sense at all knows that violent language can incite actual violence, that metaphor can incite murder. At the very least, Palin added to a climate of violence.


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/rep-gabrielle-giffords-blood-sarah-palin-hands-putting-cross-hair-district-article-1.149099#ixzz2HUbq3nfo

(http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/rep-gabrielle-giffords-blood-sarah-palin-hands-putting-cross-hair-district-article-1.149099#ixzz2HUbq3nfo)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sarah Palin's PAC Puts Gun Sights On Democrats She's Targeting In 2010

Sarah Palin is targeting -- yes, with gun sights -- House Democrats facing tough reelection fights who voted for health care reform.

Palin's Facebook page now carries a map featuring 20 gun sights, one for each of the Democrats targeted this year by her political action committee SarahPAC. Three of the gun sights, those where incumbent Democrats have already announced their retirement, are colored red.


http://i.huffpost.com/gen/235504/SARAH-PALIN-TARGET-LIST.jpg

Likewise, Palin's rhetoric is decidedly militant. "We'll aim for these races and many others," she wrote on her Facebook page. "This is just the first salvo in a fight to elect people across the nation who will bring common sense to Washington. Please go to sarahpac.com and join me in the fight."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/24/sarah-palins-pac-puts-gun_n_511433.html

^^Oh, look! It's Huffington Post, the same website where they joke of shooting Alex Jones. http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t270/cajuncocoa/Emoticons/dry.gif

Lucille
01-09-2013, 09:59 AM
The only people that seem to be suggesting murdering (shooting) various people over their issue with guns are the gun-grabbers. Maybe they don't want guns because of their own issues with controlling their murderous desires.

Progs really are violent people (http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20121230/OPINION01/312300033/Kaul-Nation-needs-new-agenda-guns).


•Declare the NRA a terrorist organization and make membership illegal. Hey! We did it to the Communist Party, and the NRA has led to the deaths of more of us than American Commies ever did. (I would also raze the organization’s headquarters, clear the rubble and salt the earth, but that’s optional.) Make ownership of unlicensed assault rifles a felony. If some people refused to give up their guns, that “prying the guns from their cold, dead hands” thing works for me.

• Then I would tie Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, our esteemed Republican leaders, to the back of a Chevy pickup truck and drag them around a parking lot until they saw the light on gun control.

And if that didn’t work, I’d adopt radical measures...

kcchiefs6465
01-09-2013, 10:03 AM
Piers Morgan and company are complete idiots. Luckily Alex Jones is armed and able to defend himself.

jmdrake
01-09-2013, 10:45 AM
I think its the other way around, Alex Jones challeneges him to a boxing match.

Oh I'm sure PM irked AJ for how he treated Larry Pratt. That said, the boxing match challenge got under Piers Morgan's skin.

Dr.3D
01-09-2013, 11:09 AM
Now I think I understand why those people want firearms banned. I believe it's because they know they couldn't be trusted with firearms if they had them and can't understand why anybody should be. They feel they couldn't contain themselves if they have a firearm handy and would lose their temper and kill somebody.

Could this be the real reason these people are afraid of letting people carry firearms. Is it that they know they would probably do bad things with them if they had them?

specsaregood
01-09-2013, 11:15 AM
That said, the boxing match challenge got under Piers Morgan's skin.

Because he is an emasculated wimp. just saying, I'd take AJ up on that offer; it wasnt like he was challenging him to a thunderdome match. The best part of that interview is how AJ proved morgan to be powerless.

Lucille
01-09-2013, 11:43 AM
'Piers Morgan and Guests Discuss Shooting Alex Jones' (http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/130274.html)


In my experience, gun controllers are violent people, and private gun-owners are not. That is, gun controllers support mass murder; they just want it to be a monopoly of soldiers, police, etc. They would be glad to see Alex and the rest of us shot. Gun owners tend to abhor personal violence, and would only use it in defense of their family, themselves, and their property. And this is not a left-right issue. Non-commissar leftists like the late Alexander Cockburn are anti-gun control; neocons like Bill Kristol or the Randites are pro-gun control. Here is something that all good people across the spectrum can agree on: the state should be disarmed; the people should be packing.

Tod
01-09-2013, 11:48 AM
Bob:
How many more little girls have to die before fools with NRA bumper stickers and fantasies of grandiose realize the 2nd amendment is no longer worth the paper it is written on. Not a single gun nut I know has either the money nor the skills to fight an M1A1 Abraham tank as it rolls over them at 45 mph. The NRA is, at it's core, a bunch of crazy people using the dream of dying a traitor as their rallying cry. It is time to repeal the 2nd amendment as it is obviously doing much harm and has zero value today.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/08/16416443-help-me-911-call-reveals-teens-desperation-after-relatives-shot-in-aurora-theater?lite



Jeff:
Answer me this. Just why do you think the criminals will turn in their guns? You want to deprive those of us who wish to protect our loved ones and ourselves from those that would do us harm. Frankly, there is NO difference between an assault rifle and a hunting rifle. It just looks different. A semi-automatic is a semi-automatic. There is also a HUGE faction that use what you would call an assault rifle for competition and sport. The truth of the matter, "assault rifles" have been used for very few murders

How about the almost 1 million people that defended themselves with a firearm? based on survey data from a 2000 study published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, U.S. civilians use guns to defend themselves and others from crime at least 989,883 times per year. How many of them would have been killed or seriously injured had they NOT been armed. While you are willing to label us as fools, gun nuts is that really fair? Perhaps we will start labeling people on your side of the argument fools, anti-gun nuts and targets! Why do people in an argument feel they have to resort to name calling. State your FACTS, but allow others to also feel the way they feel.

Bob:
Oh, hand guns are the biggest problem. I forget whether it is 40% or 48% of all murders are with hand guns. Assault rifles just kill more people in a shorter period of time. It's very simple. You don't need a 30 round clip to kill deer. A single shot bolt action will work perfectly... if you know how to shoot.

LOL Jeff there are multiple murders every day reported in the news. Yet only one or two stories of someone protecting themselves with a gun a year surface. And you seriously believe there are like 10 crimes prevented by a gun for ever murder? Such a claim is preposterous.



Jeff:
Handguns are also the largest group of weapons use DEFENSIVELY by civilians. You are try to take that right away from civilians. I am NOT talking from what I do not know. I HAD TO DRAW MY WEAPON ONCE, had I not been armed in the situation, I probably WOULD NOT BE HERE. I will NEVER agree unarming the public is good idea. Assault rifles.. big deal. You can kill more people in a classroom in a shorter time with a bucket of gasoline and a match. Not only that. there are 350,000,000 firearms in US. Ask the people to buy them back, turn them in. How many criminals are going to do this?? NONE! just ask the people Australia how will that worked out.

No, it isn't what we call "news" here in the US. It is also often not a crime and is only superficially reported if at all to the police. I reported my incident but there was not official case as I drew my weapon and that made the perps back off. No crime was committed. There is nothing to report for incidents like this.

Carl:
As usual, Bob has no idea of which he speaks. Guns don't kill people, people kill people. There were just over 300 people killed with what is termed an assault weapon last year. There were close to 500 killed with a hammer. Why don't you go after hammers also. How about abortions? 350,000 by planned parenthood alone. Lets go after them as murderers. Make the tools or their trade illegal. You are such a fool for buying into the liberal plan to disarm everyone and set up a new socialist government that will result in millions of state sponsored murders, just like Stalin's Russia, Hitler's Germany, Pol Pots Cambodia, etc. etc.

Mike:
You ^ may have got some of of that ^ from this.. http://www.facebook.com/#!/photo.php?fbid=413022995446604&set=a.362561847159386.84375.361783440570560&type=1&theater

Is this just focusing on assault rifles? Or all guns? Those docs sure do make a killing. Do you think they've saved more lives on purpose than deaths by negligence??

So y'all admit... your guns won't protect you from the largest killers in the world.


Me:
Actually, citizens with guns and improvised explosives CAN and DO do well against the best the military has to offer, short of a nuclear bomb. After all, the Taliban kicked not only the Russian's butts but they are kicking ours too. Sure, a lot of them got killed in the process, but in the end they WILL be victorious. Tanks need fuel to operate and it is a lot easier for a lesser armed combatant to attack that than the tank directly.

As for the worthlessness of the Constitution: What Bob is intentionally refusing to acknowledge is that the 2nd Amendment is merely a written expression of a natural or God-given right to self defense. The Constitution does not grant us the right, it merely recognizes it. The bigger question is this: Why does Bob feel the need to ignore that fact and why does he feel the need to de-humanize supporters of the right to self-defense (against both common criminals and the bigger tyrannical sort)?

Very simply, he feels that need because in his mind, the State is supreme. A statist believes that only the State should have any real power and that the ordinary citizen is nothing more than a sort of slave or serf that is here to serve the State. As such, the State has the unquestionable authority to make rules and take life as it sees fit.

Bob believes that the State has the authority to demand that you surrender your guns even if you have committed no crime against anyone else and he believes that if you don't surrender, the State has the authority to kill you. Of course, any amount of introspection would reveal that such thinking is sick indeed, and that is why the term gun-nut. It helps him to de-humanize us, assuaging any guilt that may creep into his dreams at night.