Uncle Emanuel Watkins
01-04-2013, 07:53 PM
In order to penalize the commoners for their illegal partaking in the business of survival on his property, as he or she at the time owned all property both public and private, the king utilized lawyers to justify the tax. In order to increase those taxes he or she got from the commoners, the king married executive Barons into his royal family in order so that they could organize the work of the commoners to increase the king's profits.
As things worked out, a two party system of lawyers and bankers were set up with some representing the "public" king and others representing the "private, free enterprising commoners. In order so he could go to war against this evil set up against him or her, the King utilized private fiat bankers, those he had already in his employ as accountants to keep track of his or her wealth, to perpetuate a trick of lending him or her back officially deemed counterfeit. This way he could employ the best lawyers to represent himself for every poor one employed to represent a commoner.
The points I am trying to make? All these lawyers, bankers, and business executives regardless of claim should be considered as part of the government. As a private business executive working for a major corporation is just as corrupt as a public executive working for the government, a great legal team working for a rich man against that of a poor lawyer working for a poor man isn't any different than a rich man and a poor man without any legal representation whatsoever. The rich man is always going to have an advantage over the poor man. Likewise, the so-called private, free enterprise banker is always going to get bailed out by the government. Why? Well, these too big to fail banks are the ones who provide the government with an endless supply of "make it so!" counterfeit.
While this all might seem humorous, this pretentious system we inherited is part of the old pagan Puritan order that existed prior to the new order established by our Founders within The Declaration of Independence.
As things worked out, a two party system of lawyers and bankers were set up with some representing the "public" king and others representing the "private, free enterprising commoners. In order so he could go to war against this evil set up against him or her, the King utilized private fiat bankers, those he had already in his employ as accountants to keep track of his or her wealth, to perpetuate a trick of lending him or her back officially deemed counterfeit. This way he could employ the best lawyers to represent himself for every poor one employed to represent a commoner.
The points I am trying to make? All these lawyers, bankers, and business executives regardless of claim should be considered as part of the government. As a private business executive working for a major corporation is just as corrupt as a public executive working for the government, a great legal team working for a rich man against that of a poor lawyer working for a poor man isn't any different than a rich man and a poor man without any legal representation whatsoever. The rich man is always going to have an advantage over the poor man. Likewise, the so-called private, free enterprise banker is always going to get bailed out by the government. Why? Well, these too big to fail banks are the ones who provide the government with an endless supply of "make it so!" counterfeit.
While this all might seem humorous, this pretentious system we inherited is part of the old pagan Puritan order that existed prior to the new order established by our Founders within The Declaration of Independence.