Demand the President to declare the White House a "Gun Free Zone"

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

Heard this while watching Alex the other day from a caller :D Genius idea. If a gun free zone makes our schools safer, it should make the president safer too, right? Right?

:confused:

[Philhelm]

The elephant in the room is that the laws do not apply equally for peasants and nobles.

[Anti Federalist]

I'm pretty sure it already is.

Oh wait, you meant not just for us Mundanes.

[Dr.3D]

Think of all the money to be saved by being able to send home the Secret Service.

I don't know why, but every time I hear or see that name written, I think of "Secret Squirrel."

[Anti Federalist]

Think of all the money to be saved by being able to send home the Secret Service.

I don't know why, but every time I hear or see that name written, I think of "Secret Squirrel."

LOL - Secret Squirrel and Morocco Mole.

http://www.confidentialresource.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/SecretSquirrel.jpg

[Danke]

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/we-demand-obama-issue-executive-order-making-white-house-federal-buildings-and-events-gun-free-zones/JlLk2nfs

[itshappening]

I agree lets make the White House a gun free zone. the president can lead by example. Spread the petitions every where

[puppetmaster]

The gfz does not apply to law enforcement.

[RonPaulFanInGA]

Presidents 1-15 never had bodyguards. Lincoln became the first President to have any security, and it was just one guy, and only because of the Civil War. The White House used to also have no fence and anyone could walk in at anytime and request to see the President. Today the President has a small army of armed security and the White House looks like this:

http://www.davart.net/awg/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/haunted_white-house-haunted.jpg

So what's the story here? Are people today simply more violent? The first fifteen Presidents survived just fine without anyone (except Richard Lawrence) trying to kill them.

[truelies]

It already is - for Mundanes

[Republicanguy]

Presidents 1-15 never had bodyguards. Lincoln became the first President to have any security, and it was just one guy, and only because of the Civil War. The White House used to also have no fence and anyone could walk in at anytime and request to see the President. Today the President has a small army of armed security and the White House looks like this:

http://www.davart.net/awg/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/haunted_white-house-haunted.jpg


So what's the story here? Are people today simply more violent? The first fifteen Presidents survived just fine without anyone (except Richard Lawrence) trying to kill them.

So does that mean a future Libertarian candidate would get rid of the security apparatus altogether eventually?

[acptulsa]

So does that mean a future Libertarian candidate would get rid of the security apparatus altogether eventually?

Might as well. When GE comes for him, that fence won't stop their drone.

That fence is clearly designed to protect enemies of the people. A friend of the people will be needing something like a Patriot anti-missile missile array.

[torchbearer]

So does that mean a future Libertarian candidate would get rid of the security apparatus altogether eventually? the only reason the nobles needs guards, laws, and fences to protect them is because they are using violence against their own people.

[acptulsa]

the only reason the nobles needs guards, laws, and fences to protect them is because they are using violence against their own people.

I saw Ron Paul on the campaign trail. I saw no armed guards, clowns in suits with earphones in their ears and bulges in their clothes, or people screening attendees and denying them entrance based on what their T-shirts said.

Was I blind? Or was there nothing to see?

[Anti Federalist]

Might as well. When GE comes for him, that fence won't stop their drone.

That fence is clearly designed to protect enemies of the people. A friend of the people will be needing something like a Patriot anti-missile missile array.

Thread winner.

A "beloved leader of the people" does not need a carrier battle group and a battalion of ground troops "protecting" him, 24/7.

[cbrons]

The elephant in the room is that the laws do not apply equally for peasants and nobles.

Some animals are more equal than others....

[Anti Federalist]

I saw Ron Paul on the campaign trail. I saw no armed guards, clowns in suits with earphones in their ears and bulges in their clothes, or people screening attendees and denying them entrance based on what their T-shirts said.

Was I blind? Or was there nothing to see?

Should I mention the three different occasions I shook the man's hand while CCW?

[Danke]

I saw Ron Paul on the campaign trail. I saw no armed guards, clowns in suits with earphones in their ears and bulges in their clothes, or people screening attendees and denying them entrance based on what their T-shirts said.

Was I blind? Or was there nothing to see?

He traveled with one full time and hired local security for events. But he also went unescorted sometimes, like for his morning breakfast.

[Dr.3D]

Thread winner.

A "beloved leader of the people" does not need a carrier battle group and a battalion of ground troops "protecting" him, 24/7.
No he needs to be protected from those in the government who would like to see him "out of the way."

[CaptainAmerica]

1984