PDA

View Full Version : CNN Insulting gun owners masculinity




tod evans
12-21-2012, 06:57 AM
What an obnoxious, self righteous "girly-man"..

I don't own a "Bushmaster" and quite honestly have never looked at any material objects as extensions of my penis.

Could it be I'm missing some major component in my life? Thanks to Mr. Waldman I'll question my masculinity from this point forward..:rolleyes:


Not man enough? Buy a gun

http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/20/opinion/waldman-guns-manhood/index.html?hpt=hp_c2


Editor's note: Paul Waldman is a contributing editor at The American Prospect and the author of "Being Right Is Not Enough: What Progressives Must Learn From Conservative Success." Follow him on his blog and on Twitter.
(CNN) -- Marketers have long told potential customers that if you used their product, it would do more than satisfy your consumer desires, it would make you into the kind of person you want to be.
You may not be young, hip, and creative, but if you buy a computer from Apple, you can tell yourself that you are. Wearing a T-shirt from Under Armour won't actually turn you into an athlete, but it doesn't hurt to pretend.
And if you're anxious about your masculinity, if you aren't quite sure whether those around you find you sufficiently strong and potent, the Bushmaster corporation has an answer for you. If you buy one of their semi-automatic rifles -- like the kind Adam Lanza used to murder 20 children and six adults last week -- you may "Consider your Man Card reissued."
That's the message of ads the company has been running, along with a particularly ridiculous social media campaign. Until today -- the page has apparently been taken down, but parts of it are visible here -- you could learn on the "Man Card" section of Bushmaster's website that "In a world of rapidly depleting testosterone, the Bushmaster Man Card declares and confirms that you are a man's man." Then you could fill out a little form to bust on your buddies for not being manly enough, to "Revoke a Man Card." Just enter a brief description of the offense and put it into one of five categories: "Cry baby," "Cupcake," "Short leash," "Coward," or "Just unmanly."

Paul Waldman
The symbol for the last is the female restroom icon (a stick figure wearing a dress), but "Short leash" gets some of the best action, like "Steve A. missed a much-anticipated poker night to attend a movie musical instead," or "Heath K, where 'Yes I will' always becomes 'If she'll let me.' " All it takes to get that Man Card back is to get yourself a Bushmaster.
You don't have to be a Freudian analyst to grasp the hidden meaning. It's not even subtext -- it's text. As we begin a long-overdue examination of where gun culture in America has gone, we can't avoid the way guns have become so entwined with masculine anxiety, as so many men seek to find their identity in instruments of destruction.
Become a fan of CNNOpinion
Stay up to date on the latest opinion, analysis and conversations through social media. Join us at Facebook/CNNOpinion and follow us @CNNOpinion on Twitter. We welcome your ideas and comments.



This isn't particularly new, of course. Male anxiety has produced backlashes before, enacted through our fantasies as the world changes and tradition gender roles are challenged. A 1959 cover story in Time magazine described how at that time there were no fewer than 30 westerns on the three networks in prime time. For the post-war American male, an office job and a house in the suburbs offered few opportunities to prove one's manhood, so tales of two-fisted cowboys wielding six-guns became irresistible. "How long since you used your fists?" Time quoted one sociologist saying by way of explanation of the western's popularity. "How long since you called the boss an s.o.b? The western men do, and they are happy men."
Opinion: Teachers with guns is a crazy idea
Hernandez: More guns not the answer Mass shooting survivors talk gun control Making children bulletproof
With manual labor but a memory for most Americans, we have even fewer opportunities to enact rituals of manhood in the way our ancestors did. The strongest caveman may have led the tribe, but who are the masters of today's universe? A bunch of skinny, pasty kids who spend their days staring at computer screens. Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg may not be able to best you at arm-wrestling, but they could buy and sell you a thousand times over.
We have to find reassurance where we can, so even if we can't prove our masculinity on the job and our kids won't listen to us, there is a way to feel that testosterone surge through our bodies. Whatever else you think about guns, no one who has ever held one can deny that they make you feel potent and strong. You don't even need to fire it to appreciate its power -- just holding it is enough. So if watching your fantasies play out on TV doesn't quite scratch that itch, you can enact them yourself down at the range -- or get a concealed carry permit, and convince yourself that the only reason you're not Jack Bauer is that the right opportunity hasn't yet presented itself.
Here's something you may not realize: Gun ownership has been declining for decades. According to the University of Chicago's General Social Survey, in 1977, 54% of American households had guns. By 2010, the number had fallen to 32%. Yet gun sales are at record highs. That means that existing gun owners are buying more and more guns. It's not enough to have a hunting rifle over your mantle; you need an entire arsenal, just in case the government falls, society disintegrates, and you have to protect your cave -- sorry, your home -- from the marauding hordes.
That's exactly what the gun manufacturers want you to think, so you keep buying. They know that hunting will never again be the pastime it once was, and as more Americans move from rural areas to the suburbs and cities, their natural market withers.
Opinion: The case for gun rights is stronger than you think
That "responsible gun owner" politicians talk about, the one who reverentially passes down to his son the bolt-action rifle his father gave him? That guy isn't good for business. The manufacturers need the other guy, the one who fears he may not be all the man he could be.
Whenever that anxiety gets to be too much, he can go down to the gun store and buy another gun, and another, and a few more after that. He'll get thousands of rounds of ammunition too, because you never know what might happen. Then he'll go home and nod with satisfaction at his own little armory, telling himself that when the time comes for him to become the hero of his own action movie, he'll be ready. He's got his Man Card. And maybe he needs one or two more guns. Just to be sure.

CaptUSA
12-21-2012, 07:22 AM
Ridiculous article.

However, as a father, I feel I have an obligation to defend my family. It has nothing to do with anxiety. It's an obligation. It's a duty. I must be prepared in case the need to defend my family arises.

Now, I suppose if you want the government to defend your family... If you want to abdicate your responsibility... I won't call you a coward or a cupcake, but I will question your trust in an entity that has proven incapable of living up to your misplaced faith in them.

tod evans
12-21-2012, 07:25 AM
If you want to abdicate your responsibility... I won't call you a coward or a cupcake,

I will............But I'm not a nice guy.

+rep.

rprprs
12-21-2012, 07:51 AM
Here's something you may not realize: Gun ownership has been declining for decades. According to the University of Chicago's General Social Survey, in 1977, 54% of American households had guns. By 2010, the number had fallen to 32%. Yet gun sales are at record highs. That means that existing gun owners are buying more and more guns.
Just curious as to whether the above assertion holds up to scrutiny. Anbody have more info or contravening evidence?

Ranger29860
12-21-2012, 08:00 AM
Just curious as to whether the above assertion holds up to scrutiny. Anbody have more info or contravening evidence?

http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/13/1/15.full


it seems about right.. but lets put that into perspective also. How many of those people have more than one person living in their house and each person owns a gun? My younger brother lives with my parents still and he owns a gun along with my parents so that is 2 people that own a gun but according to their method that only account for 1 household.

So if someone buys a gun for each family member that only gets counted once by the looks of it. So it really isnt by person its by household which would put this statistics on the lower end of what we would normally think.

tod evans
12-21-2012, 08:17 AM
Just curious as to whether the above assertion holds up to scrutiny. Anbody have more info or contravening evidence?

On a relevant note, what percentage of American "households" are actually a concrete box in some skyscraper?

For a more realistic number I'd be interested in the number of "households" that own guns that are single family dwellings, even include postage-stamp sized suburban homes....

Bet that'd skew their data tremendously..

MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2
12-21-2012, 08:45 AM
...quite honestly have never looked at any material objects as extensions of my penis.



Me either, but I do believe the marketing works. So I think some people do. And it also seems true people who say such things about others usually do it out of jealousy.



Ridiculous article.

However, as a father, I feel I have an obligation to defend my family. It has nothing to do with anxiety. It's an obligation. It's a duty. I must be prepared in case the need to defend my family arises.

Now, I suppose if you want the government to defend your family... If you want to abdicate your responsibility... I won't call you a coward or a cupcake, but I will question your trust in an entity that has proven incapable of living up to your misplaced faith in them.


Nicely put.

KingNothing
12-21-2012, 09:08 AM
I feel I have an obligation to defend my family. It has nothing to do with anxiety. It's an obligation. It's a duty. I must be prepared in case the need to defend my family arises.

I couldn't agree with this any more than I currently do. Not even on the agreeingest day of my life.
Responsible gun ownership is an obligation, and one that should not be taken lightly. We owe it to ourselves, our families, our communities, our country, and society as a whole to be able to offer protection against ANYTHING that may wish to do us harm. I don't see how anyone can escape the fact that we were lucky enough to be born into a nation that has an ingrained desire for Liberty and that we have a responsibility to defend it.

KingNothing
12-21-2012, 09:09 AM
Double post -- my apologies.

ClydeCoulter
12-21-2012, 09:25 AM
Just curious as to whether the above assertion holds up to scrutiny. Anbody have more info or contravening evidence?

That would be "background checked" guns, right? Does it take into account the others? Gun shows, etc...?
More and more households are buying non-registered weapons for fear that Uncle Sam is preparing to take the registered ones?

Kodaddy
12-21-2012, 09:49 AM
So, Adam Lanza's mom had masculinity issues?
***buzzer sounds***
I'm sorry, try again....

KingNothing
12-21-2012, 09:55 AM
There are over 300 million guns in America, and something like 88 percent of homes have at least one.

That's a TON of men, women, and children with masculinity issues.

Acala
12-21-2012, 10:16 AM
I have a laser targeting device on my heat seeking moisture missile.

nobody's_hero
12-21-2012, 10:31 AM
I think people without dicks are the ones who cower in a closet somewhere, talking on the phone with dispatchers, while a madman rapes his wife in the next room.

The one who blows a hole through the front door with his home-defense shotgun and downs a thug trying to break the lock have nothing to fear about being considered pansies.

PursuePeace
12-21-2012, 10:41 AM
So being a woman who takes responsibility for her own safety, I have "masculinity issues"?
It's more like "refusal to be a victim" issues.

nobody's_hero
12-21-2012, 10:43 AM
The good news is that Im' looking at the vote counts on the comments and it seems that people are tired of hearing this same bullshit argument about guns and 'compensating for something.' It might be a cute thing for giggling little girls to say in a locker room but a grown man(?) such as that author ought to be more mature.


Well all you have to do is very little research to find out who Paul Waldman is. He is a very liberal, ultra-progressive, ultra-socialist. He has wrote for a few ultra-liberal organizations that have since been deemed wacky and have been shut down. This article is 100% based on opinion, there is 0 fact involved and is almost as legit as W's hunt for WMD's in Iraq. [by the way: which one of you Ron Paul supporters wrote this comment? :) ]

Paul, your opinion is discriminative against all of the safe and responsible gun owners in America. You are labelling all gun owners the same as a racist uses racial slurs. You should be ashamed of yourself.

That comment at this moment has 812 positive votes and 59 negative votes. On CNN's own freaking website! lol.

Tod
12-21-2012, 10:54 AM
In a way, the author is right:

I'm not man enough to fight a gun battle without a gun. Bullets don't bounce off me like they do real men. Not even my rock-filled head.

:p

bunklocoempire
12-21-2012, 11:49 AM
Ridiculous article.

However, as a father, I feel I have an obligation to defend my family. It has nothing to do with anxiety. It's an obligation. It's a duty. I must be prepared in case the need to defend my family arises.Now, I suppose if you want the government to defend your family... If you want to abdicate your responsibility... I won't call you a coward or a cupcake, but I will question your trust in an entity that has proven incapable of living up to your misplaced faith in them.

+ rep. Bingo. I dig elephants, but I don't have an elephant in my care for the same reasoning.

"Hey, you, take care of my elephant 'cause I'm not gonna"

These people.:rolleyes::mad:

Anti Federalist
12-21-2012, 01:56 PM
Here's something you may not realize: Gun ownership has been declining for decades. According to the University of Chicago's General Social Survey, in 1977, 54% of American households had guns. By 2010, the number had fallen to 32%. Yet gun sales are at record highs. That means that existing gun owners are buying more and more guns.

Just curious as to whether the above assertion holds up to scrutiny. Anbody have more info or contravening evidence?

Only this:

That number has been based on nothing more than "self reporting" phone polls.

Now, let me ask you this, if you got a call out of the blue from some unknown polling company that started asking about how many guns you had in your home, what would you say?

Anti Federalist
12-21-2012, 01:57 PM
I couldn't agree with this any more than I currently do. Not even on the agreeingest day of my life.
Responsible gun ownership is an obligation, and one that should not be taken lightly. We owe it to ourselves, our families, our communities, our country, and society as a whole to be able to offer protection against ANYTHING that may wish to do us harm. I don't see how anyone can escape the fact that we were lucky enough to be born into a nation that has an ingrained desire for Liberty and that we have a responsibility to defend it.

Blowhard.

You know you won't do shit, if the time ever came.

Confederate
12-21-2012, 02:18 PM
On a relevant note, what percentage of American "households" are actually a concrete box in some skyscraper?

For a more realistic number I'd be interested in the number of "households" that own guns that are single family dwellings, even include postage-stamp sized suburban homes....

Bet that'd skew their data tremendously..

Exactly, how many households are there in New York City, Chicago, and San Francisco that own a gun? Likely around 3-5%, perhaps even less. How many people is that? About 20 million (Way more if you include the metro areas) That's 7% of the US population just in those three cities which skews the data tremendously.

fisharmor
12-21-2012, 02:25 PM
Now, I suppose if you want the government to defend your family... If you want to abdicate your responsibility... I won't call you a coward or a cupcake, but I will question your trust in an entity that has proven incapable of living up to your misplaced faith in them.

Coward isn't the word. When the entity has stated outright on multiple occasions that it isn't its job to protect your family, when that entity has met cases of rape and child murder - yes, the SCOTUS cases Deshaney v. Winnebago County Social Services and Warren v. DC actually are about child murder and rape - when that entity looks coldly at the facts of the case being that those entrusted with protecting us ALLOWED these things to happen, and states openly and for the record, "Sucks for you, this isn't our job"....
Coward isn't the word.

Fucking retard is the word.