PDA

View Full Version : CNN's Lemon Goes on Anti-Gun Tirade




AuH20
12-17-2012, 11:03 AM
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matt-hadro/2012/12/17/cnns-lemon-goes-anti-gun-tirade-calls-assault-weapons-ban


DON LEMON: Listen. For the past three days, I have been on the verge of tears every second and most of the people here have been crying 24 hours straight. Yeah – yes, we need to address mental health, but mental health in this particular issue, let's not get it twisted, is a secondary issue. If someone who has a mental issue did not have access to guns that should only be available in war zones, we would not be dealing with this.

Who needs an armor-piercing bullet to go hunting? Who needs an assault rifle to go hunting? You can't even use the prey that you kill with an assault rifle if you indeed do it. No one needs an assault rifle to go out and shoot a deer. No one needs an assault rifle that's capable of shooting 10, 20, 30 rounds off at the same time to shoot a duck, or to shoot quail. It does not make sense. Our first – the first thing that we need to do – and according to everyone that is here, even gun enthusiasts, is talk about what we're doing with assault rifles, why should guns that should only be available in war zones, why are they available to people who are mentally healthy and people who are not mentally healthy. That's the issue that we need to deal with.

So to say that gun violence is down does not make sense, and to me is insulting to everyone who lost a loved one here and is dealing with that. It doesn't matter if gun violence is down, 26 children – 20 children are dead here, and six adults are dead, and the mother of a person who's not mentally up – who's mentally challenged in some way is – she's dead. So to say that gun violence is down and we need to talk about mental health – yes, mental health is a secondary issue. We need to get guns and bullets and automatic weapons off the streets. They should only be available to police officers and to hunt al Qaeda and the Taliban and not hunt elementary school children.

The 2nd amendment is not about hunting game. It's about 'hunting' kings, politicians, bureaucrats, mercenaries or whomever attempts to rob you of your inalienable rights.

CaptUSA
12-17-2012, 11:31 AM
Why do we need assault weapons?

Well, if you're ever under assault, they might come in handy.

mz10
12-17-2012, 11:37 AM
They should only be available to police officers

And therein lies the problem

aGameOfThrones
12-17-2012, 11:51 AM
We need to get guns and bullets and automatic weapons off the streets. They should only be available to police officers and to hunt al Qaeda and the Taliban and not hunt elementary school children.



http://chzgifs.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/funny-gifs-wtf.gif

shane77m
12-17-2012, 11:53 AM
They should only be available to police officers and to hunt al Qaeda and the Taliban and not hunt elementary school children.

Why would he hunt down Al Qaeda? I thought we were giving them money and weapons?

brushfire
12-17-2012, 12:11 PM
The 2nd Amendment says nothing about hunting.

NCGOPer_for_Paul
12-17-2012, 12:16 PM
What "assault" weapon was fired that killed anyone in Newtown, CT last Friday?

If someone knows of one, maybe they should contact the Connecticut State Police so they can broadcast it from their "truth podium".

nobody's_hero
12-17-2012, 12:22 PM
Well, yeah. you wouldn't use an armor piercing round to shoot ducks.

I suppose you could, if you're a damn good shot. Most folks use shotguns, though.

Oh, maybe that wasn't his point.

Brian4Liberty
12-17-2012, 12:26 PM
They should only be available to police officers and to hunt al Qaeda and the Taliban and not hunt elementary school children.

Lol. Don Lemon is a deluded fool.

trey4sports
12-17-2012, 12:32 PM
serenity now!

Athan
12-17-2012, 12:52 PM
I am disgusted that this "journalist" is taking advantage of a national tragety to push his political agenda and attack the rights of law abiding citizens. Why don't they ever shoot up police stations? BECAUSE THEY CAN DEFEND THEMSELVES. They want us to all be so vulnerable we can't do nothing but let criminals run wild.

CaptUSA
12-17-2012, 12:56 PM
They want us to all be so vulnerable we can't do nothing but let criminals run wild.Well, yeah... Because they're the criminals! When you ARE the criminal, you don't want people to be able to throw a monkey wrench into your endeavors.

kahless
12-17-2012, 01:08 PM
Don Lemon is pretty hard core radical yet he and CNN get a free pass. CNN knew the only way they could push their propaganda harder and resist questioning of their hosts is by using people from protected groups.

This seems to be the game of the left, use radicals from protected groups so no one will question their opinions as not to be labeled a racist.

thoughtomator
12-17-2012, 01:12 PM
CNN's audience has been tanking for some time, it's not even a major news channel anymore by the metrics:

http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/12/14/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-december-13-2012/161816/

JK/SEA
12-17-2012, 01:35 PM
Hey Don...that train is waiting for you. Get on it. Fool.

Anti Federalist
12-17-2012, 01:50 PM
They should only be available to police officers and to hunt al Qaeda and the Taliban and not hunt elementary school children.

http://previous.presstv.ir/photo/20120818/geraphian20120818152532810.jpg

Well, he would have grown up to be Taliban.

When a Mundane snaps and kills a bunch of people and kids it's a masscre.

When people in funny looking government costumes with bad haircuts do it, it's "policy".

jmdrake
12-17-2012, 02:14 PM
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matt-hadro/2012/12/17/cnns-lemon-goes-anti-gun-tirade-calls-assault-weapons-ban



The 2nd amendment is not about hunting game. It's about 'hunting' kings, politicians, bureaucrats, mercenaries or whomever attempts to rob you of your inalienable rights.

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

I guess to him "militia" = "hunting party".

UpperDecker
12-17-2012, 03:20 PM
Yes, because having military and police forces as the only ones able to arm themselves is a good idea. You know, that wouldn't end badly at all. /sarcasm