PDA

View Full Version : RedState Endorses Rand Paul's idea




itshappening
12-10-2012, 03:10 PM
If not Boehner, then who?

Last week, American Majority Action kicked off the trending #FireBoehner hastag on Twitter and began to pressure House members to abstain from voting for Speaker.

After speaking with the House Parliamentarian, we discovered the House precedent is actually interpreted to mean an absolute majority of votes cast for a specific candidate. So, House members do nothing by abstaining. However, the core idea remains: Without a majority (50% +1), the House is speakerless. If neither Boehner nor Pelosi win 50%, the House keeps voting until a new leader arises with a majority.

To get Boehner under 50%, we need to unite behind a candidate—or candidates. We have more than three weeks to choose.

American Majority Action is endorsing Tom Price, Jim Jordan, and Jeb Hensarling as candidates for Speaker and senior leadership.

Though Price has announced that he does not plan to run, all three would be a welcome change. All three have been staunch conservatives—standing up against the Bush spending sprees. They have each been in leadership and have significant support in the caucus.

The #FireBoehner movement has become a threat: If Speaker Boehner compromises with Obama and they propose a tax-hike together, Speaker Boehner will be finished.

#FireBoehner started after Boehner proposed a tax-hike and purged four key conservatives from their committees. The movement has had tremendous support so far, and more House members will join our cause if Boehner capitulates.

We cannot raise taxes on our small businesses right now. Any Republican who votes for a tax-hike will be primaried—we can guarantee that.

If Obama continues to force the issue, we agree with Senator Rand Paul: Let Democrats eat the tax-hikes. Republicans should vote “present” and let liberals own these awful polices.

We shouldn’t—conservatives shouldn’t—endorse any policy that will destroy jobs for normal Americans, as tax hikes would. We should be fighting for what works. Frankly, we should be looking at tax cuts. Reagan cut taxes 25% in 1981, during both a recession and fiscal crisis, and by the end of his term: Revenue from the highest bracket doubled, Americans created 20 million jobs, and youth unemployment fell 43%.

That’s what we should be fighting for—not a smaller tax hike.

Boehner be warned.

h ttp://www.redstate.com/nedryun/2012/12/10/if-not-boehner-then-who-we-have-options/

alucard13mmfmj
12-10-2012, 03:14 PM
as some people point out.. somehow the democrats will fling the blame towards GOP and it will stick.

mz10
12-10-2012, 03:14 PM
All I saw on the front page was "Red State Endorses Rand Paul's..." and I got excited

torchbearer
12-10-2012, 03:18 PM
as some people point out.. somehow the democrats will fling the blame towards GOP and it will stick.

the democrats will blame the republicans for letting the democrats pass the bills the democrats wanted?

itshappening
12-10-2012, 03:20 PM
as some people point out.. somehow the democrats will fling the blame towards GOP and it will stick.

It will allow GOP to put ads on tv against democrats: X voted for higher taxes and is to blame for the economy sucking. He's cost x thousand jobs in this state.

GOP simply cannot vote for any compromise if they hope to keep the House in 2014!

torchbearer
12-10-2012, 03:22 PM
like in tug-of-war when one side just let's go.

Rudeman
12-10-2012, 04:11 PM
the democrats will blame the republicans for letting the democrats pass the bills the democrats wanted?

I said something like this in another thread in jest, but would you really be surprised if they did?

Bastiat's The Law
12-10-2012, 04:43 PM
like in tug-of-war when one side just let's go.
Good analogy!

jmdrake
12-10-2012, 04:43 PM
All I saw on the front page was "Red State Endorses Rand Paul's..." and I got excited

LOLz

angelatc
12-10-2012, 05:20 PM
Where's the Bubonic plague when you need it?

matt0611
12-10-2012, 06:22 PM
the democrats will blame the republicans for letting the democrats pass the bills the democrats wanted?

This. Its gonna be pretty hard to blame Republicans for something that none of them voted for.

erowe1
12-10-2012, 06:26 PM
You know, if we're just talking about getting 17 people to vote for someone, they don't have to vote for someone who is a member of the House or Representatives.

If it's just a matter of voting for someone other than Boehner, they could vote for Ron Paul. Or they could divide those 17 votes among any number of people.