PDA

View Full Version : Futuristic handcuffs would administer shocks, drugs




CaptainAmerica
12-10-2012, 12:44 PM
A patent for next-generation handcuffs offers a future in which the detained can be zapped directly from their restraints, and even injected with a medication, sedative, irritant, paralytic, or other fine substance.
Sometimes an invention comes along that makes you excited about the future.

For a long time, it seems that handcuffs have been stuck in the movies of old. They restrain you, but, odd for our interactive world, that's all they seem to do.

Might I tempt you toward futuristic handcuffs that will offer you a small involuntary judder?

I am grateful to Gizmodo for discovering that Patent Bolt has lucked upon a patent that offers bound(less) excitement.

For these are handcuffs that offer surprises. Indeed, they might make the idea of being tased, bro, not quite so bad.

The patent is called "Apparatus and System For Augmented Detainee Restraint."

The augmentations it offers are truly quite something. You see, these handcuffs are "configured to administer electrical shocks when certain predetermined conditions occur."

These shocks might be "activated by internal control systems or by external controllers that transmit activation signals to the restraining device."

This progressive tool is the brainchild of Scottsdale Inventions. And while you might be shocked or even excited by the idea of handcuffs with electric shock capabilities, might I move you further?

For Patent Bolt points out that this patent also allows for the idea of a substance delivery system. Yes, these handcuffs might also be used to, well, inject the detained with who knows what -- to achieve "any desired result."

Clearly, the desires of the detained and the detainer might differ. Yet, this patent allows for the possibility of the substance being in the form of "a liquid, a gas, a dye, an irritant, a medication, a sedative, a transdermal medication or transdermal enhancers such as dimethyl sulfoxide, a chemical restraint, a paralytic, a medication prescribed to the detainee, and combinations thereof."

Yes, you really did read the word "paralytic."

Naturally, some will be wondering whether, as in fine restaurants, the arresting officer will ask whether the detained has any allergies.

Some might be concerned, though that -- at least theoretically -- this creation might put quite some power into the hands of those who might not always be lucid or learned enough to use that power wisely.


Cruel & unusual punishment anyone?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57558038-71/futuristic-handcuffs-would-administer-shocks-drugs/?part=rss&subj=news&tag=title

dannno
12-10-2012, 12:56 PM
Speaking of futuristic handcuffs, I remember a little over a year ago I was out partying in this college town notorious for lots of parties since all the student housing is within less than a square mile. So I'm walking down the street, I look over and see this hot blonde piece of ass up against a paddy wagon with the tiniest skirt, high heals, butt half sticking out of her pink and black clothes and to top it off some hot pink hand cuffs! It looked like it was out of some internet fantasy porno thing, but this was real life! Cops are so ridiculous sometimes. I honestly think that chick got arrested cause the cop wanted to see her in those hot pink handcuffs..

CaptUSA
12-10-2012, 12:57 PM
Speaking of futuristic handcuffs, I remember a little over a year ago I was out partying in this college town notorious for lots of parties since all the student housing is within less than a square mile. So I'm walking down the street, I look over and see this hot blonde piece of ass up against a paddy wagon with the tiniest skirt, high heals, butt half sticking out of her pink and black clothes and to top it off some hot pink hand cuffs! It looked like it was out of some internet fantasy porno thing, but this was real life! Cops are so ridiculous sometimes.Wait, can you type a little slower?

phill4paul
12-10-2012, 01:09 PM
Wait, can you type a little slower?


ROFL.

kathy88
12-10-2012, 01:17 PM
Wait, can you type a little slower?cant you stroke a little faster?

phill4paul
12-10-2012, 01:30 PM
cant you stroke a little faster?

Snap!

UpperDecker
12-10-2012, 01:33 PM
Things like this should not be in the hands of the authorities. There is a major potential for abuse with being able to drug people at will like this.

CaptUSA
12-10-2012, 01:33 PM
cant you stroke a little faster?:o:(:o

CaptUSA
12-10-2012, 01:34 PM
Oh gawd, what a nightmare, might as well rub yourself with sandpaper.. I'm so glad I have a gf.

Although anybody in that situation, a fleshlight is quite the worthwhile investment.Oh man, where did this thread go?

Acala
12-10-2012, 01:43 PM
So the inventor envisions a future in which cops are so fat and lazy that shooting a handcuffed person with a tazer is just TOO much effort. "Just set the zap-o-matic cuffs on random and let's go grab some donuts."

paulbot24
12-10-2012, 02:22 PM
This thread is not complete without an AF rant.

thoughtomator
12-10-2012, 02:24 PM
To create such a device would constitute a crime against humanity.

paulbot24
12-10-2012, 02:44 PM
You have to be human to understand what is inhumane.

alucard13mmfmj
12-10-2012, 02:46 PM
Does it administer morphine for when the cops beat u up?

LibForestPaul
12-10-2012, 05:59 PM
Fahrenheit 451. I gotto put that in my sig. Someone msut be using that book as cliff notes. I guess the book burning will be the internet.

Occam's Banana
12-10-2012, 06:20 PM
Some might be concerned, though that -- at least theoretically -- this creation might put quite some power into the hands of those who might not always be lucid or learned enough to use that power wisely.

And there's also the alarming possibility that people who aren't cops might use them for nefarious purposes, too ...

JK/SEA
12-10-2012, 06:50 PM
Speaking of futuristic handcuffs, I remember a little over a year ago I was out partying in this college town notorious for lots of parties since all the student housing is within less than a square mile. So I'm walking down the street, I look over and see this hot blonde piece of ass up against a paddy wagon with the tiniest skirt, high heals, butt half sticking out of her pink and black clothes and to top it off some hot pink hand cuffs! It looked like it was out of some internet fantasy porno thing, but this was real life! Cops are so ridiculous sometimes. I honestly think that chick got arrested cause the cop wanted to see her in those hot pink handcuffs..

and then what happened?....

Anti Federalist
12-10-2012, 07:57 PM
This thread is not complete without an AF rant.

I'm ranted out...spent...shot my wad.



Want some torture with your peanuts?

1 July 2008

By P. Jeffrey Black and Jeffrey Denning

http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/aviation-security/2008/Jul/01/want-some-torture-with-your-peanuts/

Just when you thought you’ve heard it all...

A senior government official with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has expressed great interest in a so-called safety bracelet that would serve as a stun device, similar to that of a police Taser®. According to this promotional video found at the Lamperd Less Lethal, Inc. website, the bracelet would be worn by all airline passengers (video also shown below).

This bracelet would:

• Take the place of an airline boarding pass

• Contain personal information about the traveler

• Be able to monitor the whereabouts of each passenger and his/her luggage

• Shock the wearer on command, completely immobilizing him/her for several minutes

The Electronic ID Bracelet, as it’s referred to, would be worn by every traveler “until they disembark the flight at their destination.” Yes, you read that correctly. Every airline passenger would be tracked by a government-funded GPS, containing personal, private and confidential information, and would shock the customer worse than an electronic dog collar if the passenger got out of line.

Clearly the Electronic ID Bracelet is a euphemism for the EMD Safety Bracelet, or at least it has a nefarious hidden ability (thus the term ID Bracelet is ambiguous at best). EMD stands for Electro-Musclar Disruption. Again, according to the promotional video, the bracelet can completely immobilize the wearer for several minutes.

So is the government really that interested in this bracelet?

Apparently so.

According to this letter from DHS official, Paul S. Ruwaldt of the Science and Technology Directorate, office of Research and Development, which was written to the inventor whom he had previously met with, Ruwaldt wrote, “To make it clear, we [the federal government] are interested in . . . the immobilizing security bracelet, and look forward to receiving a written proposal.”

The letterhead, in case you were wondering, is from a U.S. Department of Homeland Security office at the William J. Hughes Technical Center at the Atlantic City International Airport, or the Federal Aviation Administration headquarters.

In another part of the letter, Mr. Ruwaldt confirmed, “In addition, it is conceivable to envision a use to improve air security, on passenger planes.”

Would every paying airline passenger flying on a commercial airplane be mandated to wear one of these devices? I cringe at the thought. Not only could it be used as a physical restraining device, but also as a method of interrogation, according to the same aforementioned letter from Mr. Ruwaldt.

Would you let them put one of those on your wrist? Would you allow the airline employees, which would be mandated by the government, to place such a bracelet on any member of your family?

Why are tax dollars being spent on something like this?

Is this a police state or is this America?

(You answered your own question. - AF)

presence
12-10-2012, 08:12 PM
Are these for cops or the BDSM folks?