pacelli
11-21-2007, 12:49 AM
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/5345/weekoverweekfourgl4.png
Over the past 4 weeks, you see that the week of the moneybomb (11/5) gave the campaign more than any other weeks (total of 4936k that week). But if you disregard the 11/5 money bomb's contribution, the remaining days in the week still gave $619k to Dr. Paul's campaign. Compare to other weeks where no moneybomb was scheduled: Week of 10/29 netted 437k. Week of 11/12 netted 263k. Week of 11/19 netted 288k.
It seems, from this graph at least, that we might tend to give more during moneybomb weeks-- particularly AFTER the moneybomb.
I've kept up with the "infernal email" debates and don't wish to sidetrack this thread, however I must say that it seems the Paul campaign would benefit from encouraging moneybombs. Not only do moneybombs bring more on a single day, but the added bonus is that the "Moneybomb Fervor" brings in more donations later in the week!
Over the past 4 weeks, you see that the week of the moneybomb (11/5) gave the campaign more than any other weeks (total of 4936k that week). But if you disregard the 11/5 money bomb's contribution, the remaining days in the week still gave $619k to Dr. Paul's campaign. Compare to other weeks where no moneybomb was scheduled: Week of 10/29 netted 437k. Week of 11/12 netted 263k. Week of 11/19 netted 288k.
It seems, from this graph at least, that we might tend to give more during moneybomb weeks-- particularly AFTER the moneybomb.
I've kept up with the "infernal email" debates and don't wish to sidetrack this thread, however I must say that it seems the Paul campaign would benefit from encouraging moneybombs. Not only do moneybombs bring more on a single day, but the added bonus is that the "Moneybomb Fervor" brings in more donations later in the week!