General Wesley Clarke Reveals THE PLAN In 2007 Interview - Topple Mid East Governments

[Dark_Horse_Rider]

For those who may not have seen this

He says this memo was mentioned to him in 2005

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXS3vW47mOE

[Dark_Horse_Rider]

worth a watch for those that haven't seen it yet

[VoluntaryAmerican]

I've seen it before but watched it again, it's that good.

Rep.

[coastie]

I've seen it before but watched it again, it's that good.

Rep.



Good info...BUT...Clark reveals himself as a traitor, he admits to sitting on this info after receiving it, thereby violating his oath to the Constitution.

[itshappening]

Nice find. That plan is being implemented..

[tangent4ronpaul]

For those who may not have seen this

He says this memo was mentioned to him in 2005

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXS3vW47mOE

Iraq <== Done
Syria <== In progress
Lebanon <== ???
Libya <== Done
Somalia <== ???
Sudan <== ???
Iran <== in queue

Interesting list. Compare it with this list:

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1680855/pg1

The Rothschild family is slowly but surely having their Central banks established in every country of this world, giving them incredible amount of wealth and power.




In the year of 2000 there were seven countries without a Rothschild owned Central Bank:

Afghanistan <== Done
Iraq <== Done
Sudan <== ???
Libya <== Done
Cuba <== later
North Korea <== later
Iran <== in queue

It is not a coincidence that these country, which are listed above were and are still being under attack by the western media, since one of the main reasons these countries have been under attack in the first place is because they do not have a Rothschild owned Central Bank yet. The first step in having a Central Bank establish in a country is to get them to accept an outrageous loans, which puts the country in debt of the Central Bank and under the control of the Rothschilds. If the country does not accept the loan, the leader of this particular country will be assassinated and a Rothschild aligned leader will be put into the position, and if the assassination does not work, the country will be invaded and have a Central Bank established with force all under the name of terrorism.




Rothschild owned Central Bank:

Central banks are illegally created private banks that are owned by the Rothschild banking family. The family has been around for more than 230 years and has slithered its way into each country on this planet, threatened every world leader and their governments and cabinets with physical and economic death and destruction, and then emplaced their own people in these central banks to control and manage each country’s pocketbook. Worse, the Rothschilds also control the machinations of each government at the macro level, not concerning themselves with the daily vicissitudes of our individual personal lives. Except when we get too far out of line.



The only countries left in 2003 without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family were:

Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran

The Attacks of September 11th were an inside job to invade Afghanistan and Iraq to then establish a Central Bank in those countries.




The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family are:

Cuba
North Korea
Iran

After the instigated protests and riots in the Arab countries the Rothschild finally paved their way into establishing Central Banks, and getting rid of many leaders, which put them into more power.

-t

[klamath]

Notice he hasn't said anything about it in the years since Obama has been in office or when he was a driving force in the clinton years for intervention in Bosnia and kosovo and the Iraqi liberation act. The guy is a partisan blueteam democrat.

[paulbot24]

If truthful statements are actually spewed by Obama himself, that doesn't take away from the fact that those statements are actually true. Why is it when confronted with something hard to believe or "conspiratorial", people usually say, "Where did you hear that?" and then proceed to bash the person or source, while ignoring the facts that were just mentioned. If somebody called you while you were out and said, "Is this (your name)? I just wanted to let you know that your house is on fire." Would you ask them, "Who is this?", and if it was somebody you'd never heard of, would you just dismiss it and continue on with your lunch? Or worse, if you do know them, would you say, "I don't believe you. You've lied to me before." Could you just carry on about your day without any care? Wouldn't you want to find out just for your own peace of mind? Who cares where the facts come from if they are facts. We've all lied and we've all been wrong before. That doesn't permanently brand us as incapable of honesty and truth from that point forward. Who cares who is holding the mic or shouting, if what they are saying is true to the core.

[klamath]

If truthful statements are actually spewed by Obama himself, that doesn't take away from the fact that those statements are actually true. Why is it when confronted with something hard to believe or "conspiratorial", people usually say, "Where did you hear that?" and then proceed to bash the person or source, while ignoring the facts that were just mentioned. If somebody called you while you were out and said, "Is this (your name)? I just wanted to let you know that your house is on fire." Would you ask them, "Who is this?", and if it was somebody you'd never heard of, would you just dismiss it and continue on with your lunch? Or worse, if you do know them, would you say, "I don't believe you. You've lied to me before." Could you just carry on about your day without any care? Wouldn't you want to find out just for your own peace of mind? Who cares where the facts come from if they are facts. We've all lied and we've all been wrong before. That doesn't permanently brand us as incapable of honesty and truth from that point forward. Who cares who is holding the mic or shouting, if what they are saying is true to the core.
I'm not sure what your point is but this has been out for 5 years and has been posted on here multiple times over those five years. It is not like this is the new smoking gun that none of us knew. What is new is how Clark's mouth has been shut about it as the plan goes on under Obama.

[paulbot24]

This observation is not just about this topic and it is not directed at you. I appreciated what tangent4RonPaul said. I admire brave people that are not afraid to say what they think or expose "unpretty" truths. Too often, after all that information, you get "Where did you hear that? Oh they don't know what they're talking about. They, they, they..." and just dismiss everything that was just previously mentioned. I'm not attacking you, I'm just using the forum to think/wonder/vent/create....which is what I thought it was here for.

+rep to tangent for TRUTH

[Dark_Horse_Rider]

I'm not sure what your point is but this has been out for 5 years and has been posted on here multiple times over those five years. It is not like this is the new smoking gun that none of us knew. What is new is how Clark's mouth has been shut about it as the plan goes on under Obama.

yeah , i knew this was from interview 2007 , posted for people to show exactly how this program is being implemented across the board AND NOT PARTISAN.

for some people this might be their first time to see this and perhaps make a connection with what has been taking place in these countries since the time of this interview.

[vita3]

Clarke's admission to the war plans, makes the propganda coming from our side over Syria easy to spot.

[UWDude]

Iraq <== Done
Syria <== In progress
Lebanon <== ???
Libya <== Done
Somalia <== ???
Sudan <== ???
Iran <== in queue


Sudan is done. It didn't take any military intervention, but it has been split, into two separate countries.