PDA

View Full Version : A $600 car was issued more than $100,000 in parking tickets




aGameOfThrones
11-28-2012, 12:11 AM
An abandoned car in Chicago worth an estimated $600 has been issued more than $100,000 in parking tickets over the past three years.

Jennifer Fitzgerald, 31, is currently stuck with the bill but says the 1999 Chevy Monte Carlo actually belongs to an ex-boyfriend who registered the car in her name without her knowledge or consent.

The Expired Meter reports that from May 23, 2009, through April 30, 2012, the Chicago Department of Finance (DOF) issued 678 tickets against the car, totaling $105,761.80 and setting a Chicago record both for the total number and amount of parking fines issued.

But Fitzgerald says she doesn't owe the city a dime and has filed a lawsuit in Cook County Circuit Court against the city of Chicago, United Airlines and the ex-boyfriend.

Fitzgerald has two main arguments in her case. First, she says her ex-boyfriend, Brandon Preveau, is the actual owner of the car, having purchased it from her uncle for $600 in 2008, according to Courthouse News. In fact, Preveau paid for the car's title, registration and insurance, but it was nonetheless registered in Fitzgerald's name.

"Brandon used his 2007 income tax refund to pay Patrick $600 for the automobile," reads Fitzgerald's complaint. "For reasons not recalled by Patrick, however, Patrick signed the title to the automobile over to Jennifer."

Second, Fitzgerald's attorney is arguing that the city should have simply towed the vehicle after 30 days from O'Hare Airport, where it was parked and where Preveau worked at the time.

According to Fitzgerald's complaint, "On or before November 17, 2009, Brandon drove the automobile into the parking lot and never drove it out again."

And as the Expired Meter reports, Chicago law does specify that an abandoned vehicle is to be towed 30 days after being illegally parked: "Any vehicle parked in violation of this section shall be subjected to an immediate tow and removal to city vehicle pound or authorized garage," the law reads.

In the meantime, Fitzgerald, who is unemployed and a single mother, has also had to deal with her driver's license being suspended while she pursues her case.

"If a vehicle is in a lot for more than 30 days and Standard Parking was not notified, then the company will try to contact the owner to find out his plans to get the vehicle," Department of Aviation spokesman Karen Pride told the Meter. "If Standard cannot contact the owner, then the vehicle is towed to Lot F, where it might remain for 30 to 90 days, in case the owner comes back for it. After that period, the vehicle is towed to the city impound lot as abandoned."

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/600-car-issued-more-100-000-parking-tickets-234529296.html

Anti Federalist
11-28-2012, 12:35 AM
In the meantime, Fitzgerald, who is unemployed and a single mother, has also had to deal with her driver's license being suspended while she pursues her case.

Just another day in the matrix.

I actually used this line from "Stripes" once:

"Hey hey hey! You can't park that car here!"

"I'm not parking it, I'm abandoning it."

Philhelm
11-28-2012, 11:00 AM
Charging an unemployed woman with a $100,000 fine makes limp-wristed men feel powerful. Watch as the state fights against her tooth and nail, despite the fact that she obviously cannot pay.

mrsat_98
11-28-2012, 10:13 PM
Charging an unemployed woman with a $100,000 fine makes limp-wristed men feel powerful. Watch as the state fights against her tooth and nail, despite the fact that she obviously cannot pay.

Of course they cant let the enemy accomplish its objective.

HOLLYWOOD
11-28-2012, 10:30 PM
Revenue... that's what it is all about.

If the man is pissed-off emough, they'll throw someone in jail/prison and the people will have to pay even more.

It's getting to the point where government is so corrupt and greedy to steal by force or by self absorbed laws... I just may have to find every single citizen innocent from Government imposed graft and racketeering, no matter what the monetary/property penalty may be, as a juror. ;)

Jury nullification... BeeAtches

Tpoints
11-28-2012, 11:09 PM
Charging an unemployed woman with a $100,000 fine makes limp-wristed men feel powerful. Watch as the state fights against her tooth and nail, despite the fact that she obviously cannot pay.

they were charging whoever was parking the vehicle in the wrong places, how were they supposed to know it wasn't her? And how did it stack up to 100,000 before she finally found out?

acptulsa
11-29-2012, 08:13 AM
they were charging whoever was parking the vehicle in the wrong places, how were they supposed to know it wasn't her?

How were they supposed to know it wasn't her? Well, they have their ways. And in a society goverened by a Constitution that says we're all innocent until proven guilty, they were supposed to use those ways before they punished her by suspending her license.

Of course, they try to get around that by saying that reinstating your license involves paying a 'fee', not a 'fine'. But if you get caught driving while it's under suspension, that's a fine, and there was no reason for the license to be suspended because all the regular fees were paid.

This is the other ugly end of corporate personhood. The rich corporations can buy their personhood and get 'Constitutional rights' that were never meant for corporations or other groups or ventures, while we wind up getting suspended licenses if our cars get tickets while we aren't in them, thus violating several of our Constitutional rights (does facing a speed camera in court really give us what our forefathers sought to guarantee us in the Bill of Rights?). But, of course, you can't violate the Constitutional rights of a car. That would be as ridiculous as violating the Constitutional rights of a corporation--or as ridiculous as the notion that a car can have no owner, or that car ownership should negate our rights...

Tpoints
11-29-2012, 09:44 AM
How were they supposed to know it wasn't her? Well, they have their ways. And in a society goverened by a Constitution that says we're all innocent until proven guilty, they were supposed to use those ways before they punished her by suspending her license.

Of course, they try to get around that by saying that reinstating your license involves paying a 'fee', not a 'fine'. But if you get caught driving while it's under suspension, that's a fine, and there was no reason for the license to be suspended because all the regular fees were paid.

This is the other ugly end of corporate personhood. The rich corporations can buy their personhood and get 'Constitutional rights' that were never meant for corporations or other groups or ventures, while we wind up getting suspended licenses if our cars get tickets while we aren't in them, thus violating several of our Constitutional rights (does facing a speed camera in court really give us what our forefathers sought to guarantee us in the Bill of Rights?). But, of course, you can't violate the Constitutional rights of a car. That would be as ridiculous as violating the Constitutional rights of a corporation--or as ridiculous as the notion that a car can have no owner, or that car ownership should negate our rights...

Do we know when she actually found out about the tickets?

Also, the headline is worded in such a way that assumes a $600 car can't cause 100k in damages, it can, maybe not by parking, but it can, easily.

PaulConventionWV
11-29-2012, 10:00 AM
They really should have a maximum on these parking tickets. Can anyone honestly say that a car occupying one space for 3 years affords the state $105k in revenue?

TonySutton
11-29-2012, 10:16 AM
They really should have a maximum on these parking tickets. Can anyone honestly say that a car occupying one space for 3 years affords the state $105k in revenue?

I checked the parking rates at O'Hare. The highest daily rate in the hourly parking lot would be $53. If you multiply $53 by 365 days then by 3 years the total is only half of what they are charging the lady.

If the car was in fact moved to Lot F the daily charge drops to $9 which at 3 years would be less than $10,000.

Sounds like out of control bureaucracy!

http://www.ohare.com/PassengerInformation/Parking/OHare/Rates.aspx

Tpoints
11-29-2012, 08:04 PM
They really should have a maximum on these parking tickets. Can anyone honestly say that a car occupying one space for 3 years affords the state $105k in revenue?

Yes, the authorities in this case admitted that their policy is to tow them after 30 days. It only makes sense, it's not outrageous to consider that a car unmoved for 30 days is abandoned or the owner/driver is nowhere to be found.