Naked statists storm Boehner's office

[MGee]

The story, plus some good points about what leads people to this sort of... protest... here (http://themattwalshblog.com/2012/11/27/breaking-taxes-can-cure-aids/)

[rprprs]

I don't know much about this guy or his blog, except for a few great articles that have been linked through RPF.
Anybody more familiar with his body of work? Is he always as good as he sounds here?

[Matt Collins]

Surely a site somewhere has gotta have better pics than that, right?

[AGRP]

Were they hot?

[angelatc]

Were they hot?

Uh, no. A massive government cover-up would not have been undesirable in this instance.

[angelatc]

Here Matt: Don't say I never gave you anything. Warning - nudity at this link: http://dailybail.com/home/video-naked-protesters-take-over-john-boehners-office.html

[AGRP]

Uh, no. A massive government cover-up would not have been undesirable in this instance.


Here Matt: Don't say I never gave you anything. Warning - nudity at this link: http://dailybail.com/home/video-naked-protesters-take-over-john-boehners-office.html

Whats the point of posting a link when theyre not hot?

[angelatc]

Whats the point of posting a link when theyre not hot?

It's the best argument against AIDs funding I've ever seen. PS: I think the third video spares viewers from the penii - so booby fans won't feel violated.

[Tod]

Whats the point of posting a link when theyre not hot?

I thought the middle gal was pretty good looking...

[angelatc]

I thought the middle gal was pretty good looking...

In the third video, she kind of looks down with a startled look on her face....for some reason I immediately guessed she was thinking she had just started her period.

[AGRP]

In the third video, she kind of looks down with a startled look on her face....for some reason I immediately guessed she was thinking she had just started her period.

First you post links. Now youre talking about periods. Negged.

[MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2]

I don't know much about this guy or his blog, except for a few great articles that have been linked through RPF.
Anybody more familiar with his body of work? Is he always as good as he sounds here?


I can't tell if you're joking or if we're on different websites. I'm gonna guess joking.

[Matt Collins]

Naked people protesting AIDS? Isn't that how a lot of people got AIDS in the first place? :confused: :rolleyes:

[Feelgood]

Naked people protesting AIDS? Isn't that how a lot of people got AIDS in the first place? :confused: :rolleyes:

They may have a point. Further education of AIDS at least may be needed.

No Collins, you do not get AIDS by protesting AIDS cuts in the nude.

[rprprs]

I can't tell if you're joking or if we're on different websites. I'm gonna guess joking.

Your guess would be wrong and I think my question was simple and straightforward enough.
Aside from the article linked in the OP, I've read maybe one or two others by the same author previously linked though RPF. On those occasions, I didn't have the time or inclination to further explore his blog. Plus, I didn't know if he had written or contributed elsewhere, or if someone here might be familiar with him from other circles.

Forum members here often express varying and often opposing views on everyone from John Stossel to Alex Jones and Adam Kokesh, Jesse Benton and Peter Schiff. Even Judge Napolitano has not been immune to criticism here, not to mention Rand. I was simply looking for some further thoughts on this guy and how consistent he was in his philosophy. I'm sorry if I should somehow already be especially familiar with him, but I'm not, and I don't believe my initial query in this thread was in any way unreasonable.

[Occam's Banana]

I don't know much about this guy or his blog, except for a few great articles that have been linked through RPF.
Anybody more familiar with his body of work? Is he always as good as he sounds here?


Your guess would be wrong and I think my question was simple and straightforward enough.
Aside from the article linked in the OP, I've read maybe one or two others by the same author previously linked though RPF. On those occasions, I didn't have the time or inclination to further explore his blog. Plus, I didn't know if he had written or contributed elsewhere, or if someone here might be familiar with him from other circles.

Forum members here often express varying and often opposing views on everyone from John Stossel to Alex Jones and Adam Kokesh, Jesse Benton and Peter Schiff. Even Judge Napolitano has not been immune to criticism here, not to mention Rand. I was simply looking for some further thoughts on this guy and how consistent he was in his philosophy. I'm sorry if I should somehow already be especially familiar with him, but I'm not, and I don't believe my initial query in this thread was in any way unreasonable.

His name is Matt Walsh. He's a talk radio guy in Kentucky (formerly Baltimore, I think). He's definitely one of us.

Here's a thread of some 'tubes he did back in January. They are absolutely hilarious. Seriously, you gotta check 'em out:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?353824-VIDEO-Brilliant-satire-on-anti-Paul-haters

He's also on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mattwalshradio

Here's his youtube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheMattWalshShow

[rprprs]

His name is Matt Walsh. He's a talk radio guy in Kentucky (formerly Baltimore, I think). He's definitely one of us.

Here's a thread of some 'tubes he did back in January. They are absolutely hilarious. Seriously, you gotta check 'em out:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?353824-VIDEO-Brilliant-satire-on-anti-Paul-haters

He's also on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mattwalshradio

Here's his youtube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheMattWalshShow

Thank you. +rep

[V3n]

I don't normally leave a comment on RPF just so I can use it to go back to a thread later.. yet here we are.

[specsaregood]

Uh, no. A massive government cover-up would not have been undesirable in this instance.

In some ways though this gives them credibility as they care more about their cause than any ridicule from people about their looks. just saying.

[angelatc]

In some ways though this gives them credibility as they care more about their cause than any ridicule from people about their looks. just saying.

Meh - they're attention whores, as well as money grubbing whores. DK if it's still true, but last time I looked, AIDs got more money than cancer and heart disease...both of which kill more people.

[FindLiberty]

I think it's fake 'cause I still see some clothes at their feet.

;->

[S.Shorland]

I wonder how much they personally donate to AIDS research

[PaulConventionWV]

The story, plus some good points about what leads people to this sort of... protest... here (http://themattwalshblog.com/2012/11/27/breaking-taxes-can-cure-aids/)

I bet he got a raging boehner.

[AGRP]

In some ways though this gives them credibility as they care more about their cause than any ridicule from people about their looks. just saying.

what is the point of protesting?

[specsaregood]

what is the point of protesting?

entertainment, clearly.

[AGRP]

entertainment, clearly.

So, it doesnt in some ways though this gives them credibility as they care more about their cause?

[specsaregood]

So, it doesnt in some ways though this gives them credibility as they care more about their cause?
Well, it appears their cause is entertainment.

[AGRP]

Well, it appears their cause is entertainment.

Someone needs to cut back on the doobies :)

[specsaregood]

Someone needs to cut back on the doobies :)

If I had any of those laying around I might just find myself dancing naked in a congressman office, "protesting".

[QuickZ06]

If I had any of those laying around I might just find myself dancing naked in a congressman office, "protesting".

No you wouldn't, you would not even make it out the the door. You would realize how dumb it would be and what a waste of time it would be as well and just continue to watch Lions on NatGeo.