PDA

View Full Version : Romney: UNELECTABLE Ron Paul: ELECTABLE




acptulsa
11-07-2012, 12:04 AM
Fox lied. I say they knew they lied when they lied. I say Murdoch owns Fox News, Murdoch owns the New York Post, and if you read the Post you find out why Fox didn't want the Republicans to win. I say McCain: UNELECTABLE and Ron Paul: ELECTABLE in 2008 as well. I say principled and truly conservative wins over independent voters and the same thing as Obama only even more frightening doesn't win over independent voters. And I say the GOP never wins again until they pull their heads out of Rupert Murdoch's ass and listen to us.

If you want to win in 2016 we have to plant this seed TODAY. As in, RIGHT NOW.

TheTyke
11-07-2012, 12:17 AM
Agreed. Now is the time.

dinosaur
11-07-2012, 12:32 AM
Yes, 2016 starts now. It would be a good idea to be inviting in the way we phrase I told you so.

TIMB0B
11-07-2012, 12:55 AM
Who are potential conservative liberty candidates for 2016?

Mini-Me
11-07-2012, 12:56 AM
Fox lied. I say they knew they lied when they lied. I say Murdoch owns Fox News, Murdoch owns the New York Post, and if you read the Post you find out why Fox didn't want the Republicans to win. I say McCain: UNELECTABLE and Ron Paul: ELECTABLE in 2008 as well. I say principled and truly conservative wins over independent voters and the same thing as Obama only even more frightening doesn't win over independent voters. And I say the GOP never wins again until they pull their heads out of Rupert Murdoch's ass and listen to us.

If you want to win in 2016 we have to plant this seed TODAY. As in, RIGHT NOW.

This is a good point: Rupert Murdoch has a huge amount of control over conservatives, and most don't even realize he's not even conservative himself, even by their meaning of the word. He's a Lieberman liberal. If they were smart, they'd start reevaluating the purpose of Fox News in American politics, which - as we've known for years - is to corral the Republican base into supporting an insane foreign policy. This way, a.) they'll win, and it will benefit the contractors and Israel, or b.) they'll lose, and it will benefit the all-around statist side of the establishment that Murdoch is so beholden to. Either way, Fox News does a huge amount to advance the Lieberman-style full-blown totalitarians in US politics.

acptulsa
11-07-2012, 08:21 AM
There was only one electable candidate in the GOP primaries. Only one.

Bachmann? Frightening airhead. Gingrich? Infused with the stench of decades of corruption. Cain? He'd be better off firing his head and replacing it with a bowling ball. Santorum? Really? Seriously?

Liberal Australian corporatist warmonger Rupert Murdoch talked Republicans out of nominating the only candidate the party had who could win, specifically because he's a Christian and full of integrity, and they did it by calling the only electable candidate unelectable. And we had better make people see this, or we're not getting anywhere.

We can teach people what Fox is doing, or we can be bitches and holler, 'This is what you get for being mean to us.' Which will do us more good? Which will help us save this nation?

Oh, and Mini-Me: Thank you for the rep. It was rep point number 1776! I like that number...

acptulsa
11-21-2012, 01:41 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/post/ron-paul-would-best-obama-in-iowa-general-election-matchup/2012/02/18/gIQABoeUMR_blog.html

http://www.fitsnews.com/2011/09/27/ron-paul-leads-obama-in-new-poll/

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/318764

http://politicalnews.me/?id=12069

http://www.ibtimes.com/ron-paul-2012-rasmussen-poll-says-he-would-beat-obama-418358

http://politicalnews.me/?id=11876

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2012/0228/Ron-Paul-poll-shocker-He-beats-Obama-head-to-head

Now, you watch what we do for Rand Paul with independent voters over the next three years. Watch close. Then when Fox tells you how unelectable he is, you can have a good laugh.

Veteran Citizen
11-21-2012, 05:17 PM
The fact is that neither of them were capable of beating Obama.


The race was run. Dr. Paul lost in the finals, and Romney lost in the championship game.

2016 will be interesting. It may be too late. Depending on which projection you believe, we will be between 18 and 23 trillion in debt by then. Most of those projections are probably way too rosy.

The fact is, it may be too late to change the course we are on. Right now, it looks bleak. Get ready, because things are likely to get much worse than they are to get better in the next 20 years.

RonPaulFanInGA
11-21-2012, 05:35 PM
If Romney was unelectable, and Ron Paul lost to Romney....

libertygrl
11-21-2012, 05:50 PM
Fox lied. I say they knew they lied when they lied. I say Murdoch owns Fox News, Murdoch owns the New York Post, and if you read the Post you find out why Fox didn't want the Republicans to win. I say McCain: UNELECTABLE and Ron Paul: ELECTABLE in 2008 as well. I say principled and truly conservative wins over independent voters and the same thing as Obama only even more frightening doesn't win over independent voters. And I say the GOP never wins again until they pull their heads out of Rupert Murdoch's ass and listen to us.

If you want to win in 2016 we have to plant this seed TODAY. As in, RIGHT NOW.

AGREE! After what happend to the GOP and what it happening economically, I think this moment could be the stongest position we have ever been in! But I sense a slight malise. Could be because we are all emotionally exhausted.. or maybe just depressed at what they did to Dr. Paul at the convention and his retirement. However, I actually feel this is the strongest we've ever been because we have been proven right on so many levels, and can influence an even greater number of people to the Liberty movement. But the time is NOW to get moving. Especially when the Republican Tea Parties have been silenced. What steps that may actually be, I'm not really sure. Perhaps it's continuing the education of the public and converting those old die hard Conservatives. Perhaps infiltrating the Republican party locally. But this is truly our time and we should come up with some ideas before the media starts steering people in the other direction again. :(

Dr.3D
11-21-2012, 06:00 PM
Ron Paul isn't unelectable, he ran for congress and was elected many times.