PDA

View Full Version : Chris Matthews Rants Against ‘Idiots’ Who Vote Third Party Or Stay Home




itshappening
11-06-2012, 01:07 PM
He's incensed anyone would vote third party or not vote at all

"you have two choices"

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-goes-on-obnoxious-rant-against-idiots-who-vote-third-party-or-stay-home/




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILCKWPSbUsY

AGRP
11-06-2012, 01:12 PM
This kind of talk is creepy. Ive noticed it everywhere. It validates the theory that theyre telling you to consent.

jclay2
11-06-2012, 01:14 PM
He's incensed anyone would vote third party or not vote at all

"you have two choices"

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-goes-on-obnoxious-rant-against-idiots-who-vote-third-party-or-stay-home/

I think we need to borrow the good old fox news saying fu frank and replace it with fu chris. Even if you are voting for the one party system, this should upset you a little bit.

jkr
11-06-2012, 01:15 PM
well, i do NOT consent!

go pee in tha front yard chrissy

Chester Copperpot
11-06-2012, 01:20 PM
well i guess he's gone full on retard now

James Madison
11-06-2012, 01:29 PM
I posted this message to my facebook this morning.

A vote cast in good conscience cannot be wasted. Rather, it is the only vote that truly counts. But we should not be surprised, for those who will declare a vote wasted have already shown their true character by voting for the lesser of two evils; their reasoning is inherently fallacious because they attempt to do good by first doing evil. And yet it will be our fault, though we have abstained from evil, they will argue. On that day I say to them, "you, who abdicated his duty to God and country, bare the responsibility, for you chose to do evil so that good may come of it". For we are aware, votes are not given, they are earned. Therefore, a vote may only be wasted when given to a man who has not earned it

mport1
11-06-2012, 01:37 PM
What a complete scumbag. He is the one who is an idiot.

Brian4Liberty
11-06-2012, 01:40 PM
It seems like he was directing it more at liberals and leftists. It was his attempt to shame the leftists into getting out the vote. He threw in the Johnson reference just so he could do a little extra name calling. There's no doubt he wants Ron Paul Republicans to vote for Ron Paul or Gary Johnson.

John F Kennedy III
11-06-2012, 01:43 PM
well i guess he's gone full on retard now


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6WHBO_Qc-Q&feature=youtube_gdata_player

BSU kid
11-06-2012, 01:45 PM
God this guy is infuriating!

Elwar
11-06-2012, 01:47 PM
His rant is basically saying "I must not have done my job right! I may get fired if you don't comply!"

ninepointfive
11-06-2012, 01:52 PM
we should anger him so much his heart gives way

jmdrake
11-06-2012, 03:07 PM
His rant is basically saying "I must not have done my job right! I may get fired if you don't comply!"

+rep

Original_Intent
11-06-2012, 03:12 PM
I think we need to borrow the good old fox news saying fu frank and replace it with fu chris. Even if you are voting for the one party system, this should upset you a little bit.

This is what I was thinking before I even read your post!

F U Chris! F U Frank!

anaconda
11-06-2012, 03:32 PM
This kind of talk is creepy. Ive noticed it everywhere. It validates the theory that theyre telling you to consent.

Why does he care? Does he think 3rd Party voting will help one candidate more than the other?

Travlyr
11-06-2012, 03:41 PM
I posted this message to my facebook this morning.

A vote cast in good conscience cannot be wasted. Rather, it is the only vote that truly counts. But we should not be surprised, for those who will declare a vote wasted have already shown their true character by voting for the lesser of two evils; their reasoning is inherently fallacious because they attempt to do good by first doing evil. And yet it will be our fault, though we have abstained from evil, they will argue. On that day I say to them, "you, who abdicated his duty to God and country, bare the responsibility, for you chose to do evil so that good may come of it". For we are aware, votes are not given, they are earned. Therefore, a vote may only be wasted when given to a man who has not earned it
Nice post! It felt so good to vote for Ron Paul. I have a few other liberty candidates running for the state house and senate that got my vote as well.

anaconda
11-06-2012, 03:42 PM
He puzzles me sometimes. This full on Stalinist rant is a marked contrast to his brutal humiliation of Jack Conway on behalf of Rand Paul in 2010. But mostly he seems like a complete tool of the military industrial complex.

scottditzen
11-06-2012, 03:44 PM
well i guess he's gone full on retard now

Couldn't have said it better.

bunklocoempire
11-06-2012, 03:50 PM
Then, looking directly into the camera, Matthews held up his fingers and said: “You have two choices.”

http://s6.postimage.org/fmarzsjch/four_lights.jpg

NorfolkPCSolutions
11-06-2012, 03:56 PM
What a shameful display of utter ignorance.

RonPaulFanInGA
11-06-2012, 04:10 PM
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-goes-on-obnoxious-rant-against-idiots-who-vote-third-party-or-stay-home/

acptulsa
11-06-2012, 04:16 PM
I am really bothered by people who thought, ‘Oh, I thought I would vote for [former third party candidate] John Anderson,’ or, ‘I really like Ralph Nader and what he stands for.’ That has nothing to do with the presidency! Nothing to do with it.

If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything. And if you listen to Matthews, you'll bend over for anything, too.

bunklocoempire
11-06-2012, 04:29 PM
He's incensed anyone would vote third party or not vote at all

"you have two choices"

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-goes-on-obnoxious-rant-against-idiots-who-vote-third-party-or-stay-home/

Thanks for posting! I just used Chris Matthew's quote on a Romney voter who accused me of being a "tool of the liberals".

Too funny. A perfect 'I know you are but what am I' moment. :D

Occam's Banana
11-06-2012, 05:15 PM
He's incensed anyone would vote third party or not vote at all

"you have two choices"

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-goes-on-obnoxious-rant-against-idiots-who-vote-third-party-or-stay-home/

Of course he's incensed. That's what they pay court-journalist hacks like Matthews for.


This kind of talk is creepy. Ive noticed it everywhere. It validates the theory that theyre telling you to consent.

What's creepiest about it is that it's not enough for Matthews (& the rest of his ilk) if you merely consent. You have to want to consent ...

Chris Matthews = O'Brien ? ...



"[T]he time has come for you to take the last step. You must love Big Brother. It is not enough to obey him: you must love him."

torchbearer
11-06-2012, 05:48 PM
http://s6.postimage.org/fmarzsjch/four_lights.jpg


yes!!!!!!!

torchbearer
11-06-2012, 05:48 PM
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything. And if you listen to Matthews, you'll bend over for anything, too.

got a tingle.

nobody's_hero
11-06-2012, 05:52 PM
I'm waiting for Chris Matthews to have an Olbermann-meltdown and get sacked by MSNBC.

bunklocoempire
11-06-2012, 05:53 PM
got a tingle.

lol!

Dr.3D
11-06-2012, 05:55 PM
well, i do NOT consent!

go pee in tha front yard chrissy
I'd rather he peed on a neon sign transformer.

LibertyEagle
11-06-2012, 05:59 PM
I posted this message to my facebook this morning.

A vote cast in good conscience cannot be wasted. Rather, it is the only vote that truly counts. But we should not be surprised, for those who will declare a vote wasted have already shown their true character by voting for the lesser of two evils; their reasoning is inherently fallacious because they attempt to do good by first doing evil. And yet it will be our fault, though we have abstained from evil, they will argue. On that day I say to them, "you, who abdicated his duty to God and country, bare the responsibility, for you chose to do evil so that good may come of it". For we are aware, votes are not given, they are earned. Therefore, a vote may only be wasted when given to a man who has not earned it

Beautiful.

Brian4Liberty
11-06-2012, 07:40 PM
Why does he care? Does he think 3rd Party voting will help one candidate more than the other?

Yes, it was really aimed at (lazy) Obama voters. He was trying to get out the Dem vote.

acptulsa
11-06-2012, 07:43 PM
Yes, it was really aimed at (lazy) Obama voters. He was trying to get out the Dem vote.

Because the only voters just as disaffected, disappointed and dissed as we are is the entire Democratic Party. The whole thing.

The next four years should be a really, really good time for rabble rousing.

Valli6
11-07-2012, 07:35 AM
So in truth, Chris Mathews hates democracy.

CTRattlesnake
11-08-2012, 11:22 PM
Mods can move this to another forum if needed.

This should rile everyone up

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILCKWPSbUsY&feature=player_embedded


Tldr: Chris Matthews: "There are only two parties"


Tldr for Chris: We are coming to get your ass, you will regret those words one day

fr33
11-08-2012, 11:39 PM
how to get him fired...

angelatc
11-08-2012, 11:40 PM
Meh - he's the same guy that said it was racist of Mitt to run against Obama.

Somebody should tell him that it's stupid to hold a job on cable - there are only 3 networks.

Anti Federalist
11-08-2012, 11:51 PM
This place is becoming more and more like the old USSR every day.

90 percent voter turnout to vote for Communist A or Communist B.

Karsten
11-09-2012, 12:01 AM
God this guy is infuriating!

I actually used to like him pre-2008. He was against Bush, I was against Bush. That was before I thought hard about economics.