Razmear
11-20-2007, 01:55 PM
This just landed in my inbox, sorry if its a dupe, no time to search before work:
ALERT FROM JEWS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FIREARMS OWNERSHIP
America's Aggressive Civil Rights Organization
November 20th, 2007
JPFO ALERT: A PERSONAL MESSAGE FROM AARON ZELMAN
Under the current laws of the United States of America, tax-exempt
educational organizations like Jews for the Preservation of Firearms
Ownership (of which I happen to be the founder and executive director)
are strictly prohibited from engaging directly in electoral politics.
That's why it's important to make sure you understand thoroughly that
the following opinions are entirely mine, at the present moment, and
do not necessarily reflect those of JPFO.
I have before me an article in which the Anti-Defamation League's
"Assistant Director of Civil Rights", Steven Freeman is attempting to
take Republican Congressman -- and dark horse Presidential Candidate
-- Ron Paul to task for receiving a small campaign contribution from
an otherwise obscure individual who turns out to run a white supremist
website.
Aside from noting that, rather like the American Civil Liberties
Union, the ADL's devotion to civil rights is rather hypocritically
selective -- for example, they can't abide the rights guaranteed by
the Second Amendment, and can barely tolerate anyone who employs his
or her right to free speech in order to defend the private ownership
of weapons -- there are one or two questions this sudden concern
evokes.
Apparently there's a small handful, out there, of similar websites
which, for some reason defying all logic, offer support to a man who
is, in fact, their mortal ideological enemy. Paul, as I interpret what
he has said over the past 20 years, is for individual freedom above
all other considerations. Obviously racists and neofascists are
collectivists, meaning that to them, it is the group that comes
first, far above and beyond the interests of any "mere" individual.
They are, therefore, socialists of one stripe or another (never forget
that Hitler considered himself a socialist), and the enemies of
freedom.
"Nazi" is an acronym for "National Socialist Workers' Democratic
Party".
Why these socialists should admire Paul is a puzzlement. But then,
they are what they are -- racists and neofascists -- so none of their
lunatic thought processes should be taken very seriously, nor should
the object of their irrationality be held in any way responsible for
them.
Of course the ADL's real objective here is to force a candidate
whom they see as their ideological enemy (once again, much more a
matter of the eye of the beholder than of any character flaw their
enemy may possess) to do a little dance for them whenever they feel
like it. They want to push him through the ceremonial meat-slicer of
renunciation, regret, and remorse that so many others have been pushed
through in recent years. The trouble is that, like every other form of
blackmail, it never ends. The instant he complies with their demands,
he becomes their property, their toy, their organ-grinder's monkey, no
longer a threat to the anti-Constitutional establishment they are part
of.
It's clear that, before the ADL starts accusing anybody else of
being unduly influenced by political undesirables, they have a few
questions of their own to answer under the harsh light of public
scrutiny. For example, to how many self-proclaimed Marxists might some
tiny minority of donations to the ADL be traced? It's statistically
inevitable that such a thing has happened, probably more than once. To
my (admittedly incomplete) knowledge, they have never renounced such
supporters or sent any money back. Does this make ADL a communist
front group? I certainly don't think so, but by ADL's own standard, it
does.
Much more importantly, the ADL has a little housecleaning of its
own to do before they start pointing fingers. How can anybody take
anything about them seriously as long as they continue to defend a
blatantly unconstitutional federal law -- the late Senator Thomas
Dodd's infamous 1968 Gun Control Act -- that is very little more than
a translation into English (one performed at Dodd's written request by
the Library of Congress) of Adolf Hitler's evil weapons legislation of
1938?
Go to http://www.jpfo.org/images02/handbill-adl.jpg to see for
yourself a photograph of the actual letter that Dodd received from
Lewis C. Coffin, Law Librarian of the Library of Congress, cheerfully
replying to Dodd's request for a translation of the original Nazi
legislation which the ADL presently supports. You might enjoy this
http://www.jpfo.org/images02/handbillpoliticians.jpg too. ADL's
shameful approval and compliance have helped turn a once-insignificant
bureaucracy into a new Gestapo and a once-free America into a police
state.
Furthermore, in light of the incontrovertible fact that every one
of history's massive genocide campaigns was preceded by the forcible
removal of weapons from private hands (as what politician wouldn't
want to make sure the individuals he or she was planning to murder in
cold blood couldn't fight back?), how can the ADL justify any kind of
gun control laws -- more accurately termed "victim disarmament" -- at
all?
Surely Abe Foxman, current national director of the ADL ought to
know better. As a boy, most of his relatives were murdered by the
Nazis precisely because they had been deprived of the means to defend
themselves.
By contrast, see http://www.jpfo.org/alerts/alert20040304.htm a
webpage dedicated to the impressive accomplishments of a 2003 JPFO
movie Innocents Betrayed where Paul himself is quoted as saying,
"Innocents Betrayed has an important message for America. It shows
why gun control must always be rejected, and it shows it very
convincingly."
It's long past time for the ADL to do a little dance of their own,
a dance of renunciation, regret, and remorse for the hundreds, or the
thousands, or perhaps even the millions of innocent individuals that
the policies they advocate are responsible for having injured or
killed.
They must apologize to the shopkeeper, robbed, maimed, and killed
because government, at one level or another, under policies the ADL
has helped to shape -- allowed him nothing with which to defend
himself.
They must apologize to the helpless woman who was raped and
murdered because she wasn't permitted the physical means of self-
defense.
They must apologize to the families of those who died needlessly
because pressure groups like the ADL would rather see them all dead in
a darkened alley somewhere than see them alive with a gun in their
hand.
Go look at that handbill again. Send it out (along with this
message, of course) to everyone you know, to all your friends and
associates, to every enemy of freedom you have an e-mail address or
URL for. ADL's hypocrisy must be exposed for what it is. Encourage
everyone you know to write to the ADL and ask about their repulsive
double standard. Ask them exactly what sort of moral compass Abe
Foxman has that can allow that double standard to influence his own
organization.
Visit ADL at http://www.adl.org/contact_us.asp .
Please understand, we are all living -- or at least we ought to be
-- in a Bill of Rights culture, and that the ADL and racist groups
have a right to express their opinions freely, although I personally
think they're both festering boils full of pus on the derriere of the
American body politic. But for the ADL to refer to itself as a civil
rights organization is pure humbug. It is the Anti-Defamation League,
and not Congressman Ron Paul, who are guilty by association -- with
themselves.
ADL, burn in Hell.
Permission granted to distribute without additions or deletions.
Copyright © Aaron Zelman 2007
Box 270143,Hartford ,WI 53027, USA
ALERT FROM JEWS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FIREARMS OWNERSHIP
America's Aggressive Civil Rights Organization
November 20th, 2007
JPFO ALERT: A PERSONAL MESSAGE FROM AARON ZELMAN
Under the current laws of the United States of America, tax-exempt
educational organizations like Jews for the Preservation of Firearms
Ownership (of which I happen to be the founder and executive director)
are strictly prohibited from engaging directly in electoral politics.
That's why it's important to make sure you understand thoroughly that
the following opinions are entirely mine, at the present moment, and
do not necessarily reflect those of JPFO.
I have before me an article in which the Anti-Defamation League's
"Assistant Director of Civil Rights", Steven Freeman is attempting to
take Republican Congressman -- and dark horse Presidential Candidate
-- Ron Paul to task for receiving a small campaign contribution from
an otherwise obscure individual who turns out to run a white supremist
website.
Aside from noting that, rather like the American Civil Liberties
Union, the ADL's devotion to civil rights is rather hypocritically
selective -- for example, they can't abide the rights guaranteed by
the Second Amendment, and can barely tolerate anyone who employs his
or her right to free speech in order to defend the private ownership
of weapons -- there are one or two questions this sudden concern
evokes.
Apparently there's a small handful, out there, of similar websites
which, for some reason defying all logic, offer support to a man who
is, in fact, their mortal ideological enemy. Paul, as I interpret what
he has said over the past 20 years, is for individual freedom above
all other considerations. Obviously racists and neofascists are
collectivists, meaning that to them, it is the group that comes
first, far above and beyond the interests of any "mere" individual.
They are, therefore, socialists of one stripe or another (never forget
that Hitler considered himself a socialist), and the enemies of
freedom.
"Nazi" is an acronym for "National Socialist Workers' Democratic
Party".
Why these socialists should admire Paul is a puzzlement. But then,
they are what they are -- racists and neofascists -- so none of their
lunatic thought processes should be taken very seriously, nor should
the object of their irrationality be held in any way responsible for
them.
Of course the ADL's real objective here is to force a candidate
whom they see as their ideological enemy (once again, much more a
matter of the eye of the beholder than of any character flaw their
enemy may possess) to do a little dance for them whenever they feel
like it. They want to push him through the ceremonial meat-slicer of
renunciation, regret, and remorse that so many others have been pushed
through in recent years. The trouble is that, like every other form of
blackmail, it never ends. The instant he complies with their demands,
he becomes their property, their toy, their organ-grinder's monkey, no
longer a threat to the anti-Constitutional establishment they are part
of.
It's clear that, before the ADL starts accusing anybody else of
being unduly influenced by political undesirables, they have a few
questions of their own to answer under the harsh light of public
scrutiny. For example, to how many self-proclaimed Marxists might some
tiny minority of donations to the ADL be traced? It's statistically
inevitable that such a thing has happened, probably more than once. To
my (admittedly incomplete) knowledge, they have never renounced such
supporters or sent any money back. Does this make ADL a communist
front group? I certainly don't think so, but by ADL's own standard, it
does.
Much more importantly, the ADL has a little housecleaning of its
own to do before they start pointing fingers. How can anybody take
anything about them seriously as long as they continue to defend a
blatantly unconstitutional federal law -- the late Senator Thomas
Dodd's infamous 1968 Gun Control Act -- that is very little more than
a translation into English (one performed at Dodd's written request by
the Library of Congress) of Adolf Hitler's evil weapons legislation of
1938?
Go to http://www.jpfo.org/images02/handbill-adl.jpg to see for
yourself a photograph of the actual letter that Dodd received from
Lewis C. Coffin, Law Librarian of the Library of Congress, cheerfully
replying to Dodd's request for a translation of the original Nazi
legislation which the ADL presently supports. You might enjoy this
http://www.jpfo.org/images02/handbillpoliticians.jpg too. ADL's
shameful approval and compliance have helped turn a once-insignificant
bureaucracy into a new Gestapo and a once-free America into a police
state.
Furthermore, in light of the incontrovertible fact that every one
of history's massive genocide campaigns was preceded by the forcible
removal of weapons from private hands (as what politician wouldn't
want to make sure the individuals he or she was planning to murder in
cold blood couldn't fight back?), how can the ADL justify any kind of
gun control laws -- more accurately termed "victim disarmament" -- at
all?
Surely Abe Foxman, current national director of the ADL ought to
know better. As a boy, most of his relatives were murdered by the
Nazis precisely because they had been deprived of the means to defend
themselves.
By contrast, see http://www.jpfo.org/alerts/alert20040304.htm a
webpage dedicated to the impressive accomplishments of a 2003 JPFO
movie Innocents Betrayed where Paul himself is quoted as saying,
"Innocents Betrayed has an important message for America. It shows
why gun control must always be rejected, and it shows it very
convincingly."
It's long past time for the ADL to do a little dance of their own,
a dance of renunciation, regret, and remorse for the hundreds, or the
thousands, or perhaps even the millions of innocent individuals that
the policies they advocate are responsible for having injured or
killed.
They must apologize to the shopkeeper, robbed, maimed, and killed
because government, at one level or another, under policies the ADL
has helped to shape -- allowed him nothing with which to defend
himself.
They must apologize to the helpless woman who was raped and
murdered because she wasn't permitted the physical means of self-
defense.
They must apologize to the families of those who died needlessly
because pressure groups like the ADL would rather see them all dead in
a darkened alley somewhere than see them alive with a gun in their
hand.
Go look at that handbill again. Send it out (along with this
message, of course) to everyone you know, to all your friends and
associates, to every enemy of freedom you have an e-mail address or
URL for. ADL's hypocrisy must be exposed for what it is. Encourage
everyone you know to write to the ADL and ask about their repulsive
double standard. Ask them exactly what sort of moral compass Abe
Foxman has that can allow that double standard to influence his own
organization.
Visit ADL at http://www.adl.org/contact_us.asp .
Please understand, we are all living -- or at least we ought to be
-- in a Bill of Rights culture, and that the ADL and racist groups
have a right to express their opinions freely, although I personally
think they're both festering boils full of pus on the derriere of the
American body politic. But for the ADL to refer to itself as a civil
rights organization is pure humbug. It is the Anti-Defamation League,
and not Congressman Ron Paul, who are guilty by association -- with
themselves.
ADL, burn in Hell.
Permission granted to distribute without additions or deletions.
Copyright © Aaron Zelman 2007
Box 270143,Hartford ,WI 53027, USA