PDA

View Full Version : Luke Rudowski and WAC tears apart Obama advisor Gibbs over NDAA.




Anti Federalist
10-24-2012, 04:30 PM
I don't care what any of you crabbers, gripers and haters say.

These guys are doing real journalism.

I'd love to see 10,000 of them out there grilling every political slut in the country, the second they sleaze out into the open.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7MwB2znBZ1g#!

donnay
10-24-2012, 05:42 PM
God Bless WAC!

NewRightLibertarian
10-24-2012, 05:49 PM
I'd love to see 10,000 of them out there grilling every political slut in the country, the second they sleaze out into the open.

Nah, liberty activists should probably be supporting Ted Cruz and Jim DeMint instead. Just follow Jesse and Jack's lead and liberty will be achieved in no time, silly conspiracy theorist.

Qdog
10-24-2012, 08:13 PM
Yeah, sorry, but these guys are jackasses. They did the same thing to Rand. Hounding, and interrupting. They didn't even let this guy speak.

fr33
10-24-2012, 08:19 PM
I'm not a big fan of them but they have been doing some good interviews lately. It's the "hey you bilderburg?" stuff that is not productive.

This video and the Wasserman Shultz video and stuff like that are great. When they bring up real provable topics like laws being passed, they bring attention to it rather than being immediately dismissed. Glen Greenwald and other journalists posted an article about kill list/Shultz interview.

jmdrake
10-24-2012, 08:52 PM
Yeah, sorry, but these guys are jackasses. They did the same thing to Rand. Hounding, and interrupting. They didn't even let this guy speak.

Not true. He was allowed to speak. His answer to the extra-judicial killing of a 16 y/o U.S. citizen simply meant that citizen should have had a better father. I'll criticize WAC when they screw up, but this was well done.

idiom
10-24-2012, 09:30 PM
The problem with real investigative journalism today is that you turn up so much corruption and fabrications and lies that no one will believe you.

jct74
10-24-2012, 10:55 PM
this video is getting some attention, one of the top stories on HuffPo right now:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/24/robert-gibbs-anwar-al-awlaki_n_2012438.html

some other coverage:
http://www.mediaite.com/online/team-obamas-pathetic-justification-for-killing-16-year-old-american-boy/
http://www.alternet.org/speakeasy/alyssa-figueroa/watch-how-obama-adviser-justifies-killing-innocent-16-year-old-boy-drone-0
http://www.businessinsider.com/alwaki-son-yemen-16-drone-2012-10


Conor Friedersdorf from The Atlantic:


Again, note that this kid wasn't killed in the same drone strike as his father. He was hit by a drone strike elsewhere, and by the time he was killed, his father had already been dead for two weeks. Gibbs nevertheless defends the strike, not by arguing that the kid was a threat, or that killing him was an accident, but by saying that his late father irresponsibly joined al Qaeda terrorists. Killing an American citizen without due process on that logic ought to be grounds for impeachment. Is that the real answer? Or would the Obama Administration like to clarify its reasoning? Any Congress that respected its oversight responsibilities would get to the bottom of this.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/10/how-team-obama-justifies-the-killing-of-a-16-year-old-american/264028/#

NewRightLibertarian
10-24-2012, 11:10 PM
I'm not a big fan of them but they have been doing some good interviews lately. It's the "hey you bilderburg?" stuff that is not productive.

I think the Bilderberg stuff goes along with this just fine. WAC do what they can to confront scumbags with the real issues. Our 'public servants' are vulnerable because they still need to masquerade in the public to show that they represent us. WAC does a good job of exploiting this weakness. This is the kind of idea that really needs to catch on in spite of what Jim DeMint-loving statists like Jack Hunter think.

Another great one from not too long ago:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d2bCirm6NA

jtstellar
10-24-2012, 11:16 PM
I'm not a big fan of them but they have been doing some good interviews lately. It's the "hey you bilderburg?" stuff that is not productive.

This video and the Wasserman Shultz video and stuff like that are great. When they bring up real provable topics like laws being passed, they bring attention to it rather than being immediately dismissed. Glen Greenwald and other journalists posted an article about kill list/Shultz interview.

lol hey you bilderburg


I don't care what any of you crabbers, gripers and haters say.

These guys are doing real journalism.

I'd love to see 10,000 of them out there grilling every political slut in the country, the second they sleaze out into the open.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7MwB2znBZ1g#!

well i care, when jack hunter and rand paul have to take time out of their busy schedule to answer useless questions about bilderburg nwo blah blah

this is the first time i've seen them even interview liberals outside of bashing the freedom movement over the head because they don't quite buy into the builderburgs on top of having hands full just promoting ron paul's agenda. props for "real change" this time.

NewRightLibertarian
10-24-2012, 11:25 PM
well i care, when jack hunter and rand paul have to take time out of their busy schedule to answer useless questions about bilderburg nwo blah blah

Sorry you can't stand to see your sacred cows withstand questioning. I'm sorry that both Jack and Rand ran away like cowards and they were made to look bad, but you must realize it was THEIR fault not the fault of the people asking them the questions.


this is the first time i've seen them even interview liberals. props for "real change"

That's because you haven't been paying close attention. Please become less ignorant and see the whole of what they are doing instead of listening to political hacks like Jack Hunter.

Feeding the Abscess
10-24-2012, 11:38 PM
I'm glad this is getting play in other parts of the web.

What this movement needs is more of this.

fr33
10-24-2012, 11:39 PM
this video is getting some attention, one of the top stories on HuffPo right now:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/24/robert-gibbs-anwar-al-awlaki_n_2012438.html

some other coverage:
http://www.mediaite.com/online/team-obamas-pathetic-justification-for-killing-16-year-old-american-boy/
http://www.alternet.org/speakeasy/alyssa-figueroa/watch-how-obama-adviser-justifies-killing-innocent-16-year-old-boy-drone-0
http://www.businessinsider.com/alwaki-son-yemen-16-drone-2012-10


Conor Friedersdorf from The Atlantic:



http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/10/how-team-obama-justifies-the-killing-of-a-16-year-old-american/264028/#That's cool. I tweeted all those. I think it's possible WAC are learning to not marginalize themselves.

fr33
10-24-2012, 11:42 PM
Sorry you can't stand to see your sacred cows withstand questioning. I'm sorry that both Jack and Rand ran away like cowards and they were made to look bad, but you must realize it was THEIR fault not the fault of the people asking them the questions.They run away because the bilderburg questioning just marginalizes both parties in the interview. No media is going to cover it except to maybe make fun of it. I'm not saying that it's right for that to happen but public perception does exist.

When Ron was asked about it by a indie journalist he seemed really uncomfortable. Even Alex Jones doesn't bring that stuff up when he interviews Rand and Ron.

jtstellar
10-24-2012, 11:47 PM
Sorry you can't stand to see your sacred cows withstand questioning. I'm sorry that both Jack and Rand ran away like cowards and they were made to look bad, but you must realize it was THEIR fault not the fault of the people asking them the questions.



That's because you haven't been paying close attention. Please become less ignorant and see the whole of what they are doing instead of listening to political hacks like Jack Hunter.

it's refreshing to see them having anything to say on civil liberty at all, at least, and i'm just going to leave it at that

say that dnc chair woman (like most) was quite a bitch.. i'm disappointed she weren't pressed harder. she probably ridiculed him because he wasn't in a suit and looked young

RonRules
10-25-2012, 12:26 AM
At 2:40 first video: "I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father ..."

Since when does a kid get to pick his parents?

idiom
10-25-2012, 12:43 AM
Osama's son turned out alright.

fr33
10-25-2012, 01:03 AM
At 2:40 first video: "I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father ..."

Since when does a kid get to pick his parents?I'm sure some of the pious fools I've seen in other topics can show up and inform you of the whole "The sins of the father" shtick.

donnay
10-25-2012, 08:16 AM
They run away because the bilderburg questioning just marginalizes both parties in the interview. No media is going to cover it except to maybe make fun of it. I'm not saying that it's right for that to happen but public perception does exist.

When Ron was asked about it by a indie journalist he seemed really uncomfortable. Even Alex Jones doesn't bring that stuff up when he interviews Rand and Ron.

That's because much of the MSM are Bilderbergs. CEO's of major corporations, politicians, foreign dignitaries and reporters are always invited to the Bilderberg meetings.

I praise WAC for asking the questions that the controlled corporate media will not dare ask. The Bilderberg meetings go completely against the Logan Act. If they have nothing to hide why do they have to meet in secrecy?

"The Logan Act (18 U.S.C.A. § 953 [1948]) is a single federal statute making it a crime for a citizen to confer with foreign governments against the interests of the United States. Specifically, it prohibits citizens from negotiating with other nations on behalf of the United States without authorization."

Source:
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Logan+Act


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOBBegSomWs

According to journalist Jim Tucker (American Free Press (http://americanfreepress.net/?p=4482)), Hillary Clinton was fined $300,000 and charged with a felony for violating the U.S. Logan Act in the 1990s for attending a Bilderberg Group meeting after citizens found out.

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty if an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." ~David Rockefeller

Cleaner44
10-25-2012, 08:37 AM
I like WAC and what they are doing. I would like to see them hone their technique and perhaps choose their battles more wisely, but they are doing good things. They simply need to ask the tough questions in a way that doesn't allow people to shoot the messenger. Its like a game of chess and they probably should practice a bit before confronting the politicians.

Brian4Liberty
10-25-2012, 11:30 AM
this video is getting some attention, one of the top stories on HuffPo right now:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/24/robert-gibbs-anwar-al-awlaki_n_2012438.html

some other coverage:
http://www.mediaite.com/online/team-obamas-pathetic-justification-for-killing-16-year-old-american-boy/
http://www.alternet.org/speakeasy/alyssa-figueroa/watch-how-obama-adviser-justifies-killing-innocent-16-year-old-boy-drone-0
http://www.businessinsider.com/alwaki-son-yemen-16-drone-2012-10

Conor Friedersdorf from The Atlantic:

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/10/how-team-obama-justifies-the-killing-of-a-16-year-old-american/264028/#

This is turning out to be how their interviews can be very useful. Other, more "mainstream" media can use it as a starting point for stories on the subject.


That's cool. I tweeted all those. I think it's possible WAC are learning to not marginalize themselves.

It's nice to see their targets and subject of interviews changing. The Wasserman-Schultz quote is a classic!

Anti Federalist
10-25-2012, 11:52 AM
At 2:40 first video: "I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father ..."

Since when does a kid get to pick his parents?

Well, I guess when it depends on whether you get vaporized by a US drone strike or not.

Anti Federalist
10-25-2012, 11:54 AM
I like WAC and what they are doing. I would like to see them hone their technique and perhaps choose their battles more wisely, but they are doing good things. They simply need to ask the tough questions in a way that doesn't allow people to shoot the messenger. Its like a game of chess and they probably should practice a bit before confronting the politicians.

I remember when Luke first started.

He had no idea what he was doing, he just had a set of brass balls and a camera.

specsaregood
10-25-2012, 12:01 PM
great vid.

jkr
10-25-2012, 12:08 PM
give that man the Nobel wAr prize!




take BACK the language