acptulsa
10-15-2012, 07:23 AM
So, why are they trashing the dollar, bombing the snot out of the middle east and curtailing civil liberties right now, and in such a hurry? Why are the laws being passed wholesale, even if they have to come in the form of executive orders? Are the rich and powerful not rich and powerful enough? Up to this time, the powers that be have been content to incrementalize us. They have preferred not to risk pissing us off, and having us take a more active role in our governance. Why the sudden rush? Why is our tolerance no longer the deciding issue?
Many people have felt this, whether they have a long enough term view to really understand the depth of the change. There have been silly reasons for it put forward; things like the Mayan calendar and whatnot. I don't think that has a single thing to do with it. But it does smell like there's a deadline. Once upon a time, they did their incrementalization but they were very scrupulous not to rock the boat too much. Now they're pushing the envelope more than ever before. Seems like there's a trial balloon in the press every day, and whatever infringement of our liberties doesn't draw too many comments of protest when they suggest it gets implemented within a week.
Well, I can think of one upcoming event that could be causing them to go for broke. In thirteen months, we will have the fiftieth anniversary of the Kennedy assassination, otherwise known as the CIA coup d'etat. Now, many of us are familiar with the Freedom of Information Act. The files on the assassination were uniquely and rather famously sealed for more than the usual term specified by the Act. In fact, those files were sealed for fifty years.
That means that a whole bunch of interesting information about that day in Dallas will be coming out, or should be coming out, within the next fourteen months. And many of us know that there's a lot of juicy stuff in there, about George H.W. Bush among others. Some of the grand old journalists of the last half century, including Jim Lehrer, are also at risk as we wait to see if what they didn't cover on that day destroys their reputations. This is particularly important as those in charge depend on the credibility of the propaganda machine to cover up and play down some of their bigger abuses of power.
Will they reneg on the promise to let this stuff see the light of day--and if so, what will the reaction be? Will they take the chance that this coup d'etat will piss red-blooded Americans off? Dare they admit that there's information in these files which still has the power to implicate organizations and companies after all of this time? For I believe that it does. This really was a coup, and the list of perpetrators is a virtual who's who of power ever since.
If I'm right about this, then the information is useful to us two ways. One, it gives us a better sense of their timeline. We can basically look at their efforts to convert the nation to a police state as a project with a deadline--of November 22, 2013. This is an advantage. We can also create (while we still have the 'net to do it with) a sense of strong anticipation for this information. If we're good, we can build a strong enough sense of anticipation to make failure to release this information more dangerous to them than the information itself--or, at least, give them similar weight. Furthermore, a lot of smart people are blind to the realities of the situation because they can't find a motivation for this sudden onslaught on the Constitution and our liberties, and this does provide a plausible reason for it.
If the government itself killed the duly elected president of the United States (and there's plenty of evidence that it did), then the Constitution died forty-nine years ago next month. And that has the power to piss people off. I think that if this is a major motivation for their recent actions, they over reacted. Of course, they wanted an excuse to over react because they have an agenda--a profitable agenda--and they are no doubt impatient to get it on line. Also remember that George H.W. Bush is up to his eyebrows in the Kennedy debacle; he was CIA at the time, and in Dallas on the day. And we got trapped into this endgame scenario by his son. It was Dubya who did the first bailouts, thus effectively sealing the Fed dollar's fate. There was no way for the funny money to recover with that kind of debt weighing it down. It was Dubya who tore down the centuries-old tradition of habeus corpus and set up Guantanimo. Dubya allegedly sent us into Iraq because Saddam threatened his father's life. Obviously, the exposure of daddy's exact role in Dallas on November 22, 1963 is a far, far greater threat to daddy's health than a tinhorn renegade puppet halfway across the world.
We're in a race. We've got to wake people up before they complete their endgame on the Constitution. The faster they move, the more they help us wake people up. So, they must both move quickly and tread carefully. That's an advantage to us. And if we have dots to connect and can connect them, that, too, is an advantage to us. But if I have stumbled on both their deadline for this endgame and the major source of their concern, that could be the greatest advantage of all. And I believe the Kennedy material, even after all of these years, is explosive enough to get a lot of Americans out of their armchairs.
So, is this the impetus, is this the timeline, and how can we best use this information to our advantage?
Many people have felt this, whether they have a long enough term view to really understand the depth of the change. There have been silly reasons for it put forward; things like the Mayan calendar and whatnot. I don't think that has a single thing to do with it. But it does smell like there's a deadline. Once upon a time, they did their incrementalization but they were very scrupulous not to rock the boat too much. Now they're pushing the envelope more than ever before. Seems like there's a trial balloon in the press every day, and whatever infringement of our liberties doesn't draw too many comments of protest when they suggest it gets implemented within a week.
Well, I can think of one upcoming event that could be causing them to go for broke. In thirteen months, we will have the fiftieth anniversary of the Kennedy assassination, otherwise known as the CIA coup d'etat. Now, many of us are familiar with the Freedom of Information Act. The files on the assassination were uniquely and rather famously sealed for more than the usual term specified by the Act. In fact, those files were sealed for fifty years.
That means that a whole bunch of interesting information about that day in Dallas will be coming out, or should be coming out, within the next fourteen months. And many of us know that there's a lot of juicy stuff in there, about George H.W. Bush among others. Some of the grand old journalists of the last half century, including Jim Lehrer, are also at risk as we wait to see if what they didn't cover on that day destroys their reputations. This is particularly important as those in charge depend on the credibility of the propaganda machine to cover up and play down some of their bigger abuses of power.
Will they reneg on the promise to let this stuff see the light of day--and if so, what will the reaction be? Will they take the chance that this coup d'etat will piss red-blooded Americans off? Dare they admit that there's information in these files which still has the power to implicate organizations and companies after all of this time? For I believe that it does. This really was a coup, and the list of perpetrators is a virtual who's who of power ever since.
If I'm right about this, then the information is useful to us two ways. One, it gives us a better sense of their timeline. We can basically look at their efforts to convert the nation to a police state as a project with a deadline--of November 22, 2013. This is an advantage. We can also create (while we still have the 'net to do it with) a sense of strong anticipation for this information. If we're good, we can build a strong enough sense of anticipation to make failure to release this information more dangerous to them than the information itself--or, at least, give them similar weight. Furthermore, a lot of smart people are blind to the realities of the situation because they can't find a motivation for this sudden onslaught on the Constitution and our liberties, and this does provide a plausible reason for it.
If the government itself killed the duly elected president of the United States (and there's plenty of evidence that it did), then the Constitution died forty-nine years ago next month. And that has the power to piss people off. I think that if this is a major motivation for their recent actions, they over reacted. Of course, they wanted an excuse to over react because they have an agenda--a profitable agenda--and they are no doubt impatient to get it on line. Also remember that George H.W. Bush is up to his eyebrows in the Kennedy debacle; he was CIA at the time, and in Dallas on the day. And we got trapped into this endgame scenario by his son. It was Dubya who did the first bailouts, thus effectively sealing the Fed dollar's fate. There was no way for the funny money to recover with that kind of debt weighing it down. It was Dubya who tore down the centuries-old tradition of habeus corpus and set up Guantanimo. Dubya allegedly sent us into Iraq because Saddam threatened his father's life. Obviously, the exposure of daddy's exact role in Dallas on November 22, 1963 is a far, far greater threat to daddy's health than a tinhorn renegade puppet halfway across the world.
We're in a race. We've got to wake people up before they complete their endgame on the Constitution. The faster they move, the more they help us wake people up. So, they must both move quickly and tread carefully. That's an advantage to us. And if we have dots to connect and can connect them, that, too, is an advantage to us. But if I have stumbled on both their deadline for this endgame and the major source of their concern, that could be the greatest advantage of all. And I believe the Kennedy material, even after all of these years, is explosive enough to get a lot of Americans out of their armchairs.
So, is this the impetus, is this the timeline, and how can we best use this information to our advantage?