PDA

View Full Version : Commit to Mitt, or Pledge to Obama?




Origanalist
09-25-2012, 04:21 PM
http://i1.cpcache.com/product/607605491/commit_to_mitt_2012_yard_sign.jpg?height=240&width=240

http://cdn.washingtonexaminer.biz/cache/r620-61248ccc8b9fdae705aa8eaa40a8b835.jpg

How about just tell em both to take a hike? The idea of voting is getting harder to justify every day.

jkr
09-25-2012, 04:30 PM
false
choice

NOBP

Origanalist
09-25-2012, 04:36 PM
false
choice

NOBP

Yes, write in Paul and vote on local candidates and issues. But there are so few where I live that matter at all, I'm beginning to wonder why I bother.

James Madison
09-25-2012, 05:00 PM
Fuck 'em both!

Origanalist
09-25-2012, 05:02 PM
Fuck 'em both!

Ewwwwwwww.................

Lucille
09-25-2012, 05:06 PM
http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2012/09/chris-hedges-reaping-of-america.html

Chris Hedges:
"We will all swallow our cup of corporate poison. We can take it from nurse Romney, who will tell us not to whine and play the victim, or we can take it from nurse Obama, who will assure us that this hurts him even more than it hurts us, but one way or another the corporate hemlock will be shoved down our throats. The choice before us is how it will be administered.

Corporate power, no matter who is running the ward after January 2013, is poised to carry out U.S. history’s most savage assault against the poor and the working class... And no one in power, no matter what the bedside manner, has any intention or ability to stop it.

If you insist on participating in the cash-drenched charade of a two-party democratic election at least be clear about what you are doing. You are, by playing your assigned role as the Democratic or Republican voter in this political theater, giving legitimacy to a corporate agenda that means your own impoverishment and disempowerment.
[...]
Our corporate oligarchs are harvesting the nation, grabbing as much as they can, as fast as they can, in the inevitable descent...

Obama is not in charge. Romney would not be in charge. Politicians are the public face of corporate power. They are corporate employees. Their personal narratives, their promises, their rhetoric and their idiosyncrasies are meaningless. And that, perhaps, is why the cost of the two presidential campaigns is estimated to reach an obscene $2.5 billion. The corporate state does not produce a product that is different. It produces brands that are different. And brands cost a lot of money to sell.

You can dismiss those of us who will in protest vote for a third-party candidate and invest our time and energy in acts of civil disobedience. You can pride yourself on being practical. You can swallow the false argument of the lesser of two evils. But ask yourself, once this nightmare starts kicking in, who the real sucker is. "

sailingaway
09-25-2012, 05:26 PM
No.

juleswin
09-25-2012, 06:12 PM
I would vote for neither man and so my vote is canceled out. I never thought I would say this but Johnson with all his flaws is getting my vote

sailingaway
09-25-2012, 06:41 PM
Yes, write in Paul and vote on local candidates and issues. But there are so few where I live that matter at all, I'm beginning to wonder why I bother.

To SHOW rejection. If you don't show up and vote on something they call it apathy or contentment, not rejection.

Writing in Ron Paul shows rejection of the others, imho.

Origanalist
09-25-2012, 07:30 PM
To SHOW rejection. If you don't show up and vote on something they call it apathy or contentment, not rejection.

Writing in Ron Paul shows rejection of the others, imho.

Oh, I'll be there. If only for that. :mad:

Dr.3D
09-25-2012, 07:33 PM
To SHOW rejection. If you don't show up and vote on something they call it apathy or contentment, not rejection.

Writing in Ron Paul shows rejection of the others, imho.
That's my plan, even if my state doesn't record that as a vote for anybody.