PDA

View Full Version : Elizabeth Warren leading in polls... SERIOUSLY?




kathy88
09-21-2012, 07:37 AM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/17/elizabeth-warren-scott-brown_n_1889660.html?ref=topbar

Don't people pay attention? The bitch got caught LYING about being a native American and these fucking lemmings just ignore it? Or don't people even know? Are they uninformed or just don't care?

thoughtomator
09-21-2012, 07:40 AM
it's Massachusetts

just let them go broke, they won't get it until then

mport1
09-21-2012, 07:48 AM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/17/elizabeth-warren-scott-brown_n_1889660.html?ref=topbar

Don't people pay attention? The bitch got caught LYING about being a native American and these fucking lemmings just ignore it? Or don't people even know? Are they uninformed or just don't care?

Who cares about that? What is much more significant is that she is incredibly socialist.

kahless
09-21-2012, 07:48 AM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/17/elizabeth-warren-scott-brown_n_1889660.html?ref=topbar

Don't people pay attention? The bitch got caught LYING about being a native American and these fucking lemmings just ignore it? Or don't people even know? Are they uninformed or just don't care?

The facts do not matter. "As long as I go to the voting booth and select D I am doing the right thing for my country and the working man. The Republicans are all religious zealots that hate gays, are waging a war on women and are the bad guys." /sarcasm

angelatc
09-21-2012, 08:30 AM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/17/elizabeth-warren-scott-brown_n_1889660.html?ref=topbar

Don't people pay attention? The bitch got caught LYING about being a native American and these fucking lemmings just ignore it? Or don't people even know? Are they uninformed or just don't care?

Liberals have no real morals. They're greedy thugs, nothing more. They're voting for the person who they feel will give them the most goodies.

Bastiat's The Law
09-21-2012, 09:26 AM
Romney is such a turd sandwich as a candidate he's bringing all republicans down in the polls.

tttppp
09-21-2012, 09:39 AM
I thought the point of elections was to keep people like her out of power.

kathy88
09-21-2012, 09:41 AM
"Conservative" talk radio has been blasting this bitch from all sides for a while. I truly think that's the attraction for the D's. If Rush hates her, she must be someone we want.

angelatc
09-21-2012, 09:49 AM
Romney is such a turd sandwich as a candidate he's bringing all republicans down in the polls.

Here in his home state of Michigan, RINO Governor Snyder is yammering about raising gas taxes. I'm sure the Republicans who are actually running this year are thrilled with his timing on that.

truelies
09-21-2012, 09:49 AM
I thought the point of elections was to keep people like her out of power.

The PURPOSE of democracy is Power to the Sociopaths.

muzzled dogg
09-21-2012, 09:56 AM
taxachusetts

Philhelm
09-21-2012, 10:03 AM
Who cares about that? What is much more significant is that she is incredibly socialist.

True, but integrity matters.

wgadget
09-21-2012, 10:06 AM
From what I heard on some radio show, she was a fresh new voice who came out AGAINST the banker class, which says a lot for the rancor you hear about her from the neocons. It seems she's "anti-corporatist" whereas her opponent is "pro-corporatist."

kathy88
09-21-2012, 10:07 AM
True, but integrity matters.

Exactly. The Dems are rife with socialists, but many of them truly believe their way is the best way. Doesn't make them less honest. Warren is a lying sack of shit and should have been run out of Harvard on a rail. Instead, it's looking like she's going to win her election. The taxpayers will still pay for this bitch's salary either way you slice it.

wgadget
09-21-2012, 10:08 AM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/17/elizabeth-warren-scott-brown_n_1889660.html?ref=topbar

Don't people pay attention? The bitch got caught LYING about being a native American and these fucking lemmings just ignore it? Or don't people even know? Are they uninformed or just don't care?

As if ethnicity means a hill of beans in these trying times...I'm gonna call it a straw man. The corporatists are running scared of this "bitch," imo.

kathy88
09-21-2012, 10:08 AM
From what I heard on some radio show, she was a fresh new voice who came out AGAINST the banker class, which says a lot for the rancor you hear about her from the neocons. It seems she's "anti-corporatist" whereas her opponent is "pro-corporatist."

Does not excuse the fact that she pretended to be a minority to get a cushy job at Harvard.

kathy88
09-21-2012, 10:09 AM
As if ethnicity means a hill of beans in these trying times...I'm gonna call it a straw man. The corporatists are running scared of this "bitch," imo.

Ethnicity doesn't matter. Lying about being a minority to get ahead does. If she'd lie about that what else? You gonna believe a word that comes out of her mouth?

wgadget
09-21-2012, 10:09 AM
It's irrelevant in the scheme of things. Look at the big picture.

kathy88
09-21-2012, 10:10 AM
My big picture doesn't include lying fucks holding office getting paid with our tax dollars.

MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2
09-21-2012, 10:11 AM
True, but integrity matters.

It does to us, but I think things are so bad, people just expect politicians to lie.

At the top levels, they expect them to lie, commit crimes, and never be prosecuted. Nothing to worry about, move along.

belian78
09-21-2012, 10:13 AM
It's irrelevant in the scheme of things. Look at the big picture.
You're both right. The fact that this woman lied so easily, and for such a reason SHOULD rule her out for any public position. However, in today's 'my team vs your team' version of politics, scruples dignity and principles really aren't such a main concern. Sad, but true.

matt0611
09-21-2012, 10:23 AM
Yeah, I watched the debate and she is terrible. Basically an Obama-clone "fair share, raise taxes millionaires and billionaires, invest in education green-energy, oil companies make billions in profit, you didn't build that blah blah blah".

Yeah, Scott Brown is not great but he's the best we can do here in Massachusetts, sadly. At least he doesn't want to raise taxes.

And if she gets in she'll be Senator for life just like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry.

If Obama is going to be re-elected I want to make sure the republicans have a majority in the Senate. I'll be holding my nose and voting for Brown in November.

I still think he will end up winning.

Brian4Liberty
09-21-2012, 10:25 AM
From what I heard on some radio show, she was a fresh new voice who came out AGAINST the banker class, which says a lot for the rancor you hear about her from the neocons. It seems she's "anti-corporatist" whereas her opponent is "pro-corporatist."

That was my impression too. Scott Brown doesn't strike me as any better on any other issues.

matt0611
09-21-2012, 10:37 AM
From what I heard on some radio show, she was a fresh new voice who came out AGAINST the banker class, which says a lot for the rancor you hear about her from the neocons. It seems she's "anti-corporatist" whereas her opponent is "pro-corporatist."

Yes, by "more regulation", more Dodd-Frank type bills, more agencies and bureaucracies, ever hear of the "Consumer Protection Agency" ? That group of un-elected bureaucrats that are not even financed by congress but directly by the Federal Reserve? She was its chief mastermind.

And she's all for doing "whatever it take to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon", "all options on the table" etc. Those are actual quotes.

She is for more regulation, higher taxes, more centralization, higher spending, more debt, status-quo foreign policy, status-quo monetary policy etc.

Don't be fooled.

The Gold Standard
09-21-2012, 10:45 AM
And she's all for doing "whatever it take to stop Israel from getting a nuclear weapon"

Well, she's a little late I would say. We already gave them several hundred.

matt0611
09-21-2012, 10:47 AM
Well, she's a little late I would say. We already gave them several hundred.

Sorry, meant Iran.

jmdrake
09-21-2012, 10:50 AM
Meh. Scott Brown isn't really a republican anyway. Does this mean Mitt Romney will lose his home state? I would LOL so hard if he did!

matt0611
09-21-2012, 10:54 AM
Meh. Scott Brown isn't really a republican anyway. Does this mean Mitt Romney will lose his home state? I would LOL so hard if he did!

Mitt was always going to lose in Massachusetts. Its not even in play really. MA will go to Obama.

Anti Federalist
09-21-2012, 11:02 AM
Meh. Scott Brown isn't really a republican anyway. Does this mean Mitt Romney will lose his home state? I would LOL so hard if he did!

Matt already said it, it was never a question, he is going to lose Mass by double digits.

Why the surprise?

This is the state that sent Ted Kennedy and Barney Frwank back to DC decade after decade.

James Madison
09-21-2012, 12:02 PM
Stunning. A woman lies about her minority status and the so-called party of diversity gives her a free pass. Could you imagine the outrage if a Republican had done the same thing? They'd be screaming 'racisit' at the top of their lungs. My grandfather is fullblood American Indian. I had the opportunity to receive minority-based scholarships but I refused because such things should be awarded based on personal accomplishments, not things we are born into. And yet this bitch lies, gets caught, and doesn't get punished. Fuck her.

Aratus
09-21-2012, 12:05 PM
starting from the top --- she's going for Teddy Kennedy's seat and has more people skills than our A.G. Martha Coakley did.
there are two Democrats party registered for every Republican and the number of independents is equal to the number of GOP
people, each Republican NEEDS indies and a few Democrats to make any dent in the party that usually wins our elections. Our
GOP contenders when going at it up here can be 3 degrees to the left of Mitt Romney or 15 degrees to the right of his more
recent stances and this does not really change how badly they can be smucked by. Scott Brown is being percieved as a really
nice guy and this has helped him. I'd call Wednesday's debate a draw and yes, all the Baystaters at the DNC helped solidify her
in the eyes of our voters as somebody of importance. When Bill Clinton countered Christy of NJ and galvanized the DNC it had
given her the confortable boost that says the election is hers to loose. Scott Brown is a GOP moderate in terms of his votes.

libertariantexas
09-21-2012, 12:06 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/17/elizabeth-warren-scott-brown_n_1889660.html?ref=topbar

Don't people pay attention? The bitch got caught LYING about being a native American and these fucking lemmings just ignore it? Or don't people even know? Are they uninformed or just don't care?

It's Massachusetts. Hiawatha Warren has a huge built in advantage. She'd have to be a complete screw up to lose (like the awful candidate Brown beat to begin with).

While she is clearly an inept politicians, she may not be a big enough screw up to lose this "gimme" election.

Remember, these people voted for Ted Kennedy decade after decade after decade...

Aratus
09-21-2012, 12:09 PM
taxachusetts

shem is succinct

Aratus
09-21-2012, 12:12 PM
i want to try to take on senator john kerry in 2014 even
though at best i might only get 30% to 40% of the vote

tttppp
09-21-2012, 01:00 PM
The PURPOSE of democracy is Power to the Sociopaths.

I would like to see her get a real job, with real authority and see what she does with it. A congressman is just another unaccountable position that anyone can do, and if you suck at it, nobody will ever know.

seeker4sho
09-21-2012, 01:26 PM
Wow, interesting responses:rolleyes:

jmdrake
09-21-2012, 01:38 PM
Mitt was always going to lose in Massachusetts. Its not even in play really. MA will go to Obama.


Matt already said it, it was never a question, he is going to lose Mass by double digits.

Why the surprise?

This is the state that sent Ted Kennedy and Barney Frwank back to DC decade after decade.

Yeah, but you're expected to win your home state. Georgia isn't liberal by any stretch of the imagination, but Jimmy Carter still carried it in 1980. It was a major loss of face for Al Gore to lose Tennessee in 2000.

juleswin
09-21-2012, 04:06 PM
Whenever you see a turd sandwich leading in a well covered race like in MA, there is always a bigger, smellier, more slimy turd sandwhich beside it. Sorry but when you give people the option between a liberal and a RINO, they will choose the authentic liberal 90% of the time

juleswin
09-21-2012, 04:09 PM
Yeah, but you're expected to win your home state. Georgia isn't liberal by any stretch of the imagination, but Jimmy Carter still carried it in 1980. It was a major loss of face for Al Gore to lose Tennessee in 2000.

I guess in the 80s candidates actually spent time in their "home town" after college other than a few years during stints as gov.

matt0611
09-21-2012, 05:37 PM
Whenever you see a turd sandwich leading in a well covered race like in MA, there is always a bigger, smellier, more slimy turd sandwhich beside it. Sorry but when you give people the option between a liberal and a RINO, they will choose the authentic liberal 90% of the time

You can't be republican senator from MA without being a RINO. Do you really blame him? He's being attacked for being TOO CONSERVATIVE.

If you stray anymore than a few feet to the right of Joseph Stalin our idiot electorate here in Massachusetts will just replace you with someone more liberal.

Anti Federalist
09-21-2012, 05:52 PM
Yeah, but you're expected to win your home state. Georgia isn't liberal by any stretch of the imagination, but Jimmy Carter still carried it in 1980. It was a major loss of face for Al Gore to lose Tennessee in 2000.

That said, what is Romney's "home state"?

Michigan? He's probably going to lose there.

California? He's definitely going to lose there.

Massachusetts? He definitely going to lose there as well.

New Hampshire? He's likely to lose there.

Utah is about the only "home state" of his that he is likely to win.

Keith and stuff
09-21-2012, 05:55 PM
That said, what is Romney's "home state"?

Michigan? He's probably going to lose there.

California? He's definitely going to lose there.

Massachusetts? He definitely going to lose there as well.

New Hampshire? He's likely to lose there.

Utah is about the only "home state" of his that he is likely to win.

I thought his home state was Mexico. Isn't that where his family is from? I thought his dad was a Mexican.

Agorism
09-21-2012, 06:04 PM
Elizabeth Warren is probably the most irritating democrat out there, but idk if I could vote for Scott Brown either.

Keith and stuff
09-21-2012, 06:12 PM
Elizabeth Warren is probably the most irritating democrat out there, but idk if I could vote for Scott Brown either.

If I lived in MA, I'd vote for Scott Brown. There is no pro-liberty candidate in the race and I tend to vote, and to vote for the least bad candidate in the race (as long as their are at least 2 candidates). If the GOP gets a majority in the US Senate, it will mean a great deal for Rand Paul's agenda. He will be able to have a lot more votes, amendments and so on. Plus, I'm worried that Reid may never allow a vote on a full audit of the FED.

matt0611
09-21-2012, 06:37 PM
If I lived in MA, I'd vote for Scott Brown. There is no pro-liberty candidate in the race and I tend to vote, and to vote for the least bad candidate in the race (as long as their are at least 2 candidates). If the GOP gets a majority in the US Senate, it will mean a great deal for Rand Paul's agenda. He will be able to have a lot more votes, amendments and so on. Plus, I'm worried that Reid may never allow a vote on a full audit of the FED.

Yep. I'm voting for Brown, he may be a RINO but he's better than having another Harvard Professor Obama-clone in the Senate for life.

juleswin
09-21-2012, 07:01 PM
You can't be republican senator from MA without being a RINO. Do you really blame him? He's being attacked for being TOO CONSERVATIVE.

If you stray anymore than a few feet to the right of Joseph Stalin our idiot electorate here in Massachusetts will just replace you with someone more liberal.

One can drop the religious right/social conservative thing (which he already dropped) and still win as a true fiscal conservative in Massachusetts. And while he is at it, he can be non interventionist and still do just fine. But instead he choose to be a warmonger(supported Libyan war + all the other wars we r fighting) and a welfare state guy, sorry but I have seen this movie before so am going to pass

matt0611
09-21-2012, 07:12 PM
Double Post.

matt0611
09-21-2012, 07:13 PM
One can drop the religious right/social conservative thing (which he already dropped) and still win as a true fiscal conservative in Massachusetts. And while he is at it, he can be non interventionist and still do just fine. But instead he choose to be a warmonger(supported Libyan war + all the other wars we r fighting) and a welfare state guy, sorry but I have seen this movie before so am going to pass

Yeah, well when there is a guy running for Senate that has those views I'll vote for him (which I did, since I voted for Joe Kennedy(no relation) in 2010), until then I'll vote for the RINO over the Obama clone.