aroberso
11-19-2007, 12:28 PM
We must remember that people new to Dr. Paul's message will thirst for more of it, as I still do.
The way to reach to vast majority of older voters is still the MSM and word-of-mouth, so we have to play the game at least a little.
We have effectively fought to get Dr. Paul covered MORE in the MSM, and now we must continue to fight for MORE of that coverage to be FAVORABLE.
The way to do this is with serious debate on the issues, not hate mail and attacking people's intelligence.
We must remember that many people will have to question their entire belief system in order to support Dr. Paul. They need to hear the LOGIC and COMMON SENSE that is so clear in Dr. Paul's message once you take the time to learn more.
As for me, my belief system has been turned on its head in the last couple of years and I am embarrsed to know how wrong I have been on so many things.
I encourage everyone to think about the best way to go about getting Dr. Paul's message out without polarizing and/or motivating the competition.
The way to reach to vast majority of older voters is still the MSM and word-of-mouth, so we have to play the game at least a little.
We have effectively fought to get Dr. Paul covered MORE in the MSM, and now we must continue to fight for MORE of that coverage to be FAVORABLE.
The way to do this is with serious debate on the issues, not hate mail and attacking people's intelligence.
We must remember that many people will have to question their entire belief system in order to support Dr. Paul. They need to hear the LOGIC and COMMON SENSE that is so clear in Dr. Paul's message once you take the time to learn more.
As for me, my belief system has been turned on its head in the last couple of years and I am embarrsed to know how wrong I have been on so many things.
I encourage everyone to think about the best way to go about getting Dr. Paul's message out without polarizing and/or motivating the competition.