PDA

View Full Version : A World On The Verge Of War?




John F Kennedy III
09-17-2012, 01:20 PM
A World On The Verge Of War?


Zero Hedge
September 17, 2012

Here is a summary of where the world stands: -

- Unable to reach a compromise over the weekend, South Africa is now in an all out labor strike, with the police again firing rubber bullets at miners with lethal escalation guaranteed


- Back from vacation, the once again penniless citizens of Spain, Greece, and Portugal have resumed protesting austerity

- US embassies attacked, in many cases with numerous casualties, in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, Sudan, Lebanon, India, Balgadesh, Indonesia, and others.

- Japan “appropriating” China-contested islands provoking a firestorm of retaliation including demands for “war with Japan”

- The Japanese ambassador to China dying mysteriously

- Netanyahu telling Meet the Press Iran will have a nuke in six-seven months and must be stopped beforehand

- Warships from more than 25 countries, including the United States, Britain, France, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, launching a military exercise in the Straits of Hormuz

- A third US aircraft – the CVN-74 Stennis – carrier is en route to Iran with an ETA of about 10 days

- And finally, a potential catalyst to light this whole mess on fire, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard announcing that its troops are now on the ground in Syria.

From Reuters:


Members of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) are providing non-military assistance in Syria and Iran may get involved militarily if its closest ally comes under attack, commander-in-chief Mohammad Ali Jafari said on Sunday.

Jafari’s statement is the first official acknowledgement that Iran has a military presence on the ground in Syria where an 18-month-old uprising has left tens of thousands dead.

Western countries and Syrian opposition groups have long suspected Iran has troops in Syria. Iran has denied this.

“A number of members of the Qods force are present in Syria but this does not constitute a military presence,” Iranian news agency ISNA quoted Jafari as saying at a news conference.

Qods is an IRGC unit set up to export Iran’s ideology. It has been accused of plotting attacks inside Iraq since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein.

Jafari did not indicate how many IRGC members were in Syria but said they were providing “intellectual and advisory help”.

The Islamic Republic has backed Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad since the crisis began and regards his rule as a key part of its axis of resistance against Israel and Sunni Arab states.

Jafari also said Iran would change its policy and offer military backing if Syria came under attack.

“I say specifically that if Syria came under military attack, Iran would also give military support but it … totally depends on the circumstances,” he said.

Next up: satellite photos somewhere “confirming” beyond a reasonable doubt that weapons of mass destruction are being prepared for usage, and a preemptive war is the only way to not only preserve peace, but to be awarded the Nobel prize in said activity.

What is perfectly obvious to anyone but the most jaded and biased, is that the West will use any opportunity of conflict escalation which in turn will send crude, and gas, prices soaring, to commence the launch of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve release, arguably at just the right time to push down gas prices, which as we showed on Friday have never been higher on this day in history. “Right time”, because any SPR release will have the short-term benefit of boosting Obama’s re-election chances even more, even if it means surging gas prices after the election.

The reality of course is that the bulk of upside pressure on commodity (crude and gas included) prices is as a result of the Fed and ECB’s recent monetization expansion and liquidity tsunami, which does the usual: soothes the symptoms for a few weeks, crushes volatility and creates the impression that all is well…. if only to lead to yet another far more grave outcome. And since there is now officially no limit much debt the Fed will monetize, there is so no limit on how high commodity prices will go.

So while in reality any war, supposedly one which is “regional” and “contained” will merely be a smokescreen to the central banks officially taking over ownership of the insolvent developed world, the likelihood is that a war will neither be “regional” nor “contained” as both countries that make up the axis of a future hard-backed currency, China and Russia, have already made it quite clear that any intervention by the US in regions they themselves consider strategic, such as the Senkaku Islands, Syria and/or Iran, will result in retaliation.

And retaliation by one or more rising superpowers to another fading superpower, will inevitably lead to yet another World War.

Needless to say, nobody could possibly foresee war as the outcome to the global depression ver 2.0: certainly not the Princeton historian who will be, more than anyone else, responsible for it.


hyperlinks in original article here:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/world-verge-war

Zippyjuan
09-17-2012, 01:38 PM
The exercises in the Gulf region were planned months ago and have occured every year- nothing new. The USS John C Stennis is going to the region to replace the USS Enterprise which is scheduled to head home in September to be decomissioned. The US always keeps two carriers in the region. Iran having people in Syria is nothing new though them admitting it is.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/07/pentagon-sends-carrier-to-the-middle-east-early/

The Pentagon is sending the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis to sea four months ahead of schedule to ensure that there are at least two carriers in the Middle East.

The U.S. Navy has had two carriers operating in the Middle East for quite some time. It usually rotates one of the two carriers into the Persian Gulf for several weeks at a time while the other operates in the Arabian Sea, providing air support for the war in Afghanistan.

Today, Pentagon spokesman George Little confirmed that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has agreed to a recent request from U.S. Central Command to maintain a two-carrier presence in the Middle East.

In September the U.S. was going to go down to one carrier, as the USS Enterprise would not be replaced after it left the region. To prevent that from happening the Stennis has had its deployment orders changed from the Pacific to the Middle East.

Little says the Stennis is being sent so that there is no gap in between two carrier assignments to the region. Also being sent on the deployment will be the cruiser USS Mobile Bay.

Little said the need to send the carrier early was “not a decision based solely on the challenges posed by Iran.”

On Sunday, the USS Eisenhower replaced the other carrier in the region, the USS Abraham Lincoln, which is headed to Norfolk for maintenance work.

In order to make the Stennis/Enterprise swap possible, the Enterprise’s deployment will be extended for what officials say will be “a few days.” It also means the crew of the Stennis will be out to sea for longer than they had expected. Originally slated for a four-month Pacific Ocean deployment, the Stennis will now leave four months early to serve a seven month deployment that will last through April 2013.


Article is actuall;y from July- they are just now on their way so this has been in the works for a while.

alucard13mmfmj
09-17-2012, 01:41 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZiymqBohKA&feature=plcp

John F Kennedy III
09-17-2012, 08:27 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZiymqBohKA&feature=plcp

Thanks for posting.

acptulsa
09-17-2012, 08:50 PM
The exercises in the Gulf region were planned months ago and have occured every year- nothing new. The USS John C Stennis is going to the region to replace the USS Enterprise which is scheduled to head home in September to be decomissioned. The US always keeps two carriers in the region. Iran having people in Syria is nothing new though them admitting it is.

Article is actuall;y from July- they are just now on their way so this has been in the works for a while.

And does it matter if it's the U.S. or Israel who is the architect of world destruction? Because you can't convince me that those 'red line' comments were made in ignorance of this large, impending exercise.

awake
09-17-2012, 09:01 PM
There are way too many people who drink from the same kool aid cup; that WW2 ended the depression. We are headed down that road because military adventurism is regarded as economic stimulus. And quite frankly politicians love the distractions that war provides, it gives them time to work on welfare-isim.

Indy Vidual
09-17-2012, 09:55 PM
How can we stop the war?

acptulsa
09-17-2012, 10:00 PM
How can we stop the war?

We fight this the same way we've been fighting it--educate, ridicule, and rebut. And pray that no one is stupid enough to shoot at us first--no matter how hard we try to draw fire.

This might help:


'China is having a new war, and we are having trouble getting into it. We always have gunboats there, so if there is any shooting, why, one of our boats will be shot at and that gives us the usual alibi.'
'But this time it seems we only had one gunboat and it had to maneuver around for days before it could get in the line of fire.'--Will Rogers