PDA

View Full Version : I responded to a tweet directed at US from Mitt Romney Central




sailingaway
08-28-2012, 05:09 PM
https://twitter.com/RomneyCentral/status/240553596859600896

my response:

https://twitter.com/usernamenuse/status/240586503879786496

sailingaway
08-28-2012, 05:12 PM
Oh, and this came over twitter, too:

https://p.twimg.com/A1a8sKOCYAEvDkd.jpg


dissidentX
‏@dissidentX
@Rene_devries Ron Paul served. Mitt ran and hid. @yowan pic.twitter.com/TnsFwJC1

LibertyEagle
08-28-2012, 05:12 PM
They destroyed any and all chances of that. Lying, cheating, sacks of dung.

sailingaway
08-28-2012, 05:13 PM
They destroyed any and all chances of that. Lying, cheating, sacks of dung.

Yep. Sometimes when you control too hard you create what you fear.

acptulsa
08-28-2012, 05:13 PM
Dad and grandad both fought Germany--because it was run the way you ran that convention. Count me out.

HOLLYWOOD
08-28-2012, 05:16 PM
another Hash Tag:

http://www.c-span.org/

#cspanRNC

jbauer
08-28-2012, 05:16 PM
Is romney central romney's campaign? Fuck them

Miss Annie
08-28-2012, 05:23 PM
They destroyed any and all chances of that. Lying, cheating, sacks of dung.

How can they expect anyone's respect, much less their endorsement by lying and cheating? !*%#T for brains!

Q11Q
08-28-2012, 05:24 PM
If you don't bleat for Romney like a good little sheeple, he will beat you into submission. Those 2 million Ron Paul votes are enough to energize a new Conservative Party. So my response to the Romney campaign is to flock off!

georgiaboy
08-28-2012, 05:27 PM
The nerve.

NoOneButPaul
08-28-2012, 05:29 PM
It's pretty crazy to think...

All we needed was 8million more people to beat him. It seems like a lot but it really isn't.

No1butPaul
08-28-2012, 05:31 PM
I like the comment somebody else made on another thread (sorry I forgot who), but basically - we don't want to waste our votes on somebody who is going to lose.

S.Shorland
08-28-2012, 05:35 PM
https://twitter.com/SShorland/status/240593344366006272

Barrex
08-28-2012, 05:36 PM
they lead us 90:3

phill4paul
08-28-2012, 05:38 PM
"whining?" Lol. I'm not whining I'm just not voting. I don't whine. I express discontent through action.

sluggo
08-28-2012, 05:44 PM
#Rmoney needs to start trending soon.

sailingaway
08-28-2012, 05:47 PM
#Rmoney needs to start trending soon.

Ron Paul has been, off and on.

libertyjam
08-28-2012, 05:49 PM
http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/293447_4667016839291_1001836181_n.jpg

libertyjam
08-28-2012, 05:53 PM
https://twitter.com/jam4liberty/status/240590104530411520

rockandrollsouls
08-28-2012, 06:20 PM
Good luck beating Obama without our 2 mil ;)

We are a FORCE now. The idea has taken off. We are the power brokers. They can not succeed without us!


They destroyed any and all chances of that. Lying, cheating, sacks of dung.

rockandrollsouls
08-28-2012, 06:21 PM
We increased our numbers EXPONENTIALLY in 2 short years, when Ron actually let us know that this was going to be continued! Imagine where we'll be in FOUR!


It's pretty crazy to think...

All we needed was 8million more people to beat him. It seems like a lot but it really isn't.

ProBlue33
08-28-2012, 06:42 PM
We increased our numbers EXPONENTIALLY in 2 short years, when Ron actually let us know that this was going to be continued! Imagine where we'll be in FOUR!

I really resent your signature, I do not support Obama in 2012, I supported Obama ONLY against McCain after Ron Paul was out in 2008, because I mistakenly thought Obama would make a more peaceful president IN 2008, I was wrong.
Remove that slander from your signature, please.

rockandrollsouls
08-28-2012, 07:08 PM
You did support Obama. Your reasoning doesn't matter. It's been that way since 08, and I will not be changing it.


I really resent your signature, I do not support Obama in 2012, I supported Obama ONLY against McCain after Ron Paul was out in 2008, because I mistakenly thought Obama would make a more peaceful president IN 2008, I was wrong.
Remove that slander from your signature, please.

Ivash
08-28-2012, 07:08 PM
Oh, and this came over twitter, too:

That's quite a good picture of Ron Paul to. He was a handsome man.

CPUd
08-28-2012, 07:44 PM
Up next - the Mitt 6-6-6 plan:

http://i.imgur.com/Aarsk.jpg

VBRonPaulFan
08-28-2012, 08:04 PM
It's pretty crazy to think...

All we needed was 8million more people to beat him. It seems like a lot but it really isn't.

actually, less than that. if 4 million had switched from romney to paul (like 45% of romneys vote), ron would have had more votes than romney. i think quite a few people voted for romney rather than paul in the primaries because they didn't think paul had any chance of getting the nomination anyways (due to the media).

VBRonPaulFan
08-28-2012, 08:04 PM
double post

WesSeid
08-28-2012, 08:53 PM
Earlier in the process, and even later in the process, there was a slight chance I could maybe have been convinced to vote for Romney.

The changing the required nomination states from five to eight at the last minute was the absolute last straw. Nevada led the petition and could have nominated him if not for that.

Dr.3D
08-28-2012, 09:10 PM
That's quite a good picture of Ron Paul to. He was a handsome man.
He still is a handsome man.