Ira Aten
11-18-2007, 09:13 AM
If Ron Paul isn't banned from the next debate, he can win the nomination by making the 2nd Amendment a debate topic, pointing out that the majority of the guys on the stage (i.e., so call front runners) have all earned a track record of being for gun controls which violate the 2nd Amendment.
It is really time for him, no matter wheat the question, simply sidle into discussions of how Guliani once said that "it makes better sense, to have a system where we take all guns out of society..."
He just needs to jump all up in that.
The majority of Americans agree with the 2nd Amendment.
He needs to point out that Thompson voted for THIRTEEN seperate anti 2nd AMendment measures in the Senate, and that Romney also supported anti-2nd Amendment measures as governor. Paul, in TEN TERMS of Congressional service, voted for ZERO anti-2nd Amendment measures.
I guess I forgot, McCain. He voted and sponsored McCain-Feingold, which was a muzzle to place on the NRA. Why those idiots support him, I will never know.
It is really time for him, no matter wheat the question, simply sidle into discussions of how Guliani once said that "it makes better sense, to have a system where we take all guns out of society..."
He just needs to jump all up in that.
The majority of Americans agree with the 2nd Amendment.
He needs to point out that Thompson voted for THIRTEEN seperate anti 2nd AMendment measures in the Senate, and that Romney also supported anti-2nd Amendment measures as governor. Paul, in TEN TERMS of Congressional service, voted for ZERO anti-2nd Amendment measures.
I guess I forgot, McCain. He voted and sponsored McCain-Feingold, which was a muzzle to place on the NRA. Why those idiots support him, I will never know.