PDA

View Full Version : Value: $0, Taxes: $40 Million (IRS Wants $29,200,000 For Item That Can't Be Legally Sold)




RonPaulFanInGA
07-24-2012, 06:38 PM
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/07/22/value-0-taxes-40-million-bald-eagle-irs-robert-rauschenberg/


This week’s winner of the you-can’t-make-this-stuff-up contest is undoubtedly a front-page story in this morning’s New York Times. When New York art dealer Ileana Sonnabend died in 2007, she left her children a fabulous collection of modern art valued at $1 billion. Her children have already paid $471 million in estate taxes on the collection, being forced to sell off most of it to meet the bill.

But there is one item in the collection, a work by Robert Rauschenberg that cannot be sold. It contains a stuffed bald eagle and under the terms of the 1940 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the 1918 Migratory Bird Act, it is a felony to “possess, sell, purchase, barter, transport, import or export any bald eagle — alive or dead.” The estate, advised by three experts, including one from Christie’s, therefore, valued the work at zero. The IRS decided it was worth $65 million, and is demanding $29.2 million in taxes and $11 million in penalties because the heirs “inaccurately” stated its value.

The trouble, of course, is that the heirs didn’t inaccurately state its value. Anything that cannot, for whatever reason, be sold, is worth zero by economic definition. The value of anything is only what someone else is willing to pay for it. And to pay a dime for this particular artwork would be to commit a federal felony. To sell it for a dime would be to commit a federal felony.

IPSecure
07-24-2012, 06:49 PM
So, if Christie’s possess the item, is that not a felony? If the IRS confiscates the item, will they be charged with a felony?

Yieu
07-24-2012, 06:49 PM
To possess it would be a felony too, why don't they charge them with that felony? They think they can get more money this way, and that's what they're after?

Weston White
07-24-2012, 06:58 PM
No ex post facto laws, while the law may have been perhaps inapplicable to the mother (I am only suggesting), it most likely should just be turned over over to whatever federal agency and that should be that. My goodness the IRS only gets more inept with each passing year.

ctiger2
07-24-2012, 06:59 PM
The Fed Govt is such a POS.

Danke
07-24-2012, 07:16 PM
Wow, they are that rich and they don't know how to avoid estate taxes!?