text of the fascistcare SCOTUS decision

[heavenlyboy34]

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/scotus_opinion_on_ACA_from_msnbc.com.pdf

If you have time to read 193 really boring pages, here ya go.

[Uncle Emanuel Watkins]

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/scotus_opinion_on_ACA_from_msnbc.com.pdf

If you have time to read 193 really boring pages, here ya go.

I don't have any power. I am not a lawyer. I was't born into a rich family. Therefore, I'm not going to argue as if I am blessed with any of these positions.
Instead, I'm going to reduce to use those correct terms which are in the best interest of, not a king (tyranny) who sits on a throne; but I'm going to reduce to those terms which are in the best interest of a worthless prostitute (the disadvantaged people) who has to live homeless under a bridge.
For example, it is incorrect to classify the necessary weather co-op as the "national hurrican center," when it should be called the "federal hurricane center." It isn't "national agenda," but "federal agenda." In other words, Russia, a nation, was a state in the Soviet Union. Texas itself is a nation state.
Texas should be a nation state left to take care of itself because, by our Founders theory, government works best the more intimate it is with the people. Or, just consider, the state of Texas is allowed by treaty to divide itself up into five states. So, really, Texas is considered more of a region and, as a result, more of an area inducive to governing as a tyranny (wilderness).
Really, most of what is posted in this forum is garbage not because it isn't intelligent, but because people fail to reduce in terms first.