Audit the Fed to be voted on WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 [Archive]

tsai3904

06-25-2012, 12:16 PM

Ron Paul's Audit the Fed bill, HR 459, is scheduled for a markup by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on Wednesday, June 27 at 10am ET.

You can watch the hearing live here:
http://oversight.house.gov/markup/full-committee-business-meeting-30/

The bill MUST pass the committee before it heads to the House floor for a full vote.

There are the 40 members of the House Oversight Committee:
http://oversight.house.gov/committee-members/

13 members of the committee have not yet cosponsored HR 459. They are listed below (members in bold cosponsored HR 1207 in the last Congress).

Please give them a call and urge them to vote for HR 459 at the House Oversight Committee hearing on Wednesday, June 27.

Use the city and zip code in case they ask if you are a constituent.

Representative
District
DC Office
City
Zip Code

Buerkle, Ann Marie
R-NY-25
202-225-3701
Syracuse
13210

Clay, Wm. Lacy

D-MO-01
202-225-2406
St. Louis
63101

Connolly, Gerald
D-VA-11
202-225-1492
Burke
22009

Cooper, Jim
D-TN-05
202-225-4311
Nashville
37219

Cummings, Elijah
D-MD-07
202-225-4741
Ellicott City
21042

Davis, Danny
D-IL-07
202-225-5006
Chicago
60612

Issa, Darrell
R-CA-49
202-225-3906
Fallbrook
92028

Lynch, Stephen
D-MA-09
202-225-8273
Brockton
02301

Maloney, Carolyn
D-NY-14
202-225-7944
New York
10128

Murphy, Chris
D-CT-05
202-225-4476
New Britain
06050

Norton, Eleanor Holmes
D-DC-AL
202-225-8050
DC
20020

Quigley, Mike
D-IL-05
202-225-4061
Chicago
60618

Towns, Edolphus
D-NY-10
202-225-5936
Brooklyn
11236

FSP-Rebel

06-25-2012, 12:22 PM

Republicans on Com
Rep. Dan Burton (IN-05)
Rep. John L. Mica (FL-07)
Rep. Todd Platts (PA-19)
Rep. Michael Turner (OH-03)
Rep. Patrick T. McHenry (NC-10)
Rep. Jim Jordan (OH-04)
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (UT-03)
Rep. Connie Mack (FL-14)
Rep. Tim Walberg (MI-3)
Rep. James Lankford (OK-5)
Rep. Justin Amash (MI-3)
Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle (NY-25)
Rep. Paul Gosar (AZ-1)
Rep. Raúl R. Labrador (ID-1)
Rep. Pat Meehan (PA-7)
Rep. Scott DesJarlais (TN-4)
Rep. Joe Walsh (IL-8)
Rep. Trey Gowdy (SC-4)
Rep. Dennis Ross (FL-12)
Rep. Frank Guinta (NH-1)
Rep. Blake Farenthold (TX-27)
Rep. Mike Kelly (PA-3)
+Kucinich

sailingaway

06-25-2012, 12:24 PM

We also really need to get the SENATE primed for this. That is where the roadblock was last time.

tsai3904

06-25-2012, 02:43 PM

Anyone make any calls?

riviera1992

06-25-2012, 06:39 PM

We also really need to get the SENATE primed for this. That is where the roadblock was last time.

I wonder if those politicians will vote for it if they think that either Ron or Rand could end up VP?
They might want to stay on the good side of the Paul's just in case.

tsai3904

06-25-2012, 08:23 PM

Tomorrow is the last day to pressure the House Oversight Committee members before they vote on the bill on Wednesday. Remember, there is always the possibility that a member will offer an amendment to water down the bill (as Mel Watt did in the last Congress).

sailingaway

06-25-2012, 08:30 PM

I'll make some calls tomorrow:

http://i.imgur.com/P1RhS.png

sailingaway

06-25-2012, 08:35 PM

and I put it on the front page

ClydeCoulter

06-25-2012, 09:25 PM

and I put it on the front page

Thanks, sailingaway.

Carson

06-25-2012, 09:31 PM

and I put it on the front page

Like your new avatar.

sailingaway

06-25-2012, 09:33 PM

Like your new avatar.

I took it from a picture you posted, then ClydeCoulter played with it because it came out too small. thanks!

ChristopherShelley

06-25-2012, 09:36 PM

I'll call tomorrow. Thanks for posting!

Tinnuhana

06-25-2012, 09:40 PM

I think it's worthwhile to also call the co-sponsors and let then know how important it is to let the bill move on "as is".

sailingaway

06-25-2012, 09:43 PM

I think it's worthwhile to also call the co-sponsors and let then know how important it is to let the bill move on "as is".

You mean, not sell out the entire text like Sanders did last time in the Senate?

MJU1983

06-25-2012, 10:11 PM

14 members of the committee have not yet cosponsored HR 459. They are listed below (members in bold cosponsored HR 1207 in the last Congress).

Please give them a call and urge them to vote for HR 459 at the House Oversight Committee hearing on Wednesday, June 27.

Use the city and zip code in case they ask if you are a constituent.

Representative
District
DC Office
City
Zip Code

Braley, Bruce
D-IA-01
202-225-2911
Davenport
52801

Buerkle, Ann Marie
R-NY-25
202-225-3701
Syracuse
13261

Clay, Wm. Lacy

D-MO-01
202-225-2406
St. Louis
63108

Connolly, Gerald
D-VA-11
202-225-1492
Annandale
22003

Cooper, Jim
D-TN-05
202-225-4311
Nashville
37219

Cummings, Elijah
D-MD-07
202-225-4741
Cantonsville
21228

Davis, Danny
D-IL-07
202-225-5006
Chicago
60612

Issa, Darrell
R-CA-49
202-225-3906
Vista
92081

Lynch, Stephen
D-MA-09
202-225-8273
Brockton
02301

Maloney, Carolyn
D-NY-14
202-225-7944
New York
10128

Murphy, Chris
D-CT-05
202-225-4476
Danbury
06810

Norton, Eleanor Holmes
D-DC-AL
202-225-8050
DC
20020

Quigley, Mike
D-IL-05
202-225-4061
Chicago
60618

Towns, Edolphus
D-NY-10
202-225-5936
Brooklyn
11236

Twitter can be a powerful tool. Here are mine to those members which utilize it.

FYI: Lacy Clay does not. Danny Davis does not. Elijah Cummings' says "suspended" but he is listed for @OversightDems.

Here are those that do "tweet":

@BruceBraley @RepBuerkle @GerryConnolly @repjimcooper @OversightDems @DarrellIssa @RepStephenLynch @CarolynBMaloney @RepMaloney @ChrisMurphyCT @EleanorNorton @RepMikeQuigley @EdTowns

https://twitter.com/mju1983/status/217469829316231168
https://twitter.com/mju1983/status/217469912464097280

sailingaway

06-25-2012, 11:01 PM

Twitter can be a powerful tool. Here are mine to those members which utilize it.

FYI: Lacy Clay does not. Danny Davis does not. Elijah Cummings' says "suspended" but he is listed for @OversightDems.

Here are those that do "tweet":

@BruceBraley @RepBuerkle @GerryConnolly @repjimcooper @OversightDems @DarrellIssa @RepStephenLynch @CarolynBMaloney @RepMaloney @ChrisMurphyCT @EleanorNorton @RepMikeQuigley @EdTowns

https://twitter.com/mju1983/status/217469829316231168
https://twitter.com/mju1983/status/217469912464097280

retweeted, but I want to add 'unaltered'. I'll be back.

sailingaway

06-25-2012, 11:03 PM

https://twitter.com/usernamenuse/status/217482821143494656

https://twitter.com/usernamenuse/status/217483120121884673

row333au

06-26-2012, 12:26 AM

Make sure Ron Paul is in control and accordingly to his rules of diligent, anti-corruption, integrity and publicly open as the approach to a thorough scrutiny without any objections for total transparency.....

Some of those senate that are in this side of the auditing would be more likely be shills of the establishment, in order for them to highjack and take control of the auditing as they will make the rulings and the limits of transparency in making sure that it legally passes according to them...

"It will be like auditing in the dark with no lights as it passes exemptions and by then in legality its been transparent and open, this is what controlled opposition would do"

sailingaway

06-26-2012, 12:31 AM

ClydeCoulter

06-26-2012, 08:20 AM

I'm not absolutely sure it will occur while he is still in the House. I have to look at the bill.

I sure hope it will.

Bumpity bump.

sailingaway

06-26-2012, 08:44 AM

Bump!

Ron Paul's Audit the Fed bill, HR 459, is scheduled for a markup on Wednesday, June 27, by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

http://oversight.house.gov/markup/full-committee-business-meeting-30/

The bill MUST pass the committee before it heads to the House floor for a full vote.

There are the 40 members of the House Oversight Committee:
http://oversight.house.gov/committee-members/

14 members of the committee have not yet cosponsored HR 459. They are listed below (members in bold cosponsored HR 1207 in the last Congress).

Please give them a call and urge them to vote for HR 459 at the House Oversight Committee hearing on Wednesday, June 27.

Use the city and zip code in case they ask if you are a constituent.

Representative
District
DC Office
City
Zip Code

Braley, Bruce
D-IA-01
202-225-2911
Davenport
52801

Buerkle, Ann Marie
R-NY-25
202-225-3701
Syracuse
13261

Clay, Wm. Lacy

D-MO-01
202-225-2406
St. Louis
63108

Connolly, Gerald
D-VA-11
202-225-1492
Annandale
22003

Cooper, Jim
D-TN-05
202-225-4311
Nashville
37219

Cummings, Elijah
D-MD-07
202-225-4741
Cantonsville
21228

Davis, Danny
D-IL-07
202-225-5006
Chicago
60612

Issa, Darrell
R-CA-49
202-225-3906
Vista
92081

Lynch, Stephen
D-MA-09
202-225-8273
Brockton
02301

Maloney, Carolyn
D-NY-14
202-225-7944
New York
10128

Murphy, Chris
D-CT-05
202-225-4476
Danbury
06810

Norton, Eleanor Holmes
D-DC-AL
202-225-8050
DC
20020

Quigley, Mike
D-IL-05
202-225-4061
Chicago
60618

Towns, Edolphus
D-NY-10
202-225-5936
Brooklyn
11236

tsai3904

06-26-2012, 09:09 AM

sailingaway

06-26-2012, 09:19 AM

Darrell Issa submitted the first amendment to HR 459.

I was worried he might have watered down the bill since he hasn't cosponsored but the only things he changed was the title of the bill (changing 2011 to 2012) and the date which the audit must be completed. HR 459 specifies an audit to be completed before the end of 2012 while Issa's amendment specifies an audit to be completed within 12 months of the date of enactment of the Act.

But that is after Ron leaves the House and the subcommittee. Do we have any faith at all if it isn't audited while Ron is there that it will ever happen? It isn't like they can't keep bouncing it down the road or reconsider its terms.

It is kinda hard to sell in a letter "we don't think for a moment you'll do it if it is after Ron is gone" but if it passes with that it is sure going to seem to me they kicked the can down the road, and we didn't really get it -- until and unless it actually happens.

On the other hand, I don't know if an audit can be accomplished in the time left. Maybe JUST an audit of the parts usually left out could be by then...

ClydeCoulter

06-26-2012, 09:22 AM

But that is after Ron leaves the House and the subcommittee. Do we have any faith at all if it isn't audited while Ron is there that it will ever happen? It isn't like they can't keep bouncing it down the road or reconsider its terms.

It is kinda hard to sell in a letter "we don't think for a moment you'll do it if it is after Ron is gone" but if it passes with that it is sure going to seem to me they kicked the can down the road, and we didn't really get it -- until and unless it actually happens.

On the other hand, I don't know if an audit can be accomplished in the time left. Maybe JUST an audit of the parts usually left out could be by then...

So, now we need a campaign to contact reps/senators to refuse the amendment that forstalls the audit?

sailingaway

06-26-2012, 09:24 AM

So, now we need a campaign to contact reps/senators to refuse the amendment that forstalls the audit?

My tweets and calls say please support it UNAMENDED. We could add that the attempt to kick it down the road is a transparent attempt to keep a window open to modify it into insignificance.

tsai3904

06-26-2012, 09:24 AM

But that is after Ron leaves the House and the subcommittee. Do we have any faith at all if it isn't audited while Ron is there that it will ever happen? It isn't like they can't keep bouncing it down the road or reconsider its terms.

The last audit bill included in Dodd-Frank had the same provision (complete audit within 12 months) so I'm not too worried about it. You're right that there won't be enough time left to get it done by the end of 2012 because it still has to pass the House and the Senate then signed by the President. That could take another couple months.

sailingaway

06-26-2012, 09:30 AM

The last audit bill included in Dodd-Frank had the same provision (complete audit within 12 months) so I'm not too worried about it. You're right that there won't be enough time left to get it done by the end of 2012 because it still has to pass the House and the Senate then signed by the President. That could take another couple months.

Yeah but then Ron was still going to be there.

I hope you are right because it might be tough to keep out. It just 'seems' so reasonable.

tsai3904

06-26-2012, 10:20 AM

I changed up most of the cities and zip codes so people won't be repetitively using the same information.

tsai3904

06-26-2012, 10:45 AM

Yeah but then Ron was still going to be there.

I hope you are right because it might be tough to keep out. It just 'seems' so reasonable.

Campaign for Liberty supports Issa's amendment.

http://www.campaignforliberty.org/profile/7788/blog/2012/06/25/house-government-oversight-and-reform-committee-members

We’ve received word that an amendment will be offered to extend the time when the audit’s results need to be reported from the end of 2012 to one year after the bill is enacted.

C4L supports this amendment.

sailingaway

06-26-2012, 11:30 AM

bump

tsai3904

06-26-2012, 12:04 PM

I think it's worthwhile to also call the co-sponsors and let then know how important it is to let the bill move on "as is".

Agreed but when no one's making calls, it's best to focus our efforts, however small it is, on the Congressmen we need to convince to support the bill.

tsai3904

06-26-2012, 01:31 PM

https://twitter.com/RepRonPaul/status/217698157000273920

Ron Paul ‏@RepRonPaul
Audit the Fed in committee! http://t.co/Rr8vitzY

tsai3904

06-26-2012, 02:25 PM

Thanks to those who contacted Congressman Bruce Braley. He is now a cosponsor of HR 459.

http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=409648545748056&id=181620931870421

ClydeCoulter

06-26-2012, 02:56 PM

So, how may votes are needed to get it out of committee and onto the floor?

edit:And Yes, it important that the bill go through "As Is", no amendments.

tsai3904

06-26-2012, 03:14 PM

So, how may votes are needed to get it out of committee and onto the floor?

edit:And Yes, it important that the bill go through "As Is", no amendments.

It needs a majority of votes. There are 40 members (23 Republicans and 17 Democrats). 27 members have cosponsored HR 459.

Issa offered an amendment that would extend the time allowed to complete the audit from the end of 2012 to 12 months from the enactment of the bill. It's a reasonable request given the amount of time left in 2012 and Campaign for Liberty says they support the amendment.

anaconda

06-26-2012, 03:40 PM

You mean, not sell out the entire text like Sanders did last time in the Senate?

LOL^This.

sailingaway

06-26-2012, 03:51 PM

Retweet this? https://twitter.com/usernamenuse/status/217736718600765440

ClydeCoulter

06-26-2012, 04:00 PM

Retweet this? https://twitter.com/usernamenuse/status/217736718600765440

^^^ THIS ^^^

sailingaway

06-26-2012, 04:06 PM

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/img/logo2.jpg
Dear XXXXXX

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is expected to vote tomorrow (Wed, June 27) on H.R. 459, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act (“Audit the Fed”).

We’ve received word that an amendment will be offered to extend the time when the audit’s results need to be reported from the end of 2012 to one year after the bill is enacted.

C4L supports this amendment, but I need your help to guarantee Audit the Fed passes the committee without being watered down and makes it to the House floor as the strong, thorough audit the American people are demanding.

I’ll provide a link where you can find the members of the committee in just a moment, but first, here’s how you can help pass Audit the Fed.

1.) If your representative is on the committee, and if they have cosponsored H.R. 459, please call them right away to thank them for cosponsoring. Along with voting “YES” on H.R. 459 in committee, let them know you also expect them to resist any attempt to water down the bill.

2.) If your representative is on the committee but has not yet cosponsored, urge them to not only vote “YES” on H.R. 459 in committee, but to clearly stand with the American people and boldly declare their support for transparency by cosponsoring Audit the Fed right away.

3.) Spread the word! Tell your family and friends to take action and help end the Fed's rein of destruction and secrecy.

You can find a list of committee members here: http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/8990535:12386366261:m:1:170779741:4244BECAE19E54A2 1B8AB4A1A8932EA5:r

Even if your representative is not on the committee, please still contact them to demand their support for Audit the Fed when it comes to the House floor for a vote this July.

After years of hard work, you and I stand on the verge of making history by passing Audit the Fed!

But now is not the time to take anything for granted.

So please contact your representative right away and help C4L finish this fight! http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/8990535:12386366261:m:1:170779741:4244BECAE19E54A2 1B8AB4A1A8932EA5:r

In Liberty,

Matt Hawes
Vice President
//

Drex

06-26-2012, 04:58 PM

Got this link from C4L.. it may not be updated.. mods feel free to delete someone who is already a co-sponsor

Republicans

Rep. Darrell E. Issa (CA-49)- https://twitter.com/#!/congressmanissa http://www.facebook.com/CongressmanIssa

Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle (NY-25) https://twitter.com/#!/RepBuerkle http://www.facebook.com/RepBuerkle

Democrats

Rep. Elijah Cummings (MD-7) https://twitter.com/#!/OversightDems (may not be him) http://www.facebook.com/elijahcummings

Rep. Edolphus Towns (NY-10) https://twitter.com/#!/EdTowns http://www.facebook.com/EdTowns

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14) http://twitter.com/carolynbmaloney http://www.facebook.com/RepCarolynMaloney

Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D.C.) http://www.twitter.com/eleanornorton http://www.facebook.com/CongresswomanNorton

Rep. Wm. Lacy Clay (MO-1) https://twitter.com/#!/LacyClayMO1 http://www.facebook.com/pages/Congressman-Wm-Lacy-Clay/109135405838588

Rep. Stephen Lynch (MA-9) https://twitter.com/#!/RepStephenLynch http://www.facebook.com/slynchforcongress

Rep. Jim Cooper (TN-5) https://twitter.com/#!/repjimcooper http://www.facebook.com/JimCooper

Rep. Gerald Connolly (VA-11) No Twitter http://www.facebook.com/congressmanconnolly?rf=111793818839312

Rep. Mike Quigley (IL-5) https://twitter.com/#!/RepMikeQuigley http://www.facebook.com/repmikequigley

Rep. Danny Davis (IL-7) https://twitter.com/#!/DannyKDavis (only has 3 tweets) http://www.facebook.com/CongressmanDKDavis

Rep. Bruce Braley (IA-1) https://twitter.com/#!/BruceBraley http://www.facebook.com/brucebraley

Rep. Christopher Murphy (CT-5) https://twitter.com/#!/ChrisMurphyCT http://www.facebook.com/ChrisMurphyCT

Rebelrouser

06-26-2012, 07:20 PM

Gerry Connolly does have a twitter account. Its @GerryConnolly

sailingaway

06-26-2012, 07:37 PM

Gerry Connolly does have a twitter account. Its @GerryConnolly

https://twitter.com/usernamenuse/status/217793517374812160

ClydeCoulter

06-26-2012, 09:19 PM

https://twitter.com/usernamenuse/status/217793517374812160

I'll retweet any tweets you make toward them, it helps if everyone retweets the same tweet (or so I'm told).

ClydeCoulter

06-27-2012, 07:25 AM

Waiting...hope it comes out of committee without changes/amendments.

tsai3904

06-27-2012, 08:05 AM

On now.

http://oversight.house.gov/markup/full-committee-business-meeting-30/

tsai3904

06-27-2012, 08:07 AM

Looks like Bernanke wrote Elijah Cummings' opening statement.

tsai3904

06-27-2012, 08:22 AM

Uh oh...Elijah Cummings has an amendment.

tsai3904

06-27-2012, 08:25 AM

Issa is speaking strongly against the amendment and says it will basically gut the bill and bring it back to the audit provisions included in Dodd Frank.

economics102

06-27-2012, 08:25 AM

I didn't realize Rep. Issa was a strong ally for us. He immediately replied to Cummings bill with "that amendment essentially guts this bill."

economics102

06-27-2012, 08:36 AM

Wait what just happened, did they just replace the bill with an amendment from Cummings????

JK/SEA

06-27-2012, 08:38 AM

passed committee...on to the house.

ClydeCoulter

06-27-2012, 08:38 AM

Issa's amendment passed, crap, that means a delay in the audit when Ron will not be in congress, crap!

tsai3904

06-27-2012, 08:38 AM

So Elijah Cummings offered an amendment to gut the bill, withdrew that amendment, then offered another amendment that, I think, asks the GAO to audit some things related to mortgages.

The bill with Cummings amendment was approved and will be sent to the House.

economics102

06-27-2012, 08:40 AM

Cummings' amendment replaces some/all of the text. Are we sure Cummings' amendment was just to add additional audit requirements and not to screw up the original?

G8orballboy

06-27-2012, 08:42 AM

Cummings' amendment replaces some/all of the text. Are we sure Cummings' amendment was just to add additional audit requirements and not to screw up the original?

Thats what i'm trying to figure out. Was the amendment just an additional audit, or does it replace the intent of the original bill... given the first amendment he put up, i'm guessing the later. What just happened?

ClydeCoulter

06-27-2012, 08:42 AM

Was it Cumming's amendment or Issa's that was included in the bill?

economics102

06-27-2012, 08:43 AM

Thats what i'm trying to figure out. Was the amendment just an additional audit, or does it replace the intent of the original bill... given the first amendment he put up, i'm guessing the later. What just happened?

It sounded like Cummings' amendment just added MORE audit stuff, but it did say it was to replace the original text so I'm not really sure what happened.

economics102

06-27-2012, 08:44 AM

poster on Daily Paul clarified:

Issa offered an amendment that would extend the time the audit can be completed from the end of 2012 to 12 months after the bill is enacted. Campaign for Liberty supports this amendment.

Cummings offered an amendment to gut the audit. He then withdrew it after it sounded like he had no support.

Cummings offered another amendment that would require some additional audit related to mortgages.

The bill passed with Issa's amendment and Cummings' second amendment.

A FULL audit bill is headed to the House.

QWDC

06-27-2012, 08:45 AM

The way I understood it was that Issa's amendment passed. Cumming's first (gut the bill) failed and his second (add on additional audits of mortgages) passed.

ClydeCoulter

06-27-2012, 08:46 AM

Damn, now the timeline for the audit is extended...I was really hoping that Ron would still be in congress (office) when the audit came in...

tsai3904

06-27-2012, 08:47 AM

poster on Daily Paul clarified:

That's me. Given that Issa was strongly against Cummings' first amendment and ok with his second amendment, the original intent of the bill is still in tact. Cummings' amendment hasn't been posted so we don't know the text but the way he described it, it sounded like it was adding more audit language to the bill.

tsai3904

06-27-2012, 08:48 AM

Damn, now the timeline for the audit is extended...

It would have happened regardless. The GAO would have asked for additional time to complete an audit because there's not enough time to do it by end of 2012.

Ron Paul held a hearing on auditing the gold reserves and the GAO said that if Ron wanted a thorough audit, he would have to give the GAO more time than was stated in his bill.

ClydeCoulter

06-27-2012, 08:51 AM

It would have happened regardless. The GAO would have asked for additional time to complete an audit because there's not enough time to do it by end of 2012.

Ron Paul held a hearing on auditing the gold reserves and the GAO said that if Ron wanted a thorough audit, he would have to give the GAO more time than was stated in his bill.

Now if it can pass the Senate "as is" without "watering down" amendments and the pres will sign it. Everyone prepared for a campaign to get a veto override?

Travlyr

06-27-2012, 08:53 AM

One can easily determine how deep the indoctrination of the masses are simply by knowing that the leaders are debating, in 2012, whether or not to audit the bank that prints the money. lol. It is very sad.

robertwerden

06-27-2012, 08:53 AM

You know Obama will add a signing statement saying something like "the names of the criminals are to be kept private until the end of my term"

tsai3904

06-27-2012, 08:55 AM

Now if it can pass the Senate "as is" without "watering down" amendments and the pres will sign it. Everyone prepared for a campaign to get a veto override?

Yea, the problem has been the Senate since the last Congress. If we are serious in wanting to get a full audit, we're going to need everyone on board in pressuring the Senate to pass S 202.

We need people to write, email, and call their Senators. Find out where their public events are held and video record them. Get people in the (liberal) media to write about the audit. This needs to be a bipartisan effort to get this passed the Senate.