PDA

View Full Version : If Romney wins the nomination, will you vote for him?




Warrior_of_Freedom
06-19-2012, 10:49 PM
Title.

RonPaulFanInGA
06-19-2012, 10:51 PM
If?

Icymudpuppy
06-19-2012, 11:01 PM
I'm still hoping for a miracle.

Realistically, I would need Romney to make some significant concessions with teeth to the constitution.

Zatch
06-19-2012, 11:02 PM
If?

Ron Paul is about to win the primary by a landslide. The media is trying to cover it up! Anyone who says differently is a traitor. /sarcasm

jj-
06-19-2012, 11:03 PM
Why not Gary Johnson? At least he wants to legalize pot.

Aratus
06-19-2012, 11:04 PM
in 2016 if he wins the nomination
and ron paul does not run or even
rand, if barack obama runs again
i might find myself voting for mitt

Aratus
06-19-2012, 11:05 PM
the poll does not say WHEN he gets the party's nod

Zatch
06-19-2012, 11:06 PM
ROM R3VOLUTION!

Anti Federalist
06-19-2012, 11:19 PM
http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2011/11/20/13a0d4eb-c21e-4110-a5b4-03ec2bd853ac.jpg

thoughtomator
06-19-2012, 11:22 PM
if the guy thinks he's going to cheat my guy out of a fair contest and then get my vote, he's got another think coming

Aratus
06-19-2012, 11:23 PM
i am trying to coax our own matt collins into taking on mitt romney in the primaries in 2016

MJU1983
06-19-2012, 11:23 PM
Hahaha? Seriously?

Aratus
06-19-2012, 11:24 PM
yes...

Marenco
06-19-2012, 11:26 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIraCchPDhk

MJU1983
06-19-2012, 11:26 PM
yes...

Sorry, not about your post. I was referring to this thread.

:)

Pauls' Revere
06-19-2012, 11:28 PM
I wont vote for the Romulan.

Aratus
06-19-2012, 11:30 PM
thats okay. i did a very good deed today.
namedropped matt collins after the powers
that bee stingingly took down his lil wiki page
that "intactmolls" kindly created. of course you
were talking about Rmoney instead of thah molls!

Aratus
06-19-2012, 11:32 PM
I wont vote for the Romulan.

you clearly have very high standards. mine may have slid.
running matt collins against an incumbant mitt keeps the
movement alive until the people who are under the age of
thirty take over things in full. i am trying to be a realist.

Aratus
06-19-2012, 11:34 PM
if dr. ron paul doesn't run third party i may
toy with voting for gary johnson or even
sitting out the election. i understand NBRP

MJU1983
06-19-2012, 11:38 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIraCchPDhk

I think George was on to something...

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum.” - Noam Chomsky


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BR0KnWnves

RickyJ
06-19-2012, 11:48 PM
Some questions don't need to be asked.
Let me quote Ron Paul ~ "NO WAY"

alucard13mmfmj
06-19-2012, 11:51 PM
if we get nothing of substantial from it.. never.

RickyJ
06-20-2012, 12:13 AM
I'm still hoping for a miracle.

Realistically, I would need Romney to make some significant concessions with teeth to the constitution.

There is nothing Romney could do or say to get me to vote for him. His word means nothing as he has demonstrated throughout his whole life. The very fact such a weasel has a chance to win anything in America shows just how far America has fallen. Land of the free and home of the brave we are not.

RonPaulFanInGA
06-20-2012, 12:15 AM
The very fact such a weasel has a chance to win anything in America shows just how far America has fallen.

Guess you missed the White House's current occupant?

anaconda
06-20-2012, 12:31 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HJxya0CWco&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PLD55F920E27AA4C1A

kuckfeynes
06-20-2012, 12:31 AM
Why put Romney in the question and not Obama? Because Obama's an outspoken socialist and Romney's a closet one?

MJU1983
06-20-2012, 12:37 AM
Why put Romney in the question and not Obama? Because Obama's an outspoken socialist and Romney's a closet one?

Lew Rockwell posted this on FB, seems relevant. :)

"It bothers me a little when conservatives call Barack Obama a 'socialist.' He certainly is an enemy of the free market, and wants politicians and bureaucrats to make the fundamental decisions about the economy. But that does not mean that he wants government ownership of the means of production, which has long been a standard definition of socialism.

What President Obama has been pushing for, and moving toward, is more insidious: government control of the economy, while leaving ownership in private hands. That way, politicians get to call the shots but, when their bright ideas lead to disaster, they can always blame those who own businesses in the private sector," says Thomas Sowell.

Socialist or Fascist? by Thomas Sowell (http://lewrockwell.com/sowell/sowell94.1.html)

kuckfeynes
06-20-2012, 01:08 AM
Lew Rockwell posted this on FB, seems relevant. :)

"It bothers me a little when conservatives call Barack Obama a 'socialist.' He certainly is an enemy of the free market, and wants politicians and bureaucrats to make the fundamental decisions about the economy. But that does not mean that he wants government ownership of the means of production, which has long been a standard definition of socialism.

What President Obama has been pushing for, and moving toward, is more insidious: government control of the economy, while leaving ownership in private hands. That way, politicians get to call the shots but, when their bright ideas lead to disaster, they can always blame those who own businesses in the private sector," says Thomas Sowell.

Socialist or Fascist? by Thomas Sowell (http://lewrockwell.com/sowell/sowell94.1.html)

Very true, got to be more careful with my terms. Though whether the corporations own the government or the government owns the corporations, I'm not sure the result is very different...

Victor Grey
06-20-2012, 01:12 AM
Fascism and corporatism are merely differentiated ultimately by who plays the husband and who plays the wife.

Xhin
06-20-2012, 01:14 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgI2ZQVyrBo&feature=related

KingRobbStark
06-20-2012, 01:26 AM
Voting for Romney? I would rather vote last nights shit, and even it would do a better job than Romney, because it wouldn't do shit.

PierzStyx
06-20-2012, 02:18 AM
N.O.B.P.

ProIndividual
06-20-2012, 02:28 AM
Those 3 yes votes are on the wrong website me thinks.

Weston White
06-20-2012, 03:40 AM
Sorry, but no, no, no! No, there are already enough crazy frickers in federal positions of power, and we certainly do not need to add another. Especially, a mormononic dolt that has earned a vast portion of his personal wealth by destroying the internal wealth of the United States of America by shipping American jobs overseas to slave-labor-factories (fully lockdown equipped with suicide netting) and that believes in a religion devised by a mind-job from behind a curtain through the use of magical translucent rocks called Urim and Thummim and invisible golden plates containing the writings of God. Mormonism-LDS (i.e., we are as Saints on Earth) is like a really, horribly, bad sci-fi movie that you wished you had not wasted your time ever hearing about, let alone having watched.

Weston White
06-20-2012, 03:40 AM
* And let's not even bother getting into the whole thing about moon people, ceremonial undies, and the green jello with carrots fixation.

Jeremy
06-20-2012, 04:14 AM
Ron Paul is about to win the primary by a landslide. The media is trying to cover it up! Anyone who says differently is a traitor. /sarcasm Ron Paul said Mitt Romney won. Where have you been?

Yieu
06-20-2012, 05:19 AM
Ron Paul said Mitt Romney won. Where have you been?

Ron Paul has a time machine and has been to the end of August?

Anyways, no, nothing could make me vote for Romney, nothing. What a silly question.

Brian4Liberty
06-20-2012, 01:57 PM
I can honestly say that I have no idea what Romney would do once in office. He's a stereotype politician that constantly panders. There's no way of knowing. Obama says he will stop the wars (including on drugs), and he expands them. Does that mean that when Romney says he will expand the wars, he would really stop them instead? Doubtful, but you never know.

BuddyRey
06-20-2012, 03:29 PM
No chance in Hell. If it's down to Romney vs. Obama, I want Obama to win just out of spite, and so I can gloat to butthurt neocons "this wouldn't have happened if you'd nominated Ron Paul!"

kahless
06-20-2012, 03:40 PM
The door is pretty much closing on any opportunity for Romney to gain me as a voter. No concessions to Ron, no speaking slot, his recent statement that he does not need Congressional approval to launch a war with Iran and now vetting of that clueless lunatic war monger Rubio as VP.

bunklocoempire
06-20-2012, 03:42 PM
In the words of Ron Paul:

"No way"

pcosmar
06-20-2012, 04:02 PM
I'm still hoping for a miracle.

.
Yup.
There are a great many things that could happen.

An accident.
A brain aneurism.
Lightning out of a clear sky.

and the odd chance that when a vote is actually taken,, he just does not have the votes.

Sam I am
06-20-2012, 04:04 PM
IF someone says to me "a vote for a third party is like a half-vote for Obama" my reply will be "I believe you might have confused me with some sort of Republican"

TAnn
06-20-2012, 05:03 PM
Firstly, the answer to that question is an ABSOLUTE "NO". Secondly; I wanted to post an open letter to Rand Paul in reply to his explanation for his endorsement of Romney, but I couldn't find the "new thread" link, so here goes; I hope he sees it.
Dear Rand,

I am not concerned about the "why" of your endorsement, but rather the timing of it. The battle is FAR from over and yet you jumped right in there and caved in to the forces of EVIL and endorsed him anyway. It seems to me that your endorsement could have waited until the fight was over and the winner was chosen; which by the way in my estimation will NOT be Romney. You didn't mention in your post why you chose such a critical time in your father's campaign to jump ship; it still looks like a betrayal of not only your dad, but all of us who have committed to him wholeheartedly. You are going to have to explain our timing if you want the majority of us to understand.

lx43
06-20-2012, 05:24 PM
No I will not vote for the mini-socialist.

Dissent
06-20-2012, 06:24 PM
NO! And while I am at it. I WILL NOT vote for Rand in 2016. You get one chance with me he destroyed that.

V-rod
06-20-2012, 06:28 PM
Never say never, but as of now I'm leaning towards no.

Chester Copperpot
06-20-2012, 06:33 PM
Firstly, the answer to that question is an ABSOLUTE "NO". Secondly; I wanted to post an open letter to Rand Paul in reply to his explanation for his endorsement of Romney, but I couldn't find the "new thread" link, so here goes; I hope he sees it.
Dear Rand,

I am not concerned about the "why" of your endorsement, but rather the timing of it. The battle is FAR from over and yet you jumped right in there and caved in to the forces of EVIL and endorsed him anyway. It seems to me that your endorsement could have waited until the fight was over and the winner was chosen; which by the way in my estimation will NOT be Romney. You didn't mention in your post why you chose such a critical time in your father's campaign to jump ship; it still looks like a betrayal of not only your dad, but all of us who have committed to him wholeheartedly. You are going to have to explain our timing if you want the majority of us to understand.

Rand Paul fights for liberty the way he thinks is best... It may not seem like the best way to others but to him it evidently was.

DerailingDaTrain
06-20-2012, 06:39 PM
94 say no and 3 say yes

I think you got your answer

QueenB4Liberty
06-20-2012, 08:20 PM
Why would any of us?

Icymudpuppy
06-20-2012, 11:13 PM
There is nothing Romney could do or say to get me to vote for him. His word means nothing as he has demonstrated throughout his whole life. The very fact such a weasel has a chance to win anything in America shows just how far America has fallen. Land of the free and home of the brave we are not.

When I use the phrase "Concessions with Teeth", I am not talking about empty campaign promises. I am talking about binding legal action that would force him to resign under circumstances such as ANY use of "signing statements", ANY foreign military engagement without congressional war declaration, etc.