PDA

View Full Version : War on Prescription Drugs




Mani
06-18-2012, 11:44 PM
We have seen evidence on this forum that the war has already begun, with little old ladies getting busted in setups and sting operations. We've been already reading about these cases.

This is the first time I've seen an article actually saying that the War on Prescription Drugs is in FULL SWING and the DEA actually admitting they are attacking people like they are part of a Drug Cartel.

HOW FUCKED UP IS THIS SHIT!?!?!


http://sg.news.yahoo.com/u-war-drugs-moves-pharmacy-jungle-121453715--finance.html

(Reuters) - Pamela Storozuk, a petite 59-year-old, spent most of her career as a sales representative, dragging heavy suitcases filled with presentation materials. When her husband developed prostate cancer, she cared for him, often helping to lift him out of the bath or into bed.

Eventually, the strain on her back caught up with her. Today she has five herniated discs and relies on painkillers to function.

Over the past six months, however, the Fort Lauderdale, Florida, resident has found it increasingly difficult to get her medications. Her regular pharmacy is often out of stock, and others refuse to dispense painkillers to new patients.

"They look at you like you're an addict, a lowlife," she said.

Storozuk is one of thousands of Americans caught up in the government's latest front in the war on drugs: prescription painkillers. From 1999 to 2009, the number of deaths from narcotic pain pills nearly quadrupled to 15,597, more than those from heroin and cocaine combined, according to the latest figures from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In response, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration has beefed up its efforts to block the diversion of prescription drugs to the black market, using many of the techniques it employs to combat illegal drug use: wire taps, undercover operations and informants.

Such efforts have helped it dismantle hundreds of "pill mills" - sham pain clinics that write thousands of prescriptions with few questions asked - as well as dozens of rogue Internet pharmacies.

Now the agency is using the same tactics to prosecute the legitimate pharmaceutical supply chain, which is required to maintain certain record-keeping and security protocols to prevent drug diversion.

Over the past three years, the DEA has stepped up its inspections and levied millions of dollars in fines against drug wholesalers for what it said were breaches of those rules.

In February, the DEA suspended the license of drug wholesaler Cardinal Health Inc to sell narcotic painkillers and other controlled substances from its center in Lakeland, Florida, saying it had failed to detect suspicious order volume from several pharmacy customers. Under a settlement, Cardinal has agreed not to ship controlled substances from the facility for two years.

Shortly afterward, the agency raided two CVS pharmacies and issued inspection warrants at a half-dozen Walgreen Co drugstores and a Walgreen distribution center.

NOT THE MEDELLIN CARTEL

"The techniques that law enforcement uses to combat drug traffickers, whether they're Colombian organizations or Mexican cartels or Afghan drug lords, those techniques are very, very essential in combating prescription drug abuse," DEA Administrator Michele Leonhart said in an interview.

But critics say applying the same strategy to the legitimate supply chain as to Colombian drug lords is ineffective and is also causing supply shortages that hurt pain patients.

"Going after a pharmaceutical manufacturer is not like going after the Medellin cartel," said Adam Fein, president of Pembroke Consulting, which advises pharmaceutical manufacturers. "I don't believe it is appropriate for the DEA to shrink the supply of prescription drugs, because it has unanticipated effects that have nothing to do with the problem."

Florida has long been considered the epicenter of painkiller abuse, due to the spread of pill mills. But experts say those are only a small part of the problem.

"The majority of drugs that end up in the illicit trade come from otherwise well-meaning physicians who do not understand the consequences of their prescribing habits," said former DEA agent Robert Stutman, whose Stutman Group management consulting firm designs substance abuse prevention programs.

Between 1991 and 2010, prescriptions for narcotic painkillers rose to 209.5 million from 75.5 million, according to National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Leonhart said that physicians, however, "now understand the problem."

PRESSURE FROM CONGRESS

As prescription drug abuse has risen, the DEA has come under increasing pressure from Congress to show it is containing the problem. A report last year from the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office said the DEA had not shown its strategy was working and called for clearer performance measures.

Leonhart said the best benchmarks were and should be "quite similar to what we use on the nondiversion side, which is the disruption and dismantlement of the organizations and the networks, and we're going in that direction."

That has meant some changes at the agency. For one thing, Leonhart has begun breaking down barriers between the DEA's nearly 5,000 special agents, who have focused on the illicit drug trade for most of their careers, and about 500 diversion investigators, who enforce rules covering handlers of controlled substances.

The agency has expanded its use of tactical diversion squads, which combine special agents, diversion investigators and local law enforcement officers to track down and prosecute prescription drug dealers.

Forcing the two sides to come together was not easy at first, Leonhart said, since special agents initially were reluctant to work on "pill cases."

But the effort has shown some results. Asset seizures on the diversion side rose to $118 million in 2011 from about $82 million in 2009, Leonhart said.

CULTURE OF FEAR

Still, sending in tactical diversion squads to break up pill mills does not address the leaks occurring from medicine cabinets at home or the drugs passed along from friends and family. That is one reason the DEA is attempting to squeeze supplies at the wholesale level.

"Going after Cardinal has sent shivers up the distributor grapevine," said John Coleman, a former DEA chief of operations. "Close a CVS pharmacy in Florida, and I guarantee every pharmacy within 500 miles will be checking their records.

"You don't have to hit a horse with a whip," he said. "You just have to show it to them once in a while."

Pharmacists confirm that they are indeed fearful. Some are reluctant to take new painkiller customers. Others will only accept patients within a certain geographic area or refuse to accept cash.

"We turn away five or six people a day," said Steven Nelson, owner of the Okeechobee Discount Drugs store in Okeechobee, Florida, and chairman of governmental affairs for the Florida Pharmacy Association.

Even large chains are leery. Walgreen spokesman Michael Polzin said that after looking into everything going on in Florida, "we've decided not to comment on our operations there at this time."

CVS pharmacies across the state stopped filling prescriptions written by 22 of the top-prescribing physicians pending a review of their dispensing practices, according to court documents filed as part of the company's dispute with the DEA.

The company declined elaborate on its actions, except to say that it will continue to monitor prescriptions for controlled substances and is "committed to supporting efforts to prevent drug abuse and keep controlled substances out of the wrong hands."

Physicians are equally nervous. Many have stepped up patient monitoring, according to Storozuk's physician, Dr. Martin Hale. That means more urine tests, more documentation, and more frequent "pill count" checks, where patients must go to the doctor's office with their pill bottle to prove they have not sold or misused their medication.

"Every hour of the day I have concerns I'll be audited, that my ability to take care of my patients and my family can be taken away, and I'm as legitimate as you can get," said Hale, who has a private orthopedic practice a few miles from Fort Lauderdale and is an assistant professor at Nova Southeastern University. "You're constantly watching over your shoulder, and it takes a toll."

CUTTING SUPPLIES

Over the past five years, Cardinal has cut supplies of controlled substances to more than 375 customers nationwide, including 180 pharmacies in Florida, it says.

Other wholesalers are similarly cautious. Rival AmerisourceBergen Corp says it now monitors orders for suspicious spikes of 20 percent to 30 percent in volume.

"All of us want to make sure that abuse is curtailed," Chief Executive Officer Steven Collis said. But when it comes to the DEA's requirements, he added, the rules have not always been clear.

Other wholesalers, pharmacists and physicians say they are also keen to help, but would welcome more communication from the DEA.

Leonhart rejects the notion that the DEA is uncommunicative. The agency repeatedly lays out its requirements in meetings and presentations, she said.

But John Burke, president of the nonprofit National Association of Drug Diversion Investigators, says the DEA behaves as though those it monitors are the enemy.

"The mindset is, these are folks we have to keep at arm's length," said Burke, whose organization tries to foster communication between law enforcement, regulators and industry.

The DEA's strategy is also prompting new questions from Congress. Senators Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island recently asked the GAO to study whether the agency's actions are contributing to shortages of medications for pain patients.

Others say the DEA should not be in the business of regulating industry at all.

Scott Gottlieb, former deputy commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, publicly fulminated against the DEA recently for tackling prescription drugs in the same way it pursues drug cartels.

"The problem is, the DEA may be the wrong enforcer here. It's very difficult to separate appropriate use from illicit use with law-enforcement tools alone," Gottlieb, who now sits on the board of biotechnology company CombiMatrix Corp, wrote in an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal.

The DEA's confrontation with wholesalers and pharmacies follows a public dispute with manufacturers over who was responsible earlier this year for shortages of certain stimulants used to treat attention deficit disorder.

The DEA strictly controls the amount of an ingredient in a potentially addictive drug that its manufacturer can obtain each year, based on projected needs of legitimate patients. Makers of the stimulants said the agency did not always authorize enough material in time for them to supply customers.

For its part, the DEA said the shortages resulted from unspecified business decisions made by the companies.

With all sides in the prescription drug fight blaming each other, nothing will be achieved without more communication and cooperation, Stutman says.

"We need to take some really bright people on each side of the issue and say: 'Where do we start today to make this problem better?'" he said.

In the meantime, patients like Pamela Storozuk are struggling to function. She has not been able to find oxycodone for five months. Replacement drugs have made her sick and even those are now hard to come by. She has lost 20 pounds and is frequently in pain.

"It's a horrendous problem down here for people like me who need the medication," she said. "You can't even imagine."

(Reporting by Toni Clarke in Boston; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn)

cheapseats
06-19-2012, 07:36 AM
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/u-war-drugs...--finance.html

..."They look at you like you're an addict, a lowlife," she said.

...But critics say applying the same strategy to the legitimate supply chain as to Colombian drug lords is ineffective and is also causing supply shortages that hurt pain patients...


YO, PILL POPPERS! WELCOME TO THE WORLD OF POT SMOKERS!

It would be a BIG mistake to "go on about your business as usual", casually confident that the legitimacy of your DRUG DEPENDENCY will keep you out of capital-T Trouble.

Howard Beal, NETWORK: "All I know is that first, you've got to get mad."

http://www.americanrhetoric.com/MovieSpeeches/moviespeechnetwork2.html

Lindsey
06-19-2012, 07:47 AM
So let me get this straight. They create a large population of addicts who believe that everything they are doing is legitimate, safe and even good for them, because it's prescribed by well-intentioned doctors and filled at legitimate pharmacies. Then they pull the rug out from under them by creating scarcity in the supply chain of their prescribed medications and start wreaking havoc on doctors and pharmacies who have been operating within legal parameters. So is the drug war not just for youth and minorities any longer, are they now extending the drug war into ruining the lives of "law-abiding" upper middle class, disabled and elderly too? Who is this benefiting?

specsaregood
06-19-2012, 07:49 AM
This is the first time I've seen an article actually saying that the War on Prescription Drugs is in FULL SWING and the DEA actually admitting they are attacking people like they are part of a Drug Cartel.
HOW FUCKED UP IS THIS SHIT!?!?!


http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul179.html
The War on Drugs Is a War on Doctors
by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
May 18, 2004
When we talk about the federal war on drugs, most people conjure up visions of sinister South American drug cartels or violent urban street gangs. The emerging face of the drug war, however, is not a gangster or a junkie: It's your friendly personal physician in a white coat. Faced with their ongoing failure to curtail the illegal drug trade, federal drug agencies have found an easier target in ordinary doctors whose only crime is prescribing perfectly legal pain medication. By applying federal statutes intended for drug dealers, federal prosecutors are waging a senseless and destructive war on doctors. The real victims of the new campaign are not only doctors, but their patients as well.

Dr. Cecil Knox of Virginia is one recent victim of federal authorities, who cannot abide physicians using their own judgment when prescribing pain medication. Dr. Knox faces federal criminal charges for prescribing legal pain drugs, and tragically has been forced to spend several hundred thousand dollars defending himself. Virginia state authorities have neither charged him with a crime nor revoked his medical license, yet the federal government — which constitutionally has no authority to usurp state drug laws — perversely seeks to imprison Dr. Knox for life!

Even if Dr. Knox is acquitted of all charges, his life will never be the same. His professional reputation and clientele cannot be easily restored, and the enormous legal bills cannot be easily repaid. So whether federal prosecutors obtain a conviction of Dr. Knox or not, the message sent to other doctors is chillingly clear: prescribe the wrong drugs and we will destroy you. The end result is that doctors become afraid to prescribe pain medication, no matter how appropriate for a patient. The judgment of doctors has been replaced by the judgment of federal drug warriors.

Those who support the war on drugs may well change their views if one day they find themselves experiencing serious pain because of an accident or old age. By creating an atmosphere that regards all powerful pain medication as suspect, the drug warriors have forced countless Americans to live degraded, bedridden lives. Even elderly deathbed patients sometimes are denied adequate pain relief from reluctant doctors and nurses. It's one thing to support a faraway drug campaign in Colombia or Afghanistan, but it's quite another to watch a loved one suffering acute pain that could be treated. A sane, compassionate society views advances in medical science — particularly advances that relieve great suffering — as heroic. Instead, our barbaric drug war treats pain patients the same way it treats street junkies.

Doctors are not slaves, and they will not continue practicing medicine forever if the federal government insists on monitoring, harassing, fining, and even jailing them. Congress should take action to rein in overzealous prosecutors and law enforcement officials, and stop the harassment of legitimate physicians who act in good faith when prescribing pain relief drugs. Doctors should not be prosecuted for using their best medical judgment, nor should they be prosecuted for the misdeeds of their patients.

cheapseats
06-19-2012, 07:50 AM
So let me get this straight. They create a large population of addicts who believe that everything they are doing is legitimate, safe and even good for them, because it's prescribed by well-intentioned doctors and filled at legitimate pharmacies. Then they pull the rug out from under them by creating scarcity in the supply chain of their prescribed medications and start wreaking havoc on doctors and pharmacies who have been operating within legal parameters. So is the drug war not just for youth and minorities any longer, are they now extending the drug war into ruining the lives of "law-abiding" upper middle class, disabled and elderly too? Who is this benefiting?


Fines = Revenue

Prosecution = Billable Hours

Incarceration = Broken System Fodder + Profit (Taxpayers assume expense)

Relief = Carrot

Compliance = Safety

Lindsey
06-19-2012, 07:53 AM
Where is big pharma in this fight? Does scarcity drive up their prices enough to compensate for the lost business?

Lindsey
06-19-2012, 07:54 AM
Fines = Revenue

Prosecution = Billable Hours

Incarceration = Broken System Fodder + Profit (Taxpayers assume expense)

Relief = Carrot

Compliance = Safety

So basically a few in government positions benefit, at the expense of millions of people.

cheapseats
06-19-2012, 07:56 AM
Where is big pharma in this fight? Does scarcity drive up their prices enough to compensate for the lost business?


Drug Dealers don't lose business. Business gets DONE...drug markets HAPPEN...one way or another.

That is why the WAR ON DRUGS goes on and on, ad nauseam. Cash out, cash out...never an end in sight.

Lindsey
06-19-2012, 07:58 AM
Why don't we just let people stop thinking that they are protected, and then let them make decisions for themselves as to whether taking x pill is worth the risk or not?

cheapseats
06-19-2012, 08:02 AM
So basically a few in government positions benefit, at the expense of millions of people.

Let us say THE FEW benefit, at the expense of millions/billions of Mundanes. It is a sad but common tale.

Same with WAR 4 PROFIT.

Same with POLITICS 4 PROFIT.





Fines = Revenue

Prosecution = Billable Hours

Incarceration = Broken System Fodder + Profit (Taxpayers assume expense)

Relief = Carrot

Compliance = Safety


Revenue supposedly funds the Greater Good of which we hear tell, but it is CLEARLY the "steady influx of new cash" in a Ponzi Scheme.

Billable Hours benefit the Legal Class, which is VERY MUCH part of what ails America at the CORE PRINCIPLE level.

Incarceration benefits the Enforcer Class (and Prison Owners, where applicable).

Relief benefits the Political Class.

Compliance benefits Elite.

tod evans
06-19-2012, 08:20 AM
As much as it sucks that "our government" is now targeting Dr.'s and pharmacy's it may actually serve a purpose...

As more and more "average citizens" fall victim to the war on drugs voters just might realize how out of control things are.

One can only hope.......

MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2
06-19-2012, 08:24 AM
Where is big pharma in this fight? Does scarcity drive up their prices enough to compensate for the lost business?


For one thing, they're busy creating shitty medicines that don't even work, like flexeril. Why? I guess so doctors can prescribe something with no risk. I predict there will never be an illicit trade for flexeril, because nobody wants it besides uninformed patients.

jkr
06-19-2012, 08:32 AM
they cut off my wife's asthma medicine and im going Rambo

cheapseats
06-19-2012, 08:56 AM
For one thing, they're busy creating shitty medicines that don't even work, like flexeril...


Exactly so.

Coming up with "NEW & IMPROVED, NON-ADDICTIVE" drugs to take INSTEAD of the ones that might give you a buzz.

"Somesideeffectshavebeenreported..."

SIDE EFFECTS = BIG BUSINESS

Thank God 'n Government, tho, if they finally mastered Restless Leg Syndrome...boy oh boy, THAT was a clear and present danger if ever there was one.

We await only SOMA, and the blissful certainty that AUTHORITIES HAVE EVERYTHING UNDER CONTROL...which will "free us up" to be polite, obedient, cheerful, cooperative GOOD NATURED Worker Bees.

tod evans
06-19-2012, 09:01 AM
Opiates effectively easing pain.......well over 5 centuries of documented use.

Government effectively regulating opiates.........0 years

Who's bright idea was this anyway?

The Goat
06-19-2012, 09:23 AM
As the victims expand so will the out cry for an end. It must get worse before it can get better.

cheapseats
06-19-2012, 09:37 AM
Opiates effectively easing pain.......well over 5 centuries of documented use.

Government effectively regulating opiates.........0 years

Who's bright idea was this anyway?


I think effin' Joe Biden coined DRUG CZAR.

His coke-head daughter got a free pass, and was lately married in a tasteful incident-free ceremony "covered" by the Society Sections of reputable print media. Her wedding day might not have been so sublime, might not have occurred at all, had she been thrown into a federal penitentiary the same way her father and his hypocritical ilk do to NOT Very Important People.

Roxi
06-19-2012, 09:54 AM
+rep for the post but MODS: Please fix thread title.

cheapseats
06-19-2012, 10:01 AM
+rep for the post but MODS: Please fix thread title.


When I first read it, I "naturally" thought it was referring to THIS:





TIME MAGAZINE

America's Medicated Army
Thursday, June 05, 2008

Seven months after Sergeant Christopher LeJeune started scouting Baghdad's dangerous roads — acting as bait to lure insurgents into the open so his Army unit could kill them — he found himself growing increasingly despondent. "We'd been doing some heavy missions, and things were starting to bother me," LeJeune says. His unit had been protecting Iraqi police stations targeted by rocket-propelled grenades, hunting down mortars hidden in dark Baghdad basements and cleaning up its own messes. He recalls the order his unit got after a nighttime firefight to roll back out and collect the enemy dead. When LeJeune and his buddies arrived, they discovered that some of the bodies were still alive. "You don't always know who the bad guys are," he says. "When you search someone's house, you have it built up in your mind that these guys are terrorists, but when you go in, there's little bitty tiny shoes and toys on the floor — things like that started affecting me a lot more than I thought they would."

So LeJeune visited a military doctor in Iraq, who, after a quick session, diagnosed depression. The doctor sent him back to war armed with the antidepressant Zoloft and the antianxiety drug clonazepam. "It's not easy for soldiers to admit the problems that they're having over there for a variety of reasons," LeJeune says. "If they do admit it, then the only solution given is pills."

While the headline-grabbing weapons in this war have been high-tech wonders, like unmanned drones that drop Hellfire missiles on the enemy below, troops like LeJeune are going into battle with a different kind of weapon, one so stealthy that few Americans even know of its deployment. For the first time in history, a sizable and growing number of U.S. combat troops are taking daily doses of antidepressants to calm nerves strained by repeated and lengthy tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. The medicines are intended not only to help troops keep their cool but also to enable the already strapped Army to preserve its most precious resource: soldiers on the front lines. Data contained in the Army's fifth Mental Health Advisory Team report indicate that, according to an anonymous survey of U.S. troops taken last fall, about 12% of combat troops in Iraq and 17% of those in Afghanistan are taking prescription antidepressants or sleeping pills to help them cope. Escalating violence in Afghanistan and the more isolated mission have driven troops to rely more on medication there than in Iraq, military officials say.

At a Pentagon that keeps statistics on just about everything, there is no central clearinghouse for this kind of data, and the Army hasn't consistently asked about prescription-drug use, which makes it difficult to track. Given the traditional stigma associated with soldiers seeking mental help, the survey, released in March, probably underestimates antidepressant use. But if the Army numbers reflect those of other services — the Army has by far the most troops deployed to the war zones — about 20,000 troops in Afghanistan and Iraq were on such medications last fall. The Army estimates that authorized drug use splits roughly fifty-fifty between troops taking antidepressants — largely the class of drugs that includes Prozac and Zoloft — and those taking prescription sleeping pills like Ambien.

In some ways, the prescriptions may seem unremarkable. Generals, history shows, have plied their troops with medicinal palliatives at least since George Washington ordered rum rations at Valley Forge. During World War II, the Nazis fueled their blitzkrieg into France and Poland with the help of an amphetamine known as Pervitin. The U.S. Army also used amphetamines during the Vietnam War.

The military's rising use of antidepressants also reflects their prevalence in the civilian population. In 2004, the last year for which complete data for the U.S. are available, doctors wrote 147 million prescriptions for antidepressants, according to IMS Health, a pharmaceutical-market-research firm. This number reflects in part the common practice of cycling through different medications to find the most effective drug. A 2006 federally funded study found that 70% of those taking antidepressants along with therapy experience some improvement in mood.

When it comes to fighting wars, though, troops have historically been barred from using such drugs in combat. And soldiers — who are younger and healthier on average than the general population — have been prescreened for mental illnesses before enlisting.

The increase in the use of medication among U.S. troops suggests the heavy mental and psychological price being paid by soldiers fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Pentagon surveys show that while all soldiers deployed to a war zone will feel stressed, 70% will manage to bounce back to normalcy. But about 20% will suffer from what the military calls "temporary stress injuries," and 10% will be afflicted with "stress illnesses." Such ailments, according to briefings commanders get before deploying, begin with mild anxiety and irritability, difficulty sleeping, and growing feelings of apathy and pessimism. As the condition worsens, the feelings last longer and can come to include panic, rage, uncontrolled shaking and temporary paralysis. The symptoms often continue back home, playing a key role in broken marriages, suicides and psychiatric breakdowns. The mental trauma has become so common that the Pentagon may expand the list of "qualifying wounds" for a Purple Heart — historically limited to those physically injured on the battlefield — to include posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on May 2 that it's "clearly something" that needs to be considered, and the Pentagon is weighing the change.

Using drugs to cope with battlefield traumas is not discussed much outside the Army, but inside the service it has been the subject of debate for years. "No magic pill can erase the image of a best friend's shattered body or assuage the guilt from having traded duty with him that day," says Combat Stress Injury, a 2006 medical book edited by Charles Figley and William Nash that details how troops can be helped by such drugs. "Medication can, however, alleviate some debilitating and nearly intolerable symptoms of combat and operational stress injuries" and "help restore personnel to full functioning capacity."

Which means that any drug that keeps a soldier deployed and fighting also saves money on training and deploying replacements. But there is a downside: the number of soldiers requiring long-term mental-health services soars with repeated deployments and lengthy combat tours. If troops do not get sufficient time away from combat — both while in theater and during the "dwell time" at home before they go back to war — it's possible that antidepressants and sleeping aids will be used to stretch an already taut force even tighter. "This is what happens when you try to fight a long war with an army that wasn't designed for a long war," says Lawrence Korb, Pentagon personnel chief during the Reagan Administration.

Military families wonder about the change, according to Joyce Raezer of the private National Military Family Association. "Boy, it's really nice to have these drugs," she recalls a military doctor saying, "so we can keep people deployed." And professionals have their doubts. "Are we trying to bandage up what is essentially an insufficient fighting force?" asks Dr. Frank Ochberg, a veteran psychiatrist and founding board member of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.

Such questions have assumed greater urgency as more is revealed about the side effects of some mental-health medications. Last year the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) urged the makers of antidepressants to expand a 2004 "black box" warning that the drugs may increase the risk of suicide in children and adolescents. The agency asked for — and got — an expanded warning that included young adults ages 18 to 24, the age group at the heart of the Army. The question now is whether there is a link between the increased use of the drugs in the Iraqi and Afghan theaters and the rising suicide rate in those places. There have been 164 Army suicides in Afghanistan and Iraq from the wars' start through 2007, and the annual rate there is now double the service's 2001 rate.

At least 115 soldiers killed themselves last year, including 36 in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Army said on May 29. That's the highest toll since it started keeping such records in 1980. Nearly 40% of Army suicide victims in 2006 and 2007 took psychotropic drugs — overwhelmingly, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) like Prozac and Zoloft. While the Army cites failed relationships as the primary cause, some outside experts sense a link between suicides and prescription-drug use — though there is also no way of knowing how many suicide attempts the antidepressants may have prevented by improving a soldier's spirits. "The high percentage of U.S. soldiers attempting suicide after taking SSRIs should raise serious concerns," says Dr. Joseph Glenmullen, who teaches psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. "And there's no question they're using them to prop people up in difficult circumstances."


Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1812055,00.html

Lucille
06-19-2012, 10:20 AM
The War on Drugs is a War on Sick People. Does the state just enjoy making people suffer? (By "state," I mean politicians and bureaucracies.)

Aimee Copeland Pleads for Painkillers, Feels Like 'Patchwork Quilt' (http://gma.yahoo.com/aimee-copeland-pleads-painkillers-feels-patchwork-quilt-132125683--abc-news-health.html)


Aimee Copeland, the Georgia student recovering from flesh-eating disease, is pleading for painkillers after surgery to replace swaths of bacteria-ravaged skin and muscle, her father said.
[...]
Summitt said narcotic painkillers like morphine and Fentanyl help patients power through the painful reconstructive surgery. But Andy Copeland said no drug is powerful enough to relieve his daughter's pain.

"The allowable doses of Morphine, Fentanyl and Lyrica are often inadequate to deal with the pain that Aimee is now experiencing," he wrote. "Please believe me when I say that Aimee's refusal to use pain medication has ceased following her most recent surgery. She is now requesting it ahead of schedule."

The keyword is "allowable."

jkr
06-19-2012, 10:24 AM
here's yo death panel...there are many

Lucille
06-19-2012, 12:01 PM
Balko: Reuters on the Painkiller Issue (http://www.theagitator.com/2012/06/18/reuters-on-the-painkiller-issue/)


Effects like making life a living hell for pain patients—and effects that are entirely predictable, no matter what the drug czar says. The DEA is now quite literally treating doctors and pharmacists like potential drug dealers.
[...]
That’s a telling metric, isn’t it? The same drug warriors who tell us prescription overdoses are skyrocketing claim, at the same time, that their decade-long anti-diversion efforts are working because . . . the government has been more successful at taking money and property away from people. Let’s not forget that in a civil asset forfeiture case, the government needn’t even charge you to take your stuff, much less convict you.

What’s really remarkable is that the DEA is admitting that it’s putting a squeeze on the overall availability of prescription painkillers, which of course will affect legitimate patients as much as recreational users. Meanwhile, the drug czar is giving us the old “Nothing to see here,” brushing off the notion that real pain patients are having difficulty filling their prescriptions. (The 400 or so desperate pain patients who have emailed me over the last few months would disagree.)
[...]
As long as you have a law enforcement agency bringing a law enforcement mindset to what ought to be a medical issue, they’re going to look at every doctor, pharmacist, wholesaler, and patient as a potential criminal. That’s what law enforcement officials do. They look for criminals.

And so in its ongoing effort to stop people from getting high, the government has once again created an atmosphere of fear, distrust, and paranoia. This time, sick people are suffering because of it.

cheapseats
06-19-2012, 12:24 PM
As much as it sucks that "our government" is now targeting Dr.'s and pharmacy's it may actually serve a purpose...

As more and more "average citizens" fall victim to the war on drugs voters just might realize how out of control things are.

One can only hope.......


I hope "pressed & dressed" Pot Smokers silently, steadily picket "legitimate" corporate behemoth DRUG STORES (marijuana pharmacies get RAIDED), with signs along the lines of:

.

NOW YOU KNOW HOW WE FEEL
WHAT WILL WE DO ABOUT IT?!
.

noneedtoaggress
06-19-2012, 01:08 PM
When I first read it, I "naturally" thought it was referring to THIS:

Don't forget the 'roided out law enforcement:


Steroid-Abusing Police Officer Richard Klementovich Holds Neighorhood Hostage (http://www.republicmagazine.com/news/steroid-abusing-police-officer-richard-klementovich-holds-neighorhood-hostage.html)
Posted on 18 June 2012 by William Grigg

Richard Klementovich, the 42-year-old Clifton, New Jersey police officer who barricaded himself in the home of his ex-wife in nearby Doylestown and turned a quiet neighborhood into a free-fire zone, was apparently attempting to commit “suicide by cop.” An admitted steroid user, Klementovich – who was paid $114, 560 in 2011 — described himself as angry “at this job and law enforcement. And it’s them who I will take out my anger on.”

“They will do the job I couldn’t and take my life,” wrote the 14-year law enforcement veteran in a June 16 e-mail to his ex-wife wife, Jill Majors. “I hope whomever comes to our house is ready to die tomorrow because I will be Jill…. Tell the police I have a surprise for them, this is the way I want to die.” When police arrived at the home, they found a manila envelope containing a note in which Klementovich said that he had scoped rifles, a cache of 2,000 rounds of ammunition, and that he “was ready to die.”

After Klementovich fired on police vehicles, several SWAT teams and emergency response units converged on the scene. Local residents were ordered to seek shelter in a nearby police facility or in their basements. Despite the deployment of paramilitary operators and heavy weaponry – including a tank-like vehicle – the standoff ended in anti-climactic fashion. Displaying uncommon restraint, the police allowed one of their own to surrender to a negotiator and leave the home of “his own free will,” reports NJ.com.

Prior to June 17, Klementovich was part of New Jersey’s tax-subsidized elite: He reportedly was paid $114,560 in 2011, at least some of which was used to feed his steroid addiction — which most likely would have led to a prison term had he been a Mundane (or common citizen).

Steroid use – including the attendant psychological syndrome called “Roid Rage” is quite commonplace among cops. “Officer Jimmy,” an anonymous active-duty police officer, told Men’s Health magazine that “Steroid use is very pervasive in law enforcement. I’d say, of the cops I know, 20 percent to 25 percent of them are using” steroids. “Jimmy,” who became a police officer in 2000, is a good representative of the “dominate-intimidate” mindset that defines contemporary law enforcement. He believes – or at least believed at one time – that police are under-utilizing an important tool: “What law enforcement needs is a little testosterone. Every cop should do a [steroid] cycle a year.”

A March 2004 pamphlet published by the DEA’s “Office of Diversion Control” underscores the reasons why steroids are so attractive to the likes of “Officer Jimmy”: “The idea of enhanced physical strength and endurance provides one with `the invincible mentality’ when performing law enforcement duties.”
If Klementovich had snapped and committed an act of violence against an innocent person while on duty, he most likely would be on “administrative leave” – that is, paid vacation – while his police union provided him with expensive legal help and unqualified support. The fact that he was able to walk away from the standoff, rather than being killed in a full-force military onslaught, is itself an illustration of the privileged position Klementovich continues to occupy: If he had been a mere Mundane, he would almost certainly be dead.

The siege in Clifton underscores another important and largely ignored point – namely, the asininity of the assumption that police officers, unlike Mundanes, can be entrusted with firearms. One of the tenets of the civilian disarmament catechism is that the same guns that are unacceptably dangerous when owned by private citizens are transmuted into instruments of civic amity when wielded by the State’s enforcement caste. Klementovich’s rampage is just the latest of numerous incidents demonstrating that the police are actually the most dangerous element of society.
Read more here.

liberdom
06-19-2012, 01:11 PM
Naturally you'd expect that if elderly are collecting social security and medicare, they would to be harassed on how they use their money.

cheapseats
06-19-2012, 02:02 PM
Naturally you'd expect that if elderly are collecting social security and medicare, they would to be harassed on how they use their money.


Medicare covers limp dick treatment. That ain't Right.

Jingles
06-19-2012, 04:59 PM
I still don't understand the abhorrent view of prescription drug use when it comes to a decent portion of people on this forum. I'm not talking about SSRIs and other useless things that don't really do much to treat issues. I'm talking about things like oxycodone, hydrocodone, oxymorphone, fentanyl, etc... that actually treat legitimate pain issues or things like diazepam, alazopram, etc... that treat anxiety issues. The "prescription" label doesn't somehow make a drug evil. You just need to actually look up what the drug is and etc... Actually, one of my biggest qualms with the drug war is people with legitimate pain or anxiety issues are not able to receive the proper amount of their given drug that they need because arbitrary laws which do not understand tolerance in the slightest.

And if your qualm is with the "Recreational use of these drugs", it confuses me that you may be involved in the liberty movement in the first place (at least if you want to try and restrict the use/purchase of said drugs via the state).

torchbearer
06-19-2012, 05:27 PM
I still don't understand the abhorrent view of prescription drug use when it comes to a decent portion of people on this forum. I'm not talking about SSRIs and other useless things that don't really do much to treat issues. I'm talking about things like oxycodone, hydrocodone, oxymorphone, fentanyl, etc... that actually treat legitimate pain issues or things like diazepam, alazopram, etc... that treat anxiety issues. The "prescription" label doesn't somehow make a drug evil. You just need to actually look up what the drug is and etc... Actually, one of my biggest qualms with the drug war is people with legitimate pain or anxiety issues are not able to receive the proper amount of their given drug that they need because arbitrary laws which do not understand tolerance in the slightest.

And if your qualm is with the "Recreational use of these drugs", it confuses me that you may be involved in the liberty movement in the first place (at least if you want to try and restrict the use/purchase of said drugs via the state).

best i can figure is that is a reaction to the fact that natural rememdies are outlawed and we are force to take the big corps meds. doesn't mean all their meds are evil or useless- but the way the laws are written leads us to resent the people who lobbied to have those laws in place.

paulbot24
06-19-2012, 05:58 PM
How does the rest of the world get by without the FDA? Just fine. I can't wait for Americans to figure that out.

Jingles
06-19-2012, 06:05 PM
best i can figure is that is a reaction to the fact that natural remedies are outlawed and we are force to take the big corps meds. doesn't mean all their meds are evil or useless- but the way the laws are written leads us to resent the people who lobbied to have those laws in place.

I don't oppose what people seek as natural remedies and I oppose all subsidies and etc.. to drug companies. What I generally don't understand is that a lot of people feel everything must be "natural" when we live in such a technologically advanced age and can produce drugs that stimulate specific receptors in the brain to provide what the person taking them is looking for. OMG IT WAS PRODUCED IN A LAB AND IT ISN'T A NATURALLY OCCURRING OR WHATEVER! Who cares!? We live in an age of science and technology. For specific ailments we can can produce specific drugs. Maybe I just don't understand the "health nut" part of the liberty movement, I don't know.

Mani
06-19-2012, 11:41 PM
How does the rest of the world get by without the FDA? Just fine. I can't wait for Americans to figure that out.

In other parts of the world, the Dr. has a mini-pharmacy in his office. He can give you the 80% common stuff that most of his/her patients require when they walk in.

It's almost like....ahmmm..WTF that was convenient. I saw the Dr. and within seconds of seeing him I'm handed my medication and I'm walking out the door....

Holy shit that was just so....ahmmm...FUCKING convenient!!!! WTF! Why is the US so ASS BACKWARDS????