GeorgiaAvenger
06-13-2012, 09:05 AM
http://www.demint.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=pickpocket&ContentRecord_id=d701d6e6-14e9-45b8-a7b1-f177b956c3be&ContentType_id=68a61be2-1ba4-4e64-8ebb-2d073518934e&Group_id=71939010-14b3-45b6-ace3-e1bb536b8179
The CFR is involved with LOST:
TASC plugs the Council on Foreign Relations, which published a 2009 report on LOST that argued the treaty should be ratified in order to stop the rise of greenhouse gases from energy use. The CFR report, posted on the TASC site, states that “Oceans are among the first casualties of increased greenhouse-gas emissions,” that “with rising levels of atmospheric CO2, the seas are being asked to absorb more carbon than ever before,” and concludes that LOST creates “a framework for further developing measures to prevent, reduce, and control pollution globally, regionally, and nationally.”
The CFR is involved with LOST:
TASC plugs the Council on Foreign Relations, which published a 2009 report on LOST that argued the treaty should be ratified in order to stop the rise of greenhouse gases from energy use. The CFR report, posted on the TASC site, states that “Oceans are among the first casualties of increased greenhouse-gas emissions,” that “with rising levels of atmospheric CO2, the seas are being asked to absorb more carbon than ever before,” and concludes that LOST creates “a framework for further developing measures to prevent, reduce, and control pollution globally, regionally, and nationally.”