Debra Medina GETS it

[cajuncocoa]

This just came over my Facebook feed from her (emphasis added):




Peggy Fikac and I discussed whether the TEA Party and liberty subsets of the Republican Party were really just the same folks. I don't believe they are. While there is overlap, I'd say generally they principally differ in their view of the proper role of government. How would you define? Are they the same?


http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10150832366071910&id=95669721909

*Note: She's obviously not speaking of the Tea Party that was originated by the Ron Paul R3volution, but the TEA Party that was co-opted by Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, et al.

[Sola_Fide]

Thomas Massie said the same thing.

[cajuncocoa]

Thomas Massie said the same thing.Good!

[Aratus]

maybe we could run Debra Medina for president in 2016!

[AGRP]

If someone ever asks me about the "tea party" I will ask them which one. The one when it began or the one that was commandeered.

[czarinaB]

Yeah. Debra can run as president this coming election.

[Number19]

I like the new description that I'm hearing, describing us as the Liberty Movement.

[Bern]

Her description rings true from what I saw at the Texas GOP state convention.

[MikeStanart]

maybe we could run Debra Medina for president in 2016!


Yeah. Debra can run as president this coming election.

I really like Debra. However, she is not cut out for a Presidential race yet. She doesn't have Ron Paul name recognition & she couldn't beat Perry in the gubernatorial race (A man who embarrassed himself in the Presidential Debate stage).

I would love to see Debra run for a Texas-wide office. She is very well known in Texas & she seems to focus on Texas issues with her organization "We Texans". Perhaps she could run for Governor again, or maybe even a Congressional seat if she could pry herself away from Texas politics.

I want Debra to run for something. She will have my complete support. But not President. Too fast too soon.