PDA

View Full Version : Department of Homeland Security Prepares to Grab DNA From Kids




John F Kennedy III
05-15-2012, 03:10 PM
Department of Homeland Security Prepares to Grab DNA From Kids

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
May 15, 2012

A Freedom of Information Act request filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation has revealed a plan by the Department of Homeland Security to collect DNA from children 14 years old and up without a search warrant or criminal prosecution.

EFF reported on Monday that the DHS plan


appears to be working its way through DHS in the wake of regulations from the Department of Justice that require all federal agencies – including DHS and its components such as ICE – to collect DNA from individuals arrested for federal crimes as well as “from non-United States persons who are detained under the authority of the United States,” whether or not they have been involved in criminal activity.

“Collecting DNA from anyone detained by the government for any number of non-criminal reasons – especially juveniles – seems to be yet another step on the slippery slope to collecting DNA from everyone in the United States, no matter their status,” writes Jennifer Lynch for the digital rights organization.

The unconstitutional trend picked up traction in 2009 when the FBI joined 15 states in taking DNA samples from people who have been arrested or detained but not convicted. At the time, the FBI database contained 6.7 million DNA profiles with a backlog of 500,000 cases. It expected a 15-fold increase in that number by 2012.

Congress has enthusiastically jumped on the DNA collection bandwagon under the cover of protecting children. The Katie Sepich Enhanced DNA Collection Act of 2010 uses the power of the purse string to convince states to keep and expand existing DNA collection programs. According to the law, increased federal crime-fighting funding will be available to states that have DNA-collection programs.

The federal government has launched a “DNA Initiative” that provides “funding, training and assistance to ensure that forensic DNA reaches its full potential to solve crimes, protect the innocent and identify missing persons.”


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FFZZUthoI2k

In 2011, the Third Circuit ruled in United States v. Mitchell that arbitrary collection of DNA from arrestees not convicted of a crime does represent a direct violation of the Fourth Amendment. “Note that this has to do with testing in the absence of probable cause (or even a reasonable suspicion) that the DNA would be evidence related to a crime,” writes Eugene Volokh.

The collection and processing of DNA by the government will be streamlined by the development of new technology. Defense contractors Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman have developed a rapid DNA analysis platform they plan to release this summer. Northrup Grumman developed its device for the U.S. Army.

“A portable, breadbox-sized scanner could map out your body’s DNA in less than an hour — and the Feds want it added to the agency’s tool bag,” Fox News reported last year. Prior to releasing information on the device to the media, the government issued its standard caveat about civil liberties.

“Sources at DHS assure FoxNews.com that evaluation of the DNA-screening technology will occur only after the department sets privacy and civil liberties safeguards — a vitally important step to protect such highly personal information,” Mickey McCarter wrote in March, 2011.

The DHS effort to target children reveals that the government has ambitiously stepped up efforts to DNA profile the populace and will continue to introduce new technology designed to add millions of profiles to the government’s databases.

DNA profiles are a critical component in the global elite’s emerging surveillance and ultimately its control grid. DNA profiles compliment efforts by the NSA and other agencies to track and trace us through electronic communication and create comprehensive dossiers of our medical and bank records in an effort to surveil all aspects of our personal lives.


original article here:
http://www.infowars.com/department-of-homeland-security-prepares-to-grab-dna-from-kids/

Schifference
05-15-2012, 03:54 PM
Maybe a bill should be introduced that requires all hospitals to submit DNA from all newborn children.

LibForestPaul
05-15-2012, 05:53 PM
They do.

Anti Federalist
05-15-2012, 06:13 PM
Maybe a bill should be introduced that requires all hospitals to submit DNA from all newborn children.

As already noted, they already do.


Brave New World of Infant DNA Data-Basing

http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/07/13/few-limits-on-infant-dna-data/

6:00 am July 13, 2009, by Bob Barr

One of the most exciting moments in life is to witness the birth of a new child. All hell could be breaking loose outside the delivery room, yet all your attention in those moments is focused on the miracle of a new baby being born. Yet in those exhilarating moments, a small event takes place in hospitals across the country that escapes the attention of most every parent, yet is becoming a matter of increasing concern for parents.

Laws in all 50 states require hospitals to collect a sample of every newborn baby’s blood (from a small pin prick to the baby’s foot). The primary purpose is to test for PKU (phenylketonuria, an inherited disease that can result in brain and nerve damage) and other diseases (California, for example, tests for some 76 different conditions).

Were the test itself the end of the matter, few questions would be raised. However, parents and others in a number of states are beginning to question what happens to those millions of infant dried-blood samples — each of which contains the entire genetic history of the infant, as well as DNA information on his or her parents and ancestors — that are collected each year. Who owns those samples? For what purpose(s) can the information be used; and by who? What agencies and commercial entities can access the information? Is parental consent required? Why should the information be retained at all?

In fact, lawsuits in at least two states — Minnesota and Texas — have been filed to test the limits of such newborn DNA data basing. The conditions under which such DNA samples are collected, retained and used likely will lead to more such lawsuits as parents learn of these factors.

Some states (California and North Carolina, among others) retain the DNA samples collected from newborns indefinitely, and other states keep them for up to 23 years. And while many states technically allow parents to refuse to have their newborn’s blood sample genetically tested, such “opt out” procedures rarely are made known to parents.

The stakes in this data war are high, as researchers and government agencies are realizing the value of such a databank of DNA and other genetic information. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has at least since 2002 been advocating for a national databank, calling such “leftover dried blood spot specimens” a “valuable . . . source for public health surveillance and . . . population-based data on prevalence of genetic variations.” The National Institutes of Health is using $13.5 million in taxpayer dollars to create a national blood sample repository.

These efforts are being aided by federal legislation signed into law by President George W. Bush last year that allows the federal government to screen the DNA of all newborns in the country. The purported justification for this far-reaching, privacy invasive law was the need to have a “national contingency plan” to meet “public health emergencies.”

State governments are moving quickly also to develop regimens for retaining and accessing what Sharon Terry of the Genetic Alliance calls a “national treasure” of data. Michigan, for example, reportedly has set up state-run freezer facilities at a “neonatal biobank” in Detroit.

Researchers and other advocates of DNA data basing are aggressively protecting their turf. The American College of Medical Genetics, for example, recently issued a “position statement” extolling the benefits of dried-blood specimen databases, and dismissing opponents’ concerns as “unsubstantiated and highly exaggerated.” Even the March of Dimes has joined the bandwagon — vigorously opposing requirements for parental consent (now required only in two states plus the District of Columbia).

With federal law, taxpayer dollars, and otherwise respected agencies like the March of Dimes lined up against them, parents and privacy-advocates trying to stem the tide of infant DNA data basing have their work cut out for them. Let’s hope they are up to the challenge.

John F Kennedy III
05-15-2012, 08:45 PM
And they have been collecting prints and blood from new borns for at least as long as I've been alive.

Schifference
05-16-2012, 06:29 AM
Now I feel safer!

oyarde
05-16-2012, 10:18 AM
In an effort to speed things along , I , often offer authorities a feces sample , they always decline.....

HOLLYWOOD
05-16-2012, 10:24 AM
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-X1JlHDMxe2U/TZPJAKOuolI/AAAAAAAAAY0/HpAfpUhjEYc/s320/markofthebeast.png