azxd
05-03-2012, 11:00 AM
President Paul
Ron Paul maybe a long shot in November, but he's America's best bet on foreign policy.
Ron Paul's treatment by mainstream media, other Republican hopefuls, and the punditry makes me think the W.B. Yeats lines (http://www.potw.org/archive/potw351.html) "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world" also describe the year 2012 in the United States. Indeed, Paul's experience in the nomination campaign suggests U.S. politics lacks reasoned substance, common sense, and an understanding of what America's Founding Fathers intended.
Open up any newspaper to see the mess America has sunk itself into around the world: for example, facing off with China (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/03/world/asia/chen-guangcheng-leaves-us-embassy-in-beijing-china.html?pagewanted=2&ref=world) over a lone, non-American dissident whose safety has no relation to U.S. security. Yet today, Paul's call for staying out of other people's wars unless genuine U.S. national interests are at stake is deemed radical (http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/seriously-iowa-ron-paul/2012/01/02/gIQAIAJGWP_story.html), immoral, even anti-American. Amazing.
If elected president, Paul's most valuable contribution to a prosperous and secure American future might well lie in his application of a noninterventionist foreign policy, following the wishes of George Washington and the other founders.
Before explaining why Paul's foreign policy would benefit the United States, it is worth rebutting those ill-educated jackasses in politics, the media, and the academy who denigrate the founders as "dead white males (http://www.ushistory.org/us/historians/ellis.asp)."
SNIP
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/05/03/president_paul
[/quote]
Truthful understanding is a good thing, IMO.
Schoolyard Rule
Ron Paul maybe a long shot in November, but he's America's best bet on foreign policy.
Ron Paul's treatment by mainstream media, other Republican hopefuls, and the punditry makes me think the W.B. Yeats lines (http://www.potw.org/archive/potw351.html) "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world" also describe the year 2012 in the United States. Indeed, Paul's experience in the nomination campaign suggests U.S. politics lacks reasoned substance, common sense, and an understanding of what America's Founding Fathers intended.
Open up any newspaper to see the mess America has sunk itself into around the world: for example, facing off with China (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/03/world/asia/chen-guangcheng-leaves-us-embassy-in-beijing-china.html?pagewanted=2&ref=world) over a lone, non-American dissident whose safety has no relation to U.S. security. Yet today, Paul's call for staying out of other people's wars unless genuine U.S. national interests are at stake is deemed radical (http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/seriously-iowa-ron-paul/2012/01/02/gIQAIAJGWP_story.html), immoral, even anti-American. Amazing.
If elected president, Paul's most valuable contribution to a prosperous and secure American future might well lie in his application of a noninterventionist foreign policy, following the wishes of George Washington and the other founders.
Before explaining why Paul's foreign policy would benefit the United States, it is worth rebutting those ill-educated jackasses in politics, the media, and the academy who denigrate the founders as "dead white males (http://www.ushistory.org/us/historians/ellis.asp)."
SNIP
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/05/03/president_paul
[/quote]
Truthful understanding is a good thing, IMO.
Schoolyard Rule