[Video] Maddow covers more delegate strategy success in Louisiana and other states

[TXcarlosTX]

Ron Paul will be on the ballot at the convention. What will happen next? Someone post the tube please. It was badass.


update:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQMtlah4Iec
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQMtlah4Iec

[Drex]

I don't care want anyone says. I like Maddow. Always have :)

[Tyler_Durden]

I don't care want anyone says. I like Maddow. Always have :)

I'm coming out of the closet.....me too. :D

[rp713]

she's just a more objective liberal. doesnt completely ignore facts. like the way she explained the delegate strategy a couple months ago. i think she actually does research unlike most of the usual msm narrative(propaganda).

[Guitarzan]

I can't stand her smug, holier than thou, contrived, pretentious attitude. And her vocal inflections. I don't like those either.

[JK/SEA]

she's a snake. don't forget that.

[andrew1229649]

2 sune fur toobz?

[rp713]

I can't stand her smug, holier than thou, contrived, pretentious attitude. And her vocal inflections. I don't like those either.

agreed. but cant ignore objective journalism, especially coming from the likes of msnbc. its not a reason to brown nose her though.

tube anyone?

[hueylong]

She likes the Ron Paul delegate story because it embarrasses Romney and helps Obama. No other reason.

[Adrock]

She likes the Ron Paul delegate story because it embarrasses Romney and helps Obama. No other reason.

Winner, Winner, Chicken Dinner!

[Bastiat's The Law]

I'm coming out of the closet.....me too. :D

LOL :D

[DRHChi]

She likes the Ron Paul delegate story because it embarrasses Romney and helps Obama. No other reason.

Thank you for stating what should be obvious. She's horrible and will fight against decency and liberty every chance she gets.

[Okie RP fan]

She's just another talking head for the socialists at MSNBC... Don't be fooled. She's playing to those of you who have given her help in the ratings department.

[coffeewithchess]

agreed. but cant ignore objective journalism, especially coming from the likes of msnbc. its not a reason to brown nose her though.

tube anyone?

Objective journalism is Ben Swann, Rachel Maddow = trying to keep ratings from going further in the tank.

[Kluge]

I don't care want anyone says. I like Maddow. Always have :)

Just never lose that skepticism that she may well be doing the "honey, honey...poison" schtick.

[outspoken]

The ONLY reason that Maddow gives a rat's ass about Paul and mentions him is because he is the only and last chance of siphoning off votes from the GOP. She hates liberty and everything the Constitution stands for as much if not more than Obama. She wants to paint everyone who does not support our president as a woman bashing, homophobic, racist. I don't know how anyone who supports Ron Paul can sit and listen to her liberal, socialistic and self-righteous dribble for more than five minutes. Jmo

[Titus]

Hey if ratings help Rachel Maddow to be an "objective" journalist then that is the free market of ideas at work and we are winning. If the other analysts realize that she consistently rates higher than the others, they might figure out why. Then we would get even more coverage because people realize we watch the networks/shows that treat our candidate fairly.

[twomp]

She's just another talking head for the socialists at MSNBC... Don't be fooled. She's playing to those of you who have given her help in the ratings department.

About time someone "plays" to us. It would seem that some of you would rather she not talk about Dr. Paul at all?

[maskander]

eh, you guys are a turnoff. who do you guys have? Alex Jones?

[Highstreet]

She likes the Ron Paul delegate story because it embarrasses Romney and helps Obama. No other reason.

I'd like to see this proven wrong when Paul gets the nomination and she gives him fair treatment. :-)

[Bastiat's The Law]

eh, you guys are a turnoff. who do you guys have? Alex Jones?
That's the only Ron Paul interviews I don't watch. Can't stand Jones sensationalistic interview style.

[MrDauven]

eh, you guys are a turnoff. who do you guys have? Alex Jones?

We had Napolitano, until Fox stole him from us.

[kill the banks]

if you look close she's wearing a go obimbo go button but what the hell as long as it helps us

[Danke]

eh, you guys are a turnoff. who do you guys have? Alex Jones?

AJ has great interviews. Ya ya, sometimes he interrupts the guests too much, but overall he lets them make their point, unlike the MSM, which rarely even gives them a chance at an interview.

[Carehn]

eh, you guys are a turnoff. who do you guys have? Alex Jones?
Nobody speaks a fowl word on Alex! He looses it sometimes on air but by God I know hes down with the seen. Tah hell with MSM.

[idiom]

She likes the Ron Paul delegate story because it embarrasses Romney and helps Obama. No other reason.

You would think the Liberal MSM would be pounding a path to our door to try and demolish Romney in Texas and tear the GOP in two...

[sailingaway]

That's the only Ron Paul interviews I don't watch. Can't stand Jones sensationalistic interview style.

I don't like it either, but I've watched some clips of AJ with Ron and Rand that were pretty good on youtubes. I haven't watched a whole show, he haas a bombastic style like Limbaugh or Olberman that I don't prefer. But he does get some stories first. Also some junk, but that goes with putting it out first, likely.

[Sentient Void]

Hey if ratings help Rachel Maddow to be an "objective" journalist then that is the free market of ideas at work and we are winning. If the other analysts realize that she consistently rates higher than the others, they might figure out why. Then we would get even more coverage because people realize we watch the networks/shows that treat our candidate fairly.

Wow. I'm glad *somebody* here 'gets it'.

Comon, people. This shit is *chess*, not checkers.

She is self-interested, as she should be. As we all are. Let's give her ratings when she praises Paul, and do what we do best when she or anyone else pulls bullshit tactics.

Reward her with ratings. Others will catch on. Her and others' support will help, not hurt. We could use all the media attention we can get. Spread it around to your liberal buddies, take advantage of it.

We have to break out of this circle-jerk, vacuum, preaching-to-the-choir mentality that some of us have...

And oh, yeah - TOOOOOOOBZ or it didn't happen! ;)

[sailingaway]

Yeah, I'm not going to diss her when she gives us coverage I like, but she HAS been unfair to both Ron and Rand, and since she went to the White House, she seems to have much more turned to the dark side in terms of cheerleading Obama. However, she did, before that, put out the only good mainstream (?) media piece on Obama institutionalizing indefinite preventative detention. She is smart and she is witty, when she uses her powers for good.... :p

[kuckfeynes]

Can't stand Jones sensationalistic interview style.

I dislike his style as well. I listen for the substance.

[MelissaCato]

All man who's got the youtube?

[FSP-Rebel]

Yeah, I'm not going to diss her when she gives us coverage I like, but she HAS been unfair to both Ron and Rand, and since she went to the White House, she seems to have much more turned to the dark side in terms of cheerleading Obama. However, she did, before that, put out the only good mainstream (?) media piece on Obama institutionalizing indefinite preventative detention. She is smart and she is witty, when she uses her powers for good....

Decency at last. I'm on her side, it's ez. Keep goin

[Brent Pierce]

I don't care want anyone says. I like Maddow. Always have :)

She is our enemy. Her reporting on Ron now is only to weaken the GOP in the general for the benefit of Obama. She has been an overnight guest in the Obama White house more than anyone else. Never forget her PC liberal sneak attack to prevent Rand Paul from getting into the Senate.

[jct74]

looks like this is the video but I can't get it to play, sometimes I have trouble playing MSNBC videos
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096434/#47256328

[jct74]

tube!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQMtlah4Iec
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQMtlah4Iec

[sailingaway]

If it weren't for the booing and lack of explanation that it was an independent Senator who had beat the GOP senator candidate, coming to the GOP convention to endorse one candidate over another (still not ok to boo, but there were more than just us there not happy to see her), I'd put it on the front page.

[Rfalcon51]

Her book is currently number one on the NY Times bestseller list, and I am sure RP would agree with a good portion of it. Also, I recently was watching CSPAN and she was at some event with Rahm, and she spoke well of RP. Basically saying he could potentially take votes from President Obama. She brought RP up, was not asked about him or anything. I like her.

[robertwerden]

The more news we make, the more Santorum, and Gingrich supporters will join us to block Romney.

[sailingaway]

The more news we make, the more Santorum, and Gingrich supporters will join us to block Romney.

Unfortunately, I don't think they are watching Maddow....

[coffeewithchess]

The more news we make, the more Santorum, and Gingrich supporters will join us to block Romney.

What makes you think this? Gingrich and Santorum are lining up behind Romney, without a peep from RP's campaign. Instead of using Santorum and Gingrich quotes to draw in their supporters, the RP campaign is running an attack ad in Texas with Santorum and Gingrich in it.

The fact this isn't on Fox News, which will NOT help us reach the base we need to reach in Texas. California? Maybe. Rachel Maddow is not one you share with Republican base, it's as simple as that.

[J_White]

take that, while the establishment GOP is focusing on the nomination and losing the general election,
we are taking the GOP back !! YESSSSSS !!

[Eisenhower]

The coverage of Paul by Maddow is just for publicity of her show and for making Obama look as good as possible. This is NBC we are talking about here, as well as her being an openly gay, pro-women, liberal in all aspects of the term.

But I'm not complaining... Any positive coverage is good coverage.

[Indy Vidual]

I can't stand her smug, holier than thou, contrived, pretentious attitude. And her vocal inflections. I don't like those either.


she's a snake. don't forget that.

It's easier to remember w/ a picture:
http://shadrachs.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/adrianne-snake.jpg?w=332&h=329

[cassielund99@gmail.com]

I would like to know where she came up with 19 delegates for Mittens and 17 for Ron Paul. We have over a 2/3 majority at the convention in Louisiana. I don't see Mittens getting to 19 when he has 5 now.

[amonasro]

The coverage of Paul by Maddow is just for publicity of her show and for making Obama look as good as possible. This is NBC we are talking about here, as well as her being an openly gay, pro-women, liberal in all aspects of the term.

But I'm not complaining... Any positive coverage is good coverage.

Can't argue with that. We take it where we can get it.

Just don't forget that in 2008 Glenn Beck was "on our side" until it actually mattered, then he turned and sacrificed himself to the Establishment gods. So we shouldn't get too attached to these talking heads :)

[coffeewithchess]

I would like to know where she came up with 19 delegates for Mittens and 17 for Ron Paul. We have over a 2/3 majority at the convention in Louisiana. I don't see Mittens getting to 19 when he has 5 now.

Yep...noticed that also, and wondered where she was getting that made up number from.

[speciallyblend]

1428

[Noble Savage]

I don't care if she has snakes coming out of her hair its what is coming out of her mouth is what is important and who she speaks to. She is showing the fire of the Good Dr. and dropping embers everywhere and doesn't even know it.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hO8MwBZl-Vc&feature=related

[cstarace]

...as well as her being an openly gay, pro-women...
OH NO! Anything but teh gayz and teh woman!
http://blog.agendize.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/OhNoLady.jpg

[cstarace]

Anyway, I've always liked Maddow. Out of the three major networks, there isn't a more objective reporter out there. Sure, she obviously has an agenda, but doesn't necessarily let that get in the way of reporting facts. I'd take her any day of the week over O'Reilly, Hannity, O'Donnell, Schultz, Morgan or John King.

[JK/SEA]

anyone know why FREEDOM WATCH was cancelled?

[LKMN]

Wow. I'm glad *somebody* here 'gets it'.

Comon, people. This shit is *chess*, not checkers.

She is self-interested, as she should be. As we all are. Let's give her ratings when she praises Paul, and do what we do best when she or anyone else pulls bullshit tactics.

Reward her with ratings. Others will catch on. Her and others' support will help, not hurt. We could use all the media attention we can get. Spread it around to your liberal buddies, take advantage of it.

We have to break out of this circle-jerk, vacuum, preaching-to-the-choir mentality that some of us have...

And oh, yeah - TOOOOOOOBZ or it didn't happen! ;)

Yes.

[MarcusI]

I liked the discussion between Rachel and Rand. I wish Rand had been a bit more directly, but in the end, he got his points clear, and she got hers. That's fine. I'm with Rand, private business should have the right to discriminate even though its immoral. Its their choice.

[AmericasLastHope]

I don't care want anyone says. I like Maddow. Always have :)

Never forget when she pushed Rand Paul "from the frying pan into the fire"

[speciallyblend]

Anyway, I've always liked Maddow. Out of the three major networks, there isn't a more objective reporter out there. Sure, she obviously has an agenda, but doesn't necessarily let that get in the way of reporting facts. I'd take her any day of the week over O'Reilly, Hannity, O'Donnell, Schultz, Morgan or John King.

same here.

[S.Shorland]

I did like her until she told O'Donnell to 'Go get 'em/him' with a sneer as she was introducing an O'Donnell/Paul interview.

**EDIT** I found the clip and unless it has been manipulated,I was wrong.She just clapped her hands and said 'enjoy'.

[AlexG]

anyone know why FREEDOM WATCH was cancelled?

low ratings, barely anyone watched it because it was on Fox Biz, if it was on Fox news it would have been a hit

[digitaldean]

Why does Maddow say that Mitt will get 19 delegates out of Louisiana? I thought since we won 74% those people would pick the majority of delegates?

[BenIsForRon]

Maddow's OK on some things, but she is neck deep in a century of progressive thought, so she loses her objectivity when someone has a position that goes against that thinking (Rand says some anti-discrimination laws may be unconstitutional).

Her heart is in the right place, her head isn't.

[messana]

I'll leave this here for the Maddow lovers.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK8O3I0NXQQ

[BenIsForRon]

^Ok, I never saw that. I had no idea she could be such a fucking demagogue.

[Sullivan*]

I'm coming out of the closet.....me too. :D
I see what you did there.

[kathy88]

Can't argue with that. We take it where we can get it.

Just don't forget that in 2008 Glenn Beck was "on our side" until it actually mattered, then he turned and sacrificed himself to the Establishment gods. So we shouldn't get too attached to these talking heads :)

I'm still not quite over that.

[No Free Beer]

shes just using us tho

[Jovan Galtic]

I love this stuff! :)

[2young2vote]

Makes me sad when Rachel Maddow is the only one covering Ron Paul. But i'm glad she is. She is the only one saying he has a chance.

[Okie RP fan]

About time someone "plays" to us. It would seem that some of you would rather she not talk about Dr. Paul at all?

Uh, no.

I ask that those of you jumping for joy over Maddow talking about Dr. Paul calm down and keep your guard up. We havr no friends in the media. And I should not have to cover Maddow's leftist talking points and agenda, all a part of MSNBC's "lean forward" progressive ploy.

[libertygrl]

I don't care want anyone says. I like Maddow. Always have :)

I thought I did until after the way she treated Rand during the senate race and they were all accusing him of being a racist. I've learned to never trust these media talking heads. They may throw a few breadcrumbs our way every once in a while but they still cannot be trusted. Just my opinion.

[libertskee]

That was a great piece as far as msm goes, but sometimes i really cant stand msnbc even more than fox news. Chris Mathews and Ed Schultz are the most biased people I've ever listened to. I end up yelling at my TV everytime. I geuss I do that for Fox too...

[slamhead]

I don't care want anyone says. I like Maddow. Always have :)

So do I. She has always been fair to Dr. Paul

[puppetmaster]

Regardless of how things turn out this year, getting real conservatives and real republicans as party leaders and taking the party BACK from these hacks will only help us for future candidates ....ie: Rand.

I see us winning this whole thing this year if everyone of us goes above and beyond the call of duty.

[DisabledVet]

She likes the Ron Paul delegate story because it embarrasses Romney and helps Obama. No other reason.

Is the enemy of my enemy my friend?

Only until they become my enemy.