PDA

View Full Version : List Of Traitors In The House Who Voted For CISPA




DamianTV
04-27-2012, 06:33 PM
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/112-2012/h192

In case any of you need a quick reference for who voted for what.

Drex
04-27-2012, 07:05 PM
All 3 jokers in my state voted for that.. and SOPA.. and NDAA.. kill me now

edit: We need to get enough people to just spam some of these tools' pages on FB.

Origanalist
04-27-2012, 07:08 PM
All 3 jokers in my state voted for that.. and SOPA.. and NDAA.. kill me now

Why would we kill you for someone elses vote?

DamianTV
04-27-2012, 07:10 PM
All 3 jokers in my state voted for that.. and SOPA.. and NDAA.. kill me now

Is it okay if we kill you after you vote in honest replacements for the Jokers?

Drex
04-27-2012, 07:11 PM
Why would we kill you for someone elses vote?

Ne[ocon]braska

John F Kennedy III
04-27-2012, 07:29 PM
Cali- 21 YES and 31 NO

That's really surprising. Of course I don't trust a single one of them.

Drex
04-27-2012, 07:42 PM
Cali- 21 YES and 31 NO

That's really surprising. Of course I don't trust a single one of them.

It turned very poltical. Most all republicans voted for, democrats no. If a republican voted against they would be deemed a traitor

John F Kennedy III
04-27-2012, 07:48 PM
It turned very poltical. Most all republicans voted for, democrats no. If a republican voted against they would be deemed a traitor

Thank you. That explains it. Cali reps are mostly democrats.

CharlesTX
04-27-2012, 08:08 PM
The Neocon in my district, Michael T. McCaul, voted aye. Not surprised.

DerickVonD
04-27-2012, 08:18 PM
Can we get an adress list of these folks, I think that would be most useful.

row333au
04-27-2012, 09:05 PM
Notice with all of the "cyber security" policies and arguments with protecting the public, there is a provision in there that doesn't protect personal data, privacy and legally hacking individuals through deceptive legalities - So the question is, what are they protecting?

The government is protecting the 'Big Corporations' to do anything while giving them unlimited rights with impunity over the billions of people's collective individual rights and freedom - from infringing, recording, manipulating and stealing - or anything you do (activities and data) and hacking into your computers and phones while using the internet; worst of these are that they will give those to the governments, UN organizations and etc...

Knightskye
04-27-2012, 10:17 PM
All Republicans in my state voted Yes and all the Democrats voted No, except one Democrat who didn't vote. That was surprising.

Also, I initially read the bill as "Cyborg Intelligence Sharing..." I'm hungry.

thetruthhurtsthefed
04-27-2012, 10:28 PM
A member of parliament in Canada ( vic toews) recently pushed for a cispa type bill ( I think it was bill c-30) and tried to sugar coat
it for the sake of child / kiddyporn ( which is a legit reason but the bill/law goes way further into stripping our internet privacy than
just protecting children. So some brilliant political insider published mr toews' personal life via twitter (he's going through a divorce) to push the point of Internet privacy. Maybe something to consider for these ass clowns that voted for cispa??

Brian4Liberty
04-27-2012, 10:36 PM
Wow, a lot of Californians voted against, both D and R.

COpatriot
04-27-2012, 11:19 PM
My neocon embarrassment of a Congressman, Doug Lamborn (CO-5), voted for it.

CaptainAmerica
04-27-2012, 11:41 PM
All 3 jokers in my state voted for that.. and SOPA.. and NDAA.. kill me now

edit: We need to get enough people to just spam some of these tools' pages on FB.

a bill recently passed in Arizona makes spam punishable with up to 17 years of prison or something close to it.

DamianTV
04-28-2012, 12:59 AM
a bill recently passed in Arizona makes spam punishable with up to 17 years of prison or something close to it.

Funny thing about Oligarchs, they usually think themselves to be exempt from their own laws.

tttppp
04-28-2012, 01:06 AM
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/112-2012/h192

In case any of you need a quick reference for who voted for what.

Why is it mostly republicans who are voting for increased regulations, and the democrats voting no? I thought republicans were suppose to support decreased regulations.

azxd
04-28-2012, 07:54 AM
Why is it mostly republicans who are voting for increased regulations, and the democrats voting no? I thought republicans were suppose to support decreased regulations.Republican and Democrat is a myth ... They work wonders with deception, and generate great divides via the Two Party labels.

seeker4sho
04-28-2012, 08:30 AM
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/112-2012/h192

In case any of you need a quick reference for who voted for what.

I do not like to be gloom and doom but I have come to the conclusion that our only hope to return our country around and restore freedom is for a collapse of the dollar. As long as the status quo is in power we do not stand a chance.

DGambler
04-28-2012, 08:44 AM
I have lost all hope for our country. This is the first time that I truly believe it too.

There is no way we get out of this mess before a collapse. And if the wrong people sieze power afterwards, we'll have a century+ of tyranny just due to the technology available.

seyferjm
04-28-2012, 08:53 AM
Screw Ohio! Only democrats voted no on this thing.

Proph
04-28-2012, 09:59 AM
On a positive note, Mo Brooks voted no. He originally co-sponsored the bill (along with many others). Maybe they do listen.

Any others that went from co-sponsoring to voting no?

hortulanus94
04-28-2012, 10:30 AM
My congressman is a Democrat (George Miller) and he voted NO. That's one good thing he's done :)

cheapseats
04-28-2012, 11:19 AM
They have HOUSES with Spouses & Children. Spouses go to pricey restaurants, spas and boutiques. Trophy Children attend schools, mainly private.

Imagine their surprise...IMAGINE THEIR FEAR...if Protesters start protesting in front of the Ivory Towers that service AND HIDE impervious Officials.

Do Officials proactively scare CITIZENS? They most certainly DO.

Are Citizens' families off the table? They most certainly are NOT.

Play hardball, or lose. Lose battles over particular bills, AND LOSE ELECTIONS.

Power=Money is not "niced" or "stealthed" outta being Bullies/Assholes.

Unless it is on orderly passing of the baton, EMPHASIS ON ORDER, no one gives up Power without a fight. Why WOULD they, when THEY HAVE THE POWER TO PREVENT IT?

tttppp
04-28-2012, 09:44 PM
Republican and Democrat is a myth ... They work wonders with deception, and generate great divides via the Two Party labels.

I agree. But when people see this crap from "republicans" they should vote them out. If they are not for reduced regulations, quit the sham and run as a democrat, or run as a communist.

Gurv720
04-28-2012, 10:47 PM
My congressman is on that list. *sigh*

I should run for Congress when I'm 25, I'm so tired of this shit.

Dissent
04-29-2012, 02:22 PM
Bastard congressman voted for it.Between that and him voting for the NDAA I am not voting for him this year.

helmuth_hubener
04-29-2012, 02:34 PM
Hey, Thaddeus “Thad” McCotter voted no. Remember him from the Iowa Straw Poll? Interesting. So there were two Michigan Republicans who broke ranks.

libertskee
04-29-2012, 02:45 PM
all five voted no in Connecticut woohoo

Warrior_of_Freedom
04-29-2012, 03:50 PM
My representative is a career politician that never worked a normal job in his life. He has a skewed view of reality. I fucking hate him. I vote against him every cycle, but he keeps getting re-elected.