[VIDEO] US Marines Major Christopher Miller Speaks for Ron Paul Slate (CD3 MO)

[Liberty Rebellion]

I was sitting two rows right behind him.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=3059490288308


[mod edit] youtube video from different angle


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OVgYCMjr8c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OVgYCMjr8c

[LisaNY]

Wow!! He was awesome!

[cassielund99@gmail.com]

Being a veteran myself and serving in desert shield I agree with him 100%. He did get a little over the top, but overall great speech.

[Philosophy_of_Politics]

Being a veteran myself and serving in desert shield I agree with him 100%. He did get a little over the top, but overall great speech.

Nah. That's not over the top. He inspired, with an idea that is morally good. On top of using a tone that speaks seriousness, and from the heart.

[kathy88]

Goosebumps.

[Justinfrom1776]

I was a few rows behind him.. Very powerful moment that unfortunately flew over the heads of the opposition in the room. How they can hear such powerful arguments being made by two former Marines (the other was Rep. Paul Curtman) on behalf of Ron Paul and not even 1 of them change their vote, I'll never understand. We ended up losing by about 5 or 6 votes.

[J_White]

great vid !

[mport1]

Can we get a YouTube version so it can be spread around more easily?

[Captain Shays]

I was a few rows behind him.. Very powerful moment that unfortunately flew over the heads of the opposition in the room. How they can hear such powerful arguments being made by two former Marines (the other was Rep. Paul Curtman) on behalf of Ron Paul and not even 1 of them change their vote, I'll never understand. We ended up losing by about 5 or 6 votes.
I'll tell you how it happens and how we can counter it to win them over. Those are probably the same people who say things to us like "I like a lot of Ron Paul's positions but he loses me on his foreign policy".

They have been convinced over the years that adhering to the foreign policy of Woodrow Wilson is not only safer but morally superior than adhering to the foreign policy of our founding fathers.

Look.. Say what you want about Glenn Beck but his audience for quite a while was pretty large and he cleared the path for us to use "progressives" as the real boogie men....and they are....or as we understand, collectivists/globalists. He pointed out to lots of people that there are progressives in both the major parties and, we can use that to show people who are otherwise conservative (I support RP on other issues but not foreign policy) that they are following a progressive foreign policy that hasn't made us any safer or stronger or any more free.

You must first know our original foreign policy and what it was based upon which was the Christian Just War Principles. Those were based in biblical scriptures that allowed killing in only four circumstances without being in violation of the Commandment that is correctly tranlated "Thou shall not MURDER" (not "kill").

1) by accident

2) capital punishment

3) self defense

4) in defense of your loved ones.

ALL other killing is considered murder. Ref "Christianity and War" by Laruence Vance

Our founders modeled our foreign policy also after Switzerland who also based their foriegn poliicy and their style of defence on the Christian Just War Principles. During the Constitutional Convention they even wrote letters to Switzerland declaring them to be our "sister nation" holding them in the highest regard for their 400 years of peace since declaring neutrality during the Swiss Convention of 1281 when Brother Klause a Jesuit Monk was called down from his monestary in the Alps to preside over the convention and he presented to them these Just War Principles.

The early Roman Church was conflicted because Rome was being threatened by hoardes of barbarians and the men wanted to defend Rome but also didn't want to violate the precepts of scripture. So a commission was formed to search scripture to see if or when a Christian could kill another human being and not violate the laws of God.
The Swiss accepted that and so did our founding fathers.

They surmised that if there was an invading force on the border of your country and they penetrated the border then they would cause harm to you and your family so in that case it was justified to take up arms, join the military and fight even to the point of death because you were defending your family in doing so.

We were a neutral country up until the progressive era starting with Teddy Roosevelt but full out under Wilson who said "we need to use our military to make the world safe for democracy". Really? We need to kill and die for a system that our founders detested?

"Democracy is mob rule. It's tyranny but of the majority where 51% of the voters can take away the rights of the other 49% may it never be" Thomas Jefferson.

"Democracy is like two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for supper. Liberty is two wolves and a well armed lamb contesting the vote" Ben Franklin

But George Washington said:

"I have always given it as my decided opinion that no nation had a right to inter-meddle in the internal concerns of another; and that, if this country could, consistent with its engagements, maintain a strict neutrality and thereby preserve peace". George Washington - Letter to James Monroe, August 25, 1796

Most reasonable people will see the difference if you present it well.

Also point out which party was in power during the start of most of our major wars. DEMOCRATS.

Bolivia,WWI, WWII, Korea (our first undeclared war) Vietnam, Bosnia, Somalia, Serbia, Kosovo. Bill Clinton had 30,000 covert troops in Columbia for 6 years (google U'wa Tribe) and kept us in Iraq for 8 yrs bombing the crap out of them over 400 times killing over 1,000 Iraqi's and another 500,000 with the sanctions (youtube Albright says it was worth it).

KNOW the quotes from our founding fathers well when you are trying to convince both the new style conservatives and Democrats because the arguments work equally well on both.

NEVER accuse Republicans of being "NEOCONS". NEVER NEVER NEVER. They find it offensive and will put us in league with the hated liberal Bush haters who said stupid things like "Bush lied and people died" relative to the Iraq war. You WILL push them away if you use the term "neocon". It's one of the biggest mistakes we've made during this and the last campaign even though it's true.

Differentiate between "old style conservatives" or the "old right" and "new style conservatives" (neocons). Whereas the old style conservatives adhered to the foreign policy and style of defense of our founders and strongly opposed the globalism and war mongering and policing the world of the progressives and were labeled "isolationists" for that opposition, the new style conservatives follow instead the foreign poicy of Woodrow Wilson. Thank you Glenn BEck for rightfully demonizing that scumbag because few so called conservatives want to be lumped in with the likes of Wilson. They instead prefer being lumped in with the founding fathers and so do most post Ron Paul Tea Party activists many of whom are devout Christians BTW.

BELIEVE ME. This approach works on Democrats and conservatives.
Democrats well, most people today think that it's the Republicans who are the war party. It's not. The Democrats (progressives) were the original war party. THEY are the police the world party. THEY are the undeclared war party. THEY are the one world government party. THEY are the authoritarian take our personal freedom away party.

To take it even further, the new style conservatives (neocons) also no longer oppose the entitlements of the progressives. Some do in rhetoric but not in practice. Even the venerated Ryan plan proudly indicts the Obama administration and Democrats for cutting back on Medicare while his plan increases spending for Medicare ignoring the $38 Trillion in unfunded liabilities for that program alone.

But Democrat/progressives also brought us the League of Nations and the United Nations---ideas of one world government. Incidently, the new style coservatives not only don't oppose the UN they even send our sons to die to enforce UN resolutions like we did in Iraq. I have even encountered neocons so entrenched and hoodwinked that they refuse to acknowledge that we went to war to enforce UN resolutions even though the facts are right in their face.

Democrat-progressives also brought to us the Federal Reserve Act which we are now $16 TRILLION in debt to and who have devalued our currency over 94%.
They brought us the 16th Amendment which is nothing more than the collection service of the corporation known as the Fed. who create money out of thin air, charge us interest on by force of arms.
They brought us just about EVERY entitlement from Socialist Security, Dept of Agriculture, Dept of Education, Dept of Housing, Dept of Welfare, Food Stamps etc. along with the 18th Amendment. This was the first time in our history that the federal government presumed to tell free people what they could or could not put into their own bodies. Progressives did that not the old style conservative. Point out that as a result we now have trans fat laws, cookie laws, smoking bans, and bans on salt shakers in restaurants. We have local health dept officials harrassing little girls for selling lemonade in front of their own houses.

ALL of this is where Ron Paul shines IF we couch our terms correctly and form our arguments the right way. Mitt Romney is a progressive and THAT is why he's no different than Obama. He WILL NOT reduce the size and scope of the federal government. He WILL NOT abolish the Fed. He DOES NOT oppose the IRS. He falls in line with Wilson and the progressives on foreign policy. He DOES NOT oppose the entitlements that we're $$$TRILLIONS in debt to. HE WILL NOT reduce the intrusiveness of govenrment or make them any less threatening to our liberty.

There are reams of quotes from the founding fathers available to help you make your argument effective. Print them out and give them to people that you identify as new style conservatives who like Ron Paul except for his foreign policy and you might win them over. If not, you will at least plant a seed. One of us will come along later and water that seed and the truth will make it grow

[RonPaulRules]

http://troll.me/images/joseph-ducreux/like-a-bawse-thumb.jpg

[TruckinMike]

I'll tell you how it happens and how we can counter it to win them over. Those are probably the same people who say things to us like "I like a lot of Ron Paul's positions but he loses me on his foreign policy".

They have been convinced over the years that adhering to the foreign policy of Woodrow Wilson is not only safer but morally superior than adhering to the foreign policy of our founding fathers.

Look.. Say what you want about Glenn Beck but his audience for quite a while was pretty large and he cleared the path for us to use progressives as the real boogie men....and they are....or as we understand, collectivists/globalists. He pointed out to lots of people that there are progressives in both the major parties and we can use that to show people who are otherwise conservative (I support RP on other issues but not foreign policy) that they are following a progressive foreign policy that hasn't made us any safer or stronger or any more free.

You must first know our original foreign policy and what it was based upon which was the Christian Just War Principles. Those were based in biblical scriptures that allowed killing in only four circumstances without being in violation of the Commandment that is correctly tranlated "Thou shall not MURDER" (not "kill").

1) by accident

2) capital punishment

3) self defense

4) in defense of your loved ones.

ALL other killing is considered murder. Ref "Christianity and War" by Laruence Vance

Our founders modeled our foreign policy also after Switzerland who also based their foriegn poliicy and their style of defence on the Christian Just War Principles. During the Constitutional Convention they even wrote letters to Switzerland declaring them to be our "sister nation" holding them in the highest regard for their 400 years of peace since declaring neutrality during the Swiss Convention of 1281 when Brother Klause a Jesuit Monk was called down from his monestary in the Alpps to preside over the convention and he presented to them these Just War Principles.

The early Roman Church was conflicted because Rome was being threatened by hoardes of barbarians and the men wanted to defend Rome but also didn't want to violate the precepts of scripture. So a commission was formed to search scripture to see if or when a Christian could kill another human being and not violate the laws of God.
The Swiss accepted that and so did our founding fathers.

They surmised that if there was an invading force on the border of your country and they penetrated the border then they would cause harm to you and your family so in that case it was justified to take up arms, join the military and fight even to thepoint of death because you were defending your family in doing so.

We were a neutral country up until the progressive era starting with Teddy Roosevelt but full out under Wilson who said "we need to use our military to make the world safe for democracy". Really? We need to kill and die for a system that our founders detested?

"Democracy is mob rule. It's tyranny but of the majority where 51% of the voters can take away the rights of the other 49% may it never be" Thomas Jefferson.

"Democracy is like two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for supper. Liberty is two wolves and a well armed lamb contesting the vote" Ben Franklin

But George Washington said:

"I have always given it as my decided opinion that no nation had a right to inter-meddle in the internal concerns of another; and that, if this country could, consistent with its engagements, maintain a strict neutrality and thereby preserve peace". George Washington - Letter to James Monroe, August 25, 1796

Most reasonable people will see the difference if you present it well.

Also point out which party was in power during the start of most of our major wars. DEMOCRATS.

Bolivia,WWI, WWII, Korea (our first undeclared war) Vietnam, Bosnia, Somalia, Serbia, Kosovo. Bill Clinton had 30,000 covert troops in Columbia for 6 years (google U'wa Tribe) and kept us in Iraq for 8 yrs bombing the crap out of them over 400 times killing over 1,000 Iraqi's and another 500,000 with the sanctions (youtube Albright says it was worth it).

KNOW the quotes from our founding fathers well when you are trying to convince both the new style conservatives and Democrats because the arguments work equally well on both.

NEVER accuse Republicans of being "NEOCONS". NEVER NEVER NEVER. They find it offensive and will put us in league with the hated liberal Bush haters who said stupid things like "Bush lied and people died" relative to the Iraq war. You WILL push them away if you use the term "neocon". It's one of the biggest mistakes we've made during this and the last campaign even though it's true.

Differentiate between "old style conservatives" or the "old right" and "new style conservatives" (neocons). Whereas the old style conservatives adhered to the foreign policy and style of defense of our founders and strongly opposed the globalism and war mongering and policing the world of the progressives and were labeled "isolationists" for that opposition, the new style conservatives follow instead the foreign poicy of Woodrow Wilson. Thank you Glenn BEck for rghtfully demonizing that scumbag because few so called conservatives want to be lumped in with the likes of Wilson. They instead prefer being lumped in with the founding fathers and so do most post Ron Paul Tea Party activists many of whom are devout Christians BTW.

BELIEVE ME. This approach works on Democrats and conservatives.
Democrats well, most people today think that it's the Republicans who are the war party. It's not. The Democrats (progressives) were the original war party. THEY are the police the world party. THEY are the undeclared war party. THEY are the one world government party. THEY are the authoritarian take our personal freedom away party.

To take it even further, the new style conservatives (neocons) also no longer oppose the entitlements of the progressives. Some do in rhetoric but not in practice. Even the venerated Ryan plan proudly indicts the Obama administration and Democrats for cutting back on Medicare while his plan increases spending for Medicare ignoring the $38 Trillion in unfunded liabilities for that program alone.

But Democrat/progressives also brought us the League of Nations and the United Nations---ideas of one world government. Incidently, the new style coservatives not only don't oppose the UN they even send our sons to die to enforce UN resolutions like we did in Iraq. I have even encountered neocons so entrenched and hoodwinked that they refuse to acknowledge that we went to war to enforce UN resolutions even though the facts are right in their face.

Democrat-progressives also brought to us the Federal Reserve Act which we are now $16 TRILLION in debt to and who have devalued our currency over 94%.
They brought us the 16th Amendment which is nothing more than the collection servaitves of the corporation known as the Fed. who create money out of thin air, charge us interest on by force of arms.
They brought us just about EVERY entitlemt from Socialist Security, Dept of Agriculture, Dept of Education, Dept of Housing, Dept of Welfare, Food Stamps etc. along with the 18th Amendment. This was the first time in our history that the federal government presumed to tell free people what they could or could not put into their own bodies. Progressives did that not the old style conservative. Point out that as a result we now have trans fat laws, cookie laws, smoking bans, and bans on salt shakers in restaurants. We have local health dept officials harrassing little girls for selling lemonade in front of their own houses.

ALL of this is where Ron Paul shines IF we couch our terms coreectly and form our arguments the right way. Mitt Romney is a progressive and THAT is why he's no different than Obama. He WILL NOT reduce the size ans cope of the federal government. He WILL NOT abolish the Fed. He DOES NOT oppose the IRS. HE falls in line with Wilson and the progressives on foreign policy. He DOES NO oppose the entitlements that we're $$$TRILLIONS in debt to. HE WILL NOT reduce the intrusiveness of govenrment or make them any less threateneing to our liberty.

There are reams of quotes from the founding fathers available to help you make your argument effective. Print thm out and give them to people that you identify as new style conservatives who like Ron Paul except for his foreign policy and you might win them over. If not, you will at least plant a seed. One of us will come along later and water that seed and the truth will make it grow

Awesome post! Great points! +rep

TMike

[camp_steveo]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OVgYCMjr8c

[InTradePro]

Awesome! US Marine Major Christopher Miller Speaks Out at Missouri District 3 Convention

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OVgYCMjr8c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OVgYCMjr8c


"I do not not believe that Mr. Romney ...Gov Romney is going to give us anything else than more Obama garbage...."

Front page, post on facebook please - going viral!

[cassielund99@gmail.com]

tweeted and facebooked. ;)

[InTradePro]

tweeted and facebooked. ;)
+Rep
Thanks

[andrew1229649]

Bump and + rep

[Constitutional Paulicy]

Was just about to post this. Very moving. I posted it several times on Facebook. I'd suggest everyone else do the same.

[alucard13mmfmj]

im glad we have that guy on our side =3... seems genuinely pissed off and angry about the state of the country.

surviving 20+ years as EOD in the marines. he must be badass o_o. most troopers avoid explosives or IEDs, but this guys job is to dispose of them.

[InTradePro]

Was just about to post this. Very moving. I posted it several times on Facebook. I'd suggest everyone else do the same.

+Rep

[Okie RP fan]

TIME TO "VIRALIZE."

[Noblegeorge]

That is awesome.

[Indy Vidual]

That is awesome.

Yes!

[Simple]

Bump, this man rocks.

[ATXRevolutionary]

Where'd the video go? Neither the FB link or YouTube link are available.

[Gravik]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OVgYCMjr8c

[Gravik]

Youtube


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OVgYCMjr8c

[ATXRevolutionary]

Youtube


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OVgYCMjr8c

Thank you! :)

[Gravik]

Listen to the video + this music:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OVgYCMjr8c

[jdcole]

I'll tell you how it happens and how we can counter it to win them over. Those are probably the same people who say things to us like "I like a lot of Ron Paul's positions but he loses me on his foreign policy".

They have been convinced over the years that adhering to the foreign policy of Woodrow Wilson is not only safer but morally superior than adhering to the foreign policy of our founding fathers.

Look.. Say what you want about Glenn Beck but his audience for quite a while was pretty large and he cleared the path for us to use progressives as the real boogie men....and they are....or as we understand, collectivists/globalists. He pointed out to lots of people that there are progressives in both the major parties and we can use that to show people who are otherwise conservative (I support RP on other issues but not foreign policy) that they are following a progressive foreign policy that hasn't made us any safer or stronger or any more free.

You must first know our original foreign policy and what it was based upon which was the Christian Just War Principles. Those were based in biblical scriptures that allowed killing in only four circumstances without being in violation of the Commandment that is correctly tranlated "Thou shall not MURDER" (not "kill").

1) by accident

2) capital punishment

3) self defense

4) in defense of your loved ones.

ALL other killing is considered murder. Ref "Christianity and War" by Laruence Vance

Our founders modeled our foreign policy also after Switzerland who also based their foriegn poliicy and their style of defence on the Christian Just War Principles. During the Constitutional Convention they even wrote letters to Switzerland declaring them to be our "sister nation" holding them in the highest regard for their 400 years of peace since declaring neutrality during the Swiss Convention of 1281 when Brother Klause a Jesuit Monk was called down from his monestary in the Alpps to preside over the convention and he presented to them these Just War Principles.

The early Roman Church was conflicted because Rome was being threatened by hoardes of barbarians and the men wanted to defend Rome but also didn't want to violate the precepts of scripture. So a commission was formed to search scripture to see if or when a Christian could kill another human being and not violate the laws of God.
The Swiss accepted that and so did our founding fathers.

They surmised that if there was an invading force on the border of your country and they penetrated the border then they would cause harm to you and your family so in that case it was justified to take up arms, join the military and fight even to thepoint of death because you were defending your family in doing so.

We were a neutral country up until the progressive era starting with Teddy Roosevelt but full out under Wilson who said "we need to use our military to make the world safe for democracy". Really? We need to kill and die for a system that our founders detested?

"Democracy is mob rule. It's tyranny but of the majority where 51% of the voters can take away the rights of the other 49% may it never be" Thomas Jefferson.

"Democracy is like two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for supper. Liberty is two wolves and a well armed lamb contesting the vote" Ben Franklin

But George Washington said:

"I have always given it as my decided opinion that no nation had a right to inter-meddle in the internal concerns of another; and that, if this country could, consistent with its engagements, maintain a strict neutrality and thereby preserve peace". George Washington - Letter to James Monroe, August 25, 1796

Most reasonable people will see the difference if you present it well.

Also point out which party was in power during the start of most of our major wars. DEMOCRATS.

Bolivia,WWI, WWII, Korea (our first undeclared war) Vietnam, Bosnia, Somalia, Serbia, Kosovo. Bill Clinton had 30,000 covert troops in Columbia for 6 years (google U'wa Tribe) and kept us in Iraq for 8 yrs bombing the crap out of them over 400 times killing over 1,000 Iraqi's and another 500,000 with the sanctions (youtube Albright says it was worth it).

KNOW the quotes from our founding fathers well when you are trying to convince both the new style conservatives and Democrats because the arguments work equally well on both.

NEVER accuse Republicans of being "NEOCONS". NEVER NEVER NEVER. They find it offensive and will put us in league with the hated liberal Bush haters who said stupid things like "Bush lied and people died" relative to the Iraq war. You WILL push them away if you use the term "neocon". It's one of the biggest mistakes we've made during this and the last campaign even though it's true.

Differentiate between "old style conservatives" or the "old right" and "new style conservatives" (neocons). Whereas the old style conservatives adhered to the foreign policy and style of defense of our founders and strongly opposed the globalism and war mongering and policing the world of the progressives and were labeled "isolationists" for that opposition, the new style conservatives follow instead the foreign poicy of Woodrow Wilson. Thank you Glenn BEck for rghtfully demonizing that scumbag because few so called conservatives want to be lumped in with the likes of Wilson. They instead prefer being lumped in with the founding fathers and so do most post Ron Paul Tea Party activists many of whom are devout Christians BTW.

BELIEVE ME. This approach works on Democrats and conservatives.
Democrats well, most people today think that it's the Republicans who are the war party. It's not. The Democrats (progressives) were the original war party. THEY are the police the world party. THEY are the undeclared war party. THEY are the one world government party. THEY are the authoritarian take our personal freedom away party.

To take it even further, the new style conservatives (neocons) also no longer oppose the entitlements of the progressives. Some do in rhetoric but not in practice. Even the venerated Ryan plan proudly indicts the Obama administration and Democrats for cutting back on Medicare while his plan increases spending for Medicare ignoring the $38 Trillion in unfunded liabilities for that program alone.

But Democrat/progressives also brought us the League of Nations and the United Nations---ideas of one world government. Incidently, the new style coservatives not only don't oppose the UN they even send our sons to die to enforce UN resolutions like we did in Iraq. I have even encountered neocons so entrenched and hoodwinked that they refuse to acknowledge that we went to war to enforce UN resolutions even though the facts are right in their face.

Democrat-progressives also brought to us the Federal Reserve Act which we are now $16 TRILLION in debt to and who have devalued our currency over 94%.
They brought us the 16th Amendment which is nothing more than the collection servaitves of the corporation known as the Fed. who create money out of thin air, charge us interest on by force of arms.
They brought us just about EVERY entitlemt from Socialist Security, Dept of Agriculture, Dept of Education, Dept of Housing, Dept of Welfare, Food Stamps etc. along with the 18th Amendment. This was the first time in our history that the federal government presumed to tell free people what they could or could not put into their own bodies. Progressives did that not the old style conservative. Point out that as a result we now have trans fat laws, cookie laws, smoking bans, and bans on salt shakers in restaurants. We have local health dept officials harrassing little girls for selling lemonade in front of their own houses.

ALL of this is where Ron Paul shines IF we couch our terms coreectly and form our arguments the right way. Mitt Romney is a progressive and THAT is why he's no different than Obama. He WILL NOT reduce the size ans cope of the federal government. He WILL NOT abolish the Fed. He DOES NOT oppose the IRS. HE falls in line with Wilson and the progressives on foreign policy. He DOES NO oppose the entitlements that we're $$$TRILLIONS in debt to. HE WILL NOT reduce the intrusiveness of govenrment or make them any less threateneing to our liberty.

There are reams of quotes from the founding fathers available to help you make your argument effective. Print thm out and give them to people that you identify as new style conservatives who like Ron Paul except for his foreign policy and you might win them over. If not, you will at least plant a seed. One of us will come along later and water that seed and the truth will make it grow

THIS. All of it. Well said.

[green73]

This was awesome

[unknown]

Good speech and excellent credentials.

Wish he had worked Ron Paul's name in a little more.

[InTradePro]

Thank you for those spreading this video. It's making a very good impression.

[Tudo]

Brought a tear to my eyes. It's not enough though. The enemy is willing to lie, cheat and kill anybody who opposes them. This won't be won with signs.

[InTradePro]

Brought a tear to my eyes. It's not enough though. The enemy is willing to lie, cheat and kill anybody who opposes them. This won't be won with signs.
+Rep

[PolicyReader]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OVgYCMjr8c&feature=youtu.be

[HOLLYWOOD]

Wish he would of added some BUSH "Change BS" too...

But very kewl

[Gravik]

Posted this video in a Republican Candidates' facebook debate group.

Got this as a response from a Romneytard supporter:

"This guy is so loud and obnoxious"
"LOL This is what drugs do to you"

It's no wonder Romney doesn't have veterans and active duty soldiers speaking in favor of him.

[coffeewithchess]

Posted this video in a Republican Candidates' facebook debate group.

Got this as a response from a Romneytard supporter:

"This guy is so loud and obnoxious"
"LOL This is what drugs do to you"

It's no wonder Romney doesn't have veterans and active duty soldiers speaking in favor of him.

And how do you know his statements were hitting home? They immediately go to name-calling. (See Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, and basically the entire lamestream media...can't win an argument, don't address the subject, just immediately call names and end the conversations).

[Okie RP fan]

Bump. This still needs to spread far and wide.

[Captain Shays]

THIS. All of it. Well said.

Thank you. Hope it helps our efforts

[Gravik]

More retarded comments from Romney supporters:

http://i50.tinypic.com/14vobx5.png

[tnvoter]

WOW

[InTradePro]

Bump!

[ClydeCoulter]

Shared on FB via CVRP2012, great video :)

[jmdrake]

Great video! Wish this happened every time republicans had an open door meeting.