View Full Version : George Soros pledges $10 million to defeat Sheriff Joe for reelection
John F Kennedy III
04-14-2012, 10:21 PM
George Soros pledges $10 million to defeat Sheriff Joe for reelection
Conservative Patriot
April 15, 2012
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is under siege by the Obama administration.
Obama has joined forces with George Soros and “La Raza” – not to mention the entire Leftwing liberal political establishment – in a multi-million dollar smear campaign to destroy and discredit Sheriff Joe, “America’s Toughest Sheriff” solely for doing his job and doing it well.
And to top it all off, they are spending millions of your tax dollars to do it.
Already, federal bureaucrats handpicked by this administration are working as “monitors” in Sheriff Joe’s Maricopa County office to stop him from enforcing immigration law.
More than anything else, the Spender-in-Chief wants to stop Sheriff Joe from continuing the Cold Case Posse investigation of his Constitutional eligibility to be President – an investigation which has already unearthed ‘probable cause’ and evidence of a systemic effort to cover-up and conceal information surrounding Barack Hussein Obama’s alleged citizenship.
Radical amnesty fanatics just held a protest demanding that the federal government step in and strip Sheriff Joe of his badge – Obama’s buddy George Soros even pledged $10 million to defeat Sheriff Joe for reelection.
We know Obama’s utter failure to reign-in his out-of-control spending has left you broke as gas prices continue to soar right along with the cost of groceries. And let’s not forget, many of us will be forking over our hard-earned dollars to Uncle Sam this coming Tuesday to pay for Obama’s nanny-state and welfare for the 12 million illegal immigrants whose fraudulent votes he’s depending on for reelection.
original article here:
http://conpats.blogspot.com/2012/04/obama-attacks-americas-sheriff.html
Lafayette
04-14-2012, 11:44 PM
I wouldn't shed a tear to see that tyrannical SOB go but i won't be welcoming his replacement... unless its and oath keeper.
Feeding the Abscess
04-15-2012, 12:01 AM
Yippee, a communist replacing a fascist.
Voting against Soros and Obama will be fun.
John F Kennedy III
04-15-2012, 01:26 AM
I wouldn't shed a tear to see that tyrannical SOB go but i won't be welcoming his replacement... unless its and oath keeper.
Well if Soros backs him he isn't an Oathkeeper.
kcchiefs6465
04-15-2012, 08:06 AM
George Soros pledges $10 million to defeat Sheriff Joe for reelection
Conservative Patriot
April 15, 2012
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is under siege by the Obama administration.
Obama has joined forces with George Soros and “La Raza” – not to mention the entire Leftwing liberal political establishment – in a multi-million dollar smear campaign to destroy and discredit Sheriff Joe, “America’s Toughest Sheriff” solely for doing his job and doing it well.
And to top it all off, they are spending millions of your tax dollars to do it.
Already, federal bureaucrats handpicked by this administration are working as “monitors” in Sheriff Joe’s Maricopa County office to stop him from enforcing immigration law.
More than anything else, the Spender-in-Chief wants to stop Sheriff Joe from continuing the Cold Case Posse investigation of his Constitutional eligibility to be President – an investigation which has already unearthed ‘probable cause’ and evidence of a systemic effort to cover-up and conceal information surrounding Barack Hussein Obama’s alleged citizenship.
Radical amnesty fanatics just held a protest demanding that the federal government step in and strip Sheriff Joe of his badge – Obama’s buddy George Soros even pledged $10 million to defeat Sheriff Joe for reelection.
We know Obama’s utter failure to reign-in his out-of-control spending has left you broke as gas prices continue to soar right along with the cost of groceries. And let’s not forget, many of us will be forking over our hard-earned dollars to Uncle Sam this coming Tuesday to pay for Obama’s nanny-state and welfare for the 12 million illegal immigrants whose fraudulent votes he’s depending on for reelection.
original article here:
http://conpats.blogspot.com/2012/04/obama-attacks-americas-sheriff.html
Yes, I'm sure that it is it. How many immigration laws must one enforce to erase the years of abuse of power? How many immigration laws must be enforced to compensate for the hundreds of rape victims? SB1070 surely has to repay the millions of unaccounted funds in the MCSO, right? I salute George Soros for his contribution. I would rather have my taxes go to getting that tyrannical p.o.s. out of power than to pay his salary.
kcchiefs6465
04-15-2012, 08:07 AM
Yippee, a communist replacing a fascist.
Exactly.
csu1987
04-15-2012, 08:33 AM
Yippee, a communist replacing a fascist.
You mean a marxo-fascist replacing someone following the law.
csu1987
04-15-2012, 08:34 AM
Arpaio should arrest obummer. Now that would be classic!
Supporting Soros on the ronpaulforums ... Well I think I'll have seen about everything, when I see an elephant fly.
slamhead
04-15-2012, 08:41 AM
Will enjoy seeing Soro's waste $10 million. For those of you who think the sheriff is a fascist. I take pleasure in a sheriff that upholds all laws and does not pick and choose. It is the laws we are trying to change, ie war on drugs. I respect him for standing up to the federal government as I see county sheriffs as the top law enforcement officer for local communities. I am from Orange County California and I wish our sheriff and the sheriffs north and south of me would push back against the federal government abusing my fellow county citizens. The federal war on drugs runs rampant in LA, Orange, and San Diego counties through intimidation and threats.
Will enjoy seeing Soro's waste $10 million. For those of you who think the sheriff is a fascist. I take pleasure in a sheriff that upholds all laws and does not pick and choose. It is the laws we are trying to change, ie war on drugs. I respect him for standing up to the federal government as I see county sheriffs as the top law enforcement officer for local communities. I am from Orange County California and I wish our sheriff and the sheriffs north and south of me would push back against the federal government abusing my fellow county citizens. The federal war on drugs runs rampant in LA, Orange, and San Diego counties through intimidation and threats.And herein lies the problem ... People develop and foment hatred toward an individual, and forget that it is the law which they are actually in opposition to.
Replacing one LEO with another, does not change the laws that are on the books.
kcchiefs6465
04-15-2012, 08:58 AM
Supporting Soros on the ronpaulforums ... Well I think I'll have seen about everything, when I see an elephant fly.
On this specific cause I can support Soros. I think I've seen about everything. Pink, dog food costing more than inmate meals, being proud of the fact dog food costs more than meals, slave labor, uninvestigated child abuse cases, millions of missing funds, child pornography charges for judges who oppose, child pornography charges being dropped after ruining the names of said "suspects," suppression of freedom of speech (as in going to a sweat box in 125 degree weather for saying on television you don't think his tent city concept was a good idea), TENT CITY. I could go on and on. I'm sure you support those though, right? Heat stroke just doesn't happen fast enough for that p.o.s. And anyone who agrees with his sadistic measures.
kcchiefs6465
04-15-2012, 09:07 AM
And herein lies the problem ... People develop and foment hatred toward an individual, and forget that it is the law which they are actually in opposition to.Replacing one LEO with another, does not change the laws that are on the books.
And which law is that? I am opposed to bullies. I am opposed to sadism. I am opposed to abuse of power. Arizona actually has rather good laws (compared to Ohio). Don't assume I am opposed to laws. And if you are hinting at SB1070 I really don't support or oppose it. One of those controversial issues I'll leave to the state.
Lot's of claims against the man, but he's still in office.
Like I said,
Replacing one LEO with another, does not change the laws that are on the books.
Change the laws, not the one assigned to enforce the laws.
And which law is that? I am opposed to bullies. I am opposed to sadism. I am opposed to abuse of power. Arizona actually has rather good laws (compared to Ohio). Don't assume I am opposed to laws. And if you are hinting at SB1070 I really don't support or oppose it. One of those controversial issues I'll leave to the state.How could I be assuming anything about you ?
I did not address you, until you addressed me.
It was a blanket statement and comment toward another forum member, but if it fits, wear it ;)
kcchiefs6465
04-15-2012, 09:19 AM
Lot's of claims against the man, but he's still in office.
Like I said,
Change the laws, not the one assigned to enforce the laws.
I'm not opposed to the laws he is enforcing, rather, the laws he is violating.
An interesting comment from AJ's coverage of this story:
Dunagan says: April 14, 2012 at 8:23 pm (http://www.infowars.com/george-soros-pledges-10-million-to-defeat-sheriff-joe-for-reelection/comment-page-1/#comment-3135713)
Sheriff Joe Arpaio is coming up against a gang of elite criminals who are forming a racket for the purpose of Obstruction Of Justice. The timing of their actions are critical, to block disqualification of the unproven one. These crooks and criminals will stop at nothing to protect their criminal network of traitors and spies. They need their election frauds to continue their criminal network.
How long would a bookie last if he started posting fake numbers, as the criminal political network has. These political crooks are more corrupt than the Mafia, when it comes to numbers fraud. Now they want to run their unqualified Obama horse, by knocking out the gate master.
The government is funding traitorous activities against the constitution — granting amnesty to illegals with-out needed skills or jobs. They are helping to fuel illegal sweat shop activities or taking over activities of bike gangs. It’s a lot to do with the illegal trafficking of banker drugs.
How do these illegals come to the attention of the Sheriff anyways if they are staying out of trouble. Obama just want’s to run his own criminal empire and needs the support of thugs — who are much like him. It’s a total racketeering operation, to be intimidating those who follow the Constitution as The Law. Obama has never shown how it is at flaw. He merely breaks the laws arbitrarily at his own whim, nor does he make any challenge to it, cause he knows he would lose.
The man in the white house is a big time crook along with his gang of political mafia criminal network. He stands in the way of Law and liberty for America citizens and rolls in harsher sets of rules to deal with imported terrorist potentials — creating new problems to create worse solutions.
They sell military weapons to thugs and shirk responsibly when boarder guards get shot by those weapons — this is their real attitude towards boarder policy and foreign spies. They reward the lawless and punish the citizen, to keep the money laundering operation rolling along. One way to avoid what might become perceived as ‘ethnic cleansing’ by La Raza would be to keep the illegal unskilled out in the first place. Or is Obama going to give them jobs in the Acorn gang of political thugs. We know what Obama the CIA operative is all about, gangsters and political Mafia, it is his heritage. 11 million illegals to justify the police state. The culture of dominators think that crime pays, and is an industry they pretend to thwart but secretly support. They want all the illegals cause they are big-business for the police-state.
A pretty picture develops about supporting G. Soros ... YES ?
Keith and stuff
04-15-2012, 11:24 AM
It is nice of Soros to give the media companies, campaign workers, hotels, restaurants, pizza companies, coffee companies, Costcos and so on of Maricopa County $10,000,000. I don't care one way or another about Arpaio. I understand most people in the liberty movement are negative about him. I've never had any interactions with him myself and don't care to.
The real story emerges ... Will $10 Million cover this up ?
Obama Lawyer Admits Birth Certificate Is A Forgery (http://www.therightperspective.org/2012/04/15/obama-lawyer-admits-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery/)
http://www.therightperspective.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Obama_Defense_Attorney_Alexandra-M-Hill-e1334505948889.jpg (http://www.therightperspective.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Obama_Defense_Attorney_Alexandra-M-Hill.jpg)
Obama defense attorney Alexandra M. Hill
A lawyer representing U.S. President Barack Obama has admitted the long-form birth certificate presented by the White House last year (http://www.therightperspective.org/2011/04/27/obama-releases-the-birth-certificate/) is a forgery – but that does not disqualify him from appearing on the ballot this November.
Defense attorney Alexandra M. Hill made the comments during a recent New Jersey ballot challenge hearing, brought about by Tea Party members who question his eligibility to appear on the state’s presidential primary ballot. Attorney for the plaintiffs, Mario Apuzzo, argued (http://www.teapartytribune.com/2012/04/11/nj-ballot-access-challenge-hearing-update/) that President Obama has furnished proof of his “natural born” citizenship status to the state of New Jersey.
Apuzzo went on to say that Obama’s father was not an American citizen, meaning President Obama is not a “natural born” citizen and ineligible for the office he holds.
SNIP
speciallyblend
04-15-2012, 12:24 PM
good for him i hope he gives another 10 mil. The sheriff is not friend to liberty.
speciallyblend
04-15-2012, 12:26 PM
Supporting Soros on the ronpaulforums ... Well I think I'll have seen about everything, when I see an elephant fly.
no one is supporting soros, but we sure are not going to support an anti liberty/freedom sheriff. he is no friend to liberty!
John F Kennedy III
04-15-2012, 01:39 PM
Yes, I'm sure that it is it. How many immigration laws must one enforce to erase the years of abuse of power? How many immigration laws must be enforced to compensate for the hundreds of rape victims? SB1070 surely has to repay the millions of unaccounted funds in the MCSO, right? I salute George Soros for his contribution. I would rather have my taxes go to getting that tyrannical p.o.s. out of power than to pay his salary.
Whoa. Please research George Soros. I understand you don't like Sheriff Joe, but he is small fry compared to Soros.
moonshineplease
04-15-2012, 04:19 PM
Good ole boy drug crusader wont get my sympathy.
Diurdi
04-15-2012, 05:14 PM
Let them spend their wealth battling eachother.
Also pretty fucked up that folks like Soros are meddling in the affairs of the individual states.
GeorgiaAvenger
04-15-2012, 05:23 PM
http://www.wethepeoplenation.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3027&d=1326558213
Let them spend their wealth battling each other.
Also pretty fucked up that folks like Soros are meddling in the affairs of the individual states.More so that people on this website support such activity, when they claim it is wrong to be doing such things at the federal level ... Double standard ?
heavenlyboy34
04-15-2012, 06:08 PM
Will enjoy seeing Soro's waste $10 million. For those of you who think the sheriff is a fascist. I take pleasure in a sheriff that upholds all laws and does not pick and choose. It is the laws we are trying to change, ie war on drugs. I respect him for standing up to the federal government as I see county sheriffs as the top law enforcement officer for local communities. I am from Orange County California and I wish our sheriff and the sheriffs north and south of me would push back against the federal government abusing my fellow county citizens. The federal war on drugs runs rampant in LA, Orange, and San Diego counties through intimidation and threats.
He does pick n' choose, though. If he were a "constitutional sheriff" which people around here advocate, he wouldn't be cooperating with the Feds in their "Drug War" and so on. If you're looking for a sheriff to respect, look elsewhere.
pcosmar
04-15-2012, 06:55 PM
Let them spend their wealth battling eachother.
Also pretty fucked up that folks like Soros are meddling in the affairs of the individual states.
What do you think he has the money for in the first place..?
It is his role as shit stirrer.
And he is connected to a whole line of shit stirrers.
Witness the old battle of Communism v Fascism played out again and both funded by the same folks.
Where have I seen this before?
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
:(
Zippyjuan
04-15-2012, 07:10 PM
I'd vote against Sheriff Joe if he was in my district. He loves to abuse his power and people.
The guy sent in a SWAT team after an unarmed school administrator in the middle of the night who had not even committed a crime. Then there was the time he sent in Steven Segal on a tank along with anther SWAT raid to go after some guys who were fighting chickens.
kcchiefs6465
04-15-2012, 07:21 PM
I'd vote against Sheriff Joe if he was in my district. He loves to abuse his power and people.
The guy sent in a SWAT team after an unarmed school administrator in the middle of the night who had not even committed a crime. Then there was the time he sent in Steven Segal on a tank along with anther SWAT raid to go after some guys who were fighting chickens.
I forgot about that. Didn't they shoot the homeowner's dog while simultaneously wasting thousands of tax payer money? We should probably have a thread dedicated just for the abuses of Arpaio.
Edit: Knew I was forgetting something.
hxxp://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/03/steven_seagal_joe_arpaio_deputies_sued_for_reality .php
The Sheriff’s Office, which used “a tank, a bomb robot and 40 deputies,” according to the Arizona Republic, accidentally killed over 100 of Llovera’s roosters and his 11-month old dog during the course of the raid.
....
Llovera’s suit claims that the raid was conducted for the purposes of the show, and is part of a pattern of Arpaio “arresting and prosecuting individuals without probable cause solely for the selfish and improper purposes of achieving personal and political gain through publicity,” the Republic reports.
pcosmar
04-15-2012, 07:25 PM
I'd vote against Sheriff Joe if he was in my district. He loves to abuse his power and people.
The guy sent in a SWAT team after an unarmed school administrator in the middle of the night who had not even committed a crime. Then there was the time he sent in Steven Segal on a tank along with anther SWAT raid to go after some guys who were fighting chickens.
No evidence that the guy ever was fighting chickens. As far as I know,, no conviction. He was arrested once (prior) for attending a fight.
The guy does have a law suit for destruction of property.
mport1
04-15-2012, 07:38 PM
Nobody could be worse than Joe, so I never thought I'd say this, but "Go Soros!"
Zippyjuan
04-15-2012, 07:41 PM
Who needs charges anyways? The woman school administer was supposedly accused of stealing money from school funds- problem is, nothing was missing or even reported as missing. She sued too. Sheriff Joe lawsuits have cost the county millions.
Who needs charges anyways? The woman school administer was supposedly accused of stealing money from school funds- problem is, nothing was missing or even reported as missing. She sued too. Sheriff Joe lawsuits have cost the county millions.The left has lot's of money that forces government to spend money defending itself against frivilous lawsuits.
Zippyjuan
04-15-2012, 08:20 PM
Do you think the two cases cited were "frivilous"? Innocent people were attacked by (local) government SWAT teams. What determines if a lawsuit is frivilous? Legal action is supposed to be a tool to fight against abuse or tyrany. Sure there are some stupid ones- but I would not want to restrict all lawsuits for that reason.
CaptainAmerica
04-15-2012, 08:21 PM
LOL
Soros is just trolling the old farts to come out as birthers.
Do you think the two cases cited were "frivilous"? Innocent people were attacked by (local) government SWAT teams. What determines if a lawsuit is frivilous? Legal action is supposed to be a tool to fight against abuse or tyrany. Sure there are some stupid ones- but I would not want to restrict all lawsuits for that reason.Nor would I ... That's why, while I consider it stupid, I support the Federal governments ability to sue a State, in the same fashion and with much less stupidity, I support an individuals right to sue any level of government it wishes.
The problem, and reason I call one act stupid, is because it serves only a political purpose ... Many of the lawsuits that have political connotation are stupid, and I consider those who align with someone like Soros to be bottom of the barrel scum, or severly misguided, and in need of a more open perspective.
kcchiefs6465
04-15-2012, 08:30 PM
Nor would I ... That's why, while I consider it stupid, I support the Federal governments ability to sue a State, in the same fashion and with much less stupidity, I support an individuals right to sue any level of government it wishes.
The problem, and reason I call one act stupid, is because it serves only a political purpose ... Many of the lawsuits that have political connotation are stupid, and I consider those who align with someone like Soros to be bottom of the barrel scum, or severly misguided, and in need of a more open perspective.
I feel the same for anyone defending Arpaio.
LOL
Soros is just trolling the old farts to come out as birthers.Don't forget racists !!!
Another term made derogatory for political gain.
YA ever notice that Ron Paul avoids such words ?
I'm pretty sure there is a reason for this ... Neoconned, and What If come to mind ;)
The man isn't fixated ... He's grounded !!!
I feel the same for anyone defending Arpaio.That is your right ... And to be clear, I'm not defending the man, as much as I'm pointing out the misguided hatred toward the man.
The real issue is disagreement with current laws ... YES ?
He is tasked to enforce what is on the books, and some don't like his tactics ... Oh well.
Change the laws, and the tactics will necessarly change.
CaptainAmerica
04-15-2012, 08:34 PM
Im not even saying that Obama was or wasn't born in america...its just water under the bridge...and it takes the eyes off of the real goal of changing policy and restoring rights.
Don't forget racists !!!
Another term made derogatory for political gain.
YA ever notice that Ron Paul avoids such words ?
I'm pretty sure there is a reason for this ... Neoconned, and What If come to mind ;)
The man isn't fixated ... He's grounded !!!
Zippyjuan
04-15-2012, 08:35 PM
That is your right ... And to be clear, I'm not defending the man, as much as I'm pointing out the misguided hatred toward the man.
The real issue is disagreement with current laws ... YES ?
He is tasked to enforce what is on the books, and some don't like his tactics ... Oh well.
Change the laws, and the tactics will necessarly change.
I don't buy it that Arpaio abuses power because the law requires him to do so. He frequently steps over that boundary and that is why he should go.
kcchiefs6465
04-15-2012, 08:36 PM
That is your right ... And to be clear, I'm not defending the man, as much as I'm pointing out the misguided hatered toward the man.
The real issue is disagreement with current laws ... YES ?
He is tasked to enforce what is on the books, and some don't like his tactics ... Oh well.
Change the laws, and the tactics will necessarly change.
As I have stated numerous times, NO. Arizona has rather decent laws considering the states I have lived. Maybe you just have a conflict of interest in the case. You are a MCSO, YES?
juleswin
04-15-2012, 08:39 PM
I say good riddance to bad rubbish. I once heard him on freedom watch to Napolitano that his job is just to enforce the laws on the book and not to judge them, so following that statement, he will be oh so willing to start rounding Americans up if politicians put such orders in the book. The man scares the hell out of me
Im not even saying that Obama was or wasn't born in america...its just water under the bridge...and it takes the eyes off of the real goal of changing policy and restoring rights.I'm sure the current administration appreciates this, and so do many who hold Senate and Congressional seats.
An interesting perspective, for sure.
Did Barack Obama Campaign Threaten Life of Chelsea Clinton to Keep Parents Silent on Obama’s Ineligibility? (http://www.pakalertpress.com/2012/04/04/did-barack-obama-campaign-threaten-life-of-chelsea-clinton-to-keep-parents-silent-on-obamas-ineligibility/)
As I have stated numerous times, NO. Arizona has rather decent laws considering the states I have lived. Maybe you just have a conflict of interest in the case. You are a MCSO, YES?Glad that you finally have asked this, rather than implied it ... NOPE, not even close.
As I told you before, my background is in aviation/aerospace, and I am currently working in education.
I say good riddance to bad rubbish. I once heard him on freedom watch to Napolitano that his job is just to enforce the laws on the book and not to judge them, so following that statement, he will be oh so willing to start rounding Americans up if politicians put such orders in the book. The man scares the hell out of meWhy do you think I keep saying that the misdirected need to be focusing on current laws, and drop their false hatred ?
They play into the hands of others, and do the bidding of evil people who use division to advantage ... Witness the 2 Party System ;)
juleswin
04-15-2012, 08:50 PM
Why do you think I keep saying that the misdirected need to be focusing on current laws, and drop their false hatred ?
They play into the hands of others, and do the bidding of evil people who use division to advantage ... Witness the 2 Party System ;)
He is a man with no principle or conscience, a droid that cannot override an immoral law if his life depended upon it. That is what I have a problem with, yea the law is bad but if the politicians know they have an enforcer who wouldnt raise a stink when told to enfore anti liberty laws, they will end up passing such laws
Zippyjuan
04-15-2012, 08:51 PM
Arpaio's DA Disbarred: He and Joe were going after political opponents with fake charges (like the woman I described earlier):
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/10/1082195/-Sheriff-Joe-Arpaio-s-Right-Hand-DA-Disbarred-for-Abusing-Powers-to-Persecute-Political-Opponents
A three-member panel of the State Bar of Arizona ruled that ex-Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas abused his powers as a prosecutor to target his political enemies. Because of that, they ruled he would be disbarred.
One of Thomas’ top aides, Lisa Aubuchon, was also disbarred for her role in the misconduct. A second aide, Rachel Alexander, had her law license suspended for six months. [...]
Investigators with the State Bar of Arizona said somewhere along the way he became obsessed with his political enemies. He turned disagreements over policy into a full-fledged attempt to see his opponents jailed and disgraced.
With Arpaio’s help, investigators said, Thomas used the powers of his office to target his opponents with criminal investigations. He had some arrested and some charged with crimes. The evidence he and Arpaio used in the process was often questionable. The charges rarely stuck.
Thomas first came to prominence in Arizona in 2002, winning the Republican nomination for attorney general. He lost the general election to Terry Goddard, a Democrat, but cemented his role as a conservative up and comer.
Two years later, he won the race for Maricopa County attorney, putting him in charge of felony prosecutions and other legal matters of a community of more than 3.5 million people. It set him on equal footing with Arpaio and a team was born. [...]
Just weeks after both [Arpaio and Thoma] were reelected in 2008, the two men began using their offices to target many of the same officials they had battled with in the years prior.
During the next year or so, Thomas and Arpaio announced criminal investigations against at least 14 officials, including all five members of the Board of Supervisors, four judges, the county’s top two appointed officials, a high-ranking attorney for the county and two private lawyers. [...]
Thomas and Arpaio filed a major lawsuit against the group, accusing them of corruption and racketeering. Thomas also charged three of them with crimes, warning charges may be coming for the rest. “No one is above the law,” he said at the time.
Soon, however, the cases began to crumble. In some instances, the evidence that was promised by Thomas and Arpaio never materialized. In other instances, independent judges ruled that Thomas’ office filed charges on allegations that were well past the statute of limitations.
Ethics investigators have since said Thomas and Aubuchon knew those charges were bogus but filed them anyway to ruin the reputations of the accused. The investigators described this as perjury. Thomas insisted that the cases were good and the people he was targeting were corrupt. But in early 2010, he hit the eject button.
kcchiefs6465
04-15-2012, 08:55 PM
Why do you think I keep saying that the misdirected need to be focusing on current laws, and drop their false hatred ?
They play into the hands of others, and do the bidding of evil people who use division to advantage ... Witness the 2 Party System ;)
It is more about the laws he violates rather than the ones he enforces. I don't think I can make it any clearer. Do you think my average disdain for law enforcement is anywhere near the level I have for this man? It's not. This man wipes his ass with the Fourth Amendment. He is no friend of liberty; he is a cancer. As I am sure you are aware, the only reason he keeps getting elected is Sun City West, Grande etc. Snowbirds who would welcome a standing army to "protect and serve" their community.
kcchiefs6465
04-15-2012, 08:56 PM
Arpaio's DA Disbarred: He and Joe were going after political opponents with fake charges (like the woman I described earlier):
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/10/1082195/-Sheriff-Joe-Arpaio-s-Right-Hand-DA-Disbarred-for-Abusing-Powers-to-Persecute-Political-Opponents
+rep
EDIT: During the next year or so, Thomas and Arpaio announced criminal investigations against at least 14 officials, including all five members of the Board of Supervisors, four judges, the county’s top two appointed officials, a high-ranking attorney for the county and two private lawyers.
If I recall correctly most were child pornography charges.
He is a man with no principle or conscience, a droid that cannot override an immoral law if his life depended upon it. That is what I have a problem with, yea the law is bad but if the politicians know they have an enforcer who wouldnt raise a stink when told to enfore anti liberty laws, they will end up passing such lawsSo you're a personal friend of this man ?
It is more about the laws he violates rather than the ones he enforces. I don't think I can make it any clearer. Do you think my average disdain for law enforcement is anywhere near the level I have for this man? It's not. This man wipes his ass with the Fourth Amendment. He is no friend of liberty; he is a cancer. As I am sure you are aware, the only reason he keeps getting elected is Sun City West, Grande etc. Snowbirds who would welcome a standing army to "protect and serve" their community.I'd welcome a standing army to protect my community, from many things.
+rep
EDIT: During the next year or so, Thomas and Arpaio announced criminal investigations against at least 14 officials, including all five members of the Board of Supervisors, four judges, the county’s top two appointed officials, a high-ranking attorney for the county and two private lawyers.
If I recall correctly most were child pornography charges.I guess if no corruption occurred within the political arena, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
kcchiefs6465
04-15-2012, 09:33 PM
I guess if no corruption occurred within the political arena, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
I really don't know why I respond since you are obviously a troll. The charges were determined to be baseless and unfounded. He harrassed those who opposed. And I'm sure you would welcome a standing army. This is why I'm perplexed as to why you are on a Liberty forum. Probably to thwart actual discussion and cause disruption, YES?
I really don't know why I respond since you are obviously a troll. The charges were determined to be baseless and unfounded. He harrassed those who opposed. And I'm sure you would welcome a standing army. This is why I'm perplexed as to why you are on a Liberty forum. Probably to thwart actual discussion and cause disruption, YES?Perhaps it is as simple as supporting a candidate, and also trying to correct a few narrow minded views that expose theirself on an almost daily basis.
You seem reasonable ... Does guilty because of title make sense ?
kcchiefs6465
04-15-2012, 09:40 PM
Perhaps it is as simple as supporting a candidate, and also trying to correct a few narrow minded views that expose theirself on an almost daily basis.
You seem reasonable ... Does guilty because of title make sense ?
No.
No.Didn't think so.
Is it a problem to call out those who hold this belief ?
kcchiefs6465
04-15-2012, 09:55 PM
Didn't think so.
Is it a problem to call out those who hold this belief ?
I am in no authority to dictate what you do on the internet in your time. That being said I have never posted that all cops are guilty. Sheriff Joe, however, is. My suspicions and distrust of the police are not unwarranted nor unfounded.
I am in no authority to dictate what you do on the internet in your time. That being said I have never posted that all cops are guilty. Sheriff Joe, however, is. My suspicions and distrust of the police are not unwarranted nor unfounded.I respect your honesty, and consider it a breath of fresh air.
bolil
04-15-2012, 11:03 PM
Gangsters playin games.
libertarian4321
04-16-2012, 02:12 AM
Arpaio, it seems to me, is a right-wing version of Jesse Jackson.
A blow-hard demagogue who keeps tripping over himself trying to fight for camera time.
I would never vote for Jesse Jackson.
I would never vote for "Sheriff Joe" either.
Both represent the worst in US politics.
John F Kennedy III
04-16-2012, 08:50 PM
What do you think he has the money for in the first place..?
It is his role as shit stirrer.
And he is connected to a whole line of shit stirrers.
Witness the old battle of Communism v Fascism played out again and both funded by the same folks.
Where have I seen this before?
:(
Rothchild
Rockefeller
JP Morgan
John F Kennedy III
04-16-2012, 09:08 PM
I really don't know why I respond since you are obviously a troll. The charges were determined to be baseless and unfounded. He harrassed those who opposed. And I'm sure you would welcome a standing army. This is why I'm perplexed as to why you are on a Liberty forum. Probably to thwart actual discussion and cause disruption, YES?
Stop feeding him then. We wouldn't have a troll problem if they didn't have anything to feed on. Remove their ability to subsist here and they will be forced to go elsewhere.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.