Wayne Allyn Root: Obama Is No Ordinary Socialist; he's the deadliest breed of Socialist

[FrankRep]

Obama Is No Ordinary Socialist (http://personalliberty.com/2012/04/12/obama-is-no-ordinary-socialist/?eiid=)


Wayne Allyn Root
April 12, 2012


Wayne Allyn Root's latest video commentary is entitled "Obama is No Ordinary Socialist." It's about Wayne's recent trip to New York to appear on "The Daily Show" on Comedy Central TV Network to prove that Obama is in fact a Socialist. But not just any Socialist- Wayne proves Obama is the deadliest breed of Socialist we have ever faced.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov6nwES3-vk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov6nwES3-vk

[Danke]

http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/0905/norman-thomas-socialist-democrat-socialism-demotivational-poster-1243716896.gif

[Acala]

Bull. Obama is an empty shell. A puppet. Root is playing the Republican party "anyone but Obama" game which is deliberately designed to divert attention from real reform and get the next puppet elected. ANYONE who tries to focus you on the evils of Obama the man, or the individuals in his administration, is either a disinformation agent or their dupe.

[FrankRep]

Bull. Obama is an empty shell. A puppet. Root is playing the Republican party "anyone but Obama" game which is deliberately designed to divert attention from real reform and get the next puppet elected. ANYONE who tries to focus you on the evils of Obama the man, or the individuals in his administration, is either a disinformation agent or their dupe.

Puppet or not, what Obama is doing is Socialist.

[WilliamC]

Socialists, like anyone else, can be good or bad people.

Denis Kucinich is a socialist, but I don't put him in the same catagory as Obama.

One of them seems to be a genuinely good person working within a fatally flawed system to to good things for people.

The other seems to be an evil, narcicisstic psychopath who is working within a fatally flawed system to gain personal power for himself and his buddies.

[FrankRep]

Socialists, like anyone else, can be good or bad people.

Denis Kucinich is a socialist, but I don't put him in the same catagory as Obama.

Theft is wrong no matter who you are.

Root separates the Kucinich types from the Obama types because he calls Obama the "deadliest breed of Socialist."

[mczerone]

Root is just as deadly and just as socialist as Obama.

[Acala]

Puppet or not, what Obama is doing is Socialist.

Except Obama isn't DOING anything. He is rubberstamping what the special interests are pushing through Congress. The idea that Obama is the CAUSE of anything that is happening is false and deliberately misleading. The Obama administration has in no way deviated from the prior administration, except rhetorically. The parade towards totalitarianism has continued without a pause or change in course. The only thing that changed is the color of the uniforms.

Obama is not the problem. Runaway government is the problem. Obama is simply the figurehead of the moment. He, personally, doesn't have any agenda beyond being President.

[LibertyEagle]

Socialists, like anyone else, can be good or bad people.

Denis Kucinich is a socialist, but I don't put him in the same catagory as Obama.

One of them seems to be a genuinely good person working within a fatally flawed system to to good things for people.

The other seems to be an evil, narcicisstic psychopath who is working within a fatally flawed system to gain personal power for himself and his buddies.

You are splitting hairs. If they are willing to use government to take what is not rightfully theirs and redistribute it to themselves and others, they are not our friends.

[Acala]

Socialists, like anyone else, can be good or bad people.

Denis Kucinich is a socialist, but I don't put him in the same catagory as Obama.

One of them seems to be a genuinely good person working within a fatally flawed system to to good things for people.

The other seems to be an evil, narcicisstic psychopath who is working within a fatally flawed system to gain personal power for himself and his buddies.

Socialism is ALWAYS violent, elitists, and eventually unworkable.

[LibertyEagle]

Except Obama isn't DOING anything. He is rubberstamping what the special interests are pushing through Congress. The idea that Obama is the CAUSE of anything that is happening is false and deliberately misleading. The Obama administration has in no way deviated from the prior administration, except rhetorically. The parade towards totalitarianism has continued without a pause or change in course. The only thing that changed is the color of the uniforms.

Obama is not the problem. Runaway government is the problem. Obama is simply the figurehead of the moment. He, personally, doesn't have any agenda beyond being President.

Yes, but he sure is a good little puppet doing what he can to finish driving our country into the ground, now isn't he? So, yeah, I do think he is a problem. Not the root, no, but still a problem.

[Acala]

Yes, but he sure is a good little puppet doing what he can to finish driving our country into the ground, now isn't he? So, yeah, I do think he is a problem. Not the root, no, but still a problem.

Oh, he is despicable. But he is irrelevant. You could eliminate him from the face of the earth right now and not a single thing would improve. The next puppet would step in and the machine wouldn't miss a beat. And that is exactly why the Republican party insiders push the Obama hate - because they don't WANT anything to change except the party in charge of the machine. And every bit of energy spent on blaming Obama the man, or the people in his administration, is energy diverted from the real problem of run away government. And the proof will be if Romney is nominated and wins - nothing of significance will change as a result. Although things likely will change as a result of economic and social upheaval. But that will be in spite of Mitt or any other establishment candidate.

[John F Kennedy III]

http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/0905/norman-thomas-socialist-democrat-socialism-demotivational-poster-1243716896.gif


Bull. Obama is an empty shell. A puppet. Root is playing the Republican party "anyone but Obama" game which is deliberately designed to divert attention from real reform and get the next puppet elected. ANYONE who tries to focus you on the evils of Obama the man, or the individuals in his administration, is either a disinformation agent or their dupe.

^^^ Perfection.

[Zippyjuan]

Oh, he is despicable. But he is irrelevant. You could eliminate him from the face of the earth right now and not a single thing would improve. The next puppet would step in and the machine wouldn't miss a beat. And that is exactly why the Republican party insiders push the Obama hate - because they don't WANT anything to change except the party in charge of the machine. And every bit of energy spent on blaming Obama the man, or the people in his administration, is energy diverted from the real problem of run away government. And the proof will be if Romney is nominated and wins - nothing of significance will change as a result. Although things likely will change as a result of economic and social upheaval. But that will be in spite of Mitt or any other establishment candidate.

Much of Obamacare was actually first proposed by Nixon. And the concept even pre-dates that.
http://mcroberts-robert.suite101.com/the-nixonkennedy-healthcare-plan-a143121

Nixon’s Plan for Universal Health Care

By the time of President Richard Nixon’s election to office, the debate over health care had once again resurfaced. In the same vein as Teddy Roosevelt’s proposed “Square Deal”, which had first broached national health insurance as a political topic in 1912, Nixon proposed a plan that would provide health insurance for all Americans. Similar to the situation faced by President Johnson, partisan opposition to Nixon's policies was firmly entrenched. In this instance, few were prepared to label the renowned anti-communist president as an advocate for socialism. Instead his opponents, such as Senator Edward “Teddy” Kennedy of Massachusetts, attacked Nixon on the grounds that he was offering a deal that would see the insurance companies benefit.

Nixon, for his part, was stalwart in his belief that a national health insurance plan was vital to the country’s future. He stated in his 1974 State of the Union Address that “The time is at hand this year to bring comprehensive, high quality health care within the reach of every American.” Nixon’s own past experience with poverty and family illness made this a personal issue for the President. Yet Nixon’s call for an employer mandate to provide health insurance as part of his planned universal health care coverage for all citizens was seen as inadequate by many democrats in congress. The plan was also opposed by powerful unions such as the AFL-CIO and the United Autoworkers, who lobbied hard to defeat the legislation.


Read more at Suite101: The Nixon-Kennedy Health Care Plan: How Richard Nixon and Edward Kennedy Worked For American Health Care | Suite101.com http://mcroberts-robert.suite101.com/the-nixonkennedy-healthcare-plan-a143121#ixzz1rr1Vc6jA

[LibertyEagle]

Oh, he is despicable. But he is irrelevant. You could eliminate him from the face of the earth right now and not a single thing would improve. The next puppet would step in and the machine wouldn't miss a beat. And that is exactly why the Republican party insiders push the Obama hate - because they don't WANT anything to change except the party in charge of the machine. And every bit of energy spent on blaming Obama the man, or the people in his administration, is energy diverted from the real problem of run away government. And the proof will be if Romney is nominated and wins - nothing of significance will change as a result. Although things likely will change as a result of economic and social upheaval. But that will be in spite of Mitt or any other establishment candidate.

Agreed.

[DerailingDaTrain]

Eh, I don't seem to recall Obama demonizing the rich, if anything they are some of his best pals.

http://www.wildsound-filmmaking-feedback-events.com/images/george_clooney_obama.jpg

http://www.minnesotansforglobalwarming.com/m4gw/2012/01/26/warren-buffett-obama.jpg

Not to mention who funded his campaign.

[angelatc]

Socialists, like anyone else, can be good or bad people.

Denis Kucinich is a socialist, but I don't put him in the same catagory as Obama.

One of them seems to be a genuinely good person working within a fatally flawed system to to good things for people.

The other seems to be an evil, narcicisstic psychopath who is working within a fatally flawed system to gain personal power for himself and his buddies.

I actually sort of agree. I don't have any use at all for Kucinich's politics. He honestly believes that it is possible to turn government into a force for good. But deep inside of me, I think he'd likely at least cringe when their party started putting conservative bodies in mass graves.

Unfortunately, I don't think there's any chance he'd ever abandon the cause, even if that happened though. He'd just be the guy saying that socialism wasn't bad, it was just unfortunate that some bad people were running it.

[seraphson]

Except Obama isn't DOING anything. He is rubberstamping what the special interests are pushing through Congress. The idea that Obama is the CAUSE of anything that is happening is false and deliberately misleading. The Obama administration has in no way deviated from the prior administration, except rhetorically. The parade towards totalitarianism has continued without a pause or change in course. The only thing that changed is the color of the uniforms.

Obama is not the problem. Runaway government is the problem. Obama is simply the figurehead of the moment. He, personally, doesn't have any agenda beyond being President.

I think I may add on to this simply by saying that from what I can tell the El' Presidente' position is more or less the pubic pin cushion. Someone to throw a few foul words at when things don't go as planned or "promised". "Oh foowee!" says the American people as they travel yet another four year term down the road to serfdom.

[heavenlyboy34]

WAR is confusing "Socialism" and "Fascism". He also plays pretty fast and loose with what Socialists actually believe. And "stealth success"? Not really. His intentions and their ramifications have been quite obvious all along except to those who don't know how to translate politician-speak.

[heavenlyboy34]

I think I may add on to this simply by saying that from what I can tell the El' Presidente' position is more or less the pubic pin cushion. Someone to throw a few foul words at when things don't go as planned or "promised". "Oh foowee!" says the American people as they travel yet another four year term down the road to serfdom.
qft! This is the nature of regimes throughout history. Killing off or forcing out the titular head doesn't actually affect the inner workings of the regime.

ETA: WAR and many other conservatives give Obama way more credit than he deserves. It's quite obvious that he's an empty suit-and many "conservative" talking heads are correct to point this out. However, in the same breath BO is accused being some mastermind-of-all-things-evil. Pretty derned silly.

[Bosco Warden]

Bull. Obama is an empty shell. A puppet. Root is playing the Republican party "anyone but Obama" game which is deliberately designed to divert attention from real reform and get the next puppet elected. ANYONE who tries to focus you on the evils of Obama the man, or the individuals in his administration, is either a disinformation agent or their dupe.

First video I found, but read this actually a last year sometime. or you can Google Zbigniew Brzezinski, Kissinger and get the drift.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKzEpQc-yo8

[Acala]

First video I found, but read this actually a last year sometime. or you can Google Zbigniew Brzezinski, Kissinger and get the drift.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKzEpQc-yo8

I wish I was part of a different species.

[Bosco Warden]

I wish I was part of a different species.

yeah, why my charity extended to Animal shelters because we are certainly DOING IT WRONG!

Another one of interest. This is the guy pulling Obama's strings.

Who is Zbigniew Brzezinski and what is his (their) plan for humanity?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpzJI9Yew90


Here is the infamous Brzezinski quote from his 2009 book: "Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a concensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat."

[heavenlyboy34]

I wish I was part of a different species.
meh, I rather like my opposable thumbs and brain/body size ratio. :cool:

[Acala]

meh, I rather like my opposable thumbs and brain/body size ratio. :cool:

Your hatred for ceteceans is noted and when our Briney Overlords take power, justice will be done.

[WilliamC]

All I'm trying to say is that it isn't labels that make people good or bad, it's their actions.

Our entire economic, political and social structures are so messed up right now that it's impossible to tell whether or not someone is 'good' or 'bad' based on if they call themselves a conservative, liberal, capitalist, communist, socialist, or libertarian, or anarchist. I do think there are confused good people who self-identify with 'bad' labels.

But it is how people act, especially towards those who have less power than they, that defines who they are to me. I believe certain great religious leaders have made note of this so it's certainly not my idea, but don't get so hung up on labels that it causes you to mis-interpret what someone really believes when they are finally given the information to make truly informed choices.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRDa6P0voxM

[Acala]

All I'm trying to say is that it isn't labels that make people good or bad, it's their actions.

Our entire economic, political and social structures are so messed up right now that it's impossible to tell whether or not someone is 'good' or 'bad' based on if they call themselves a conservative, liberal, capitalist, communist, socialist, or libertarian, or anarchist. I do think there are confused good people who self-identify with 'bad' labels.

But it is how people act, especially towards those who have less power than they, that defines who they are to me. I believe certain great religious leaders have made note of this so it's certainly not my idea, but don't get so hung up on labels that it causes you to mis-interpret what someone really believes when they are finally given the information to make truly informed choices.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRDa6P0voxM

Kucinich supported WITH HIS ACTIONS, dispatching government thugs to your home with guns and using deadly force to MAKE you support HIS ideas of economic equality. I don't really care what label he, or anyone else, puts on it.